In the "Red or Blue" poll, do you think there is something wrong with those who picked Blue*?
1) I am/would be a "Red", I think the "Blue"s should examine their thinking/motives
2) I am/would be a "Red", I think the "Blue" choice is as valid as "Red"
3) I am/would be a "Red", I admire the "Blue"s but would never dare to go "Blue"
4) I am/would be a "Blue"
5) I am/would be a "Blue" and the "Red"s kinda make me angry
*The Red or Blue experiment asks people to imagine the following scenario:
Everyone who votes Red gets to live, guaranteed. Everyone who votes Blue will die UNLESS Blue is the poll winner, in which case everyone lives.
The result usually seems to be that Blue wins.
If you think you are a "Red" voter, do you think the result is concerning and says something about the people who voted Blue that they should interrogate?
Leaving aside that the experiment is technically bullshit because there are no stakes so who knows what the "real" result would be.
In the "Red or Blue" poll, do you think there is something wrong with those who picked Blue*?
I am/would be a "Red", I think the "Blue"s should examine their thinking/motives
I am/would be a "Red", I think the "Blue" choice is as valid as "Red"
I am/would be a "Red", I admire the "Blue"s but would never dare to go "Blue"
I am/would be a "Blue"
I am/would be a "Blue" and the "Red"s kinda make me angry
Results
*The Red or Blue experiment asks people to imagine the following scenario:
Everyone who votes Red gets to live, guaranteed. Everyone who votes Blue will die UNLESS Blue is the poll winner, in which case everyone lives.
The result usually seems to be that Blue wins.
If you think you are a "Red" voter, do you think the result is concerning and says something about the people who voted Blue that they should interrogate?
Leaving aside that the experiment is technically bullshit because there are no stakes so who knows what the "real" result would be.
