Your vibe is oddly bitter and reeks of insecurity
sounds like someone needs to go in the water
Reblogging again because the art is spectacular. 10/10.

KIROKAZE
we're not kids anymore.
Game of Thrones Daily

shark vs the universe

Love Begins
Stranger Things
dirt enthusiast
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Peter Solarz
styofa doing anything

Kiana Khansmith

çĽćĽ / Permanent Vacation

JVL
art blog(derogatory)

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
h


Discoholic đŞŠ
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Netherlands
seen from Tunisia
seen from Germany
seen from Singapore

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Uzbekistan
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Ukraine

seen from Singapore
@segashark
Your vibe is oddly bitter and reeks of insecurity
sounds like someone needs to go in the water
Reblogging again because the art is spectacular. 10/10.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Your ancestors got there freedom. Also what do you deserve? You didnât have to live through slavery.
Compensating slavers for the slaves they lost and not compensating our ancestors for the many hundreds of years they lost while being slaves contribute massively to the wealth disparity we see in america today. For you to think freedom is all they deserve says everything I need to know about you.
So you wish to simply hand out money to those who have done nothing to earn or deserve it, their ancestors were the one who suffered not them. As well I donât believe these slave owners should have been paid but thatâs not anything I can do about that.
If you donât fight for all women, you fight for no women. âđżâđžâđ˝âđźâđť (đ¸: Kennedy Dickerson)
I love how itâs only women on both they donât give a shit about men.
Wow maybe thatâs because women have been oppressed by men for years. Notice how the United States just had the first woman vice president? The first one in 231 years. That means every single vice president the US has had has been a male.
No real feminist has ever said they donât care about men. But people have constantly been saying that they donât care about women for years.
Maybe you just havenât ever noticed because youâre blinded by all of your male privlage but when half of the planet has had to fight for their rights to vote, fight for their rights to have equal pay, has to deal with people constantly hating on them for being women, and have almost zero representation in the media or in politics or almost anything at all, THEN IT IS OKAY FOR THEM TO HOLD UP A FREAKING SIGN ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR FIGHT.
Stop begging to be oppressed because you have absolutely no idea of what it feels like.
You act like a female Vice President is some how an accomplishment, itâs totally not like women have held positions of power in government before. And yes no real feminist actually hates men but i doubt any of these star bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents mad lookinâ assholes comes close to fitting the definition of a real feminist.
Also what woman in a 1st world country has to remotely worry about being oppressed. Especially when farkhunda malikzada was beaten to death by a crowd in Afghanistan, tell me in a country like America or the young could they have gotten away with that? No because we live in a society that doesnât tolerate that no matter what. You say Iâm reaching to be oppressed when thatâs all modern western feminism is.
Okay youâre just wrong on so many levels.
A female Vice President is an accomplishment especially after over 200 years of there only being men in positions of power in America. Find how many women in positions of power there are compared to men. Its a SIGNIFICANTLY fewer amount.
I think youre also forgetting that not everyone is a feminist. So if these âstar bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents madâ people donât fit your definition of a âreal feministâ that doesnt mean that they hate or donât care about men.
Being a feminist is believing that women and men should be equal. Thats literally what feminism is so if they dont fit your definition of a âreal feministâ then oh well.
Youâre saying what do I have to be oppressed about? The first thing you said that I replied to was talking about how these women âdonât give a shit about menâ Where have they said they dont give a shit about men? Tell me? Oh yeah thats right, they didnât. Youâre begging to be oppressed when you say things like that because no one has ever said they donât care about men. I know there are people out there that have it worse than me but the difference between you and I is that I am acknowledging the fact that yes, there are people that have it worse than me. But you on the other hand think that because people are holding up a sign acknowledging their fight that that somehow means theyâre coming at you. Acknowledge the fact that there are people that have it worse than you so instead of shitting on the people that are trying to make things better and equal, maybe you should realize that men do have things easier than women and that is an issue.
Considering theyâre are entire hashtags of people saying kill all men or men are trash and many times these people are heavily tied to the feminism movement.
And if women were truly oppressed theyâd have NO position of power. Hell this conversation probably wouldnât be happening.
