Retirees Are Risking Their Life Savings on Junk Bonds
Retirees and other investors are reaching farther and farther for yield. Theyâre piling into all sorts of increasingly risky investments. So, it should come as no surprise that credit spreads are shrinking between what in theory are risk-free investments and other investments.
My friend Danielle DiMartino Booth, formerly at the Dallas Fed, covers a range of topics affected by central-bank policies. I think she is going to be an increasingly visible force in the world of central bank critics.
Danielle deals with credit spreadsâspecifically high-yield bondsâin the article below. She urges, âThis is important folks, your sweet grandparents could well own junk bonds in their desperate need to generate yield on their atrophying retirement funds!â
Itâs not a long piece, and itâs easy reading, even if it wonât make you comfortable.
The Bond Market: Beware of Junkyard Dogs
By Danielle DiMartino Booth
Having spent a chunk of his youth âshoppingâ them, Jim Croce came to know a thing or two about junkyards. In those youthful days, should his clunker de jour be missing some vital part or parts, a trolling expedition through South Phillyâs scrap heaps was always the enterprising Croceâs preferred method of procurement.
Amid all of Croceâs parts foraging, it was a universal joint for a â57 Chevy and a â51 Dodge transmission, two must have and must-be-cheap or, better yet, free, parts that the legendary folk singer still recalled. He also reminisced that junkyards could and would provide a no frills, but highly motivated and easy way to get in some cardio, as in running for your life.
âI got to know many junkyards well, and they all have dogs in them,â the late Croce said in a 1973 interview. âThey all have either an axle tied around their necks or an old lawnmower to keep âem at least slowed down a bit, so you have a decent chance of getting away from them.â
So was born the junkyard dog yardstick by which to measure the meanness of one Bad, Bad Leroy Brown, Croceâs hit which landed at the top of the charts 42 years ago this week.
As for high yield bond analysts, they arenât exactly known for catchy turns of phrase. However, in recent weeks, theyâve shed the dry and donned the dramatic, as youâll soon see. Such is the overheated state of the junk bond market this sweltering summer.
In his latest missive, Deutsche Bankâs Oleg Melentyev, arguably the best-in-class high yield analyst among his sell-side peers, warned of the perils of investing in this âfrenzied market.â
Legendary high yield investor Marty Fridson shares Melentyevâs concerns and has for some time. By his best estimate, high yield was already in âextreme overvaluationâ territory on June 30th, defined as being one standard deviation above fair value. Flash forward two weeks, and he calculates that the standard deviation has doubled.
(A quick Statistics 101 refresher: standard deviation tells you how tightly clustered or wide-of-the-center individual components of a given data set are from their mean. Remember the grade bell curve the engineering undergrads blew in business school? When all of the test scores came in on top of each other, the bell curve was super steep; when there was vast divergence, the bell curve was low and wide.)
Defining bond valuation also requires one employ âspreads,â which compare the prevailing yields on a given credit to a supposedly risk-free Treasury of a comparable maturity. And that means you have to get down to the nitty-gritty of measuring risk in basis points (bps), or hundredths of a percentage point.
In the event your eyes have rolled into the back of your head, listen up! This is important folks, your sweet grandparents could well own junk bonds in their desperate need to generate yield on their atrophying retirement funds!
With that preamble posited, on July 15th the option-adjusted spread on Bank of America Merrill Lynchâs High Yield Index was 542 basis points. That compares to 621 bps on June 30th. The lower the spread, the less extra compensation investors are demanding for taking on the added risk of being exposed to, well, junky bonds.
Of the compression in spreads, an incredulous Fridson could only characterize the overvaluation which begat more overvaluation as, âmore staggering.â
Now in light of this, just how did mom & pop investors react to the price increase? Well how else? They poured $4.4 billion into high yield mutual funds, the second highest weekly inflow on record after March 2ndâs $5.3 billion inflow.
Bloomberg caught up with yet another stunned strategist:  âTheyâre out there scrounging through the dumpster looking for yield,â worried Karyn Cavanaugh of Voya Capital Management. âWhen you have artificially low rates, you force people to go out and look for things they normally wouldnât.â
The question is, will investor insouciance ever come back to haunt them? They, as in investors, certainly donât seem to think so.
The Daily Shot is a must-read email proffering just about every graph thatâs important for investors in one succinct one-stop shop, and itâs free. The Shotâs editor, the estimable Dr. Lev Borodovsky, is notoriously judicious with his editorial additives. So when he adds a quip, his readers understandably sit up and take note.
