sashene

Before diving into the nuances of all of this, there is the elephant in the room to address, and the origin of most Catholic!Jason headcanons to begin with: in the Flashpoint universe, Jason is canonically a priest, as shown in Flashpoint: The World of Flashpoint. The very little information we are given about him is as follows, paraphrased from his own words: he was a bad kid who ran with the wrong crowd and stole to pay for a drug habit, eventually getting mixed into an apocalypse cult run by Brother Blood. This made him see the world as a terrible place, and he eventually died, but was given a second chance and was taken in by the Church, seemingly leading to him joining the Holy Order. There’s a lot to unpack with that, and a lot of missing information. We have the stereotypical worst interpretation of Jason’s childhood and who he would become as a result of it, a doomsday cult we have next to no information about, and somehow, an implied Jesus metaphor all in one page. Because comics are weird. 

For the sake of simplicity, I won’t focus on the metatextual narrative and how Flashpoint did strange things with characters simply for the sake of subversion and transgression and why the idea of Jason becoming a priest was likely not a good faith exploration of his character but rather a shock value cameo. Instead, we’re going to take this plot at face value for what it is: Jason was in a vulnerable state of drug addiction that drove him to commit crime, which led to him being indoctrinated into a cult, dying, and getting taken in by the Church and eventually joining the Holy Order. It’s notable that Jason specifies he was taken in, not that he chose the Church on his own, which already removes a layer of agency. Furthermore, he enters religion already in a state of vulnerability and lacking agency, because he is a cult victim. As a member of a cult, Jason would’ve been subjected to cult tactics of mind control, intimidation, groupthink, and social isolation. (look into the BITE model for more information on how cults systematically maintain control over their members) And at some point, being in this cult led to his death. 

While the Catholic Church is not a cult, it upholds its own hierarchical power structure that looks and feels similar. There is rigidity and specific behavioral expectations and requirements of belief. Seeking religion after leaving a cult is often done by victims as a way to seek out community, structure, and purpose that they lack without the cult defining their life. Jason going as far as becoming a priest means his life would be subjected even more to the rules and routines of the Church. Because of this, the most logical assumption to make is that Jason became a priest as a trauma response to coping with attempting to build his own life after cult brainwashing. He was taken in and conformed to the new community that was supporting him to survive, and assimilated to its power structures because of the comfort of familiarity. And because New Earth Jason at no point is indoctrinated in a cult, this circumstance cannot be replicated in the main timeline, nor used to make assumptions about New Earth Jason’s religious values. (It could be argued that the control Bruce exerts over the Robins, particularly Jason, replicates cult-like mentalities, but given this isn’t an intended canon reading and does not intentionally replicate the BITE model, we’ll breeze by it.) Especially when nothing in any other canon indicates any religious beliefs for Jason. For these reasons, I won’t be considering Flashpoint!Jason further in this analysis. 

Which brings us to headcanoning of a main timeline Jason as Catholic. I can only speak to what I’ve observed in the fandom when it comes to the common points used in this headcanon. I am not using any specific person or post as an example, and instead painting broad strokes about fandom trends. Largely, the interest in making Jason Catholic comes from the aesthetics of Catholicism looking pretty on Jason, as any headcanon seeks to be pretty and esoteric. But more important to our discussion is the secondary interest: the idea of subverting Catholicism and, by extension, the pacifism of Catholicism/Christianity in a character like Jason. The issue in this attempted subversion is that it’s largely done by non-Catholics, with a lack of understanding of how Catholicism works both as a religion and as a culture in the USAmerican context. Which, ironically, ends up making most attempts of a Catholic!Jason read as incredibly Evangelical, ending up as almost an antithesis of Catholicism. 

