givemelibertypleasw is focusing too much on show fanon, not whatâs actually in the books.
Both Criston and Otto made wild accusations about her killing her siblings but Rhaenyra was ready to forgive them because she saw them as victims of Hightower ambition. She only turned on them AFTER Lukeâs murder, not before.
People forget how damaging the tarnish of kinslaying is in Westerosi culture. Rhaenyra would never start her Queenship with this because it would make people turn against her.
Daemonâs shown to be a wild card in the show because the dumbass writers think passive women = feminism. In the books heâs Rhaenyraâs attack dog, he doesnât kill without her direct order e.g. Vaemond Velaryon. So no, he wouldnât kill her siblings because like I said kinslaying is political suicide and Rhaenyra made no indication she blames her siblings for her crown being usurped.
imo I think she would still be against kinslaying despite Lukeâs death if Aemond had been punished, instead Aegon II threw him a feast. How else would a grieving mother react?
She wouldnât kill them but sheâs also smart enough to know keeping them around will have long term repercussions, especially for Jace. What I can see her do is have Daeron and Aemond sent to the Wall or to the Citadel to become Septons/Maesters that way they automatically lose their claim. Sheâd do the same to Jaehaerys and Maelor when they come of age. As for Aegon he would be put under house arrest, similar to what Baelor I had done to his three sisters. Helaena isnât a threat by herself and Jaehaera could be easily married off to Joffrey.
Point is Rhaenyra had options when it came to her siblings that didnât involve kinslaying. Options she wouldâve gone through with if it wasnât for Luke and Jaceâs death and the Greens subsequent reaction to said deaths.
i donât have anything to add, this right here is exactly it.

