And sure as hell know people have it worse than me. And if wanna talk about women having it harder than men letâs bring up a few different things:
1) women receive shorter prison sentences for the same crime compared to men
2) men have much higher work place fatality rate.
3) majority of homeless people in the word are men.
Yeah compared to a good number of people Iâve got it easy but so does just about everyone in the modern world. Women are no different.
The people saying kill all men is in retaliation to men creating a hashtag for rape all women. Saying kill all men is a joke however it is not a joke when people say rape all women because it actually an issue that many women face today.
People that say that men are trash are saying it towards the men who are actually trash, men like you who believe that because people are finally realizing that women deserve to have the same rights as men that theyâre automatically shitting on men.
No not all men are trash the same way not all feminists believe men are trash. Hell, if you believe that men are trash youâre not a feminist at all because again its all about equality.
And remember when I said men like you are dying to be oppressed? This is an example of it, because you think that for these three reasons men automatically have it harder than women. Darling I could write a list a mile long about all of the struggles women go through and if your list of reasons is as short as your dick its going to be a very small fraction of my list. Stop thinking that because people are realizing that things should be equal that means that theyre shitting on men. There are so many things that women face that you probably donât even know about. So shut up and educate yourself.
You know for a fact that rape all women thing is a crock of shit, I scoured Twitter looking for anything relating to it and found most people shitting on instead of supporting it and many of these dated back to 2014.
So you some how know how every person thinks when they say men are trash? That not a single on of them are just shitting on men.
my list of things were just three things were simply off the top of my head, thereâs plenty of others such as college graduation rates, death rate in war, our mental health in general, etc and never said that because of these issue we have it worse than women, Iâm saying that we have our own problems that women donât face quite as often.
Listen man, Im done having this stupid argument with a dumbass misogynist like you but men saying to rape all women is a real thing and the difference between that and kill all men is that kill all men is a joke. Women have been being raped for so long and men treat it like its a joke. Have you actually ever heard of a woman killing a man with the specific intent of killing him because hes trash? No. But there are countless victims of rape and many men treat it like a joke when its not. Those men are what âmen are trashâ is directed to. No not all men are trash but people have bad experience with men who are.
And your pathetic list is nothing compared to the struggles of women. Maybe mens death rate in war is higher because it wasnât until 1948 that women were allowed to be in the military? Maybe men have a higher workplace fatality rate because more men work in workplaces because people believe that women should stay home. Maybe womenâs graduation rates are higher than menâs because they have more to lose and have to work hard for what they have.
Now lets talk about how there is still a wage gap in most companies. As of 2020, for every dollar a man earns a woman earns 81 cents.
Or would you like to talk about how on only 25 percent of the senate is women, 23 percent of the House are women, and on average worldwide only 24 of all national parliamentarians are female as of 2019
Oh maybe we could also talk about the pink tax which makes common household items more expensive for women then they are for men. For example shampoos, body wash, razors, and clothing cost more for women then they do for men and overall women pay more than men 42% of the time.
We can also talk about how men are more likely to receive higher salaries and raises than women in the same position and how women are less likely to get promoted then men.
Or maybe we can talk about how women spend more than twice the amount of money on medical bills on average that men do.
Did you know that 1 in 5 women will be raped in their life? I know people raping men is an issue too but compared to women is a much smaller amount of people.
Oh and youâre forgetting the most important part. All of these issues are caused by men and can be changed. We already know there are barely any women in positions of power and only 20% of CEOs in a company are women so the people raising the prices for women are primarily men. The reason for your arguments about how men have it âsooo much worseâ are not caused by women or even by men, theyâre caused by themselves. Are women the cause of menâs graduation rates? I donât think so considering that the only person responsible for someone not graduating is themselves or if they canât afford to finish it but even then, that wouldnât be the fault of women. Workplace fatality rates? Not womenâs fault either.
So now what we have established that women and men are not equal but now we also know that women do in fact have it harder than men. Yes men are not perfect but men like you certainly arenât making things better by thinking that youâre being hated on simply because two women are holding up a sign. No they did not include men because men have not had and gone through the same struggles they have. So instead of thinking that youre being hated on or that people donât care about you, why dont you try to help the people with actual struggles. Some people saying that they hate men isnt a struggle at all especially because people have been saying that to women for years.
