can people still join the discord server?
of course!

roma★
trying on a metaphor
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
AnasAbdin
d e v o n
Cosmic Funnies
styofa doing anything
noise dept.

Origami Around

shark vs the universe
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JVL
todays bird

if i look back, i am lost

@theartofmadeline

NASA
Stranger Things

Discoholic 🪩

Kiana Khansmith

seen from Maldives

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Jamaica
seen from India

seen from United States

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@safe-kin-network
can people still join the discord server?
of course!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
interested? read about us here!
please note: we do not intend by any means to imply that fictives or fictional introjects are ‘equivalent’ or the same as fictionkin! the network is open to them as well in an attempt to be inclusive, not to offend anyone.
in the meantime, i’ve updated all relevant pages and posts to make sure our wording is more inclusive & does not imply that kin & fictives are equivalent, and am working on replacing the initial image so it’s less offensive!
hey! i have DID and i just wanted to let you know that its kind of .. not great to include fictional introjects (fictives) in your kin server. fictives aren't kin, theyre a product of mental illness. its a bit offensive.
i appreciate you writing in! this is something i’m uncertain of because i came to the decision to include that in the kin server because of another friend i have who has DID & is a system; the decision was made in accordance with xyr opinions on the matter, but at the same time, i understand that it isn’t right to consider that one person can speak for an entire group.
i didn’t mean to imply that fictives were synonymous with fictionkin at all – but as the group is also open to coping kin who are kin because of mental illness as well, it made no sense to me to exclude fictional introjects, who are in a similar (but not at all exact!!) situation. one of the two founders of this network is entirely coping kin and not spiritual kin, and to exclude anyone, part of a system or not, who is or identifies as a fictional character just because they’re mentally ill doesn’t seem right to me.
as i don’t have DID myself (although i was tentatively diagnosed with it as a child, but am not currently a system of any sort and no longer consider the diagnosis appropriate), i would prefer to defer to those directly affected by this on the matter; if anyone could weigh in, i’d very much appreciate it!
what course of action would you suggest the network take? (keeping in mind that i refuse to kick out or disallow coping kin just because they’re a product of mental illness - i don’t mean to sound rude by reiterating this, but just to make clear that i won’t pursue that avenue!) is there a way that things could be worded or phrased differently while being more sensitive to this issue, or is the only solution to bar fictives from the group entirely?