#ai problems

So Pinterest labeled nearly ALL my Sims Blender content as AI modified. I was lucky to save this blender file with Dean to prove they are not AI. Unfortunately, I don't have all blender files for the pics I was creating, but the mere fact I now need to PROVE my art isn't AI is absolutely crazy.

And no. I'm not the only one this 'lucky'. The majority of sims content (blender or not) was labeled the same way.

‘Longtime’ Hertz customer says he’s ‘done’ after AI scanner flagged water reflection as actual damage: ‘Unchallengable, automated accusation’ Interesting: Return a rental car and get charged for damage that doesn't exist.

Drop of water stain, not a dent. The customer included a screenshot of the computer-generated image that he said was sent to him by Hertz.

“This system is broken, and the lack of human accountability is infuriating,” wrote the customer.

Because I was just randomly accused of using AI in my writing. And I never have used AI for my creative hobbies and never will, but I also know I can't really prove I don't use it, so... frankly, the accusation really bothers me.

Look, I mainly learned to write by reading. Reading A LOT. My mom tells me I begged her to teach me to read when I was three years old - I don't remember that, but I DO remember reading short chapter books in kindergarten. I wrote my first Boxcar Children/Secret Garden-esque short story when I was six (weird fandom crossover as story inspiration, I know, but you can tell what some of my favorite books were as a little kid!). I wrote my first fix-it fic when I was ten (because I hated that the book I had just read ended on a cliffhanger with no sequel in sight after a decade). I read the Anne of Green Gables series so many times the binding split on half the books, and I genuinely believe the classics are called "classics" for very good reason.

All this to say... I use dashes, semicolons, and exclamation points far too often, I try to avoid cliche phrases or unnecessarily flowery language but sometimes it fits (I mean, there's a reason why the phrases have become cliche!, plus LM Montgomery is the queen of flowery descriptions [both literally and figuratively]), and there are some characters I write about who like to use big words.

And, at the end of the day, AI was (sadly) trained using human creations, including punctuation and language styles and vocabulary, so there is no one writing style or creative choice that automatically means AI was used.

Anyway, all I'm saying is: maybe, just maybe, there are better ways to protest AI than slinging accusations.

(not "pick your fave site," you need all of them if not more)

👀Sight Engine- You'll need to scroll up once you submit an image, and it will tell you the percentage of each popular consumer model AI used on the picture. 9/10 times effective in my use experience.

📲Was It AI?- Shows you a scale of confidence as to whether or not the image contains AI. Note this scale doesn't say how MUCH generation was used, but whether or not the image fits the criteria OF being AI. 9/10 times effective in my use experience.

🤖Decopy AI- This uses it's own AI (I'm pretty sure) to asses the image and break down it's red flags. YOU WILL NEED TO READ IT'S BREAKDOWN TO ENSURE IT UNDERSTANDS THE IMAGE. 4/10 times effective in my use experience, but the breakdown can be useful for comparing to the next website:

✨Undetectable AI- Shows you a new copy of the image that points out which pixels are generated and which are not. This is the newest site I've been using, but, so far, 10/10 times effective for me.

Again, use ALL OF THEM, not just one. They each tell you different information and you will get the most trustworthy picture from comparing all their results. This usually takes me three minutes or less, but now that all the links are in one place, this method will probably only take us a minute to use lol. Also, if you have a detection program you like, or if you've had different experiences with these websites, drop that info in the comments or reblog cause it will be useful to at least somebody- just make sure to mention whether it's software or in browser lol

Question!

I’ve noticed a rise of AI-generated fanfics on perhaps all reading platforms and it’s lowkey making me exasperated.

Those soulless books, which are, strangely enough, praised, are wholly unreadable. I wonder why anybody even goes through all the trouble to post 500 pages of AI generated content—can anybody explain?

YouTube ver :

Original ver :

I know it's not very visible but still, I know there's something wrong with my drawing because I am the one who made it

My drawing may not be perfect but I don't want Ai to fix it, No wonder I don't get many viewers, this Ai filter really makes my animations painful to watch

YouTube really needs to learn what 'consent' is