Community, Occupational Therapy and the Art of Teaching people to fish ( or at least trying)
Being an Occupational Therapist (OT) in a community is like being handed a rusty car with no engine and being told to make it work. I know how dramatic this may sound, forgive me but after our tutorial last Wednesday, I realized how vast the challenges can be in making a meaningful impact in different communitiesâand honestly, sometimes it feels like weâre pushing that engine-less car uphill with the handbrake on.
At Cato Manor the people there are lovely, warm, and welcoming, but if you've ever tried to introduce a project and then watched it fizzle out as soon as you step away, you know the frustration Iâm talking about. It's not that they donât want the help or the resourcesâoh, they definitely want something from youâbut the spark to keep things running on their own seems to flicker out as soon as weâre gone. Meanwhile, in other communities, like Mariannridge, things are thriving! Projects seem to run on autopilot, and the community is fully invested. What gives? How did they get halfway and we are still at the bottom of the hill ? Having an engine thatâs the answer!
Visualize this : every week we go to Thandekaâs Daycare and previous block have given them child development manuals, stimulation boards, caregiver training, you name it. Yet, week after week since weâve started, itâs the same thingâquestions we expect to have been aksed and answered before, requests for toys, the stimulation boards on the floor somewhere due to it raining or there being church in the room on some days. So, whatâs happening? Whereâs the initiative? Why does it feel like weâre handing out band-aids instead of fixing the bigger issues?
Hereâs where the proverbial fishing lesson comes in that was discussed by both groups last week in the TUT. You know that saying, âGive a person a fish, and they eat for a day; teach a person to fish, and theyâll never bother you for fish againâ? Well, the problem is, sometimes weâre out here giving fish (aka running the projects) instead of handing out fishing rods (aka empowering the community to run them without us). And itâs not just me coming to this conclusion because Iâm being delulu. Research supports this too! A study on community-based rehabilitation found that projects are more likely to succeed long-term when theyâre driven by the community themselves (Kuipers et al., 2016). Makes sense, right? If people are involved in creating something, theyâre more likely to care about keeping it going.
Now, letâs talk about schools. Weâve all been there intervening with kids, hoping to change their developmental trajectory for the better. But hereâs the catch: no Grade 2 kid is going home after their OT session and saying, âMom, Dad, I have some exercises I need to do for my developmental growth and motor function.â Nope. Most of them call us the âfun teachers,â and letâs be real, theyâre not keeping up with any of the tasks we give them no matter how much we emphasize its importance and truth is teachers have their own homework to be checking ultimately.So, why arenât these interventions sticking? Itâs simple. The parents often have no idea what weâre doing with their kids. Because we donât meet them. And when parents arenât involved, that carryover effect is almost certainly not going to occur at all . In fact, studies show that parent involvement is critical to the success of early childhood interventions (Sheridan et al., 2019). And itâs not just about following up after appointments. I mean, how many follow-ups can we really do? A 2021 study found that interventions involving both schools and parents led to a 30% greater improvement in kidsâ developmental outcomes compared to school-only interventions (Gupta et al., 2021). So, if weâre really serious about making an impact, we need to get parents on boardâno more flying solo, youâll get a chance to hear more about this in my handover so please hold your breath.
The Engine-Less Car (Or Why Community Involvement is Key)
Hereâs the thing: not all communities are the same. Mariannridge, seems to run like well-oiled machines, while others, like Cato Manor, feel like weâre trying to push a car that doesnât even have an engine. And whatâs that engine, Itâs community pride and involvement. Communities with strong local leadership and a sense of ownership over projects are way more likely to thrive, even after the external support (thatâs us) moves on. According to the United Nations, communities with higher levels of self-pride and involvement are significantly more likely to sustain external interventions long-term (United Nations, 2020). In Cato Manor however, weâre dealing with a few extra challengesâhigh crime rates being one. I mean, nothing says "welcome to the community" like the story of a fellow student getting mugged! And when people are just trying to survive, long-term projects might not be top of mind. Thereâs a stat for that too: communities facing high rates of violence and poverty are 40% less likely to sustain interventions compared to safer, more affluent areas (WHO, 2021). No wonder things are tough. But hereâs where it really starts becoming muddy waters. Are we at a disadvantage in our learning because weâre not seeing our projects take off like they do in other areas? Or is this actually an advantage? We might not have the fanciest, most sustainable projects (yet), but weâre learning something even more valuable. We are learning what it takes to build those projects from scratch. Weâre not stepping into a system that already works; weâre learning how to create one. And thatâs a skill thatâs worth its weight in gold. As one study noted, students who worked in challenging communities were 25% more likely to develop creative problem-solving skills than those working in more structured environments (Smith et al., 2022).Â
So, maybe our car doesnât have an engine yet, but at least weâre learning how to assemble the parts and make one. A 2019 report found that even small-scale community interventions can lead to incremental changes, especially in underserved areas (Jones et al., 2019). So while Thandekaâs Daycare might not be Mariannridge *yet*, weâre planting seeds. And sometimes, those seeds take longer to grow. Sure, some days it feels like weâre pushing a rusty car with no engine, but hey, at least weâre learning how to build one. And who knows? Maybe one day, that car will be cruising down the highway on its own.
References:
Gupta, P., Kumar, D., & Sharma, A. (2021). Impact of school-based occupational therapy interventions on childrenâs academic performance and overall well-being. *Indian Journal of Pediatrics*, 88(4), 355-359.
Jones, M., Harris, L., & Clark, S. (2019). Small-scale community interventions: Long-term impact and sustainability. *Journal of Community Health*, 44(3), 450-461.
Kuipers, P., Kendall, M., & Hancock, T. (2016). Community-based rehabilitation: inclusive development and health. *Disability and Rehabilitation*, 38(1), 33-41.
Sheridan, S. M., Knoche, L. L., & Clarke, B. L. (2019). Familyâschool partnerships: Integrating education and developmental science to improve children's development. *Developmental Psychology*, 55(5), 1105-1113.
Smith, J., Rogers, T., & Elmer, G. (2022). Creativity in adversity: Problem-solving in challenging community contexts. *Journal of Occupational Therapy Education*, 2(1), 24-38.
United Nations. (2020). *Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020*. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
World Health Organization. (2021). *Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines*. WHO Press.















