Not of this world ☽

DA Tom Sneddon was a huge racist, by the way. He tipped off Diane Dimond about the 2003 raid so she could have it filmed to sway public opinion on Jackson. She was there outside the ranch that day with her cameras. He regularly leaked info to her which was either biased or completely false, which she reported on. He had a reputation of going after predominantly innocent people and black men, and his colleagues nicknamed him “mad dog”.

He told Chris Tucker to be a “good boy” during his cross examination on May 25th, 2005.

Michael Jackson himself accused Sneddon of being a racist in his song D.S. on his HIStory album, and even claimed he was involved with the KKK.

And mind you, there were even allegations of Tom Sneddon passing around those photos he took of Michael’s dick to all his friends and colleagues in private just for the shits and giggles. The strip search was just a way to humiliate Jackson.

The DA and partnering police departments contacted the FBI to see if they could prosecute Jackson under the MANN Act on September 7th, 1993. The MANN Act is also known officially as the “White Slave Traffic Act”, which was introduced in 1910 by the author Rep. James Robert Mann.

This Act allowed police officers to arrest on the grounds of “immoral behavior”, and this law was historically used to frequently smear black men, especially those that dated white women.

Jack Johnson was the first black man to be prosecuted under the MANN Act. He was the world’s first black Heavyweight Boxing Champion. The proposition of the law was largely due to the potential to smear Johnson. Johnson was viewed by the press as a black man who didn’t know his place. He displayed his success openly, more than 50 years before segregation ended in America. Society deemed he be humbled accordingly.

He traveled and was sexually involved with white women, and was prosecuted for it, specifically for “transporting females across the state line for immoral purposes”. The white women that were involved with Johnson stated under oath it was consensual, and their travels with him were willingly made. Moreover, these travels took place long before the MANN Act was established, but this did not stop an all white jury from convicting him.

Years later, Chuck Berry was prosecuted for the same thing. He met a teenage girl and asked her to work as a hat-check girl in his restaurant. The girl in question was a waitress, which is how he met her. She agreed to the job offer, and he traveled with her after a concert so she could work in St Louis. He was prosecuted for traveling with her, and sentenced to 3 years in prison.

Mind you, none of these men’s white contemporaries were ever prosecuted for such things, despite them doing the same thing and far worse.

The MANN Act is an inherently racist law that exists because of the potential to prosecute black men. The LAPD, working with the DA, wanted to prosecute Jackson under this law. It is in the FBI documents.

"Band Candy" 03.06 (1998)

just gotta throw my all-time favourite Giles scene into the mix

Anthony Head (1954-2026) as Rupert Giles

Rest in Peace, Tony.

I'll always remember your smile.

Wow, what a way to start things off with footage of the Neverland Ranch raid from 2003, which was an obvious PR stunt carried out by the prosecution, who aimed to make a media spectacle of it for the world to see. Mind you, they found absolutely nothing in said raid, or in any other raid carried out against Jackson from 1993 onward.

The first person they bring in is J. Randy Taraborrelli, a known liar and tabloid whore—and don’t any of you worry, there’s plenty more where that came from that I’ll cook as well in other posts.

Randy Taraborrelli has written two books about Michael Jackson over the decades, none of which Michael himself ever endorsed. And in these books, he embellishes many stories about Michael, and throughout the editions of these books, his stories continuously change. He claims to be close friends with Michael (and has for decades), and yet he only met Michael one time because Taraborrelli was head of a Diana Ross fan club and got the opportunity to meet and interview Michael when they were both teenagers. There is exactly one photograph of them together, from the 70’s, pictured below.

In Randy’s book Michael Jackson: The Magic, The Madness he tells a lie that Emmanuel Lewis’ mother did not want Michael to be around the child star and put an end to their friendship. In reality, this did not happen and Emmanuel Lewis himself has stated such. He also tells a tale of the 1993 strip search Jackson was forced to submit to by police, a specific version of a story told in Victor Gutierrez’s book Michael Jackson Was My Lover, a book that he was sued for (along with a slanderous interview in which he told Hard Copy he had a video of Michael Jackson sexually abusing his own child family member),which effectively bankrupted him. He also borrows heavily from Ray Chandler’s (Evan Chandler’s brother) book All That Glitters, which ALSO borrows from the above mentioned Gutierrez pedo fantasy novel. In fact, most of MJWML and ATG are nearly identical, aside from the alleged sexual acts. This is because Ray Chandler and the rest of the Chandler family worked with Gutierrez to create this CSA hoax in the first place. Remember, Gutierrez managed to somehow tell these stories first (in 1997), while Ray didn’t until 2004. That’s Gutierrez telling the exact same version of events from the Chandler camp 7 full years before they did themselves.

