Hello

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER in this volume:

31. Haters LOVE Receiving YOUR Sympathy

32. How Haters Spend Their MONEY

33. (Will be added soon...)

+Before you see this, these documents will be really helpful to understand:

*

*

*

31.

In her 31st video, Mirei is providing her audience with a literal guide on "how to frame a victim's trauma as mere attention-seeking to justify mass-ostracism and blocking."

First, she claims that "a critic's or victim's cry of distress is nothing but a calculated 'sympathy trap' designed to manipulate public opinion." Here is what she says:

"If the person has faced public criticism, backlash, or accountability for toxic behavior, posting about a severe personal crisis like a relapse is a classic deflection tactic."

"They use vulnerability as a shield to instantly halt criticism, force people to feel sorry for them, and paint themselves as the victim."

Let us ask a very simple question: Who is the actual entity that has spent the last several years shamelessly weaponizing their own vulnerability and mental health as a shield to evade accountability? It is none other than Mirei herself—who consistently brought up her autism spectrum and mental health issues whenever her grooming scandals were exposed—alongside her sister Brittany, who enabled and defended her every step of the way. The fact that they continuously exploit mental health to deflect from reality and justify their own wrongdoings is an unerasable piece of historical data.

Furthermore, the severe emotional collapse and trauma relapse experienced by the victims are the direct, agonizing consequences of this duo's grooming and subsequent mass-blocking campaigns. Dismissing this genuine pain as a calculated "performance" for public opinion is an incredibly cruel, perpetrator-centered act of secondary victimization.

Second, she asserts that "anyone who shares their pain on the internet is just entirely desperate for attention." She states:

"However, the choice to broadcast it publicly rather than seeking private, professional help often reveals a deeply ingrained habit of weaponizing their own pain for public consumption."

"A hater might post a cryptic or alarming update specifically to see who reacts, who comes running to their defense, or who among their "enemies" breaks their silence to comment on it."

The true purpose of victims documenting and archiving their trauma and exposure posts online is not to beg for validation. It is a public interest effort to prevent these sisters from deceptive clout-washing and to protect new users from becoming their next targets. If their intent was genuinely malicious, why would these victims exhaust their own energy to gather massive amounts of evidence just to share their pain?

Moreover, this narrative of forcing victims to resolve their pain strictly in private is an insidious extension of the same rhetoric I dismantled in Vol. 1—where she claimed that "real victims remain silent." This is a sociopathic gagging tactic. It allows the perpetrator to hold onto power, isolate the victim from the community, and permanently bury the crimes away from public view.

She concludes the video with the following statement:

"The most common and effective response from observers is to refuse to take the bait, disengage entirely, and let professionals or genuine loved ones handle it if there is any actual danger."

Yes, this is fundamentally no different from commanding her audience that "a victim's pain is merely an emotional trap, so you must cut ties and ignore them completely." The complete disconnection ("disengage entirely") that Mirei currently preaches is nothing more than a hypocritical masquerade under the guise of protection. In reality, it is a meticulously constructed shield designed to provide a psychological excuse and a fake justification for Brittany's abnormal mass-blocking, blind censorship, and refusal of feedback on platforms like Bluesky.

Labeling the victims' suffering as a "dangerous emotional orbit" or "bait" to order the audience to "ignore and bypass them like machines" is an evil campaign. It is an insidious attempt to castrate the community's healthy capacity for critical thinking and human empathy, ultimately trying to socially erase the victims and treat them as invisible ghosts.

Do not let them trick you. Even if their words sound superficially plausible or right, this entire video is nothing but another classic display of DARVO.

32.

In her 32nd video, Mirei is providing her audience with another deceptive guide on "how to frame the community's rightful use of the boosting feature as a malicious smear campaign designed to weaponize money and trick the algorithm into destroying a creator's reputation." Since this video lacks a proper concluding remark at the very end, this section will be relatively short.

First, she claims that "the sole purpose of users spending money to boost exposure posts is to engage in targeted defamation and cut off a creator's financial backing." She asserts:

"Instead of relying on organic algorithms—which might limit a hateful post or controversy to a small circle—abusers use financial backing to inject toxic content, targeted attacks, or out-of-context clips directly into the feeds of wider audiences..."