Iâm done having this argument now so I just hope that reading this youâll have a change of heart or something and realize that these people could use your help.
You are full of such shit. If men hold as much power as you act like they do then none of the things I listed would be problems to begin with.
And when the fuck did I ever claim any of these issues are the fault of women? I said these are just issues men have to deal with, you straw man arguing shitter.
Despite what you might think men have been through shit as well, as much as women? Maybe Iâm not sure. But donât for a second act like weâre not struggle with major problems that your biased ass ignores.
If you donât fight for all women, you fight for no women. âđżâđžâđ˝âđźâđť (đ¸: Kennedy Dickerson)
I love how itâs only women on both they donât give a shit about men.
Wow maybe thatâs because women have been oppressed by men for years. Notice how the United States just had the first woman vice president? The first one in 231 years. That means every single vice president the US has had has been a male.
No real feminist has ever said they donât care about men. But people have constantly been saying that they donât care about women for years.
Maybe you just havenât ever noticed because youâre blinded by all of your male privlage but when half of the planet has had to fight for their rights to vote, fight for their rights to have equal pay, has to deal with people constantly hating on them for being women, and have almost zero representation in the media or in politics or almost anything at all, THEN IT IS OKAY FOR THEM TO HOLD UP A FREAKING SIGN ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR FIGHT.
Stop begging to be oppressed because you have absolutely no idea of what it feels like.
You act like a female Vice President is some how an accomplishment, itâs totally not like women have held positions of power in government before. And yes no real feminist actually hates men but i doubt any of these star bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents mad lookinâ assholes comes close to fitting the definition of a real feminist.
Also what woman in a 1st world country has to remotely worry about being oppressed. Especially when farkhunda malikzada was beaten to death by a crowd in Afghanistan, tell me in a country like America or the young could they have gotten away with that? No because we live in a society that doesnât tolerate that no matter what. You say Iâm reaching to be oppressed when thatâs all modern western feminism is.
Okay youâre just wrong on so many levels.
A female Vice President is an accomplishment especially after over 200 years of there only being men in positions of power in America. Find how many women in positions of power there are compared to men. Its a SIGNIFICANTLY fewer amount.
I think youre also forgetting that not everyone is a feminist. So if these âstar bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents madâ people donât fit your definition of a âreal feministâ that doesnt mean that they hate or donât care about men.
Being a feminist is believing that women and men should be equal. Thats literally what feminism is so if they dont fit your definition of a âreal feministâ then oh well.
Youâre saying what do I have to be oppressed about? The first thing you said that I replied to was talking about how these women âdonât give a shit about menâ Where have they said they dont give a shit about men? Tell me? Oh yeah thats right, they didnât. Youâre begging to be oppressed when you say things like that because no one has ever said they donât care about men. I know there are people out there that have it worse than me but the difference between you and I is that I am acknowledging the fact that yes, there are people that have it worse than me. But you on the other hand think that because people are holding up a sign acknowledging their fight that that somehow means theyâre coming at you. Acknowledge the fact that there are people that have it worse than you so instead of shitting on the people that are trying to make things better and equal, maybe you should realize that men do have things easier than women and that is an issue.
Considering theyâre are entire hashtags of people saying kill all men or men are trash and many times these people are heavily tied to the feminism movement.
And if women were truly oppressed theyâd have NO position of power. Hell this conversation probably wouldnât be happening.
And sure as hell know people have it worse than me. And if wanna talk about women having it harder than men letâs bring up a few different things:
1) women receive shorter prison sentences for the same crime compared to men
2) men have much higher work place fatality rate.
3) majority of homeless people in the word are men.
Yeah compared to a good number of people Iâve got it easy but so does just about everyone in the modern world. Women are no different.
The people saying kill all men is in retaliation to men creating a hashtag for rape all women. Saying kill all men is a joke however it is not a joke when people say rape all women because it actually an issue that many women face today.
People that say that men are trash are saying it towards the men who are actually trash, men like you who believe that because people are finally realizing that women deserve to have the same rights as men that theyâre automatically shitting on men.
No not all men are trash the same way not all feminists believe men are trash. Hell, if you believe that men are trash youâre not a feminist at all because again its all about equality.