Now, let’s move on, seeing as I’ve already displayed all the ways in which Randy Taraborrelli is not a credible source for anything pertaining to MJ.

Martin Bashir is a highly unethical “journalist”, yet no outright mention of the criminal behavior he and BBC took part in regarding Princess Diana to be found in this hit piece!

Martin Bashir tells a lie claiming that Michael brought Gavin in to be a part of Bashir’s slanderous documentary LWMJ, yet in the 2005 criminal trial, Gavin Arvizo himself testified stating that Michael planned to have Dave Dave (David Rothenberg) in the documentary, and that Bashir then completely omitted Dave Dave from the documentary.

Gavin Arvizo testimony March 14th, 2005. ^

Dave Dave was a close friend of Michael and was an adult at the time, though he’d known Jackson from childhood. Bashir insisted on having Gavin in the movie instead, as Gavin was still a child.

Martin Bashir, in this netflix hit piece, goes on to tell a complete lie about Michael supposedly sleeping in bed with Gavin, and then playing a clip from his movie, despite this longsince being proven edited.

What was not originally aired, and what continues to be perpetuated by the media and these hit pieces is Michael supposedly saying he slept in a bed with Gavin. What he went on to say was “always give the beds to the company”.

Oh and by the way, Bashir told Gavin to put his head on Michael’s shoulder and instructed them to hold hands behind the camera. Because while Bashir was filming Michael, Michael had his team secretly film him without him knowing. This documentary was proven to be maliciously edited in court, Bashir took the stand and refused to answer questions saying he had protections as a journalist under shield law, and even Gavin said that the portrayal of Michael in Bashir’s film was not truthful.

Let’s move on to the next person interviewed: Diane Dimond.

Diane Dimond has had a 3+ decade career built upon slandering Michael Jackson. She has lied and claimed he possessed CP, she allowed tabloid liars onto her show Hard Copy (a 90’s tabloid TV show), most notable being Victor Gutierrez.

This is the interview Michael Jackson sued him for and won, being awarded 2.7 million dollars, which bankrupted that bitch. Victor then fled the country and was later convicted of the same shit in Chile. Michael sued Diane Dimond too, but she was let off the hook, claiming journalistic privilege. Same thing Bashir did. Noticing a pattern yet?

additional post I’ve made with sources about another lie in these allegations Diane Dimond allowed on her show ^

and yet another source to show the ways in which Diane Dimond allows lies to run rampant. this video shows proof of a boy being coached to lie on MJ. it aired on her tv show Hard Copy. ^

She smiles here with glee at seeing footage of Gavin with Michael, recalling the Chandler allegations. Why the apparent happiness if she believes it to be true? It is not shocking Dimond finds glee in guilting Michael Jackson; she clearly holds a deep contempt toward him. Look no further than how she speaks of him here in this video I posted.

Not only did Diane Dimond state of Victor Gutierrez (a self admitted pedophile and NAMBLA member) “I’ve never had a doubt about this person, ever!”, but she was in bed with the prosecution and DA Tom Sneddon during the trial and the media swarm leading up to it. They regularly leaked biased info to her which she reported.

Diane, in Netflix’s doc, lies and states that the 1994 Chandler civil settlement is what caused the Chandler allegations to never go to trial. However, what no one makes mentions of is that the Chandler allegations and evidence from 1993-1994 were tried alongside the Arvizo case in 2005’s criminal trial.

This was due to CA Evidence Code 1108, otherwise known as “prior bad acts” evidence, which allows a prosecution in the state of California to bring in evidence of an alleged similar sex crime against a defendant even if they were never previously charged, such as in Jackson’s case. This means that the Jury did in fact hear and see evidence of BOTH allegations, and still met a unanimous not guilty.

What she also fails to mention is this: IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A CIVIL SETTLEMENT TO PREVENT A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OR CRIMINAL TRIAL IN THE UNITED STATES!

Nothing can stop the government from charging someone with a crime. Jackson was forced into a settlement with the Chandler family due to his rights being violated by the judge, and being deposed for the civil trial while the criminal investigation was pending. Had he given deposition, it would have revealed his entire defense to a prosecutor actively hunting him down, which the DA could then take and use to tailor his criminal case against Jackson.

The criminal investigation continued for half a year following this civil settlement. The reason the Chandler’s never went to trial in 1994 was because they stopped cooperating with the police, and the accuser Jordan Chandler refused to testify. Despite his refusal, DA Sneddon brought 2 grand juries (one in LA and another in Santa Barbara) to review evidence for the case. They convened, reviewed the evidence and heard witness testimony from 400+ people, and then said they wouldn’t indict Jackson.

