I am a Disabled transmasc. My social security amounts to ~$1,000/month. Living on that is Hard.
So if anyone ever wants to toss me money to help me out
Cash App: $EnfysAlina Venmo: @EnfysAlina
Ko-Fi Buy Me A Coffee
The Bright Sessions
Game of Thrones Daily
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

titsay
Fieri Frames
The Bowery Presents
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Color Me Curious
Sade Olutola

roma★
h
untitled
noise dept.

Product Placement
Not today Justin

if i look back, i am lost
hello vonnie

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Philippines
seen from Vietnam
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Pakistan
seen from United Kingdom
@ruinedrainbowpooka
I am a Disabled transmasc. My social security amounts to ~$1,000/month. Living on that is Hard.
So if anyone ever wants to toss me money to help me out
Cash App: $EnfysAlina Venmo: @EnfysAlina
Ko-Fi Buy Me A Coffee

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
why be radically exclusionary abt queerness when you could be radically inclusionary instead. let's inflate the numbers. let's become the majority. the sky's the limit
"we can't let just ANYONE call themselves queer!!" what are you talking about. I'm steepling my fingers and gleefully cackling every time we Get Another One and you should be too. lock in.
Fuck yeah, let's make this little raft we're surviving on big as hell. If I bring my bit of driftwood and you bring yours and we let as many people join in as want to, we might end up with a functional boat.
I heard someone say 'queer is that which accepts queerness' a few weeks ago and I've been thinking about it ever since.
Back when I was active on AVEN (I have no idea what it's like now), we had two definitions of asexual -- an external definition and an internal definition. The external definition, the one that's on the wiki and the press material and that everyone uses when talking about asexuality, was of course "an asexual is someone who does not experience sexual attraction". The internal definition, the one we kept in mind when talking to each other, was "an asexual is someone who calls themself asexual".
The reason for this was very simple and very practical. In the very early AVEN and immediately pre-AVEN days, back before my time when the disparate ace communities were first finding each other and creating a public online network, there was a fair lot of exclusionist discourse. There are a lot of ways to be asexual, and the early community of course fell prey to the usual infighting about whether someone with a libido counts as asexual, whether someone who chooses to have sex can be asexual (usual tiring Purity Brigade Bullshit), whether someone without a libido counts as asexual (after all, if you have no sex drive, are you sure it's a matter of sexual orientation?), whether ace people count as lgbtq, all the usual nonsense. This worked out the way it pretty much always does -- the inclusionists "win", because exclusionists always break off into smaller and smaller communities so the largest group is, of course, the one where all different kinds of people stick together and welcome each other. And that was AVEN.
And when you're trying to have a strong community and somebody shows up at the gates saying, "hi, I think I'm asexual", it's a fucking horrible idea to start doubting their credentials. They saw the public definition and started calling themselves asexual; they're here, and now they're under the internal definition. An asexual is somebody who calls themself asexual. Sometimes, these people would be frustrated allosexuals, or people choosing to swear off sex, who might not fit the external definition of the term. We made sure that everyone knew the external definition, and there were always conversations about asexuality and how it affected our lives, if they asked us directly what we thought then we'd say "only you can know for sure" and then give our thoughts on the matter for as long as they asked for them, and other than that it wasn't anyone else's fucking business or anyone's place to judge. If people weren't nasty and didn't create problems, they could stay and call themselves whatever they wanted.
Many of these people who didn't fit the strict definition eventually left after receiving support and discovering more about themselves. Some stopped IDing as ace but became allies to the community. Some people who came in with the most "I'm a heterosexual girl who is angry at my boyfriend" intro posts you've ever seen in your life discovered that they were in fact ace and that the messages that society had taught them about sex and romance were simply not for them -- these are people who, in a gatekept community, would have been incorrectly ousted immediately.
And then there were people -- a LOT of people -- who found themselves in grey areas. People who said "okay, this community makes sense to me and is useful to me and I have so much in common with a lot of you, but not EXACTLY like you. However, what I experience may not be the strict default definition but it's an awful lot like these other members on the forum." And they formed sub-communities. The grey aces. The demisexuals. The aromantics and greyromantics. Through these dialogues, between subgroups who in a more exclusionary community would be arguing about who the "real" asexuals are and splintering off into their own communities away from all those stupid cishet fakers, we developed language to describe our similarities and differences. The sexual/romantic/aesthetic attraction model came out of these dialogues and it became so massively important to our understanding of asexuality that basically everyone in the ace/aro community describes themselves by it, as do a large number of people outside the community. The community made massive leaps ahead in just a decade or two by, well, being a community. By being a place where anybody who called the place home, and didn't bully other people in the home, was right. By being somewhere where anybody who saw "asexual: someone who doesn't experience sexual attraction" and thought "that sounds like a term with some use for me" was allowed to use it.
An asexual is somebody who does not experience sexual attraction.
An asexual is somebody who calls themselves asexual.
These definitions are not in conflict -- they are both, in concert, fundamentally necessary for a safe and vibrant community where we can protect, support, and learn about each other and ourselves.
And that is absolutely not exclusive to asexual communities.
My favorite SW-battle ever!
I think this ship (spaceship) is really funny
Mammal in a Sunday Dress, by Georgina M. Cox, 2026
Mammal in a Sunday Dress explores the uneasy relationship between femininity, civilisation, and the animal body. At first glance, the figure appears modest and withdrawn. Her posture is composed, her gaze seemingly lowered towards her bare feet, recalling the conventions of nineteenth-century portraiture where women were often depicted as passive objects of observation. Yet as the viewer moves closer, the illusion collapses. Her eyes are not lowered at all. She is looking directly back. The delayed eye contact transforms the encounter. The viewer approaches believing they are safely observing a woman; instead, they realise they have been observed themselves. The work refuses the traditional power dynamic of portraiture, denying the comfort of anonymous spectatorship. Looking becomes a reciprocal act. For Cox, the painting considers humanity's persistent desire to separate itself from the rest of the animal kingdom. The title quietly undermines this distinction. A "mammal" is not another creature—it is us. The Sunday dress, rich with cultural associations of femininity, morality, and respectability, becomes an attempt to distinguish ourselves from nature. Yet clothing cannot alter biology. Beneath lace and ritual remains the same vulnerable animal body. The work also reflects on the historical relationship between women and nature. Across art, religion, and philosophy, women have repeatedly been positioned as closer to instinct, emotion, reproduction, and the body itself, while men have been aligned with reason, culture, and civilisation. Mammal in a Sunday Dress does not reject this comparison. Instead, it questions why proximity to nature has so often been treated as something lesser. Chiaroscuro isolates the figure within darkness, allowing the luminous dress to symbolise the performance of civilisation while the bare feet quietly return the body to the earth. Neither is presented as more truthful than the other. The painting exists in the tension between performance and instinct, refinement and biology. Mammal in a Sunday Dress ultimately asks a simple but unsettling question: if every layer of culture were stripped away, what would remain? Not a king. Not a saint. Not a gentleman or a lady. Only another mammal, looking back.
source

