2020
Holy fuck I was cringe back in high school. Guess I’ll check in again in another 5 years.Â
we're not kids anymore.

Love Begins
Cosimo Galluzzi
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Three Goblin Art
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Xuebing Du
Misplaced Lens Cap
dirt enthusiast

blake kathryn
AnasAbdin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
taylor price

tannertan36
almost home
Peter Solarz
will byers stan first human second
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Croatia

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland
@risingfalling
2020
Holy fuck I was cringe back in high school. Guess I’ll check in again in another 5 years.Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
False rape accusations are an anomaly.
True rape accusations are a norm.
You’re, quite literally, more likely to be killed by a comet than falsely accused of rape.
Re-blog now, read later.
“Because 1 in 33 men will be raped in his lifetime, men are 82,000x more likely to be raped than falsely accused of rape. It seems many of us would do well to pay more attention to how rape culture affects us all than be paranoid about false accusers.”
No one has ever been killed by a comet, so they’re literally saying that false accusations do not exist. That women are incapable of lying, pretty sexist wouldn’t you say?
Buzzfeed is not a reliable source.
One important thing to remember, regardless of the all-over-the-place stats on false accusations, everyone seems to completely forget about the most common form.
Most life destroying false accusations were not made to the police, they were just rumours, reported to the media (especially when made about celebrities) and the subject of gossip. My sister and I have known so many men whose lives were torn apart by false accusations of rape, paedophilia and domestic abuse, a few of which resulted in them committing suicide. I’ve talked about a few of them on here, just one of them was reported to the police. The rest merely had to say the word and the man in question was beaten to a pulp, fired, abandoned by his partner and disowned by his family. Based, quite literally, on a woman’s word.
fixt
Yeah I’ll contribute.
Repeal all federal and state gun legislation (as every word of it is unconstitutional) and fold the ATF into a very small department at the FBI which investigates legitimate interstate arms trafficking, illicit explosives usage, major arson, etc.Â
Well at least do it right
Borrasca
by reddit user The_Dalek_Emperor
I originally posted this story in my Top 10 Creepy Stories of Summer 2015 but I figured this story deserves it’s own post. It’s one of the most highly rated stories on reddit and has only been around for a month. It’s a series and although it’s long, it’s a total mindfuck. Simply, putting it on my list messed many of you up. These are the messages I received:Â
I completely agree, after I finished reading this story, I was WRECKED.Â
HUGE trigger warning for sexual abuse.Â
Keep reading
The creators of the Pringles Packaging had his ashes stored in a Pringles can after he died.
Stood by his product till the very end.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hey male side of tumblr, are you scared / impressed,by a woman who says she is feminist, what are your first thoughts, if a girl tells this ?
Labels tell me nothing. I’m not scared or impressed or even remotely interested in the label itself. What I want to know is what a person believes. What behaviors they engage in based on those beliefs. Say you look at a bird and someone asks you what the bird is and you say you don’t know. Then they tell you it’s a brown-throated thrush. All well and good, you know the name. But do you know the diet? The migratory patterns? Their calls? No. You still have to observe that to know it. And by then the label becomes apparently arbitrary. “Brown-throated thrush” is just what we call it in English. You can learn the name in every language and still know nothing about the bird.
As far as I’m concerned, when someone claims they are a feminist (as with any label - be it Christian, Communist, etc.) all they are doing is opening up a dialogue. Then I am compelled to ask them questions and argue with them to determine what they really believe. Doing this with many so-called feminists has given me the understanding that when you speak to enough of them, the label again becomes arbitrary. Even fundamental beliefs sometimes vary.
However, this arbitrary labeling has been used to form a nebulous movement that is difficult to target with criticism as a whole. The only absolutely fundamental value that is present in all feminsts and even many non-feminists is gynocetrism. In the name of such an -ism, the motive of protecting and providing for those bearing a uterus has lead to some abysmal things being done. Copious amounts of false information being spread around, much of it even on a legal level rooted in feminism as a recognized movement.
