canon is a suggestion and i'm not listening

Insurance agencies use M markers to deny coverage for pregnancy related healthcare. Doctors offices hang up on pregnant people trying to schedule pre- and post-natal appointments for themselves because their voices or their names aren’t feminine enough. And if they manage to make the appointment, they can get harassed out of the waiting rooms or face medical malpractice behind closed doors.

Charities and benefits made for pregnant or new mothers don’t accept pregnant/new fathers or non-gendered parents. The WIC fund is called women, infants, and children.

If we degender pregnancy and childbirth (and periods while we’re at it) we open up support for every trans and intersex person who needs it. We normalize pregnant people of other genders and sexes, leaving less room for harassment and malpractice and more accountability for those who decide to be assholes anyway.

Then look to the west from there and you'll see the area between Oxford and Cambridge. I hope you've heard of Oxbridge before, we use that portmanteau because almost every British Prime Minister (and broadly British politicians actually throughout history) went to either Oxford or Cambridge. The area around London there, but not London itself are characterised by being 1. very very very white 2. very very very conservative and 3. representing some kind of core "englishness" which is why they're called the "home counties". These people have had a chokehold on what happens in the UK for hundreds of years and for a couple of hundred years there they had a pretty strong say in what happened to essentially the whole planet.

When yankees talk about "British people" but are clearly referring to English people from one of these two areas, it drives me absolutely fucking insane. Even if you just said "English" instead of "British" it would be a massively ignorant thing to say, but it would be so much better than generalising the attitudes and politics of these areas onto, for example, Northern Ireland, a literal occupied territory oppressed by precisely these people. Please start directing your hatred appropriately toward the English and specifically the southern English.

So here we have Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and York, five of the most populous cities in the UK. Those together are well over (about twice) the populations of Edinburgh and Glasgow put together. This area contains some of the most shocking natural beauty in the country and also was relentlessly targeted by capitalists for internal colonisation and industrialisation within Britain in the 18th & 19th Centuries.

Workers from this area and from each of these cities have at various times throughout British history been massacred by people from the South in a centuries-long conquest that establishes the South as the UK's centre of power and the North as the UK's generator of power (I mean this quite literally because factories, power plants and coal mines are all quite notoriously concentrated in the North). These bouts of open violence by the Southerners are just the visible eruption of physical violence against the North, usually against workers' uprisings, but are part of a slow burning eternal obliteration of the Northern working class.

The area I've shown is the most commonly agreed conception of what "The North" is, but because this socioeconomic history defines what people understand the North to be some people will feel intuitively that Birmingham, which is firmly in the Midlands, is part of the North as well. The uniting political reality of the North is being used for other people's political ambitions with no real voice whatsoever. This is why Andy Burnham former Mayor of Manchester becoming PM tomorrow is supposed to be a big deal, because he's promising a devolution of power from London, but we'll have to see if that really happens at all.

If you want to understand the tension between London and the rest of the UK but especially the North, this map of Gross Regional Product is pretty useful. You'll notice that they have included two colours on this map that are just for London. This is because, and I cannot stress this enough, London is completely unlike the rest of the country in basically every way.

Firstly, London is huge. If you add up all the other cities I just mentioned above, Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds, York, Sheffield, Birmingham, Glasgow and Edinburgh, you would have roughly half the population of London. Secondly, London is rich and horribly unequal. If you look at the table above, you will see that GRP per capita for inner West London is over five times the national average. Bear in mind that average is divided by such an enormously higher population than other regions, AND that most of the people living in London are still poor as hell. That should give you a picture of how unequal London is.

But this is actually a much better picture of how unequal London is:

Grenfell tower, where a fire killed 72 people, is in the Royal Borough of Chelsea & Kensington which also contains: Kensington Palace, Lords Cricket Grounds, Notting Hill (from the Hugh Grant film Notting Hill), and Westfield London.

The Grenfell fire, a product of unsafe cladding that wasn't replaced despite being flagged as dangerous because the landlord didn't want to spend money, is a perfect demonstration of London's inequality because in the same borough as all these obscene displays of wealth dozens of working class black and brown people burned to death because their safety was too expensive. There are tonnes of towers around the UK that still have the same kind of cladding by the way, and since the fire the number of MPs who are also landlords has consistently gone up and up and up.