i love this art piece, i think it deserves to be reposted
noise dept.
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
d e v o n

Kiana Khansmith
will byers stan first human second
i don't do bad sauce passes
Mike Driver

"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Cosimo Galluzzi
DEAR READER

oozey mess
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
NASA

blake kathryn
styofa doing anything
Claire Keane

@theartofmadeline
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Latvia

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@prozmal
i love this art piece, i think it deserves to be reposted

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I stand with my cancelled wife
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
just me being emotional about them. again
everybody moves on I’m still here

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
sketch for THE BEST BOY OF “BLEACH” POLL from twitter
and of course our third place
boy with a basket of fruit
that’s my boy