"By boosting a post containing false claims, leaked private information, or manufactured drama, they artificially inflate its distribution. This forces the victim's followers, peers, or potential clients to see the negative content immediately upon opening their apps."

Let us ask a very straightforward question: What is the real reason users are paying out of their own pockets to boost these posts? It is because these sisters are actively engaging in abnormal "mass-blocking and collective censorship" across the community, trying to artificially bury the truth from the public.

The leaked logs of Mirei's inappropriate conversations with minors, her massive production of harmful NSFW art, and her recent, shameless bastardization of other users' original characters (OCs)—taking them without permission and twisting them entirely out of context to masquerade them as her own—are not some "manufactured drama." They are unerasable, concrete pieces of empirical evidence documenting actual systemic wrongdoing and blatant artistic theft.

Furthermore, framing a public interest exposure campaign and efforts to prevent further minor grooming as a mere "smear campaign" driven by money is a repulsive play on words. In her previous video, she shamelessly criticized her own fans for how they spend their money. Yet here, she completely contradicts herself, practically confessing that she is terrified of boosted posts because they warn her "potential clients" and might permanently dry up her financial income, commissions, and overall clout.

Second, she argues that "these exposure posts are just an exploitation of algorithmic loopholes for vanity metrics and a form of psychological warfare." She states:

"By pumping money into an inflammatory or rage-baiting post, abusers can rapidly generate thousands of reactions, arguments, and quote-shares. This tricks the platform's algorithm into treating the hostile content as "trending"..."

"The psychological impact of knowing someone spent actual money just to ensure people see content meant to mock, demean, or harass them is a potent form of intimidation... which can wear down the mental health and well-being of the target."

What on earth does she actually think of her own audience and critics? The true reason these exposure posts gain thousands of quote-shares and trend on the platform's recommendation feeds is not because users are using money to trick the system. It is because Mirei's minor grooming crimes, her inappropriate NSFW content, and Brittany's absolute refusal of feedback are critical pieces of data that the entire community has a rightful duty to share, archive, and monitor.

And why is the public so deeply enraged in the first place? The audience is not reacting because the posts are inherently "inflammatory." They are furious because the horrific actions committed by these sisters are genuinely infuriating to any decent human being.

While completely disregarding the mental health of the actual victims—who now suffer from lifelong, irreversible trauma and severe emotional abuse caused by her actions—she shamelessly tries to package her own financial stress as if she is the one enduring "psychological harassment." This is a textbook display of DARVO.

In the end, Mirei’s long-winded technical jargon about platform algorithms is nothing but a desperate smoke screen. She isn't actually terrified of "harassment" or "misinformation"—she is terrified that these boosted exposure posts are warning her "potential clients" and cutting off her stream of financial income and fame.

All these ugly truths have simply become too expensive for her to block.

*

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

To ground the conclusion of this volume, I would like to reference a profound concept from the political philosopher Hannah Arendt, who extensively analyzed how systematic malice takes root when individuals willingly choose the "Inability to Think." She warned that the darkest compliance in human history does not require monsters, but rather ordinary minds who consciously embrace a specific moral blindness:

"The refusal to understand, and the deliberate inability to think from the standpoint of somebody else."

This timeless philosophical insight serves as a brutal, unyielding mirror to Mirei’s 31st and 32nd uploads. By instructing her remaining followers to classify the genuine trauma and emotional relapse of her victims as a calculated "sympathy trap" or "bait," and commanding them to "disengage entirely," Mirei is attempting something far more sinister than mere historical revisionism. She is trying to systematically castrate the basic human empathy of her fandom. She is conditioning her audience to paralyze their own capacity for compassion, demanding that they close their eyes to actual human suffering so they can remain comfortable, unfeeling shields for her reputation.

To those of us who have been unfairly branded as "haters," "manipulators," or "saboteurs" simply for refusing to turn a blind eye to the victims: do not let her pseudo-psychological trickery shake your resolve.

When creators resort to weaponizing terms like 'trauma' and 'relapse' to enforce an emotional quarantine around their income, they aren't displaying strength—they are exposing the absolute depth of their own panic. They are trying to rewrite history by terrorizing their own community into a state of chilling apathy, desperately hoping that enforced isolation will make the world look away from the cold, hard facts of their minor grooming, artistic theft, and the bastardization of other users' OCs. But we will not bow to this pathetic, corporate intimidation.