There is a supposed romantic idea to the thought of a Catholic!Jason being a “soldier of God” with a mission of salvation and divine violence. The issue is, the imagery evoked here may sound similar to the Catholic Crusades, but that is not reflective of modern-day Catholicism, which tends to renounce the Crusades. And even then, this isn’t really in alignment with the theology of the Crusades, which primarily sought to conquer, not to enact justice. The idea of a holy war being waged by soldiers of God is an incredibly Evangelical mindset, particularly by televangelists who profit by fearmongering off the idea that Christians are under attack and need to defend their religion. The ideas used in Catholic!Jason headcanon don’t sound similar to this televangelist narrative at first, but they share the same root: the idea of weaponizing religious faith against those who are acting outside of the doctrine of said faith. In this headcanon, where Jason is acting on his morals through a religious veneer, it is implied that the people he is taking down are sinners, and he is the soldier of God sent to punish them. It’s a fantasy of holy wars dressed in aesthetic language, replicating Evangelical persecution mindsets. It takes away Jason’s own moral and logical -and sometimes emotional- reasoning for targeting the people that he does to replace it with a “divine purpose”. Not only does this remove a layer of agency in Jason (which we’ll circle back to), but it paints the idea that he is right because of his religion and the reason these people are immoral is because of the religious doctrine he follows, not an ethical code he has created himself to abide by.

In addition to this “holy war” imagery is the imagery of “biblically accurate angels”. (Which, there is the general understanding of what this term means aesthetically, but theologically speaking, there is no such thing as a “biblically accurate angel”. All biblical descriptions of angels are humanoid. See: Genesis 18-19, Daniel 7, Isaiah 6. The only tradition with angels looking inhumane is Orthodoxy, not Catholicism. That is not what “be not afraid” meant. But I am digressing.) The idea of Jason specifically being the image of an angel, something inhumane and fearful, that fights.  While Catholics do have a stronger presence of angelic veneration and belief than Protestants, Catholic angels are far more pacifistic, as they are venerated as guardians. The idea of unsettling angels with complex roles again, leans more Orthodox, not Catholic. The slight thing that this mindset does get right about Catholicism is the idea of the intermediary; whereas Protestants tend to view God as being the one to enact his will, Catholicism lends itself to the idea of things like angels being sent down to God’s bidding. But the idea of this being a violent crusade is intensely Evangelical. Evangelicalism loves the idea of Old Testament wrath, and the thought that they can call upon the Lord to smite their enemies. A wrathful, angry, violent God is the God that Evangelicals like to worship because again, they believe they are consistently under attack. And yes, it’s understandable that when we strip all the religious nuance from it, it’s a pretty picture to paint, the idea of Jason being something unsettling and inhumane, especially with how well this imagery melds with him “coming back wrong” or being “changed” by the Lazarus Pit, which are also common headcanons/beliefs about his character. But the issue lies in calling this Catholic imagery, and using it to desperately cling to the idea of a Catholic!Jason, when it doesn’t align with Catholicism. 

Another thing Evangelicism enjoys is rapture theology, which ties into the “judgment day” imagery used in these headcanons. That Jason is bringing about divine judgment for the evil sinners of Gotham (or, for Bruce) when he returns, and that he has the ability to judge who is good and bad and enact punishment. It’s a small scale, psuedo-rapture for crime on Gotham. In Catholicism, the idea of good and bad is far less black and white. Beyond Catholics outright not believing in the rapture or judgment day, they also don’t believe in a strict “punishment/reward” system. The entire purpose of Purgatory in Catholicism -which isn’t present in other denominations- is that there is moral grey to actions and not everyone can be judged in this righteous way. Sins can be prayed away and atoned for, which directly clashes with the mindset being used in this headcanon, because it clashes with Jason’s ethics as a person. It's not so much that Jason doesn't believe in redemption, but rather that he judges actions as a reflection of a person and does not believe in forgiveness from the victim, which is something Catholicism holds at a high value, forgiveness and atonement as a rinse-repeat cycle with sinning. Jason is individualistic, and so is Evangelicalism. Evangelicalism makes its followers feel special, unique, and empowered to speak on behalf of God, something that isn’t present in the Holy Order of Catholicism, which requires God to be interpreted through the clergy. To make Jason’s faith individualistic and something he is in control of the nuances, in which he bends faith and scripture to his own personal beliefs puts him at odds with Catholicism. And to try to make this work and explain a theology he could have under his moral code, the romanticized violence of Evangelism is again evoked. Particularly the idea of scripture above the authority of the Church. If certain Bible quotes can be pulled out of context to support a holy war, then this is the correct path of God, as according to Protestants. Meanwhile, Catholicism has the clergy and papacy specifically to avoid any one person attempting to twist the words of the Bible to support whatever moral code a person has. (I am stressing that I am trying to remain neutral as possible as to which of these is “more correct” when engaging with Christianity. That is not the point of this essay. This is a neutral commentary on how Catholic theology does and doesn’t work. Form your own opinions on religion, don’t base them off a meta about a comic book character, I am begging you.)