Therefore, when someone, especially a woman, points out that she is a feminist, I am wary of her as I would be with anyone doing the verbal equivalent of tapping their name tag like it was supposed to tell me everything I need to know. It’s likely she is ignorant, uninformed, or outright malicious and is using the label as a sort of shield to hide behind, allowing her to act without critical thinking but still promote a movement that seeks to serve her benefit.
god, this hurts. words mean things. words mean things! i don’t know why antifems/antiSJs/”critical thinkers” like this ray of sunshine like to write paragraphs on paragraphs about how words are just arbitrary grunts that mean nothing. do us all a favor and stop talking if you’re so fucking against words!!
look, i couldn’t honestly pick a brown-throated thrush out of a lineup. BUT, if you say “hey, that’s a brown-throated thrush” i can at least assume the bird has a brown fucking throat. and if i have a ten-second wikipedia skim’s worth of knowledge of what other birds-we-call-thrushes look and act like, i can make reasonable assumptions about the physiology and behavior of the bird you are pointing at. because you used words to describe it, and words mean things!
feminism primarily focuses on the needs of women. some feminists use the presence of certain reproductive organs to define womanhood. others use the self-determination of a person’s identifying as a woman or not. and this difference in opinion continues all the way down to inconsistencies between individuals - not because feminism is necessarily an incoherent category, but because people are inherently unique and everyone disagrees with someone on something at some point. so sarah’s feminism might look very different from susan’s feminism.
you know what else? this bird and this bird are both pigeons. but they look so different, you say! but they share certain characteristics (herbivorous diet, a small pointed beak, certain breeding habits, genetic similarities, etc) we group in the category of “pigeon-ness”, so they are both fucking pigeons, you asshole, i say.
words mean things. oh my god.
(if you respond please note i am not a woman but consider myself feminism-aligned)
god, this hurts. words mean things. words mean things! i don’t know why antifems/antiSJs/”critical thinkers” like this ray of sunshine like to write paragraphs on paragraphs about how words are just arbitrary grunts that mean nothing. do us all a favor and stop talking if you’re so fucking against words!!
I didn’t say words don’t have meaning, so you can put the strawman down. I said labels don’t really tell me what I need to know. They don’t actually do what we typically think they do. Why would I be against my primary form of communication? And see there, what you’ve done? You’ve tried to label me as anti-whatever, yet you don’t know what I identify as. And why do you complain about me writing paragraphs then turn around and do the same thing? Did you even think this through before hitting the reblog button?
look, i couldn’t honestly pick a brown-throated thrush out of a lineup. BUT, if you say “hey, that’s a brown-throated thrush” i can at least assume the bird has a brown fucking throat. and if i have a ten-second wikipedia skim’s worth of knowledge of what other birds-we-call-thrushes look and act like, i can make reasonable assumptions about the physiology and behavior of the bird you are pointing at. because you used words to describe it, and words mean things!
As stated above, I never argued that words don’t have meanings. You’re deliberately misrepresenting my argument to make it easier to argue with. But notice how you said you couldn’t pick one bird out from the other, and would still have to look into what the thing is and does despite knowing it’s label? That’s what I said. That’s exactly my point. Labels, at best, prompt dialogue or scrutiny. But they don’t actually tell you anything about the thing itself. That’s the difference between knowing something and merely knowing the name of something. You wouldn’t know what the thing is by its name alone, so you have to look into it. Words have meanings, certainly. And labels can have definitions but definitions are just more words with meanings. It should also be noted that humans are fallible and that things change. And those meanings can be different from person to person. So this is how a bare-bones dialogue between a feminist and non-feminist may go:
A - “I am a feminist.” B - “What is a feminist?” A - “A feminist is someone who believes in equality between men and women.” B - “What is equality?” A - “Equality? You know, like how women don’t have as many rights as men.” B - “What are rights?” Etc. etc. etc.
This conversation could go on at length, but you see how person B has to get down what the feminist means with the words he or she uses before he can even begin talking about the particular issues? How one defines equality, rights, and even feminism changes from individual to individual. The label itself is rendered all but nearly if not entirely irrelevant, because where labels are supposed to provide consistency in what they represent, “feminist” lacks that consistency. Even brown-throated thrushes don’t always behave consistently, but much more consistently than feminists. The difference being one identifies a species and the other identifies someone involved in a social movement, so my analogy ends there, of course.Â
feminism primarily focuses on the needs of women. some feminists use the presence of certain reproductive organs to define womanhood. others use the self-determination of a person’s identifying as a woman or not. and this difference in opinion continues all the way down to inconsistencies between individuals - not because feminism is necessarily an incoherent category, but because people are inherently unique and everyone disagrees with someone on something at some point. so sarah’s feminism might look very different from susan’s feminism.
