the original archive.org link to the essay is now unfortunately broken, and I have not been able to find a more convenient link. so far, the only way I’ve been able to re-find the essay is through the collection On Antisemitism: Solidarity and the Struggle for Justice, ISBN: 9781608467617 or ISBN: 9781608467624, which can be found through [common method of finding pdfs and epubs by ISBN]
What started organically, therefore, morphed into a planned campaign to create a coalition of mostly Jewish activist academics, pro-Israel and national representative bodies in the Jewish Diaspora, and the aforementioned major American Jewish organizations to take the discussion in an increasingly political and ideological direction, linking anti-Zionism and antisemitism ever more closely. A key player in and growing influence on this campaign was the Israeli government, pursuing a new policy since the late 1980s, through its then-recently-established Monitoring Forum on Anti-Semitism. The policy aimed at establishing Israeli hegemony over the monitoring and combating of antisemitism by Jewish groups worldwide. This was coordinated and mostly implemented by Mossad representatives working out of Israeli embassies.
The policy served to bind Diaspora communities more closely to Israel, their self-appointed “defender against external threats”; to promote Zionist immigration by using highly problematic data on antisemitic manifestations to stress the fragility of Diaspora Jewish communities; and to portray Israel as equally in the firing line of antisemitic attack by increasingly linking criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism.
I had close personal experience to the role the Mossad played in establishing Israeli hegemony over the monitoring and combating of antisemitism. While I was director of the Institute of Jewish Affairs (IJA) and its successor the Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) in the 1990s, I founded and was principal editor of the annual Antisemitism World Report, the first objective, independent, country-by-country survey of antisemitism worldwide. The London Mossad representative dealing with antisemitism made it clear to me that they were unhappy about our independent operation and tried to pressure us into either ceasing publication or merging our report with one that the then-new Project for the Study of Antisemitism at Tel Aviv University, headed by Professor Dina Porat and part-financed by the Mossad, was beginning to produce. I vigorously resisted the pressure, as I recalled in my book, The Making and Unmaking of a Zionist: “I tried to persuade the Israelis to allow us to operate without interference, but was given short shrift by the Mossad representative at the Israeli embassy in London and by the Israel ambassador [Moshe Raviv] himself,” with whom I had met, together with the chairman of the IJA, to discuss the matter in 1994. Notwithstanding, we continued to produce our report and continued to come under pressure from the Mossad. A year or two later, I made a further effort to persuade them to end their attempts to undermine our work—which they were having some success in doing as certain Jewish antisemitism monitoring bodies in other countries succumbed to Mossad demands that they cease to provide us with information about developments in their countries. In 1994 the IJA had severed its connection with the World Jewish Congress and had entered into a relationship with the American Jewish Committee (AJC), which was very keen to be associated with our Antisemitism World Report. The head of the AJC’s Israel office at that time was Dr. Yossi Alpher, former head of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University, but more important, he had been a Mossad officer for twelve years, leaving the agency in the late 1970s. Alpher and I developed a good working relationship and he fully understood the value of the independent antisemitism work we were undertaking. He offered to use his good contacts with the Mossad to broker a meeting between me and the Mossad official responsible for overseeing the agency’s role in centralizing global Jewish monitoring and combating of antisemitism. This meeting took place in Tel Aviv, but to no avail. The exchange was polite, but he had absolutely no intention of relaxing pressure on us. We soldiered on, but the obstacles placed in our path proved too onerous to allow us to continue, and the publication of our Report in book form ceased in 1999.
romaincrisis
annaxmalina
stormborns
andulkaphoto
kianamaiart
prguitarman
titsay
dailybridgerton
dededos
