Another thing that I really don't like about antis is that they rarely have a solid understanding of the burden of proof.
Lets say you want to make a claim on the internet based in logic. I don't care if this claim is "tumblr user whoeverthefuck is racist" or "a foot is made up of 12 inches". It is on you to defend your claim, or make it clear you can't defend it. If someone comes to you asking for proof, you should give it, not just double down with logical fallacies.
You can't go accusing people of serious crimes without proof. Even if you set aside how innately unjust that is, you're creating alarm fatigue that lets real criminals fall through the cracks.
You want me to not write about abusive ships? Prove to me with facts that I should. Not just "but it makes me uncomfortable!!!"















