I won't even bother posting another fact-check of last night's speech. If people want to believe claims that have been repeatedly debunked, that's their choice. But anyone willing to look at the evidence can recognize the difference between facts and misleading rhetoric.
Here's what I find telling: if Democrats supposedly had the ability to "steal" a presidential election in 2020, why didn't they do it again in 2024? Why would they lose the White House, the Senate, or other key races if they possessed the kind of massive election-rigging operation that's being alleged? That claim simply doesn't hold up to basic logic.
It also raises another question: Why does election fraud become a major issue only after Republicans lose? When Republicans win, the system is described as secure and legitimate. When they lose, we're told the election was rigged. That pattern alone should make people stop and think before accepting these claims at face value.
Healthy skepticism is important, but it should apply to everyone—not just to election results we don't like. -Tim Custis