ENTER AN (Isshinryu) DRAGON
DRAWING A LINE IN THE SAND
Recently, an isshinryu practitioner reached out to me to let me know he was reading my latest book, Rebel Isshinryu, and to share a thread from an isshinryu Facebook forum discussing my work.
With all due respect to the many years of martial commitment and value brought by the two respondents in their thread, Charles James and Victor Smith are out of their venue of martial expertise when speaking on the topic of Internal Isshinryu and the controversial subject of KI as it relates specifically to the underlying technicalities of this art and which forms the basic platform of my work.
In the future, I hope that such critics qualify their experience when commenting on such topics as Ki and isshinryu, so we understand they are offering their ‘guesswork’ opinions. Those who know me are aware that I am always open for dialog and ready to learn. I will also defend my turf.
As a senior U.S. karateka with nearly fifty years of active martial experience, I find it ironic that we have two career martial artists offering vague disputations on a subject outside of their purview, and who do not actually comment on any of the 57 Challenges outlined in the book as you will read below.
(Mr. James and Mr. Smith’s comments are italicized below.
Charles E. James An Example of Rebel Isshinryu (he refers to my book) In the book one of the short chapters refers to the existence of ki or chi or qi and then explains how it works with a more creative articulation thus resulting in a confusion and bastardization of its true meaning. It forgets that terms and explanations and definitions and meaning of ancient concepts such as chi or ki is simply the best possible way to convey a subject of those times. Examples follow: In the book he uses a term that literally does not exist except as a term loosely defined as relating to another term, biomechanics. Here is what it says:
biomechanistic (not comparable) 1 Relating to biomechanics The branch of biophysics that deals with the mechanics of the human or animal body; especially concerned with muscles and the skeleton. (biology) The functioning of a particular part of a body.
Now, what I would actually say about ki is the following: Ki, as it is assumed to exist, has literally nothing to do with biomechanics for biomechanics deals with the mechanics of the muscles and skeletal system of the human body. It is the study of the functioning of the body and pertains to the individual parts thereof.
Let’s start with the term that I use often; biomechanics |ˌ the study of the mechanical laws relating to the movement or structure of living organisms. From a martial perspective, biomechanical laws dictate that if one postures correctly with their legs, for example, their musculo-skeletal structure will become more resistant to pushes or pulls. A proper or correct body ‘biomechanic’ is better able to generate or withstand certain angles of force. Anyone disagree here? There is no debate, just nitpicking?
Mr. James comments about Ki’s relationship to biomechanics are false and misleading. I am neither bastardizing nor misusing the term ‘ki,’ as understood in the world’s internal martial arts community. I have observed, for decades, that the physical structure, when either still or in motion, greatly affects the flow of Ki (an immaterial ‘charge’ science is still trying to define) and vice versa, in precise and recordable ways. There is an intimate relationship between underlying Ki flow and hard-matter, musculo-skeletal actions. I quote from an excellent work, The Field, by L. Taggart; ‘For a number of decades respected scientists in a variety of disciplines all over the world have been carrying out well-designed experiments whose results fly in the face of current biology and physics. … At our most elemental, we are not a chemical reaction, but an energetic charge.’
I’d be happy to prove the value of this statement to him within the martial construct. He can then make up his own mind what he thinks is causing the phenomenon and choose whatever label he deems fit. The 3,000 year Chinese history of using the word Qi suffices for me.
Ki [気] is translated, a Japanese term much like Chi or Qi as termed by the Chinese, as, “spirit; mind; heart; nature; disposition; motivation; intention; mood; feelings; atmosphere; essence.
It is something that is more philosophical than reality for all the applied definitions are philosophical rather than real. Use the wheelbarrow test, if it cannot be put into a wheelbarrow then its reality is questionable at best and more of an emotional effort to explain the unexplainable.