And remember when I said men like you are dying to be oppressed? This is an example of it, because you think that for these three reasons men automatically have it harder than women. Darling I could write a list a mile long about all of the struggles women go through and if your list of reasons is as short as your dick its going to be a very small fraction of my list. Stop thinking that because people are realizing that things should be equal that means that theyre shitting on men. There are so many things that women face that you probably donât even know about. So shut up and educate yourself.
You know for a fact that rape all women thing is a crock of shit, I scoured Twitter looking for anything relating to it and found most people shitting on instead of supporting it and many of these dated back to 2014.
So you some how know how every person thinks when they say men are trash? That not a single on of them are just shitting on men.
my list of things were just three things were simply off the top of my head, thereâs plenty of others such as college graduation rates, death rate in war, our mental health in general, etc and never said that because of these issue we have it worse than women, Iâm saying that we have our own problems that women donât face quite as often.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
If you donât fight for all women, you fight for no women. âđżâđžâđ˝âđźâđť (đ¸: Kennedy Dickerson)
I love how itâs only women on both they donât give a shit about men.
Wow maybe thatâs because women have been oppressed by men for years. Notice how the United States just had the first woman vice president? The first one in 231 years. That means every single vice president the US has had has been a male.
No real feminist has ever said they donât care about men. But people have constantly been saying that they donât care about women for years.
Maybe you just havenât ever noticed because youâre blinded by all of your male privlage but when half of the planet has had to fight for their rights to vote, fight for their rights to have equal pay, has to deal with people constantly hating on them for being women, and have almost zero representation in the media or in politics or almost anything at all, THEN IT IS OKAY FOR THEM TO HOLD UP A FREAKING SIGN ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR FIGHT.
Stop begging to be oppressed because you have absolutely no idea of what it feels like.
You act like a female Vice President is some how an accomplishment, itâs totally not like women have held positions of power in government before. And yes no real feminist actually hates men but i doubt any of these star bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents mad lookinâ assholes comes close to fitting the definition of a real feminist.
Also what woman in a 1st world country has to remotely worry about being oppressed. Especially when farkhunda malikzada was beaten to death by a crowd in Afghanistan, tell me in a country like America or the young could they have gotten away with that? No because we live in a society that doesnât tolerate that no matter what. You say Iâm reaching to be oppressed when thatâs all modern western feminism is.
Okay youâre just wrong on so many levels.
A female Vice President is an accomplishment especially after over 200 years of there only being men in positions of power in America. Find how many women in positions of power there are compared to men. Its a SIGNIFICANTLY fewer amount.
I think youre also forgetting that not everyone is a feminist. So if these âstar bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents madâ people donât fit your definition of a âreal feministâ that doesnt mean that they hate or donât care about men.
Being a feminist is believing that women and men should be equal. Thats literally what feminism is so if they dont fit your definition of a âreal feministâ then oh well.
Youâre saying what do I have to be oppressed about? The first thing you said that I replied to was talking about how these women âdonât give a shit about menâ Where have they said they dont give a shit about men? Tell me? Oh yeah thats right, they didnât. Youâre begging to be oppressed when you say things like that because no one has ever said they donât care about men. I know there are people out there that have it worse than me but the difference between you and I is that I am acknowledging the fact that yes, there are people that have it worse than me. But you on the other hand think that because people are holding up a sign acknowledging their fight that that somehow means theyâre coming at you. Acknowledge the fact that there are people that have it worse than you so instead of shitting on the people that are trying to make things better and equal, maybe you should realize that men do have things easier than women and that is an issue.
Considering theyâre are entire hashtags of people saying kill all men or men are trash and many times these people are heavily tied to the feminism movement.
And if women were truly oppressed theyâd have NO position of power. Hell this conversation probably wouldnât be happening.
And sure as hell know people have it worse than me. And if wanna talk about women having it harder than men letâs bring up a few different things:
1) women receive shorter prison sentences for the same crime compared to men
2) men have much higher work place fatality rate.
3) majority of homeless people in the word are men.
Yeah compared to a good number of people Iâve got it easy but so does just about everyone in the modern world. Women are no different.
If you donât fight for all women, you fight for no women. âđżâđžâđ˝âđźâđť (đ¸: Kennedy Dickerson)
I love how itâs only women on both they donât give a shit about men.