So then, if we’ve covered the bases of why the most common elements of Catholic!Jason headcanons aren’t rooted in Catholicism, instead just a vaguely “Catholic-core” aesthetic that instead romanticizes Evangelicalism, then what does American Catholicism look like? And is it compatible with Jason’s ethics and morals? The answer? Shocking to no one, it’s complicated. 

American Catholicism, as both a culture and a religion, broadly follows the following ideals:

Catholic Guilt: “Original Sin” is, most simply, the theological belief that all humans are born with the sin that Adam and Eve committed by eating the apple in the garden. It means that we are born sinners. And while Catholicism is not the only branch to believe in this concept, it is most prominent in Catholicism. (hence Catholics believing in things like the Immaculate Conception. The Mother of God cannot be born with sin, so she must be Immaculate from birth.) In a cultural way, this means Catholics are raised to believe we are always guilty of something. We will always be sinning, and we will always be apologizing to God for these sins. It’s a rinse and repeat cycle, where the weight of sin hangs over your head to force you to be a good person. And even then, you’re probably not being good enough. Sin, atone, and repeat the cycle. Hence the need for Penance/Confession. Most American Catholics tend to joke that they’re bad Catholics. 

Catholic Judgment: If you’re born a sinner, then everyone else is too. In the same way Catholics are convinced they’re a bad person, the de facto assumption is: at least everyone else is a bad person too. There’s a quiet, whispered judgment to Catholic culture. The only person who can judge a Catholic more than themselves (and God) is another Catholic. Anything out of the norm will earn a judging stare. It’s not necessarily a superiority complex, but it is a complex of judgment. This complex is especially strong in the case of when others brag about being a good person. Catholics believe actions speak over words, and if you have to constantly tell everyone you’re a good Christian instead of letting God decide, then you’re prideful and the worst type of sinner. Which ties into the sanctimony in Catholicism. As long as you don’t say it, you can act better than everyone else, and certainly think you’re better than everyone else. (especially non-Catholics lmao) 

Catholic Charity/Suffering: One of the most important things to Catholicism is charity. Especially charity when you yourself are already within poverty. This is why those in the clergy take oaths of poverty. Though the churches look flashy, the people within them are expected to live lowly and give to others any excess. (or: give to the Church) It is a good thing to give your happiness away. To suffer is to make you more Catholic. It earns your way to Heaven. God gives you a hard life to teach you lessons and to make you a better person. There isn’t much belief that God will reward you in this life like there is in Evangelicalism. Instead, you are grateful for what you already have, and you give anyway. Your life should be in service, and you are never the least fortunate person. (Catholic charities make up a disproportionate percentage of charity work in America for this reason, but the exact numbers are hard to gauge because the Church does like to... fudge the odds in their favor.)

 The Holy Order: As previously mentioned, there is a lack of individualism in Catholicism because there is instead, emphasis on the Holy Order. You have priests and bishops and cardinals and of course, the pope, there to tell you what God means. There isn’t much personal control over religion, you need a priest (or higher) for the Sacraments, you need to be told what to believe, etc. The Church is the highest power, second only to God. 

Forgiveness/Piety: No matter how bad of an action you do, it can be forgiven. So long as you are reverent of God and begging for his forgiveness, your actions speak little for who you are. Anything can be prayed away with a few decades of the rosary, and a couple of charitable acts. Catholicism deeply values redemption, so long as it is before God. Catholics like to lament to God, to beg for his help and his forgiveness and they usually assume they’re granted it, so long as they beg and worship enough.

Intercession/Veneration: A big thing Protestants like to accuse Catholics of is “worshipping saints”. The actual term here is veneration. There is a high importance placed on saints in the Catholic Church, and they’re venerated as holy figures who are beside God in Heaven. While they’re not worshipped in their own sense, they are often prayed to. These are prayers of intercession; asking a saint to pray to God on your behalf. Some Catholics honor saints more than others, but it’s a unique factor of Catholicism in comparison to Protestantism, to view people as holy and capable of miracles. Saints are oftentimes viewed as a more human connection, and as a way to reach Divinity through a person who is holier than you.