Mr. James personal opinion that Ki is ‘something that is more philosophical than reality’ is contrary to Tatsuo Shimabuku’s own understanding of the term. In several, many hours long personal interviews with the late 10th dan, Frank Van Lenten, this respected expert, who studied directly with Isshinryu’s founder, stated that Shimabuku was the first Okinawan sensei to talk about Ki as it related to Sanchin kata training and even more specifically, in raising body temperature. Shimabuku was referencing a concrete experience—the Kiko practice of Sanchin.
THE WHEELBARROW TEST LACKS SUBSTANCE
Mr. James use of the wheelbarrow test to dismiss Ki, though witty, is irrational. You can’t put wind, love, mathematics, consciousness into a wheelbarrow. Is Mr. James suggesting these do not exist? You can’t put the sound of my voice into a wheelbarrow, yet I’m sure I could rile Mr. James up if I shouted loud enough in his ear. So sound isn’t real either? Can you put intention into a wheelbarrow? Compassion? Mind? God? Quantum Physics? This is just a small sampling. Is Mr. James suggesting that none of these constructs exist? Hmm!
Mr. James and Mr. Smith’s comments properly represent the conventional isshinryu paradigm. They add nothing unique except a newly whitewashed ceiling. They are spokespersons of an historical view that is being surpassed.
Mr. James does not seem aware of cutting edge work in Quantum Physics particularly, ‘quantum entanglement’, the strange properties of waves and particles apparently influencing everything. These frontier scientists are proving the value and power of intention, for example, to affect (with statistically significant data), that humans can influence both machines and people without any physical movement involved. If we just took the power of voice alone – which you can’t be put into a wheelbarrow, human sound has catalyzed all manner of extraordinary accomplishments.
(image below from the book REBEL ISSHINRYU)
CHI’S NON-REALITY REALITY—REALLY?
It’s fine if Mr. James himself wants to relegate Ki to a conceptual, ‘non-reality’ box. I do not put the subject into such a box, because I have reams of evidence compiled with the aid of other advanced martial artists, acupuncturists, engineers and a noted biophysicist who strongly suggest otherwise. Many intelligent people have experienced a ‘Ki’ phenomenon first-hand in our research. Did I say flying through the air? Nowhere in my book is a fantasy world hinted at or embraced. The use of the term Ki is and has been, for centuries, a useful model to describe unexplainable events that can produce predictable and reproducible results. Thirteen Advanced martial artists with experiences ranging from 15-60 years were asked to comment on Ki’s reality in my last book Internal Karate: Mind Matters and the Seven Gates of power. No one denied its existence as a mysterious phenomenon, nor were they coerced to say so. Neither do many acupuncturists, Chinese medical Chi Kung healers, and an impressive slew of other energy practitioners along with increasing scientific studies to back up their observations.
Mr. James is speaking outside of his purview, attempting to define another’s martial experiences as perhaps, false, off base, and incorrectly labeled. But his own observation appears based upon his lack of actual hands-on experience within this field of study. Other than his dictionary challenge and personal opinion, I simply hear one man espousing his ‘theory’ of ki with far less substance and research backing it.
I acknowledge Ki as a catchall term for unexplainable behaviors in Rebel Isshinryu. In his own words James states; “(Ki) is at best and more of an emotional effort to explain the unexplainable.”
Really? An emotional effort—at best? At least, he agrees with me that there is an unexplainable. Rebel Isshinryu points out how Ki influences our kata and individual technique - without emotionalism.
Chi, the Chinese term for the Japanese term “Ki”, is translated as, “the circulating life force whose existence and properties are the basis of much Chinese philosophy and medicine. Qi, Blood and Body Fluids are the most basic substances that constitute the human body and maintain its functional activities.”
So, I would go on again to say that, in essence, even in the West as is in the East, Chi or Qi or Ki or Energy is a manifestation of a product that is generated energy fueled by physics, fundamental principles of physiokinetic such as structure, body alignment, body stability and so on as well as the healthful, fit, and strong flow of that fuel we feed our bodies that is changed into the blood, and its oxygen and other fuels, and other body fluids that make the body alive and functional. It is contained within the body and cannot be transmitted from the body, especially through the air, to effect other objects including the human body of others to move or damage or disrupt that body.
