I've just watched Saul Gone and emotionally, character-wise, it was perfect, but as someone deeply anti-carceral, not just the fact that it's a life sentence, but the way they portray the few 'prison' scenes rubs me the wrong way, it felt intellectually dishonest, like a fantasy instead of a modern-day torture system; there will be neither 'redemption' nor healing for Jimmy in that place, what's even the point in Jimmy reclaiming his name and identity if he's just going to spend the rest of his life in an incredibly dehumanising/alienating place? I want to like it more than I do and I'm hoping maybe you have a slightly more forgiving take?
I do!! mostly I want to point you to this great post, which I think has a really smart take on the vagueness of "justice" in the finale and how much is left to the viewer to define.Â
honestly, my read on jimmyâs ending has always been that the point of the prison is figurative â I don't mean it's not literal within the world of the story (it's not a dream), but it is a story. jimmy's prison sentence is exactly as real as the prison bar imagery the directors kept trapping him and kim in for the whole series, especially the final season; itâs just taking that imagery to its logical conclusion. he's in a prison of his own making and has to find a way to live in it. I definitely don't think better call saul developed faith in the justice system or carceral punishment at the eleventh hour (jimmyâs apparent folk hero status behind bars feels like a testament to saul goodmanâs virtues in a rigged system). but âjudgingâ jimmy in the eyes of the same law that he twisted for his own gain is poetic. the show isnât interested in realism here; itâs interested in a man whoâs living and dying by the same sword (the law).Â
there are also plot reasons: as a wanted man, jimmy couldnât have publicly, legally reclaimed his name any other way, and reclaiming his name is the emotional core of his arc across breaking bad and better call saul. but thematically, I think the finale is using courtroom imagery to complicate easy conclusions about justice, doubling down on how difficult it is to reconcile legality and morality (âthat wasnât a crimeâ âyes it wasâ). and if that struggle for reconciliation also falls to the viewer in the end, thatâs interesting, because the focus of the final season was on how much harm can be caused by someone taking the definition of right and wrong into their own hands. but maybe better call saul believes that taking the definition of right and wrong into our own hands is just what life is. if every system is broken, maybe thereâs nothing else but to be our own judges.
there is a tragic âbut so whatâ quality to all of this â look at kim desperately searching for any punishment that carries meaning. she doesnât find it in florida; she doesnât get it from the law. through her, I see better call saul grasping for some kind of reliable moral framework within the american way of life and coming up empty. and that leaves the characters to define it for themselves. kim finds it in helping people again after keeping to herself for so long. jimmy finds it in a public act of confession, honesty after years of lies. in each case I think the key is other people, and, specifically for jimmy and kim, each other. people on better call saul really changed each other. in that sense, I don't see jimmy's ending as dehumanizing or alienating: the one thing the show wants us to be sure of is that he has kim's love again, however that might look. and maybe he has a network of fans in prison, too. but the redemption we see for him, and the implied redemption that might follow, is interpersonal; the prison is incidental. heâs in prison for life because he chose to put himself there. and choice is all anyone has.