Which makes feminism inconsistent. Feminism, like any other human-developed concept, cannot exist without humans. It’s not tangible, formed from a mold to ensure everyone’s feminism is the same. You acknowledge this, but do you understand that if everyone’s feminism is different, then there’s no point in calling what one believes feminism at all? If we called every bird a thrush, it would lose whatever consistency the label represented and we may as well call them giraffes for all the good it does us to call it anything at all. Unless feminists establish and maintain a strict sort of “official” definition that is reflected in their beliefs and behaviors, then it means nothing. Not the word - but the use of the word becomes meaningless. That is where I think you got lost.
you know what else? this bird and this bird are both pigeons. but they look so different, you say! but they share certain characteristics (herbivorous diet, a small pointed beak, certain breeding habits, genetic similarities, etc) we group in the category of “pigeon-ness”, so they are both fucking pigeons, you asshole, i say.
I said nothing of the sort, because I’m not stupid enough to think those two are the same breed of pigeon when they display wildly different characteristics. Biologists didn’t come up with the labels according to “pigeon-ness” so what the fuck are you even talking about there? We have different labels for them. The first being a rock pigeon and the second being a goura pigeon. Different labels for different birds due to recognized differences, despite some consistency in biology, you see? All feminists eat, sleep, and shit. Just because they have some biological consistencies, like the birds being named, does not mean they are consistent enough in belief and behavior based on those beliefs for the label “feminist” to carry any significance. As I said above, my analogy highlighted the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something. That’s where it ended. Your analogy doesn’t hold up in defense for the label “feminist” or the feminism movement for these aforementioned reasons.
words mean things. oh my god.
(if you respond please note i am not a woman but consider myself feminism-aligned)
Again, never my argument that they didn’t. And I don’t really give a damn what you call yourself, in case that wasn’t clear.
Btfo the way I like it
I just wanted to mention that not all women who play video games are straight. Some of us are sga, and like looking at sexy female characters. Also not all straight or otherwise women feel alienated by sexy designs either. Thanks for your time.
Just because you personally don’t find something problematic doesn’t mean that it isn’t wrong or harmful or sexist. Misogyny is a political standard, not an opinion by one person.Â
Sexualized images of women in video games are made by men for men. The fact that you can enjoy them and not “feel alientated” by them does not change that. Sexualized figures of women were created by men to mark women as a subordinate sex class and make them less intimidating to men. The makeup and the porn industry were created as a backlash to women getting into the workforce, etc. These are the reasons they exist, the fact that you can take the choices out of context and act like it all exists in a vaccum does not change the sexism behind them.Â
Also, I have read plenty of lesbian and bisexual friends who can’t be attracted to these images of women because they know they are made by men for men to degrade women. They themselves are women and can’t get off to their own objectification. So don’t try to use that as an excuse for misogyny either.Â
I just want to point out that Bayonetta was made by a woman as her personal power fantasy and that kind of blows your entire argument out of the water.
Nope.Â
Just because something personally empowers someone doesn’t mean it isnt’ free from sexism and misogyny. If I say makeup empowers me that doesn’t change the fact that the makeup industry is primarily owned by men that profit off of women’s self-esteem and telling them their value is in their looks.Â
Plus, women self-objectify all the time. And Bayonetta being made by a women doesn’t change the fact that it was made in a male dominated industry which expects her to be sexualized.Â
The world must be a really scary place to you huh?
Yeah a scary place with things like critical thinking and not just “well if I like it can’t be sexist!!!!”Â
No your argument has been that women in videogames were designed by men, for men. Not only does that erase the identities of female devs, it also erases sga women who find women in videogames attractive. Not only is this horrendously false, but given that over half of all gamers are women, it’s bad marketing if what you say is true. With the success of the gaming industry in spite of “misogynist” game designs, if have to say it’s clear you’re wrong.