Modern science has already proved Mr. James’, Cartesian view of the martial world is an old an overturning paradigm. Frontier scientists, using rigorous methodology, have proved that humans can transmit through the air via wave frequencies, the ability to effect objects including the human body, in significant ways.
Outside of a basic health platform, citing the biochemical properties of cellular metabolism or ATP energy production is an aside regarding the nature of isshinryu kata and Ki’s known energy affects in the assembly and execution of karate moves.
Yes, Ki is blood, breath, cellular metabolism etc. But Ki is also behind ‘Kiko’ principles in isshinryu. I did not invent the term ‘[Ki]ko.’ The Okinawans karate masters did. Mr. James cleverly points his intellectual finger at the validity of martial artists metaphorically fixating on the ‘right’ view. His insistence you look there doesn't mean the left viewpoint is any less real. My finger and my book Rebel Isshinryu points to new and emerging information on the left. This is precisely why I have a brief section in the book called, ‘Why Draws Its Sword On What Is.’ Mr. James and Mr. Smith offer us the standard ‘What is?’ I offer something more expansive.
The use of ki, or chi or qi is about how the body makes use of fuel, i.e., proper dietary intake along with water and air that is converted within the digestive system to feed the body the appropriate fuels to run it where the levels of proper fuel, appropriate levels of air intake and maximized and efficient conversion to a fuel the body can use to generate the energy necessary to make the mind function and the body move as it was meant to exist in the world at large. The energy generated within the body allows it to be, if properly applied within the limits and maximum capability of physics and principles such as physiokinetic to achieve efficient maximum output is how we make use of chi, qi or ki to apply our bodies in martial arts, etc.
This is an accurate description but a misdirection of the subject discussed in my book. James fails to make mention of scientific observation of the body to produce ‘wave frequencies’ that have been proven to alter the functioning of another human body. My interest has been on the martial behavior of Ki as it influences the body’s functioning and vice versa in contests of strength to resist or overwhelm an opponent. Some quantum theorists are observing that physical mass is not equivalent to energy but that Mass is energy. So fundamentally, there is no mass. There is only charge. This open up a whole new way of thinking.
The ancients were keen observers of natural laws that could be used in intriguing ways. Modern scientific understanding of the principles behind these ‘ways’ wouldn’t even begin to investigate until centuries later.
When you're a batter trying to hit a ball are you concerned in that moment with your cellular metabolism? Neither were the karate masters when it came to generating power in a karate technique.
Reply · October 11 at 5:31pm Charles E. James
Charles E. James In a nutshell, ki is merely the energy generated by a fuel in the body that if manifested in accordance with properly applied physiokinetic such as balance, structure, body skeletal alignment, strength of stability of bodily musculature while moving the body mass toward a target and then applying methods and energy and force levels would maximize energy use and internal consumption to ensure maximum power and force is reached at point of application to another body. Ki or the body fuels has already been consumed and used to generate energy that the body uses to move, remain alive and other such mundane natural nature's things.
Jame’s ‘nutshell’ definition is a misdirection. His science is right but his statement “Ki is merely…..,” offers no method or new information for enhancing actual karate performance. I see this as one man’s attempt to shoo the topic and others away from engaging it because it’s not familiar to him. If you fall for his charade you will miss vital information about the isshinryu art.
Reply · October 11 at 5:35p Victor Donald Smith
Victor Donald Smith Thank you Charles, that answers some questions I have about the book. I can’t see getting it, money has better uses at this time :-)
The real challenge for these men would be to prove that Ki does not exist as an actual particle/wave phenomenon or that my observations are invalid? Don't minimize my work by simply waving your hands with dismissive and static dictionary definitions, or offer personal opinion that science itself refutes. This subject is a complex one, which we professionals all need to engage in. I welcome all challenges to the ideas in my book. If you can’t connect to the subject in a tangible manner. I’m only a phone call away.