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i. hope you guys know that when i Like your comment and don’t respond its not that i Wanr you to explode its just that i don’t have anything to say and Yet love you so much still 👍
if i were a respected british actor with any principles at all i would simply not agree to a project whose earnings will have material consequences for trans people but maybe i'm built differently
another one bites the dust
God damn it
some hyper famous artists like Van Gogh transcend overratedness and become underrated because they're so normalized. Like I'll look at a van Gogh and I'm like wait this really is amazing you guys don't get it
I'm still shocked by how many of our close friends decided on the first option. Were they faking their friendship for years? if they thought so poorly of us, why be our friends in the first place?
“kindness radicalized me teehee!!! anyways here’s all the groups of people I think should die”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i’ve started looking at weight and health the way i look at class and income and it really puts a lot of things into a new perspective.
let me explain: in america at least, the lower class have significantly worse health outcomes, even when accounting for other factors. just being poor is enough to make your overall health worse. we don’t know that being fat makes your health directly worse, like the data just isn’t there, but for a moment, pretend it does.
imagine going to the doctor with a health problem and the doctor looking at your chart and saying well, this problem will be less severe if you go up an income bracket. have you thought about becoming rich? it would really help. start by saving a little money every month.
ridiculous, right?? very few people successfully go from working class to rich, it just doesn’t happen on a large scale in society. maybe for a time you pick up some overtime hours, spend a little beyond your means, and appear rich. but eventually you burn out, your car needs to be repaired, and you return to being working class.
we do have this data: only some people can successfully lose large amounts of weight, and only a tiny fraction of people who lose that weight actually keep it off for more than a year. telling people to lose weight for their health is just absurd because they almost certainly can’t do it any more than they can double their income for their health.
and yet i see it everywhere. a little poster in my work breakroom tells me to improve my blood pressure by losing weight! a psa on the radio says you need to take care of your heart by losing weight! we can’t even conclusively prove that weight is the cause rather than just correlated with a lot of these problems but here it is offered anyway: have you tried being rich?
You hit the nail on the head. A lot of people tend to try and invalidate fatphobia as a form of oppression by saying its not an immutible quality like race or sexuality or gender. The old “you can lose weight, i can’t become white/straight/cis” argument.
That’s because fatphobia is a lot more like classism; i.e. it’s a form of bigotry that is only TECHNICALLY changeable. They’re both seen as a lot more changeable than they actually are, for all the reasons you’ve listed.
If it was really about health, shouldn’t y'all be concerned about chronic pain, chronic illness, disability, medication side effects, hormonal disorders, eating disorders, poverty & food deserts, the crash dieting industry, and all the other shit that sometimes makes us fat instead of just pretending to be worried about how lazy and overindulgent you assume we must all be?
Texts From Superheroes
Facebook | Threads | Patreon | Instagram | BlueSky
Not gods, just people from another planet 💙