There are of course other qualities, no religion can be boiled down neatly, but these are the main ones of interest here as we transition into talking about the core tenets of Jason’s character and where these qualities conflict with him. This is not meant to be an all-encompassing list of Jason’s key traits (again, only viewed from a Post-Crisis lens to better narrow the playing field but I think most of these can apply to a well-written Jason on the whole) but rather notable traits that are relevant to the conversation. 

As a quick aside before we address these nuances though, I do want to mention that some Catholic headcanoning for Jason is specifically headcanoning him as a cradle Catholic. (meaning: He was born and raised into Catholicism through a Catholic parent.) The reason I don’t see this as much of a talking point is because firstly, a religion someone is born into doesn’t reflect what they choose as an adult, and this essay primarily discusses Catholic!Jason as a religion he actively chooses to practice/identify with. And secondly, given Jason’s history, neither of his parents were present enough in his life to impress a strong religion onto Jason, even if we can assume they practiced one. (Catherine’s headstone had an angel on it, so she was likely Christian of some sort.) Willis was in prison, and Catherine was suffering health issues by the time Jason would’ve been old enough to notice and take in religious values. Furthermore, if Catherine was devoutly religious, specifically Catholic, I believe Jason watching his mother slowly die even as she was praying/attending mass would only distance him from religion, not incline him to follow it. And Bruce raised none of the “Batkids” with religion. So in my opinion, whatever religion Jason was raised with, if he was raised with any, would have little reflection on his religious identity as an adult.

Firstly, whenever a Catholic!Jason is brought up, the biggest thing discussed is murder, as Jason’s lethal morality is a defining characteristic. However, the ethics of his murder are where we lose the vision that is often had with the Catholic!Jason headcanon. Even if we strip the above nuance for a moment and approach this through the idea of Jason using Catholicism as a divine mission of violence, this doesn’t mesh well with how and why Jason does murder. 

Murder for Jason is largely an action of praxis, not a larger mission that would be comparable to Bruce’s mission as Batman. Meaning: Jason is not prioritizing the idea of hunting down bad people to the point that it is his end goal, to constantly hunt and find terrible people, but rather he is killing them as he comes across them. When Jason does commit murder for the sake of killing someone as a function of removing a bad person from the world, it tends to be a person he organically comes across. He is not actively hunting criminals, in a Batman-but-lethal-esque style. The main time we see Jason going out of his way to kill people is Lost Days, in which his primary goal is to better himself as a weapon in preparation for his return to Gotham. 

Most of Jason’s murders are functional. They serve his current goal, such as him killing drug dealers in part because they are bad people, but largely because they’re in his way. Even with an example such as Brothers In Blood, Jason’s choice to seek out bad people and kill them serves a goal of getting Dick’s attention above all else, hence doing it in a Nightwing suit. Jason does have a clear goal in Under the Red Hood outside of his confrontation with Bruce, one that’s a harm reduction-style controlling of crime in Gotham. Which does not involve him going out and killing every bad person, but rather calling them to heel. This is all to say: the “divine crusader” imagery of going out and targeting sinners with lethal justice is a moral code that does not align with Jason, even if it did align with Catholicism. Jason does not want to live a life where he is targeting and killing “sinners”, and his ideal worldview tends to be one without violence. He doesn’t take joy in killing people or have this idea that he is doing a divine right by the world in his actions, he simply is removing obstacles in his path, or taking out bad people as he comes across them. Jason doesn’t place this high, moral or spiritual importance on murder. He views it as an objective fact of justice sometimes, but he isn’t intending to be a divine missionary as murder, which this Catholic!Jason headcanon often places him as. 