We are the ones standing firmly in the light of reality, holding up a mirror to a crumbling fortress of delusion. If they choose to treat an entire community's shared empathy as a hostile conspiracy and retreat into a vacuum built on blind praise, selective amnesia, and financial desperation, that is their downfall, not our burden.

True artistry cannot survive inside a vacuum of censorship, and a clean reputation cannot be manufactured through a frantic, mass-blocking spree. No matter how many manipulative smoke screens they throw from behind their screens, they can never erase the collective memory of this community. We are not emotional extortionists. We are the living, unbreakable evidence of their actions.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our refusal to accept their gaslighting is the ultimate proof that the truth cannot be mass-blocked.

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER:

11. Your hater came by to leave you a comment, but why?

12. Your Hater isn't Sorry.

13. Haters love a "Gotcha" Moment.

14. Haters Make Low Effort Moves.

15. Your Haters Aren't Creative.

16. Haters DONT CHANGE

17. Haters Obsessed With Darkness

18. It's Not Too Late To Walk Away.

*

19. Haters are DESPERATE

20. Haters Hate REALITY

*

*

11.

To be quite frank, this eleventh video is utterly incomprehensible. It leaves me wondering whether this duo is genuinely oblivious to how they ended up in this position, or if they are simply acting out of sheer, calculated denial. In this video, Mirei argues that critics use the phrase "no one supports you" as a deliberate tactic to isolate creators and make them feel vulnerable. Ironically, the reality is the exact opposite. The audience is not trying to isolate them; the sisters have isolated themselves by building a closed-off, dictatorial echo chamber. They continue to evade all accountability, churn out bizarre "advice" videos to brainwash their remaining blind followers, and ruthlessly mass-block innocent fans who either speak the truth or genuinely care about their work—all simply because those fans don't fit their narrative. The fandom didn't isolate this duo; the sisters quarantined themselves because they are terrified of feedback and desperate to preserve their fragile image. One cannot help but question who in their right mind would continue to follow creators like this.

Mirei goes on to claim that anyone using absolute, extreme expressions like "no one" or "never" is an irrational attacker. This statement is laughably hypocritical when it is her own sister, Brittany Robinson, who has been aggressively throwing around absolute, dictatorial statements toward the audience. Look no further than Brittany's 2026 "OC Boundaries" which strictly enforces bans like "NSFW is HELL NO!", or her YouTube comment sections where she threatens that anyone asking about the next episode will be immediately blocked. Has Brittany conveniently forgotten that her own sister was the one who produced suggestive and NSFW content using her The Pink Corruption characters? It is completely absurd to declare that it is acceptable when the older sister does it, but strictly forbidden when the fandom does. Furthermore, if simply asking when the next episode drops warrants an immediate block, it makes one wonder what she truly thinks of her own audience. With these irrational claims, Mirei has essentially self-destructed and exposed her own sister's tyranny.

Finally, the sisters play the ultimate victim, claiming that haters try to sweep their hard work and genuine connections under the rug. Yet, the true perpetrators sweeping hard work under the rug are the sisters themselves. They are the ones who dictatorially stripped away the legitimacy, sweat, and tears of various creators within this diverse fandom—creators who poured their hearts into fan projects out of pure love for the work. Not only did the sisters bury those efforts, but they also ruthlessly crushed both the creations and the character of those artists. Our fandom must never fall for this pathetic gaslighting. We need to look directly at the truth, hold onto it, and make sure it is widely shared among us.

12.

The twelfth video is truly mind-blowing in its audacity.In this video, she discusses the concept of a "fake apology." She claims that those who give fake apologies weaponize their own suffering and mental health as excuses, effectively flipping the roles of victim and offender. Yet, this exact behavior is a carbon copy of what these sisters have been doing for years.

Whenever the sisters faced call-outs for severe misconduct—such as grooming allegations involving minors or their manipulative backtracking on copyright ownership—they would constantly bring up their autism spectrum disorder and mental illnesses, claiming that the public’s criticism was causing them immense suffering. This directly resulted in turning the fandom, which was merely demanding legitimate accountability, into "abusers," while flipping themselves into the victims. How utterly malicious is this? No amount of mental illness or autism can ever serve as a free pass for such toxic behavior.