Wow maybe thatâs because women have been oppressed by men for years. Notice how the United States just had the first woman vice president? The first one in 231 years. That means every single vice president the US has had has been a male.
No real feminist has ever said they donât care about men. But people have constantly been saying that they donât care about women for years.
Maybe you just havenât ever noticed because youâre blinded by all of your male privlage but when half of the planet has had to fight for their rights to vote, fight for their rights to have equal pay, has to deal with people constantly hating on them for being women, and have almost zero representation in the media or in politics or almost anything at all, THEN IT IS OKAY FOR THEM TO HOLD UP A FREAKING SIGN ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR FIGHT.
Stop begging to be oppressed because you have absolutely no idea of what it feels like.
You act like a female Vice President is some how an accomplishment, itâs totally not like women have held positions of power in government before. And yes no real feminist actually hates men but i doubt any of these star bucks sipping, red haired, got a lip ring at 16 to make my parents mad lookinâ assholes comes close to fitting the definition of a real feminist.
Also what woman in a 1st world country has to remotely worry about being oppressed. Especially when farkhunda malikzada was beaten to death by a crowd in Afghanistan, tell me in a country like America or the young could they have gotten away with that? No because we live in a society that doesnât tolerate that no matter what. You say Iâm reaching to be oppressed when thatâs all modern western feminism is.
So apparently somebody Decided to shit talk me and block me at the same time giving me no way to respond directly, you know Like a coward, so Iâm gonna respond here.
Yes I acknowledge that debit/ credit cards and other such things arenât luxury items any more but when have I ever said I donât think the minimum wage should be raised? You then kinda just ramble about a theoretical situation about me telling a misogynistic joke at work and getting upset about getting reprimanded.
And while I have made jokes like that itâs with friends who have a similar sense of humor not at work in front of professionals. Then you go on to bring up the sanitary pads thing for some reason? It was kinda just tacked on at the end. In the end it doesnât matter because you make no real point at all really you just ramble. @vermillionquinn
Nobody ever really talks about this, but in America (Canada is for intents and purposes America for this rant) a car, cellphone, and a credit card are not luxury items, theyâre things you need to possess to function as even a lower class citizen.
Yes the quality of our life has improved to the point where these items are easily available and have now become standard in life.
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
The âvery small amountâ is still a non-zero amount, you get that, right? If you had that much urine in your pants at a given time, that would still be a problem. Why do you think it only being a âlittleâ blood makes it okay?
Because blood is far less of a health risk than urine or feces due to the amount of bacteria in them. Blood has far less bacteria in it compared to urine.
Maybe fresh blood from the vein has less bacteria than urine, but period blood isnât fresh blood. Itâs uterine lining, vaginal and cervical secretions, and any kind of bacteria that the exterior of your vulva has on it. Menstrual blood also carries a risk of transmitting any STDs the woman might have, including HIV, which is definitely a health risk for anyone that could come into contact with it, which will happen if a woman doesnât have some form of containment like a tampon.
Yet this risk is rather small in comparison to the health risk of not having a bathroom. A tampon is not equivalent to an entire room of your house. There are also other was of disposing of this blood than a tampon.
Just because the risk is smaller doesnât mean there isnât a risk at all, and the original comparison to a bathroom was meant to illustrate that tampons serve a similar need, which is containing and disposing human waste. Your early comparison to a razor, which has no hygiene purposes and is purely aesthetic, is less appropriate than the comparison to a bathroom.
And yes, there are other menstrual hygiene products available, but that doesnât negate that tampons and pads are the most accessible. Most women that menstruate are going to use a tampon (or pad) because itâs necessary for womenâs health to contain our period blood and keep it off of our clothes, chairs, etc.
I am not arguing that there is no risk I am arguing that comparing a tampon, an object women use a few days out of the month. Is not equivalent to a bathroom, a place we use daily. On top of this yes a razor is used for hygiene purposes especially in the food industry. Many places restaurants (fast food at the very least) have a no heavy facial hair policy meaning you have to shave.
Iâm not saying you said that, Iâm saying there is a risk and it shouldnât be ignored because itâs âsmallerâ than another similar risk. Learn how to read. Also, an employer having a no-facial-hair policy is not the same as a beard innately posing a health risk. For all your talk of false equivalence, it seems like you donât even know what that means.