I’ve met far too many arrogant and white tower martial artists who don't want to dialog—just dismiss, distort, or control the information flow. It’s easy for some men to assume guardianship for information they do not grasp. I come from a very different teaching background that heartily contests such positions.
Those of you who are one the fence about all of the above, my advice for you is to keep your mind open, question, be ready to change, and most importantly, when speaking amongst your peers, dialog and challenge in a fair manner, and yes, expect rebuttal. We all grow through stronger through healthy exchange.
Reply · October 11 at 5:37pm Charles E. James
Charles E. James HI, Victor Donald Smith, don't get me wrong, it is entertaining and within he does makes some excellent points but if you wish to find something more concrete on Isshinryu or martial arts then it may not be one's cup of tea. As I indicated, its entertaining but as to worth the expense ... an individuals decision. 2.99 would be more appropriate for its words, length and content which upon more mindless meandering would be ....
I like what a colleague of mine recently wrote about Mr. Smith’s assayment of my book as, ‘entertaining’:
“Someone, somewhere said that the way they (referring to Smith and James) are trying to get rid of new-paradigm ideas these days is exactly this way: they are being pushed away into the "entertainment" category. It is actually a more effective killer than burning the author, as that would draw much more attention to the fact that something remarkable is going on here.”
I do agree with Mr. Smith that if you want to stick to the ‘same old game’ (my words, not his), there are better books out there that will keep you fixated. My book discusses what isn’t being seen or said. Of course, shame on me if I could have articulated better. I’ll do my best to write more clearly in the future.
October 11 at 5:40pM Charles E. James
Charles E. James Oh, and I have gone off on tangents myself in my blogging but you won't find me trying to make money off of it. I have a blog on the kenpo gokui as a philosophical work with a lot of Chinese and Japanese ancient tao type references as a teaching tool to connect with reality but as to karate applications and self-defense I kind of leave those writings separate except when it benefits the teachings reality. Mysticisms has its place and it ain't in reality. Yet, if it leads to reality and makes the journey fun then use it but make sure the reader and student understand the differences. It is way to easy to lead the student down the wrong path with stuff like this.
God forbid someone should be making money from their life work. I guess karate instructors should teach for free? Mr. James here is offering readers an opinion about what he deems reality and non-reality. If anyone is leading students down the wrong path, it will be someone telling you what is and what is not real. People need to determine that for themselves.
Trash talk Mysticism? Mystical practices, as an aside, have held major value in many cultures throughout the world. In just one example, esoteric Buddhism was conveyed for centuries in this manner. And there are many fine books on the subject.
Victor Smith: For instance, there was a really awesome martial artists who let himself be deluded to believe he could project his Ki, etc. only to be embarrassed when others would challenge him and his students, etc. It was a shame because it ruined his reputation in the end.
Mr. Smith’s point above is what? Beware, those of you who talk about subjects some professionals do not understand! Maybe that instructor was awesome because of his ki work. Plus, people get deluded for many reasons. Since the individual isn’t named or the specific facts leading to his downfall are not revealed, the above is merely innuendo. It’s a ‘beware of stepping outside of the box’ statement with no real value.
It’s easy to be duped in this world. As the Buddha urged, don't believe anything until you’ve experienced its truth or falsity for yourself. I didn’t believe or disbelieve in Ki for twenty-five years in my career. Honestly, I didn't really care about the subject. Then one day I decided to investigate. I’m now part of a growing group of professionals in multiple systems looking at a fascinating subject that has engaged long-term martial artists, scientists, and philosophers from around the world for centuries.
Mr. James and Mr. Smith’s comments misrepresent Rebel Isshinryu in the above thread with misleading opinions and false understandings that touches nothing substantive in the book. I invite them both to gain a better understanding of our research here. They are entitled to hold to their current paradigm, but if it involves public statements regarding my work, I will continue to be the rebel and challenge them with equal fervor and with a different perspective.
Readers must choose for yourself, which way they want to proceed. I merely point to some exciting alternatives.