This movie was rife with paternalism, tokenism, white saviorism on the part of most of the White teachers. The department headās insistence onĀ ācondensedā versions of classic books, and the school districtās tacit approval of thisĀ āliteratureā as a mode of instruction, confirms to the kids at the high school that the administration doesnāt think they amount to or will amount to anything. Administrators refer to them asĀ āthese kids.āĀ Ms. Gruwellās teaching ability is even questioned because sheĀ āonlyā teaches students that are considered to beĀ āthose studentsā (e.g. brutish, savage, dumb, lazy, good-for-nothing gang members). Her (eventual ex) husband questions this ability, even after initially supporting her. The department head and the other admins and teachers push a dehumanizing, one-size-fits-all, culturally ignorant way to teach that continues to pit students against one another, repeatedly stigmatize them, and continually re-traumatize them. Most of the teachers at this school are wholly unsympathetic; they preferred honors students and perfect scores to integration andĀ āthese kids.āĀ
The administration does not see them as human beings.Ā
The administration was right about one thing: Ms. Gruwell had to climb a steep learning curve. She had to learn to approach teaching with cultural humility. She stated at the beginning of the film that she wanted to be there, to learn. But she didnāt learn until she completely changed her curriculum. Until she got rid of her White, middle class privilege and asked her students about their lived experiences. Until she invited them to share their lives with her. Until she stopped focusing on scores and homework and started focusing on stories and relationships. She united that classroom and taught them that they had a home--but the learning curve for her was steep.Ā
I ask myself often where the learning curve begins for me. What are the things I donāt know? How can I learn?Ā
I know someĀ new things now--that I didnāt know about the Rodney King riots. I didnāt know the first thing about the reality of gang violence.Ā
I didnāt know. In narrative therapy, clients write stories, narratives, about their lives. The idea is that narratives give people power. The ability to take a stack of words and shape oneās own story, write the future into existence. Thatās power. Ms. Gruwell was giving these students power. The cool (and ethical) thing she did is that she didnāt require the students to share with her. She let them share on their own terms. She learned. I think about that a lot. I think about how entitled it must look when I, a White person, ask (subtext: require) Black people, or people of any minority, for that matter, to do the intense emotional labor of sharing their lives with me. I know itās important to first build trust. Relationship first. If people want to share, then, they can. But the key is, it has to be optional, unpressured, uncoerced. To force a story out from under a personās tongue is to commit yet another act of violence. I donāt ever want to hurt or retraumatize someone. Thatās one of the reasons why Iām letting you take the reins to begin with, Miriam, when it comes to picking films. I want you to watch things youāre comfortable watching. I donāt know your trauma. What I donāt know, I should respect.Ā
Itās all well and good for me to sit here writing this--but then when it comes down to it, I think--who would I be in this story? Would I have the courage to be Ms. Gruwell? Would I have the resilience and tenacity to be the students in her class who continue to come back to room 203 even when they donāt want to? Would I be complacent, content to teachĀ āthe curriculumā and participate in the dehumanizing violence of check-a-box education?Ā
Would I be the Department Head? The 11th-grade Honors teacher?Ā
I canāt say I wouldnāt. All I can say is that Iām committed to learn.Ā
I learned something about my family a couple years back. My mom, she told me that my grandfather used to do pulpit swaps every so often with the local AME church (he was UMC). Their pastor would preach at his church, heād preach at theirs. One day, he took my mom along to the AME church. She sat there watching him preach, and at some point, he admitted to and apologized for something: his grandfather had been a member of the KKK in Stewartstown, PA, or at least the surrounding area.Ā āIt was very emotional for him,ā Mom said,Ā āI remember that day.ā I admire him still, for his commitment to righting the wrongs in his past. He did things to build interracial community then--like those pulpit swaps.
As I think about that story, it strikes me that this means my great-great grandfather was that same KKK member. I, too, recognize, admit, and repent for the acts of violence in my familyās past. I additionally recognize that acts of violent oppression have changed, but are still ongoing and I still have a role to play in working for justice. I have learned that like Ms. Gruwell, I need to shut up and listen. I canāt be that āwhite lady trying to teach us rap.ā I have to be the White lady who listens to and elevates Black voices. I have to be the White lady who fosters narratives of empowerment and positive change. I still have a lot to learn, and I pledge to remain as committed as I can to the goal of learning and growing and doing.Ā
Thank you, Miriam, for sharing in this learning experience with me. I am grateful.Ā