I also want to point out if the things that are oppressing you most are videogames and makeup, then you live a very charmed life, child.
The video gaming industry is still very male dominated and video games are still considered “boy games” despite the large amount of girls who play, that’s why men appeal to male audiences the way they do. Women report harassment, discrimination, etc when they enter these fields. It’s still a very male dominated environment, acknowledging that men make up the majority of the working industry is not erasing anyone; it’s pointing out the problem.Â
Also, I speak out plenty about sex trafficking, honor killings, misogyny within the Islamic community, rape, violence against women, etc. Gender roles are not separate, in fact it’s casual misogyny that leads to the worse consequences women face for speaking out. I am perfectly capable of caring about multiple issues but clearly you are not.Â
What exactly do you do to fight oppression? Besides vehemently defending misogynistic game designs on tumblr?Â
You keep asserting these things but I find it hard to believe you could prove even a fraction of it. “Sexualized images of women in video games are made by men for men.“ False. Just, completely false. There are two examples here in this one post that disprove this. “Sexualized figures of women were created by men to mark women as a subordinate sex class and make them less intimidating to men.“ Nope. Show how you got to this absurd conclusion, because that sounds like conspiracy theory level bullshit. If anything, people are sexualized in media simply because sex sells - because human beings in general are sexual creatures; men and women.
“The makeup and the porn industry were created as a backlash to women getting into the workforce, etc.“ The use of cosmetics goes back several millennia and exist in most every society on earth. Same with porn. Just utterly false. You’re beginning to sound more and more like a crackpot conspiracy theorist by the second.
“These are the reasons they exist, the fact that you can take the choices out of context and act like it all exists in a vaccum does not change the sexism behind them. “ The fact that you’re literally fabricating everything in these posts does not change the fact that sexism exists, but it makes me heavily question why someone should ever take your word on what’s sexist and what isn’t.
“Plus, women self-objectify all the time.“ Women also apparently invent reasons to consider things sexist all the time. Kinda like what you’re doing here. With all these things that aren’t sexist.
“And Bayonetta being made by a women doesn’t change the fact that it was made in a male dominated industry which expects her to be sexualized.” It makes what you’re saying completely irrelevant, because being created in a male dominated industry and being sexualized isn’t inherently sexist and you’ve yet to prove how they correlate. I would go as far as to say it’s evidence against your claim. Similar to how you’ll probably label every juiced up shirtless male character as a “male power fantasy that caters to men and therefore isn’t sexist”, this particular character is a female power fantasy created by a woman and therefore isn’t sexist.
“The video gaming industry is still very male dominated and video games are still considered “boy games” despite the large amount of girls who play” Considered “boy games”? By fucking who? I haven’t heard of video games referred to as just “boy games” since the fuckin 90s you scrub. Who holds this belief and why should that be representative of the opinions of all gamers/non-gamers?
“Women report harassment, discrimination, etc when they enter these fields.“ “Women” are reporting harassment and discrimination every fucking five feet. Kinda devalues their claims a little bit, honestly. But seriously, do you have any evidence that this is a big problem in the industry that only affects women? Or is this “sexist air conditioning” level discrimination? Harassment I can agree with. Women do experience a lot of harassment for being a woman in gaming. Men also experience a lot of harassment in gaming, just not for being male. Which is good… I guess? At the end of the day, does it honestly matter why a person is being harassed? Is it worse for a woman to be told “tits or gtfo” than for me to receive death threats for beating some kid in a 1v1? It’s not black and white. Harassment is a problem in video gaming in general.
“acknowledging that men make up the majority of the working industry is not erasing anyone; it’s pointing out the problem.“
Okay, first off, an industry being male dominated is not a fucking problem until you can prove it’s because of sexism. There’s nothing inherently wrong with men having more interest in something than women do. And secondly, you ARE erasing people. There are tons of women in the industry who have talked about their great experiences in the industry - women who have been imploring other women to give it a shot. You’re erasing them. You’re attempting to paint gaming as a male dominated field that isn’t hospitable to women, when in reality a lot of women are saying it IS hospitable. This can easily cause other women to be intimidated by the field and avoid getting involved in it. You’re not helping in the slightest.