She goes on later in this doc to tell a tale of complete fabrication with ZERO evidence to substantiate it, a story she made up and put in her book where she tells plenty of other lies. She claims Michael was “entertaining a group of teenage boys who all spoke German”, where they were all, Michael included, heavily drinking liquor and smoking cigars. Yeah, likely story there, Dimond.

Honestly, I would need an entire thread to go through Diane alone, but let’s move on to Vincent Amen.

Vincent Amen alleges that Michael Jackson gave Star Arvizo the nickname “blowhole”, showing off Polaroid photos that were evidence in the 2005 trial. But this is a lie—Star Arvizo testified and stated numerous times that HE chose that nickname for himself and stated he made it up himself.

Star Arvizo cross examination testimony March 8th, 2005 ^

Now, to address Vinnie’s lie about nudist magazines with kids being circled in a magazine for order:

Which he has been telling for decades and selling to tabloids mind you…

There is ZERO evidence to prove Michael ever owned such a thing, let alone circled things like this. Vinnie even went to the prosecution and they deemed him inconsistent and non credible, refusing to call him as a witness. The prosecution, who called upon some of the least credible people I’ve ever seen in any court case, chose not to call this guy who claims he had proof that MJ was trying to get ahold of CP? Yeah, again like Dimond, likely fucking story bud.

Amen owns this magazine, and has for decades, sold stories about it for decades, but supposedly it’s MJ’s? What the hell, sure!

DA Tom Sneddon who was spearheading the prosecution never notated anything about Helios or any such related DVDs that Amen claims were circled throughout any court filing or within any search warrant and seizure from 2003-2005. And none of the items supposedly circled were ever found in Michael Jackson’s possession.

Michael did own nudist magazines from the 1930’s which were not pornographic, as confirmed in actual documentation. None of these materials had DNA evidence on them, either, as confirmed in forensic examiner testimony.

Michael owned thousands of books of all sorts of things, and collected all sorts of stuff. The man was borderline a hoarder. Said “nude children” were not the focus of these magazines. They were part of a nudist community. Any pornographic or erotic material found focused solely on adult women.

And I should also mention: Vinnie Amen’s wife, Rina Oh, was literally a pimp for Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein victim’s have accused her of this. 🤔🤔🤔 Me thinks this circled CP is his idkkkkkkk guys lol

Now, let’s talk about Dr. Stanley Katz

Dr. Katz came into contact with the Arvizo family through Larry Feldman. Larry Feldman was referred to the Arvizo family by their at the time attorney Dickerman, who admitted to referring them in his testimony. It was stated that Feldman was the “go-to” guy on anything Michael Jackson, which is quite peculiar, seeing as Feldman only ever worked on ONE case involving Michael Jackson: the Chandler allegation of 1993. Similarly, Dr. Katz admitted that Larry Feldman was plotting to file a civil lawsuit on behalf of the Arvizo family, which Dickerman corroborates in his testimony, stating he has a fee-sharing arrangement with Feldman.

Of course, DA Sneddon lied to the media and claimed the Arvizo’s didn’t want money, yet both attorneys they had stated otherwise and the psychologist they queried did as well.

After being referred to Larry Feldman, Feldman then referred the Arvizo family to Dr. Stanley Katz, a psychologist who specializes in the field of child sexual abuse. More importantly, this is the same exact psychologist that interviewed Jordan Chandler in 1993. Dr. Katz was formerly also involved in the highly controversial McMartin preschool trial. He was the Director of Training and Professional Education at the Children’s Institute International (CII). Kee McFarlane, who initially interviewed the McMartin children, worked under him. During his cross examination at Jackson’s 2005 trial, Dr. Katz testified that he did the assessments of the McMartin children. The CII’s role in the McMartin case has been widely criticized in professional circles. Their interviewing techniques are considered coercive and manipulative which may lead children to make false allegations of sexual abuse.

Dr. Stanley Katz, who operated his organization CII in the 1980’s, and one which resulted in HUNDREDS of falsely coerced child sex abuse allegations and mass hysteria, was the prosecution’s star witness.

Credibility? Nada 👎🏻

Remember, if you don’t fact check, that means you don’t care. So don’t eat garbage from Netflix and take it as truth. I still have 2 more parts to power through, and I intend to, but for tonight I’m clocking out and enjoying the rest of my evening free from glue sniffer delusions 🤣

I’ll leave you with these two comprehensive threads discussing both the Chandler allegations from 1993 as well as the Arvizo allegations from 2003-2005 for your reading pleasure 📖

And to all my fellow moonwalkers out there, stay fun and fresh and keep silencing these lying assholes