MUELLER REPORT A LAUGHABLE MONTAGE OF NOTHING
I have finished reading the Mueller Report. I only dozed off twice. Here's the thing. Thirty-five times the report states the investigation found NO EVIDENCE there was collusion or a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign or Trump with regard to election interference. Here are thirteen of the thirty-five which you can find through page 127:
1. the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
2. the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
3. the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
4. while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges.
5. the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.
6. the investigation established that interactions between Russian Ambassador Kislyak and Trump Campaign officials both at the candidate's April 2016 foreign policy speech in Washington, D.C., and during the week of the Republican National Convention were brief, public, and non-substantive.
7. the investigation did not establish that one Campaign official's efforts to dilute a portion of the Republican Party platform on providing assistance to Ukraine were undertaken at the behest of candidate Trump or Russia.
8. The investigation also did not establish that a meeting between Kislyak and Sessions in September 2016 at Sessions's Senate office included any more than a passing mention of the presidential campaign.
9. The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA's interference operation. ( MY NOTE: Internet Research Agency owned by a Russian oligarch and operated out of St. Petersburg, Russia.)
10. In all cases, the IRA contacted the Campaign while claiming to be U.S. political activists working on behalf of a conservative grassroots organization. (MY NOTE: This in the exhaustive section about the IRA and its activities) the investigation has not identified evidence that any Trump Campaign official understood the requests were coming from foreign nationals.
11. The investigation did not find evidence that the Trump Campaign recovered any such Clinton emails, or that these contacts were part of a coordinated effort between Russia and the Trump Campaign. (MY NOTE: this is about her 30k e-mails)
12. In particular, the investigation examined whether these contacts involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination. (MY NOTE: Really? After two years? Then there was no crime)
13. the Office found no documentary evidence showing that he (Trump) was made aware of the meeting--or its Russian connection-before it occurred. (MY NOTE: About the Trump Tower meeting)
As far as the obstruction of justice portion of the investigation, Mueller and his team exhaustively go through all the machinations, maneurvering, tweets, conversations, meetings, etc. where Trump and his advisers were trying to protect him from the den of vipers that is Washington D.C. After ALL that, here is what Mueller and his team had to say:
"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
NOTE: Alan Dershowitz, a renowned attorney and constitutional expert, plus a Democrat and liberal, has come out and denounced Mueller here, along with many others. It is not a prosecutor’s job to exonerate anyone. The last phrase of this sentence in the report is heinously added by Mueller to harm Trump and urge impeachment. If Mueller could not, or would not, conclude a crime had been committed, then it wasn’t committed, and that by every definition of the law of our being presumed innocent.
Now, pertaining to Trump's written answers to the Special Counsel's questionnaire, this is what they had to say:
"we determined that the substantial quantity of information we had obtained from other sources allowed us to draw relevant factual CONCLUSIONS on intent and credibility, which are often inferred from circumstantial evidence and assessed without direct testimony from the subject of the investigation."
NOTE: If they were able to draw relevant factual conclusions on intent and credibility, with the ‘substantial’ quantity of information they had obtained from ‘other’ sources, why did they not ‘conclude’ on obstruction? If there was no final conclusion on obstruction, after two years of investigations, then the conclusion was no obstruction. Period.
It seems to me if that's all Mueller and his team couldn't find after two years of dogged investigation...that there is no crime or crimes here by Trump or his campaign. The crimes committed were by the IRA, GRU, Wikileaks, Gucifer 2.0 and others, as is stipulated in the report, who were not colluded with, or conspired with by Trump or anyone in his campaign.
The report clearly states that "During its investigation the Office issued more than 2,800 subpoenas under the auspices of a grand jury sitting in the District of Columbia; executed nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants; obtained more than 230 orders for communications records under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d); obtained almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers; made 13 requests to foreign governments pursuant to Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties; and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses, including almost 80 before a grand jury.” And all these hacks can find is no evidence, no evidence, no evidence? Then, that must mean there IS NO FREAKIN’ EVIDENCE!!! Then, The ever race baiting, democrat butt kissing, socialist loving Don Lemon says it is WE who are brainwashed???? No, Mr. Lemon. It is not WE who are brainwashed. I don’t know what report Lemon and the rest of those who hate Trump are reading, but it isn’t the one on the government’s website.
The shame here is that liberals don’t believe in facts, evidence or any such proof. No, they only believe in hate and the propaganda they allow themselves to be fed every day by the liberal elite media who are all saying the same thing on every channel once they receive their marching orders. Too sad.
The swamp was swampier than we ever imagined.