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
German trailer for The Thing (1982).
A detail I never see people talk about in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine 6x19 "In the Pale Moonlight" is that Grathon Tolar (the guy Ben Sisko hires to make the fake recording of Weyoun plotting against Romulus) initially thinks that Sisko wants to commission some bespoke porn.
This is not just some random artist he found on the Space Internet, mind you. Tolar was on death row in a Klingon prison, and Sisko somehow convinced Chancellor Gowron to pardon him, even though he wouldn't have been able to specify the *reason* he wanted this particular death row inmate pardoned.
And Tolar's first thought, when he meets the man who saved his life (with an extremely non-trivial feat of international diplomacy), is that he did it because he really really wants some very specific pornography custom-made to his specifications and is willing to call in no-questions-asked favors from a foreign head of state in order to get it.
Idk, that's just kinda fascinating to me. Have people gone to similar lengths to commission porn from Tolar before? If not, why is that his assumption? It raises some very weird questions about the porn industry in the Star Trek universe.
The way that I interpret it is that Garak just picked a specific guy he knew (well, both knew AND disliked) who also 1. was already in trouble (I assume Garak knows plenty of people who are in hot water with various Federation allies at any given time lol), and 2. had experience in an adjacent field (bespoke porn holoprograms), rather than seeking out someone with a particular expertise in these kind of forgeries.
Like, maybe Garak is scrolling through list of upcoming Klingon executions (regular daily activity for him because old enemies of his end up on there not infrequently—but now he’s looking with slightly more intent) and he sees Grathon Tolar on there and is like “ohhh yeah, that guy! I absolutely hate that guy! 🥰💕 hmmm, wonder if I can use him for this scheme… 🤔”, then checks his CV on the dark web LinkedIn and learns that he can make holoporn involving 5-6 partners (that’s what Tolar offers Sisko), and Garak considers this and is like “okay yeah we would need a scene with a handful of people in it, he should be able to handle that 👍”
the porn industry in the Star Trek universe
Trek circa 1967: pornography doesn't exist any more because humanity has evolved beyond the need for that sort of thing, the same way we stopped having nuclear wars
Trek circa 1995: OF COURSE these is porn! It's holographic! And deeply personalized! In fact there's a whole industry of
Idk, I think '67 Trek was a pretty horny show for its time. I've seen every episode, and I don't remember it ever implying that porn wasn't a thing anymore. I'd be surprised if it did. Is there something specific you're thinking of?