***This post was originally written previous to the announced firing of Joe Paterno and Graham Spanier, and was in response to the Grand Jury Report and subsequent outrage over what the allegations against Sandusky had to do with Paterno and the other men involved in the Grand Jury Report. Â I want to emphasize that my goal is not to condemn anyone, but rather bring attention to how inaction is a societal problem involving all of us, and this scandal at Penn State is just shedding light on the larger problem as a whole.***
There’s a famous quote that I’ve heard numerous times that is sometimes attributed to 18th century politician and philosopher Edmund Burke that goes something like this:
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
For the past week, the nation has been captivated by an unbelievable tragedy that has been brought to light at Penn State University.  I’ll spare you the details of what is alleged (you can read the grand jury report or visit ESPN if you need to catch yourself up), but the bottom line is this:
An eyewitness saw a young boy being sodomized by an adult associated with the university, and at least five people with knowledge of it did nothing to actively protect the child.
The Penn State quarterback-turned-graduate assistant (allegedly) whose gut told him to run away when confronted with the sight of his former coach raping a child, rather than do anything it took to rescue the boy. Â (Recent developments suggest that this may not be accurate, and that the grad assistant did intervene.)
The legendary coach who, when confronted with the news that his friend and protege had committed unspeakable acts, decided that the only thing he could do was pass the information along to his boss rather than wielding the authority he held as the most powerful man on campus to resolve the situation when a known predator was left unchecked.
The two Penn State officials who had the eyewitness account reported to them and felt that a slap on the wrist (forbidding the accused from bringing children on campus anymore) was a sufficient punishment for someone who now had multiple accusations of sexual abuse levied against him, essentially giving him permission to carry on with the abuse, as long as it wasn't on campus. Â
The president of one of the most influential universities in the world, tasked with making decisions that are in the best interest of the students of Penn State and the university, who approved the handling of the matter and the continued active presence of a known predator on his campus.
Let me be clear: Joe Paterno is one of my heroes. Â I believe that Joe Paterno is a good man who has done a lot of great things to make the world around him a better place. Â I believe the same for Graham Spanier, whom I have always admired as the president of my university, and who has done much for the advancement of higher education. Â I believe that each of the five men involved in the grand jury report are good men.
But they dropped the ball. Â They decided to remain neutral. Â Their silence became permission.
They allowed a sexual predator to not only remain free, they enabled him to continue running an organization that put him in direct contact with young boys every day.  And tonight, there are multiple young men (nine have come forward, but there’s no telling how many more are out there) who wake up to nightmares of what happened to them.  There are young men whose lives are forever changed because of the actions of Jerry Sandusky, and the inactions of those with the knowledge to stop him.
Desmond Tutu said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”
Many people don’t understand why this scandal necessitates the accountability of someone like Joe Paterno (there are thousands of students rioting on PSU’s campus in support of him, and many more posting their support across social media).  By any legal definition, Paterno did what protocol told him he was supposed to do.  The other men involved in the grand jury report likely acted in what they believed was the correct way to handle accusations.  I think when we speak of Paterno, Spanier and the rest, we're truly talking about good men.  They’re not the ones being accused of multiple counts of sexual abuse against children - Jerry Sandusky is, a fact that can be lost in the outrage over what has happened. Â
But by choosing to stand on the sidelines, they unintentionally supported Sandusky when they should have done whatever it took to protect children.
Before I'm accused of finger pointing or casting judgement that is not mine to make - this entire situation has forced me to ask myself the question: how many times have I chosen inaction? Â How many victims have I ignored? Â If I'm honest with myself, I'm certainly not innocent in this by any means. Â I think each of us could point to a moment (or more) where we've erred in judgement and perhaps unintentionally let wrongs go unchecked. Â We're human and we make mistakes.
Paterno acknowledged the weight of his own mistake in his attempted resignation statement, saying:
“This is a tragedy. It is one of the great sorrows of my life.  With the benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more.”
But unfortunately, there is no benefit of hindsight in this situation. Â Not to the victims, who will live the rest of their lives with the physical, emotional and psychological horror of what happened to them. Â This is no doubt a case about the alleged actions of Jerry Sandusky, but in a larger sense, this story is about systematic sexual abuse and how inaction equals permission. Â
When good people do nothing to help victims, we allow the oppressor to triumph. Â Everything is wrong about that.