In your TSAMS AUs, do the characters personalities, motivations and relationships tend to be the same/similar to canon or different? How different from canon are they? In what ways?
Hmm. I couldnāt begin to answer this for every single one, but Iāll give examples and an overall explanation.
The whole point of it being an AU is to explore how a world and circumstances affect a characterās development, what would have had to happened for them to resemble the character they are in canon, or for relationships to happen how I want them to. I ask myself about what needs to happen in order for them to be familiar enough to still be that character, but different enough to be interesting in a fresh way. What happens next entirely depends on what my intent is with the AU.
For example, in monster hunter (EAPS group), Ruin is trying to get Eclipse to be cooperative with him so they A. Donāt get themselves killed in the wilderness due to miscommunication and grudges and B. So they donāt hate their jobs and burn out. My intent with this specific AU is to explore what Ruin and Eclipseās relationship could have looked like if they actually were able to collaborate and have a good relationship in early-mid EAPS. Ruin and Eclipse donāt have the same history together that they do in canon, itās impossible to accomplish in this AU, so instead I give Eclipse reasons to genuinely dislike Ruin that maybe arenāt exactly ruinās fault at all. Maybe for his attitude, how chipper he is all the time, maybe eclipse doesnāt like to be led by the hand or to be the one who doesnāt know what heās doing. Maybe Eclipse hasnāt gotten over the reasons why he accepted the expedition offer to the forbidden land in the first place; because he felt unwanted at home, like he was a guest. Like how eclipse was before he left TSAMS to go to EAPS. Maybe he didnāt get along well with his previous team, so his team decided to just leave him out. Or eclipse decided they didnāt need him first, before they could decide that for themselves, to save himself that hurt of rejection.
Thatās me setting the stage for in-AU-universe reasons for characters to be the way they are.
Some characters look closer to their canon counterparts than others. In my most recent viva piƱata au, Dahlia is different; heās never seen war. That world doesnāt have a lot of physical conflict in general, like that. Instead, I amplify his history with Willow and Nightshade, I give him regrets and lasting consequences and an empty home with physical, painful reminders of what used to be. He still has Dahliaās core personality traits, but his upbringing is different because the AU canāt exactly supply an equivalent that makes sense.
However, in that same AU, Carme is closer to canon in a specific way. He used to be part of a merchantās fleet, helped around wherever needed, with Rigel. He got off the ship one day and never got back on. He and Rigel are still on talking terms; the ship comes to town every now and then, but Carme avoids Rigel because Rigel keeps suggesting Carme come back, come sail the seas and see new places with him again. But Carme wants to settle down and be on his own. That conflict is similar to what they are in canon, just scaled way down and more personal. Itās about finding what parts of a character can be switched out and what needs to be a constant. Like for Carme, the circus part doesnāt matter so long as the āI left so I could have freedom and autonomy but Rigel wants me to come backā conflict is there, so heās instantly more familiar because thatās how he is in canon.
So. Tldr. It varies with my intent. Maybe Iāll make a relationship between two characters better or worse intentionally, to find out what happens. Or Iāll experiment with how much I can change about a character and still have them be recognizable. Sometimes they are exactly the same and I donāt change anything. ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