Furthermore, she claims that words are incredibly cheap online, and that we must trust and watch the behavior after an apology, rather than the script. This is exactly what our fandom should be saying to them, not the other way around. In fact, the absolute reason why the fandom fundamentally distrusts these sisters is because their words and behavior are completely contradictory, just as that logic dictates. Mirei did release a script in 2024 apologizing for using her YouTube channel as a mere vent space in the past. However, she is now uploading this entire "Some Advice for You" series, essentially brainwashing their remaining fans and fully justifying all of their past actions. In other words, her 2024 apology was nothing more than a cheap public performance. The behavior she is exhibiting right now could arguably be considered far more malicious than before. This is because this video series carries an extremely high risk of twisting the core values of her blind followers in the wrong direction.

To make matters worse, she encourages blocking in this video, just as she always has. She states that even if you receive an apology, you can still keep the other party blocked and keep your boundary locked tight to protect your personal peace. This content is merely a cowardly pretext designed to retroactively justify her younger sister Brittany's abnormal mass-blocking data. Take my personal case, for instance: she arbitrarily branded a completely innocent fan as a "child" and blocked them over a trivial reason like missing an age indication or tag. Yet, even after the misunderstanding was completely cleared up, the absolute most she did was silently unblock them without a single word of apology. Is a simple apology really that difficult? Treating a fan like that out in the open and refusing to offer even a basic apology is a complete violation of human courtesy and moral duty. Furthermore, looking at her staggering block statistics, it seems highly likely that there are countless others who, like my friends, were blocked over the most trivial reasons. Simply put, the "boundary" these sisters preach is nothing more than a sophisticated shield designed to legitimize and dress up their dictatorial censorship and blatant disrespect.

These sisters need to realize something. They might sit there thinking that the public lacks accountability, but the reality is that the ones truly lacking accountability are themselves. A person who wouldn't even offer a single word of apology to a genuine fan after a misunderstanding was cleared, and a person who crossed the line first by drawing NSFW content of her younger sister's character—seeing these two gather in the exact same space to judge "other people's accountability and fake apologies" is the most massive, laugh-inducing comedy of this entire drama.

13.

In the 13th video, frankly speaking, it is nothing but the same utterly absurd and appalling nonsense we’ve seen throughout this entire series.

In this episode, Mirei claims that people look for "human errors"—like a minor typo, a slight continuity slip, or a tiny misstatement—and use it as "ammunition." According to her logic, the only reason the fandom is angry is because of their simple, innocent mistakes. But let me ask you this: are "minor grooming allegations involving minors," "the backstabbing of QuadragonX," and "the indiscriminate mass-blocking of hundreds of fans" just simple "human errors"?

She goes on to state, "spotting an error elevates them above the creator. It’s a classic projection of insecurity." She also lectures us on confirmation bias, claiming that haters will completely ignore 99% of what you did flawlessly just to "hyper-focus" on the 1% that was slightly off. Oh, the irony. The sisters themselves are the ultimate living proof of confirmation bias. They completely shut their eyes and ignore the 99% of legitimate, justified criticism from hundreds of independent individuals, choosing instead to hyper-focus on their own 1% narrative that this is all just a 'malicious conspiracy by jealous haters' to suit their own taste.

Finally, consider her concluding remark: "dealing with the messiness of the creative process means you're already miles ahead of anyone sitting on the sidelines keeping score." Do they honestly think they have the right to say this? As I already proved in Vol.1, the victim, QuadragonX, was never a bystander sitting on the sidelines. They were a true creator who poured their literal blood, sweat, and tears into the work day and night. Who was the one that ruthlessly trampled on and ousted that true creator? For them to sit there and preach about the "solitude and greatness of a creator" while blaming bystanders is deeply insulting.

They will probably never realize it. They will never understand how disgustingly hypocritical and malicious they are—writing this garbage, blindly agreeing with it, promoting it, and enforcing these twisted standards upon their audience.

14.