Your original point was that tampons are luxury items because âyou donât need them to survive.â That is demonstrably wrong, because women do need tampons (or comparable menstrual hygiene products, since you pointed out there are other ways of disposing blood than tampons while you were moving the goalposts,) to avoid exposing themselves and the people around them to the biohazard that is menstrual blood.
Menstrual hygiene products are not luxury items. They are necessary for womenâs health and survival.
They hardly are especially when such things as toilet paper and things of that sort are easily just as effective. And even if no access to them their is little risk not enough to consider tampons a necessity. 10-80ml less than two shot glasses of blood is released. This blood is not a danger to anyone. And beards (when left ungroomed) area health ob the same level as period blood because of its risk in getting into food and the bacteria it contains.
Quick question, Segashark: Are you male?
This has no relevance in the topic at hand.
Yes it does, and that answer means yes you are. Itâs super easy to just say âput some toilet paper up there, itâs not so badâ when youâve never menstruated and never will. This conversation is going nowhere, and nobody but you thinks the way you do. I hope for the sake of all women everywhere that you never get married or have a daughter.
And I ALSO hope you learn how to clean your face and hair, apparently, since you think a beard is as unhygienic as menstrual blood. Fucking wow, man.
Oh I love it, whenever I bring up a good point it always comes down to âyouâre not x so you donât get to have an opinion on thisâ itâs such an unbelievably bad point. And you say that no one thinks like me as if you know the thoughts of everyone in the world.
To your point about my facial hair I shave regularly and itâs a fact that most menâs facial hair contains more bacteria then that of dog hair. Hereâs a source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30062526/
Oh and I know you tried to sneak it in the tags like a rat but yes I am autistic, using it like an insult hardly makes you look good.
⢠Bearded men harbour significantly more microbes than dogs. ⢠Dogs are no risk to humans if they use the same MRI. ⢠Deficits in hospital h

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
The âvery small amountâ is still a non-zero amount, you get that, right? If you had that much urine in your pants at a given time, that would still be a problem. Why do you think it only being a âlittleâ blood makes it okay?
Because blood is far less of a health risk than urine or feces due to the amount of bacteria in them. Blood has far less bacteria in it compared to urine.
Maybe fresh blood from the vein has less bacteria than urine, but period blood isnât fresh blood. Itâs uterine lining, vaginal and cervical secretions, and any kind of bacteria that the exterior of your vulva has on it. Menstrual blood also carries a risk of transmitting any STDs the woman might have, including HIV, which is definitely a health risk for anyone that could come into contact with it, which will happen if a woman doesnât have some form of containment like a tampon.
Yet this risk is rather small in comparison to the health risk of not having a bathroom. A tampon is not equivalent to an entire room of your house. There are also other was of disposing of this blood than a tampon.
Just because the risk is smaller doesnât mean there isnât a risk at all, and the original comparison to a bathroom was meant to illustrate that tampons serve a similar need, which is containing and disposing human waste. Your early comparison to a razor, which has no hygiene purposes and is purely aesthetic, is less appropriate than the comparison to a bathroom.
And yes, there are other menstrual hygiene products available, but that doesnât negate that tampons and pads are the most accessible. Most women that menstruate are going to use a tampon (or pad) because itâs necessary for womenâs health to contain our period blood and keep it off of our clothes, chairs, etc.
I am not arguing that there is no risk I am arguing that comparing a tampon, an object women use a few days out of the month. Is not equivalent to a bathroom, a place we use daily. On top of this yes a razor is used for hygiene purposes especially in the food industry. Many places restaurants (fast food at the very least) have a no heavy facial hair policy meaning you have to shave.
Iâm not saying you said that, Iâm saying there is a risk and it shouldnât be ignored because itâs âsmallerâ than another similar risk. Learn how to read. Also, an employer having a no-facial-hair policy is not the same as a beard innately posing a health risk. For all your talk of false equivalence, it seems like you donât even know what that means.
