In college, I really didn’t think that new urbanism was a cool thing, but the more I think about it now, the more I see it a necessity. With more than half of the world’s population living in cities, it’s incredibly important that we make cities as sustainable as possible.
And with the turfgrass issue he talks about, I think it’s certainly important to cover this issue as well. Lawns are great and pristine and they work with the Joneses ideal, but they do nothing. We use potable water, precious potable water, to feed our lawns, and then dump TONS of chemicals on them (more chemicals than the plants can take, and then with the rain, they’re washed into our potable water system... see a problem?)
I totally support the edible, workable, functional lawns. Having a lot of property and fields is one thing, but having turfgrass polluted with Scott’s MiracleGro is another. I’m not saying you shouldn’t be able to have your pretty lawn, I’m saying you should be conscious of what you’re doing by having that lawn. Think about planting some raised bed gardens, or even converting part of your green grass into an edible garden. It lowers the overall albedo effect, decreases the greenhouse effect, and by creating a permeable surface that is workable (and hopefully organic) you’re also decreasing the chemicals you’re pouring into a yard while decreasing the percentage of runoff.
I did a huge, nerdy thesis on this in college, and I’d share it with you if you wanted to look at it, but in short I’m just saying that suburbs should look into making use of their green lawns that do nothing besides make you look more successful than your neighbors and suck up your precious drinking water (here’s looking at you, California). I also think that cities should turn to new urbanism as a solution to population issues, as well as the whole greenhouse/albedo effect issues. You can significantly cool a city and create ample space for humans ans business alike while still remaining sustainable.