optical unconscious--2015
In his “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility,” Walter Benjamin claims that the camera enables the discovery of the optical unconscious, just as psychoanalysis enabled the discovery of the instinctual unconscious. This statement is followed by the following passage:
“Moreover, these two types of unconscious [the optical and instinctual] are intimately linked. For in most cases the diverse aspects of reality captured by the film camera lie outside the normal spectrum of sense impressions. Many of the deformations and stereotypes, transformations and catastrophes which can assail the optical world in films afflict the actual world in psychoses, hallucinations, and dreams. Thanks to the camera, therefore, the individual perceptions of the psychotic and the dreamer can be appropriated by collective perception. The ancient truth expressed by Heraclitus, that those who are awake have a world in common while each sleeper has a world of his own, have been invalidated by film—and less by depicting the dream world itself than by creating figures of collective dream, such as the globe-encircling Mickey Mouse.”
The pivot point is not photography’s so-called indexical relationship to reality, but rather its proximity to fantasy. Photography’s political potential lies not in its ability to document material reality, but rather in its profound link to psychic structures. Unconscious impulses and desires guide visual perception. They also shape the way that climate change has been traditionally ignored in order to protect the status quo of a carbon economy. We are on the edge of a new era in which many of our past habits of thought and practice have become blinders which prevent us from perceiving the realities of our present situation.
Paralysis and denial in relation to the unthinkable, the uncanny and the catastrophic. If the Anthropocene requires that we think of humans as a species, then the narrative is this: there is a species, and part of that species decides initially that it is exceptional at a moral and rational level, but then declares—late in the day—that the species is better described neither as moral nor as rational, but as constituted by destruction.
Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility,” Second Version (1936), in Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, vol. 3, 1931–1938, trans. Rodney Livingstone et al., ed. Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2002), pp. 117–118.
Rolleiflex TLR, Zeiss 75mm Planar f.2.8, Kodak Portra 400ASA, handheld
Instagram Tumblr Eye on the Mallee website poodlewalks Twitter