sayitasitis

For, as Eliade writes, “If we observe the general attitude of archaic humanity, one fact strikes us with particular force: neither the objects of the external world nor human actions possess any intrinsic or autonomous value. An object or an act acquires value—and thus becomes real—only insofar as it participates, in one way or another, in a reality that transcends it.”

Although certain values have been forgotten, and even denied, Eliade maintains that they remain indestructible constants, for they spring from archetypes whose necessity does not diminish with the passage of time. They may be distorted, reshaped, or—as the discoveries of depth psychology, to which Eliade himself frequently appeals, suggest—repressed deep within the unconscious of individuals and societies alike, where they contribute to the formation of the collective unconscious.

The achievement of the Greeks, therefore, lies not so much in creating unique literary texts as in devising a writing system capable of preserving oral poetry with remarkable fluency and completeness.

Homer's Odyssey is one of the works that entered the cultural code of Europe and the Balkans. It is among the most influential literary creations in history and has endured for more than three millennia.

At first glance—especially in simplified school editions—the Odyssey may appear to be little more than an adventure story. However, reading the complete text reveals an entirely different impression. It is a Jungian exploration of character, a mythology of dreams and imagination, and at the same time a profound psychological study of human nature.

All of us wander in search of our own home. The Odyssey is ultimately a story of nostos—the return home—but also of suffering, longing, fidelity, cunning, and revenge. Odysseus is an archetype in whom many recognize themselves: a human being struggling against the gods, against daimon (fate), against personal weaknesses, and at times against moral failure and the loss of self-confidence. Yet the true meaning of archē and ethos—the beginning and the end—lies in learning how to conquer oneself.

The Odyssey is an epic that profoundly influenced the birth of literature itself—the emergence of literary fiction. Its legacy shaped the works of Virgil, Aristotle, Plato, Dante, and James Joyce. Odysseus remains one of the foundational figures of Western civilization. Courage, resilience, intellectual cunning, and the readiness to confront adversity are among the defining qualities embodied in this timeless epic.

The female characters in the Odyssey play a far more significant role in the fabric of Homer's narrative than those in the Iliad.

Each of these women embodies a distinct aspect of femininity in the ancient world: Penelope represents unwavering fidelity; Athena, supreme wisdom and rationality; Nausicaa, youthful grace and innocence; Circe and Calypso, seductive power and transformation; Arete, political wisdom and dignity. Alongside them stand Helen, an inherently ambivalent figure, and Clytemnestra, whose actions represent the darker possibilities of female agency.

Most of these women rely on intelligence rather than physical power, for they possess little direct authority—except, of course, the goddesses and enchantresses. Penelope occupies a unique position. Forced to defend her household against relentless suitors, she must preserve her family and kingdom while her husband remains imprisoned for years on distant islands by Circe and Calypso.

And where does Helen fit into all of this?

Helen is the archetype of femininity itself: from fatal beauty to domestic wisdom. She becomes the catalyst for war, death, and destruction, yet despite everything, she ultimately returns to Menelaus. Is she merely a beautiful shell, or a self-aware woman? Within ancient mythology she belongs far more to the realm of mythic beauty than to the feminist interpretations of contemporary anthropology. She is an ambivalent figure who attempts to move beyond the destiny assigned to her, only to return to the place where myth ultimately restores her. She is not the true cause of the conflict, but rather its occasion; her beauty serves as the spark, not the underlying reason.

A comprehensive analysis of all the characters in the Odyssey and the Iliad would require a study of its own. The essential point is that Helen became the very embodiment of the ancient Greek ideal of beauty—the "golden Helen," as myths and epics often portray her. She established a standard that would resonate throughout Western culture.