Should You Clue In the Reader?
This post is a bit of a cheat. It's taken from this Reddit thread, but I think the reply is dead-on.Ā
SPOILERS FOR "WHIPLASH" AHEAD
In the reddit thread, someone asked,
Is it cheap to tell readers what the characters feel?Ā
I was reading the Whiplash screenplay and (spoilers ahead) right at the end it said something about Fletcher smiling because he's finally found his Charlie Parker. It actually does this a lot throughout the script. Telling us what the characters are feeling.
To me it feels a bit like cheating because if the action and dialogue don't show it, you won't be able to simply tell the audience why the character is doing what they're doing.
Thoughts?
The following response is, in my opinion, SPOT ON
Nope. It's not cheap at all. And WHIPLASH is a great example why. When JK Simmons gives Miles Teller that look, you KNOW, what he's thinking. Simmons is such a great actor that he conveys that very idea without having to say a word. But a script doesn't have the luxury of great acting.
A screenplay isn't a piece of art meant to stand on its own. Above all, it is a sales document. It is a ream of paper meant to convince a handful of very busy producers to put money behind it in order for it toĀ becomeĀ art. So clarity is key. And sometimes that means telling the reader EXACTLY what the hell is going on, even when it will only be inferred by the audience.
It only becomes lazy if you use it as a crutch and lean too heavily on it. But used sparingly, it can do everything for your reader that a great actor will do for the audience.
#slowclap
