“Yeah a scary place with things like critical thinking- “ Yeah, no. There’s no critical thinking in your post. Just wild, baseless assumptions.
Lemme ask you something, OP, as another female gamer:Â
If video games are to blame for sexism, rape, or violence, then why is it that all of these things were dramatically more of an issue BEFORE video games even existed? I mean, you’d think that statistics would show a sharp increase in such things AFTER video games came into being. Rape alone has decreased by over 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims in reporting it.
Gee…it’s almost as if video games are a source of escapist entertainment, and not actually seen as a form of instructional pamphlet on how to be human. And gosh…it’s also as though those capable of playing video games are already beyond the formitive stages in life where the bulk of one’s learning takes place.  And wow…it almost seems like having a virtual environment in which to release hostility and other socially unacceptable transgressions is psychologically healthy, and may actually help reduce incidents of violence in the real world. Imagine that.
The only two reasons anyone would say “all lives matter” instead of “black lives matter” is either they don’t know about black lives matter or they’re an entitled white person who needs to be included in everything or else they’ll think they’re being oppressed.
Or, you know, they’ve actually seen the kind of shit that the #blacklivesmatter “movement” has actually done and refuse to support it. Now, don’t misunderstand me; I like the idea and sentiment behind it, just…the movement itself is kind of shite. I say the same thing about feminism. It started out fine and I was a big supporter, but as time went on, it sort of devolved to just spreading hate, violence, and misinformation so I parted ways from it.
So yeah, I say “all lives matter” because that’s what currently reflects my views on the subject. Police brutality is a major problem in the United States, but it is far from being a race-specific one. When people start accepting this and stop trying to incite antagonism between the races, we will actually be able to do something about it.
Every human being has every right to not wish to be associated with–and to distance themselves from–any group or person whose actions they no longer agree with. To insist otherwise is manipulative, and no better than someone trying to force another to remain in an abusive relationship. A person can still believe in and support an ideal, even if they disagree with how others are representing it. No one has the monopoly on believing in justice and equality.
being a female means avoiding eye contact with men to not draw attention to yourself as a potential target
Being a male mean avoiding eye contact with women because they might think we are ugly
hmm yes being a target of abuse is equivalent to thinking you’re ugly
this is literally it. male idea of oppression is women not being sexually available to them when they want them to be. that’s why whiny internet men cry so much about the friend zone. this is literally it for them.
“Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.” - Margaret Atwood
awfully relevant.
You all try so hard to hate on males. If I recall correctly, feminism tried to call men not finding them sexually attractive to be misogyny, that men having preferences was sexism and hurting women. But women doing the same is not considered a problem.
now, you try to ignore problems men face and pretend like that will make them go away, then make fun of stuff they bring up, even if it is the same thing previously brought up by your group.
Men not having abuse shelters? Not seen as a gender issue. Men getting worse sentencing than women? Not considered a gender issue. Literal crime definitions that exclude female criminals and male victims? Nope. That benefits women so it isn’t a problem. Women being more likely to be child abusers, but men being treated like the majority abuser? Nope, somehow that is actually all about how bad women have it.
Very sad. You try so hard to pretend like problems aren’t problems when males are the victim but blow up non issues like “manspreading”. You have to try harder if you want people who actually believe in equality to consider your arguments valid.
Reevaluate your feminism and start actually caring about equality
🙌🏽👏🙌🏽👏🙌🏽👏OKAY BITCH!!!🙌🏽👏🙌🏽👏🙌🏽👏
Gotta do better than that
@fempoli
 “Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.” - Margaret Atwood
>A claim which was, as best as anyone can tell, based on a sample of a handful of women and one man.<Â
But hey, be sure to tell us how men being less afraid of dying than being shamed in front of a woman means women are the oppressed group.Â
You do know that men are more likely to be murdered, right? Roughly 80% of murder vics in the US.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.
John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s former domestic-policy advisor (and Watergate co-conspirator), getting real about the origins and purposes of the war on drugs. From Dan Baum’s article “Legalize it All: How to win the war on drugs” in the April 2016 issue of Harper’s. (via thepoliticalnotebook)
@westernsocietyfucked100years
Rare Colt Model 1855 revolving carbine.