Though, while Jason does not love murdering as some kind of hobby, he also certainly doesn’t feel remorse for it. Which brings us to another angle often presented in this headcanon: assigning Jason with “Catholic guilt” over his sins, the primary “sin” of which being his murder. Often there is imagery of Jason with bloody fists and a bowed head asking for forgiveness for what he’s done. It feels very akin to Marvel’s Daredevil character, in how certain popular scenes involve Daredevil asking for forgiveness for violence he’s about to enact, or expressing guilt over enjoying being Daredevil. These scenes work for Daredevil because he’s a deeply Catholic character, but on Jason, they’re misaligned. Attempting to push a religious morality onto Jason he canonically never expresses is at best, just an OOC headcanon, but at worst, forcefully centering American Christian values onto a character. It implies Jason should feel bad for his murders, or that deep down, he must feel bad for them because to be a murderer is not Christ-like of him. Jason is not guilty about killing, no matter how many fan headcanons want to try to put him in a position where he might be, such as ideas where he kills the wrong person or is Catholic. That is not to say there are absolutely no actions of Jason’s that he might feel guilty for, and in some world where he’s religious, expresses penance over. But these actions Jason could or does regret are not actions reflective of his moral character. Strict Catholic morals just don’t overlay well onto Jason and the only way they can is by forcing a character-breaking guilt complex onto him. 

Ultimately, Jason’s moral codes and actions reflect an end-goal of control, not moral sanctity. Jason may try to convince others to see his perspective and agree with him about murder or how to reduce crime, but he’s not grandstanding on a moral soapbox. Jason is not trying to project a holy, reverent importance on his actions. He’s fully aware the way he does things is often messy and  not pretty. He understands the cost of  collateral damage more than the fandom seems to acknowledge. The ends justifying the means is often highlighted in Jason’s actions as well as how he explains his justifications. Meaning, Church-like ideas of a perfect and sanctimonious mission do not work with Jason. He doesn’t want to achieve something morally enlightened such as the eradication of crime, because he’s aware that isn’t feasible within Gotham, or most anywhere else. What he wants to achieve is harm reduction and control of crime. The black and whiteness of Christian mindsets, where actions are either objectively good or objectively bad, fails to work here. And further fails to work under specifically Catholicism, which values sanctity and obsessively perfect ritual. 

Jason is a character of many things, but primarily: he is a character of self determination and a rejection of hierarchical positions of power. He does not submit to those above him, he does not follow orders on how or why he should do certain things. His moral code is self-defined, as are his actions. Clearly, this would put him at conflict with the Catholic Church, an as-before-mentioned incredibly hierarchal and rigid power structure. But further, it even puts him at odds with the concept of God. A God that Jason would have to submit to, follow the rules of, and be beholden to is not a God Jason could ever follow. Because in essence: it replaces one dominating and controlling figure in Jason’s life with another. Jason rejects the control Batman attempts to put on his life and his morality, so why would he embrace the control of God? Making Jason Catholic in headcanon often subjects him, ironically, to the very thing he is confronting about in Bruce. Someone telling him what to do and who to be and how to fight crime. Even going back to Jason’s Robin days, he is consistently at odds with Bruce’s opinions on what should be done about crime. (see: the Felipe issue) Jason does not take well to being a blind follower. The entire purpose of his Red Hood arc is to challenge the indomitable control Batman holds over the “rules” of how to do superheroics. He challenges Bruce’s despotnature, and would do the same to any religion, if he was raised within one. It’s in his nature to question and to push back against the ideas of pacifism, love thy neighbor, and forgiveness. As was the whole point in the Batman-Joker confrontation. 

Building off of the last point, while Jason opposes Batman specifically, he opposes the status quo entirely and exists to disrupt it. This is why he “targets” people like Mia Dearden, who have no direct relation to Batman; because he’s trying to break others out of the cycle he was in. The closest Jason ever came to proselytizing in a religious way wasn’t him actually trying to get Mia to agree with him and share his morals, it was to get her to question the system she exists within. Jason is trying to break cycles. In a way, he’s opposing a doctrine that could be compared to religion: the doctrine of superheroes and sidekicks and how they’re considered an unquestionable “commandment” of saving the world, that the sidekick is obedient to the hero and takes on the hero’s ethical codes. While a Catholic!Jason is often claimed in a counterculture “Catholicism as an aesthetic not a religion” way, assigning him such a rigid religious framework ironically becomes antithetical to his character in this way. Because it takes a character whose existence is about challenging status quos and subjects him to a massive status quo: organized religion. It inserts Jason into a comfortable cultural norm, being a part of one of the most popular and “default” religions in America, just for the sake of aesthetics, which flattens the most interesting thing about him. 