Your original point was that tampons are luxury items because âyou donât need them to survive.â That is demonstrably wrong, because women do need tampons (or comparable menstrual hygiene products, since you pointed out there are other ways of disposing blood than tampons while you were moving the goalposts,) to avoid exposing themselves and the people around them to the biohazard that is menstrual blood.
Menstrual hygiene products are not luxury items. They are necessary for womenâs health and survival.
They hardly are especially when such things as toilet paper and things of that sort are easily just as effective. And even if no access to them their is little risk not enough to consider tampons a necessity. 10-80ml less than two shot glasses of blood is released. This blood is not a danger to anyone. And beards (when left ungroomed) area health ob the same level as period blood because of its risk in getting into food and the bacteria it contains.
Quick question, Segashark: Are you male?
This has no relevance in the topic at hand.
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
The âvery small amountâ is still a non-zero amount, you get that, right? If you had that much urine in your pants at a given time, that would still be a problem. Why do you think it only being a âlittleâ blood makes it okay?
Because blood is far less of a health risk than urine or feces due to the amount of bacteria in them. Blood has far less bacteria in it compared to urine.
Maybe fresh blood from the vein has less bacteria than urine, but period blood isnât fresh blood. Itâs uterine lining, vaginal and cervical secretions, and any kind of bacteria that the exterior of your vulva has on it. Menstrual blood also carries a risk of transmitting any STDs the woman might have, including HIV, which is definitely a health risk for anyone that could come into contact with it, which will happen if a woman doesnât have some form of containment like a tampon.
Yet this risk is rather small in comparison to the health risk of not having a bathroom. A tampon is not equivalent to an entire room of your house. There are also other was of disposing of this blood than a tampon.
Just because the risk is smaller doesnât mean there isnât a risk at all, and the original comparison to a bathroom was meant to illustrate that tampons serve a similar need, which is containing and disposing human waste. Your early comparison to a razor, which has no hygiene purposes and is purely aesthetic, is less appropriate than the comparison to a bathroom.
And yes, there are other menstrual hygiene products available, but that doesnât negate that tampons and pads are the most accessible. Most women that menstruate are going to use a tampon (or pad) because itâs necessary for womenâs health to contain our period blood and keep it off of our clothes, chairs, etc.
I am not arguing that there is no risk I am arguing that comparing a tampon, an object women use a few days out of the month. Is not equivalent to a bathroom, a place we use daily. On top of this yes a razor is used for hygiene purposes especially in the food industry. Many places restaurants (fast food at the very least) have a no heavy facial hair policy meaning you have to shave.
Iâm not saying you said that, Iâm saying there is a risk and it shouldnât be ignored because itâs âsmallerâ than another similar risk. Learn how to read. Also, an employer having a no-facial-hair policy is not the same as a beard innately posing a health risk. For all your talk of false equivalence, it seems like you donât even know what that means.
Your original point was that tampons are luxury items because âyou donât need them to survive.â That is demonstrably wrong, because women do need tampons (or comparable menstrual hygiene products, since you pointed out there are other ways of disposing blood than tampons while you were moving the goalposts,) to avoid exposing themselves and the people around them to the biohazard that is menstrual blood.
Menstrual hygiene products are not luxury items. They are necessary for womenâs health and survival.
They hardly are especially when such things as toilet paper and things of that sort are easily just as effective. And even if no access to them their is little risk not enough to consider tampons a necessity. 10-80ml less than two shot glasses of blood is released. This blood is not a danger to anyone. And beards (when left ungroomed) area health ob the same level as period blood because of its risk in getting into food and the bacteria it contains.
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
The âvery small amountâ is still a non-zero amount, you get that, right? If you had that much urine in your pants at a given time, that would still be a problem. Why do you think it only being a âlittleâ blood makes it okay?
Because blood is far less of a health risk than urine or feces due to the amount of bacteria in them. Blood has far less bacteria in it compared to urine.
Maybe fresh blood from the vein has less bacteria than urine, but period blood isnât fresh blood. Itâs uterine lining, vaginal and cervical secretions, and any kind of bacteria that the exterior of your vulva has on it. Menstrual blood also carries a risk of transmitting any STDs the woman might have, including HIV, which is definitely a health risk for anyone that could come into contact with it, which will happen if a woman doesnât have some form of containment like a tampon.
