#buffetrule

Whenever I see discussions about Marxism, Anarchism and taxing the rich, etc, I always go back to what Communist blogger Jehu Eaves, known mostly from Gonzo Times tweeted a VERY long while ago (twitter user name @ReThePeople, go follow, he's brilliant), about how Marxism should be OPPOSED to the sort of "moral capitalism" things like the #BuffetRule and Warren propose: 

Every time a Marxist calls for increased taxes on the rich, libertarians and anarchists should hit them over the head with this fact. How can increased taxes on the rich be anything other a scramble to divide up the looting of the working class? In Marx's argument there are only two classes of income: wages and surplus value; all state spending falls in the latter category. All of the latter category is the booty from the ruthless exploitation of the working class; it follows all taxes are surplus value. Surplus value is divided into two big pots: 1. profits/interest/rent and 2. state revenue. The state can only raise taxes from two sources: 1. wages, and 2. profit/interest/rent. In the final analysis profit/interest/rent is also nothing more than surplus value extracted from the working class.All taxes are paid by the working class whether directly out of wages or indirectly in the form of tax on profits extracted from the worker.Libertarians and anarchists should beat this fact into the head of every Marxist they engage.