So, if we’re going to focus just on aesthetics and not Catholic doctrine, can we find a middle ground? With folk Catholicism, possibly. Folk Catholicism does a blend of aesthetics and community that seems to appeal to what people find so intriguing about this headcanon.

For the sake of this discussion, the rough definition of folk Catholicism is: the blending of cultural/regional/local beliefs with Catholicism. It syncretizes Catholicism with the folklore/folk magic/folk practices of the people of the region it exists in, making it highly variable from region to region. Simply put: it is Catholicism of the people, not the Church, which brings into question if it’s “actually Catholic” or not. I do not have a neat answer for that, I think it is both Catholic and it isn’t. Every practitioner will be different. But some key features of folk Catholicism worth noting are:

Disinterest in the Church/not following the doctrine of the Church. No member of the clergy, from priest to pope, holds any real power over what folk Catholics do or believe. They care about their personal experiences and cultural norms first. More importantly, they care about the needs of the people, and the faith bends to fit those needs.

Syncretic practices (ie: blending of Catholicism with beliefs of the people that are not Catholic. This can be “pagan” or polytheistic beliefs, or folk magic beliefs.) from the people practicing. This makes folk Catholicism place an importance on community, ancestor work, and culture. Hence why every iteration of it is so different. Santeria (Afro-Caribbean) does not look like Benedicaria (Italian) which does not look like Candomble(Afro-Brazilian), etc. There is often ritual work that looks like witchcraft, but doesn’t necessarily fall under that label. 

Saints hold even more focus and reverence in folk Catholicism, going from veneration to actual worship, with altars and ritual work surrounding saints. The ritual work isn’t always positive, saint punishing is its own complicated (and debated) topic, but the most important facet of saints is the reverence put on the divine feminine. Mother Mary is the most prominent example, but there’s also figures like Santa Muerta, Mary Magdalene, and Joan of Arc given more time and space in folk Catholicism. Because again, this is a practice of the people that is filling in the gaps left by the Church, it carves out more of a space for women, especially when it comes to themes of motherhood. 

If I were to personally write a folk Catholic!Jason, given my experience, certain elements I’d attempt to highlight on that manage to find a healthy balance between Jason and this religious experience would be:

Charity & Mutual Aid: applying Jason’s harm reduction mentality to crime as a way of protecting a community is one of the best ways to highlight Jason’s moral positions. Folk Catholicism is just that, a religion of the folk. It’s incredibly communal, and not something that exists sitting alone in a quiet, dusty church. There are of course, many headcanons about Jason protecting sex workers, protecting kids from drugs, and protecting the disenfranchised. (With most of these headcanons having a basis in canon to begin with) Putting Jason in a position where if he has a folk Catholic-esque faith, he focuses that faith on helping others and building stronger communities in Gotham is a way to focus this headcanon on Jason’s kindness, not his violence. 

Subjugated Women: as mentioned in the above, Jason has a canonical history with respecting and protecting marginalized women, particularly sex workers and victims of sexual violence. One of the biggest ways folk Catholicism differs from the Catholic Church is its reverence of women. Female saints, madonnas, and martyrs are beloved by the community. Many folk Catholics often put Mother Mary above God, seeing her as the most important holy figure in their worship. This could be particularly interesting to see in Jason, someone who has canonically longed for maternal love and had a complicated history with it. If Jason is going to worship any Catholic figure, it’s going to be a loving mother, not a God off in the sky. That is where he would find comfort in religion, if he had to be religious in the first place. 

Gospel of Mary Magdalene: This is where I get a little rhapsodical on the topic, but I think if Jason were to be interested in religion, he would apply his interest in academia to religion. He wouldn’t take a Church doctrine blindly, and would want to engage with all religious texts, canonical and non-canonical to develop his own opinions, leading him to apocryphal gospels, like Mary Magdalene’s. Again, a woman who has been subjugated and a strong feminine presence. Jason just is a respecter of women constantly, I deeply am of the belief if he were folk Catholic, he’d relate strongly to her Gospel and would be a Mary Magdalene devotee. This is admittedly more personal headcanon than anything else, but I think it’s worth noting since it ties neatly into Jason’s history with women. (Also this Gospel presents the idea there is no sin, it is mankind who makes sin in man-made doctrines, thus rejecting the idea of people being born with the Original Sin, which I think Jason would fuck with. But I digress.)