In Tuesdayâs Shot, Borodovsky featured a graph of the VIX Index, the so-called âfear gauge,â which depicts the perceived risk of owning stocks, which have traditionally moved in lockstep with junk bonds. Reflecting extreme complacency, the VIX is sitting at the lowest level since last August. âIn the equity markets,â Borodovsky recapped, âthe VIX hits a multi-month low. All is well.â
Or not. The Shot goes on to depict the price-to-earnings ratio on the S&P 500 at the highest level since at least 2006. âThese valuations rely on extremely low long-term rates,â Borodovsky cautioned.
As a punctuation mark, as in exclamation, Borodovsky features two charts on the high yield market. At the risk of over-paraphrasing, the high yield market is apparently no longer concerned about energy prices, which have yet to stage the oft-predicted blistering rebound. How so?
Despite the defaults that continue to emanate from the oil patch, the performance of high yield bonds has completely divorced itself from that of still-depressed crude prices. The mirror image of this nonchalance is that investors are no longer demanding a premium level of compensation for owning high yield energy issuers vis-Ă -vis their non-energy brethren.
In priceless understatement, Borodovsky concludes that, âHigh yield is definitely starting to look frothy.â
As for Deutscheâs Melentyev, he isnât bothering to wait for the ink to dry on the clear message written on the wall. In his latest note to clients, he ratchets up his expectations for HY (high yield) defaults to rise this year beyond his worst case initial scenario â and it ainât just an energy story.
âAt this point, we have little doubt that our original forecast of a 4% ex-commodity HY default rate will be met by late 2016/early 2017. Moreover, we think there are now enough reasons to believe that defaults could rise to 5%, ex-commodities, sometime over the next year or so. Coupled with our 20% commodity HY default rate forecast, we are looking at 7.25% aggregate default rate sometime around mid-2017.â
In the event youâve fallen off Planet Earth in recent weeks, the global corporate default count, as in companies reneging on their promises to make good on those coupon payments, is at the highest level since 2009. And if your memoryâs eye has erased 2009 to prevent permanent scarring, the economy was in a full meltdown state back then.
Letâs get this straight. Defaults are going through the roof and investors are flocking to the sector in record numbers? And how.
Moodyâs Tiina Siilaberg keeps an eagleâs eye on the concessions investors give to issuers in the form of protections they donât demand. Theyâre called âcovenants,â which Investopedia defines as, âdesigned to protect the interests of both parties. Restrictive covenants forbid the issuer from undertaking certain activities; positive covenants require the issuer to meet specific requirements.â
By Siilabergâs latest tally, covenant protections are at their weakest level in recorded history. To translate, investorsâ collective interests are as vulnerable as theyâve ever been. Though the leveraged loan market remains open for business, Siilaberg is apprehensive about whatâs just over the horizon given stretched valuations.
âIssuance in the high yield bond market is still relatively weak compared to historic levels,â Siilaberg said. âI worry, though, because refinancing risk for many lower-rated issuers is close to an all-time high.â
The culprit? That would be a delusional reliance on what Melentyev refers to as, âthe new narrative,â and âits apparent reliance on (a) strong monetary response.â Unconventional monetary policy is delivering, âlittle tangible benefit.â
Overreaching central bankers are in fact doing more harm than good at this juncture. Though small investors may not be wise to the damage being wrought, veterans of financial market warfare are weary to the point of exhaustion.
The endless waiting for Godot has apparently worn their resolve down to near nothingâŚwith good reason. For all of central bankersâ Herculean efforts, expectations that U.S. job losses will accelerate are at a two-year high while householdsâ prospects for the economy over the next year have fallen to a two-year low.
Pride will surely precede the fall of the orthodoxy of todayâs accepted monetary policy framework. But at what cost?
âEveryone in the world needs yield and nothing else matters,â Melentyev laments. âThis has never ended in any sort of a problem before, so we can all go back to sleep.â And what happens when weâre abruptly shaken from our slumber?
Recognizing the painfully obvious, Voyaâs Cavanaugh observed, âThis isnât a really normal environment.â
Thank you Chair Yellen & Co. for rendering snarling, lawn mower toting junk bond dogs cute and cuddly critters to retirees on fixed incomes.
Subscribe to John Mauldinâs Free Weekly Publication
Each week in Outside the Box, John Mauldin highlights a thoughtful, provocative essay from a fellow analyst or economic expert. Some will inspire you. Some will make you uncomfortable. All will challenge you to think outside the box. Subscribe now!