So let me get this straight...
So youâre (for the sake of this hypothetical) a senior member, which is earned through community contribution, which means people should remember you, and you make a status message which remains your latest one for a month, and itâs about someone going after you, and after a month, it has no faves and a single comment expressing skepticism, all while the person youâre talking about gets engagement on a regular basis despite being âbannedâ, and you insist your audience or contribution isnât fake? Iâm sorry, but if all of this is true about you, either A) your audience is all bots, B) your audience is all banned, C) senior membership means nothing, or D) people just really side with Triagonal despite slander efforts. What a demographic.
Thereâs lots of grass outside. maybe step outside and give it a soft little pat.
You say that like coming here to do nothing more than ask about a major scandal in the worldâs leading artconomy community (even if that has to do with someone you have a bone to pick with) is less valid to do than your entire history on here and the history of your comrades who have harassed and slandered the person in question to a greater extent than some people alive have even breathed air (both in and outside the âgrass worldâ, in fact one of you tracked down an associate at a pub about it) for things that ethically would amount to far less (including simply showing up on someoneâs page, God forbid), to the degree that I prepared a contemplatory response to this out of sheer predictability. The mainmost point that suggests what youâre saying should only be taken with less seriousness than non-seriousness rests in the realization that this is all gatekeeping at work (the kind that shatters your obvious concern-trolling here) on your part, to the point where I wouldnât be surprised to see the senior member answering the most pressing question here.
All of this is assuming the hate art made by you and your peeps (which trumps mere memes which nobody here has gone beyond) isnât already a sign of your own fanaticismâŚ
âŚwith some artists even hate-art-mined as recently as a week ago in hopes of taunting her with art made by unsuspecting artists containing things like known phobias/weaknesses/experiences to add a touch of nuisance if someone works as a stand-in for herâŚ
âŚwith the harassment being so bad that the admins who nobody might ever high regard for have decided they were fed up upon the first glance of what you just said.
I call upon @the-abyss-watcher to respond to this as the circumstances already do.
writing an essay in response to one sentence is usually a good sign its time to log off for a bit.
No, gatekeeper. Know by what Iâm calling you that you miss the point. The very context-heavy point. The forums are dead, and not only are there people still witch hunting any possible trace of the boogiewoman, but with every word you say, youâre missing what nobody else is calling an obscure point (as much as you like to put forward that the reverse is true).
Nothing else is verbally welcome from you if not an explanation as to why youâre here, whether in my terms or yours. We know who you are, your intention to dodge every question that would undermine you, and the intention of 99.9% of you who lay eyes and ears on my words to mistake me as Triagonal for the 10,000th time and make claims about what mindset is being exhibited.
logging off and going outside would solve all your problems.
