Censorship and the Dumb Wolf Fable (Sermon 22)
âWe need to understand that this idea of pure freedom, of being able to do whatever you want whenever you want, is not a righteous idea. Itâs chaos, itâs natural brutality. Responsiblity* gives us limits. We need limits.â
Everything we do is communication. Every choice we make, every action we partake in, whether intending to or not, communicates something about who we are. If you define censorship as not allowing any form of communication, you  are saying that absolutely any rules are a form of censorship.Â
Censorship and Freedom are two heavily coded words- censorship is bad and freedom is good. This seems undeniable on the surface, but you need to begin to ask yourself, in context, what do those words mean? As always, context is incredibly important. Are we calling chaos âfreedomâ? Are we calling justice âcensorship?â What are we actually saying?
We should not be allowed to do whatever we want. Not because we should be wholly controlled or limited, but because some artificial limits are needed to avoid the natural state of the world. We remind you that the natural state of the world, the big and powerful eat the weak without consequence. The natural order of things is almost entirely an evil order. Â
Of course, the question becomes, what limits do we need? That is the much more difficult question. We need limits that protect the hurt, enhance the quality of life for all, and provide justice and righteousness. What exactly these limits are changes, and in short, I am not wholly sure what they are.Â
However, I am certain, that some of these limits should be on unchecked communication of hate, violence, and genocide. In the world of the hateful, this might be censorship, but in the world of the just, we realize that this is an emotional ploy to allow their hatred to spread. If everything is communication, all rules are censorship. Since rules are necessary, we understand there is a level of censorship that is necessary, even when the buzzword makes it sound so evil.
The reason we make the claim for these limitations on communication can be furthered described by a familiar fable. Youâve probably heard of it, about the two wolves in a manâs mind. One wolf represents justice and love, and the other represents hatred and fear, and the wolves are locked in a constant battle. The student asks what wolf will win, and the wiseman replies âthe one I feed.â
For many reasons, that is a dumb fable. Itâs often muddled with the ideals of a moral binary (something that in truth doesnât exist) and exoticism and racism. The Signless tells me they want to come up with a better fable to spread the same message- that you cultivate the actions in your world with the thoughts that you choose to have and give attention to.Â
In a single person, we can understand that although they can never be rid of negative thoughts, they can choose to add positive thoughts to themselves and slowly overtake the negative. What we think becomes how we feel becomes how we act.
This is the same for the macrocosm of society. What we allow to be put into the metaphorical âmindâ of our world, what we give attention to and how we react (or donât) to it, becomes how society will behave. Can you see now what this so-called âcensorshipâ really is? It is us filling up our societies mind with positive thoughts of help, of justice and righteousness and love, and drowning out that hatred.Â
When we give undue voice to the wicked, we are feeding their wolf. We can never truly be rid of the wicked, we should always be questioning and unsure of what we consider wicked, but we do not have to encourage what has shown to be poisonous.  Do not drink poison because you should âtry it before you knock it.â Do not be tricked into thinking what protects lives and hope is âcensorshipâ and what kills is âfreedom.âÂ