Rejection of the Church: this point is a simple one and self explanatory: while it’s interesting to headcanon Jason believing in certain religious ideals, it’s almost always incompatible to make him exist within the Church. And since folk Catholicism is likewise in its rejection of Holy Order, there is an alignment that could be had. 

Action Over Belief: Orthodoxy (the word itself, not the branch of Christianity) loosely means “correct belief”, while Orthopraxy is “correct action”. Almost all Christian denominations are orthodoxic, meaning they value what a person believes over what a person does. This is where atonement and forgiveness come into play; as long as someone believes in God “correctly”, it doesn’t matter what they’ve done. This obviously does not align with how Jason views people’s beliefs, in that he wholly believes people should be judged based on their actions. Because folk Catholicism blends with local non-Christian religions, it oftentimes leans more orthopraxic, in which emphasis is placed not on having the exact correct “beliefs” but rather on doing the right things. This mindset better clicks with Jason, in which less rigidity and value is placed on believing exactly what the Church says. So long as the worship and the intent is there, there is religion to be found, usually in doing good for yourself and others which as touched on above, aligns with Jason’s harm reduction. 

Guilt: If Catholic guilt has to be assigned to Jason, there are other places to insert it that don’t disrupt his moral character. It makes the most sense for Jason to feel guilty about those whom he has failed to protect. In a way, that’s what fuels Red Hood. When he was Robin, he repeatedly saw how Bruce’s moral framework failed victims and protected criminals. Jason existed alongside Bruce and aided in these actions. Which is not his fault, given his was a child lacking autonomy, but it’s clear he expresses guilt and upset when a victim is hurt and he can’t stop it. If I have to imagine Jason bowing his head and praying for forgiveness, the best way to place such an image is here: in which he’s praying over those he couldn’t save, not those he killed.  Himself included.

Born With Sin: There is a pervasive idea, both in fandom and current canon, that Jason was “born wrong”. He was the bad seed, the angry Robin, etc and so on. And since Catholicism believes in Original Sin, it seems those two things align a bit too well. Obviously, Jason wasn’t born wrong, and he’d likely reject the thought of anyone being born a sinner. Again, rejecting Catholic doctrine. But, the idea of rebirth and redefining oneself outside of who they were before is important to Catholicism and Christianity as a whole, that anyone can change. That mindset is intriguing to place on Jason, as the rebirth ideal can be applied to Robin being reborn as Red Hood. Jason can pick and choose which parts of doctrine to follow, if he’s folk Catholic, and find comfort in reinventing himself while not being beholden to his supposed “sins”. (again, tying in the apocrypha of Mary Magdalene’s views on sin which I totally had a point in bringing up that wasn’t just self-serving lol)

Now, even with all of the above, it’s clear there’s still gaps and awkward leaps of logic that have to be made to even slightly make Jason work as a Catholic. A very specific framework of Catholicism has to be applied to him, whole chunks of religious doctrine have to be ignored, and an understanding of Catholicism that goes beyond surface-level aesthetics needs to be applied. I don’t think Jason needs to be or should be Catholic, based on who he is in canon. The concept is flawed from birth. I included sections on folk Catholicism not as a way to proselytize what I think should be written, but to try to find reasonable middle ground with fans who hold this headcanon without looking like a complete and utter buzzkill who’s just thinking too hard about a headcanon that, admittedly, is mostly for the vibes. 

Because, to be clear, I do not believe whatsoever that Catholicism can be “appropriated” by these sorts of headcanons. There is no harm being caused to the most influential religion in the world by some fans of a comic book character gutting it for aesthetics without understanding its culture or doctrine. With the rise in  tradCatholic converts (ie: those not raised in Catholicism converting to the religion because of their interest in its supposed conservatism, rigid rules, and rejection of modern reformation) there’s a new push in people insisting that certain things are “disrespectful” to Catholicism and God as a whole, like sexy nun outfits or the “improper use of a rosary” tag on archive of our own. Simply put: you cannot oppress the oppressor. The large-scale harm Catholicism has done to indigenous communities and marginalized peoples are in no world equitable to someone “aestheticizing” Catholicism for character headcanons or religious kink porn. In fact, I think more people should get into Catholicism strictly for the aesthetics just to piss off tradCaths.