Sold at Auction: $27,500
Positive attitude is a must.
We love you, spetsnaz) Â
@my-babys-guns-n-roses
My child asked me a question.
“Mommy, why do they make guns?”
“To kill people. Or to hurt people.”
A pause.
“There isn’t really any good reason.”
What if those people are trying to kill or hurt you?
Hunting hunting is a good reason
1 we don’t live in a society that requires us to hunt for food any more 2 hunting for sport makes you a dick 3 if you hunt for your food, great, but there are other ways to hunt other than a gun.such as bows. now you may say “bow hunting is harder” and to that i say good and refer you back to #1
Yes we do. When I lost my job, my house and the majority of my stuff in 2009 I couldnt go on government assistance because I had no documentation at the time. It burned up. So in the month that it took to get replacements I had no food. Now I could probably have gone to Vegas and begged but I did not. I took my rifle and shot my food and lived off the land. Look at the very poor in Appalachia and elsewhere. If they dont hunt they dont get enough to eat. Its nice when you can go to Walmart and buy a turkey but you cant always do that.
cup of noodles is very cheap and filling. No need for hunting even if your poor.
You literally do not have to hunt for food in America
You could also have sold your gun and used the money to buy a great deal of food
Did you not read anything I said? You somewhat did but only what you wanted to read. Cup O Noodle is pure crap. Its over processed and over salted. Thats not healthy food at all. Keep thinking that theres no need for hunting. There is and im not just talking about food here.
Conservation - Hunters are conservationalists. They want the animals to thrive and be happy. The dollars we pay in permits go to keep the land healthy and fertile. We go out of our way to make sure that things remain clean and useable for others.
Population Control - Hunters make sure that big and small game populations actually survive. If there are too many deer there is not enough food and they all suffer and die. If you cull the herd by hunting you get food and the deer population remains sustainable and well fed.
Pest Control - Animals are a huge pest problem to Human crops and they devour or ruin a good portion of the harvest. To ensure that wheat gets to the factory to make your Cup O noodle as well as dried carrots, peas and so on Hunters routinely kill rabbits, squirrels, doves and other pest species that destroy the crop. Not to mention Coyotes that kill chickens and sheep, goats and even young cows.
So you sit there saying Hunting isint necessary but the food you eat, the land you hike on and the beautiful animals you enjoy watching in the wild are because of hunters like me. Remove us and the whole system falls apart and you get low crop yields, sickly and starving animals and destroyed wilderness.
there’s a saying “beggars can’t be choosers” so yeah you’re full of shit. i’ve been poor and jobless and cup o noodles was the only thing that kept me alive. also my mother’s entire family has been poor for generations and they lived off rice and beans why? because it’s fucking cheap shit! so no, there are other options besides hunting
hunting is no longer necessary in any first world country
and again you do not need a gun for population control lol
the food i eat was raised in a factory like the hamburgers everyone gets from mcdonalds
remove you and we survive because you people are not needed. you like to pretend you are because you don’t understand how the food industry worksÂ
hahaha hunters think they’re feeding america!!
literally the people who feed us are giant corporations who do no hunting whatsoever.Â
this isn’t the 1800s anymore pal. society has changed, our resources have changed.Â
you are literally not needed in any capacity, despite what your over-inflated ego saysÂ
He didn’t say hunting put meat in grocery stores, he said people can feed themselves. Reading comprehension is a thing. He also explained how hunting actually protects the environment.
If you really think that a $1 cup of noodles is a better option than an under 50 cent deer or 4 cent varmint, you’re very lost. You tell him this shit about ego, while insisting that you know more than him about the situations of other people lmao.
Im not responding her so ill respond to you @fuckyourguncontrol . Thanks. I did have my SKS before hand with a bunch of ammo. It was not expensive at all. Teach a man to fish he will eat for a lifetime. Its like that saying. Sell my gun for $200 and eat for a month if im frugal or keep it and eat for a lifetime. Ah well.
Of course it was the sks, haha. No problem.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Famous Failures
I stumbled upon this video a long time ago and it honestly made me feel a lot better.
“If you’ve never failed, you’ve never lived.”
I could not fit everyone mentioned in the video in this post so be sure to give the video a look.
WATCH IT HERE