Yet this risk is rather small in comparison to the health risk of not having a bathroom. A tampon is not equivalent to an entire room of your house. There are also other was of disposing of this blood than a tampon.
Just because the risk is smaller doesnât mean there isnât a risk at all, and the original comparison to a bathroom was meant to illustrate that tampons serve a similar need, which is containing and disposing human waste. Your early comparison to a razor, which has no hygiene purposes and is purely aesthetic, is less appropriate than the comparison to a bathroom.
And yes, there are other menstrual hygiene products available, but that doesnât negate that tampons and pads are the most accessible. Most women that menstruate are going to use a tampon (or pad) because itâs necessary for womenâs health to contain our period blood and keep it off of our clothes, chairs, etc.
I am not arguing that there is no risk I am arguing that comparing a tampon, an object women use a few days out of the month. Is not equivalent to a bathroom, a place we use daily. On top of this yes a razor is used for hygiene purposes especially in the food industry. Many places restaurants (fast food at the very least) have a no heavy facial hair policy meaning you have to shave.
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
The âvery small amountâ is still a non-zero amount, you get that, right? If you had that much urine in your pants at a given time, that would still be a problem. Why do you think it only being a âlittleâ blood makes it okay?
Because blood is far less of a health risk than urine or feces due to the amount of bacteria in them. Blood has far less bacteria in it compared to urine.
Maybe fresh blood from the vein has less bacteria than urine, but period blood isnât fresh blood. Itâs uterine lining, vaginal and cervical secretions, and any kind of bacteria that the exterior of your vulva has on it. Menstrual blood also carries a risk of transmitting any STDs the woman might have, including HIV, which is definitely a health risk for anyone that could come into contact with it, which will happen if a woman doesnât have some form of containment like a tampon.
Yet this risk is rather small in comparison to the health risk of not having a bathroom. A tampon is not equivalent to an entire room of your house. There are also other was of disposing of this blood than a tampon.
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
The âvery small amountâ is still a non-zero amount, you get that, right? If you had that much urine in your pants at a given time, that would still be a problem. Why do you think it only being a âlittleâ blood makes it okay?
Because blood is far less of a health risk than urine or feces due to the amount of bacteria in them. Blood has far less bacteria in it compared to urine.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
There luxury items for the same reason razors are, you donât need them to survive.
Then why are bathrooms considered a right? Technically you can survive because you can pee on the floor. Why should it be different than bleeding through your clothes and all over everything like chairs and the floor.
Ignoring how this is a false equivalence itâs Because bathrooms are something that is needed to survive. It is place where you can safely relieve bodily waste and clean yourself, without cleaning oneself your health is out at major risk. Tampons serve a similar roll but it is a roll that isnât as high as a priority for ones health.
But like if you didnât have a bathroom you could per on the floor just like how if you donât have feminine hygiene products you bleed on the floor. Whatâs the difference?
As I stated the higene issues the bathroom resolves are intergral the survival. Again though this is a massive false equivalence.
How are they integral to survival? Please just explain it, I donât understand.
Discarding of human waste (something we produce everyday) is integral to keeping our homes, businesses and selves clean and as such keeping us from spreading diseases. Showering is also important as it is the best way of cleaning our skin and hair removing any dirt filth and dead cells. Tampon, while serving a similar roll, are not as important to keeping us clean and are used far less.
And how is preventing yourself from dumping literal liters of your blood onto your chair not discarding human waste? If you did that every day for a week, wouldnât it be just as dirty?
A human female only expel 10-80 ml of blood during their period which is very much less the feces or urine.
You are aware the blood expelled during a period, which canât be held in, is still a waste product, right? Even if itâs âless,â having any waste in your clothes is as much of a biohazard as having pee or poop in there. If using the bathroom is integral for survival so you arenât in contact with waste, then so is some form of menstrual hygiene product. I donât understand why you seem to think this is a false equivalence. What makes this a false equivalence??
As I stated above a humane female expels a very small amount of blood where as the amounts of urine and feces is much greater. including the fact that a bathroom includes a shower which is used to clean our skin of bacteria, dirt, and other types of filth which we use every day not just a few days out of the month, itâs easy to see this as a false equivalence. Tampons are not essential to our survival just like razors which is why they are both considered luxury items.
Purple.
Green