In her 14th video, she begins by stating: “Dealing with someone who explicitly dislikes you or your work, yet constantly watches it, screenshots it, and uses it for their own content, is incredibly frustrating.” She is essentially claiming that taking screenshots and using them in criticism is inherently "hypocritical and parasitic." However, anyone who understands the truth behind these events knows this is a textbook case of psychological projection. Mirei distorts the community’s pursuit of accountability, labeling it as mere 'parasitism to siphon views.'

Let us be clear: the public does not utilize screenshots for casual gossip. We use them because they serve as undeniable, objective evidence of the sisters' indelible misconduct—including the grooming and exploitation of minors, and the predatory usurpation of another creator's rights. Dismissing these screenshots as "parasitic" is nothing more than a cowardly tactic to muzzle the truth, trying to erase their crimes and suppress genuine victims by branding them as mere "rage-baiters."

If anyone is truly guilty of "The Clout Market (Riding Your Coattails)" and parasitizing someone else's original ideas and success, it is the Robinson sisters themselves. The fandom remembers exactly who backsabbed QuadragonX—the sole creator who poured blood, sweat, and tears into sustaining Pink Corruption Continued (PCC). They stripped QuadragonX of their rights and unilaterally resumed the series to hijack its success. To claim they "merely took back what was theirs" is a grotesque distortion that flies in the face of basic creative ethics.

She also targets critics by claiming it is “'Rage Farming' and Hate-Watching,” stating that we “start drama or frame ourselves as critics to get people talking” and use screenshots as a “visual anchor to make commentary look legitimate... to trigger a reaction.” No, absolutely not. This manifesto seeks zero profit and zero clout. The collective exposures across X, DeviantArt, Reddit, and Tumblr are not "rage farming" for views. They represent a legitimate exercise of consumer and community rights to prevent minor grooming and authoritarian censorship. Furthermore, no one in this fandom desires their toxic audience. Quite the contrary: this critique serves as the ultimate visual anchor to warn innocent fans who are still being gaslit and brainwashed by their false narratives to finally open their eyes.

The deception runs even deeper. She categorizes the criticism as “Intense Envy Masquerading as Criticism,” asserting that critics are “deeply envious of the community and recognition you've built, and tearing it down... is their misguided way of feeling equal to you.” In other words, she eagerly paints her critics as obsessed, inferior contrarians driven by pure envy. But the fandom does not monitor their footsteps out of jealousy; we watch them as a necessary vanguard, a Watcher, ensuring they never again groom another vulnerable minor or execute their tyrannical mass-blocking campaigns. The community has no desire to be "equal" to perpetrators. What we feel toward those who exploit children and stab fellow creators in the back is not envy—it is absolute moral contempt.

As for her practical options, she advises followers to “Starve Them of Oxygen” and entirely ignore critics. If ignoring criticism is the ultimate rule, then one must ask: Why did she feel so utterly compelled to manufacture 14 defensive videos? The answer is obvious. She is hyper-aware of her own unraveling reputation, and these videos are a desperate, frantic attempt to muzzle the community, legitimize her censorship, and sweep her past under the rug.

She flippantly suggests “Watermarking” to protect visuals, claiming it makes the original creator undeniable. But what good is a watermark? A watermark cannot erase the receipts of exploitation, the history of deceit, or the cold data of mass-blocking 300 to 400 innocent users. A watermark is a tool to protect intellectual property; it is not a detergent capable of washing away moral bankruptcy.

Finally, the sisters undoubtedly comfort themselves with the delusion to “Let Your Success Be the Ultimate Defense,” believing that “a copy or a bitter critic will never have the authenticity that made your series popular in the first place.” Yet, the "success" they boast of is a hollow monument built on hypocrisy, treating human beings as disposable tools. As of 2026, Brittany continues her dictatorial rule, slapping fans with aggressive "OC Boundaries" that outlaw fanfiction and threatening to instantly ban anyone who dares to ask about upcoming episodes.

A success built inside a "glass castle," constructed by trampling the authenticity of creators who genuinely loved the community and hiding behind a mass-block button, is entirely counterfeit. True "Authenticity" requires the courage to embrace both praise and critique, both light and shadow. Because these sisters have aggressively blocked out half of the truth, the word "authenticity" no longer belongs to them. They have none left.

15.

While the 15th video may seem plausible on the surface and appear to leave no room for rebuttal, it invariably contains glaring contradictions. In this video, Mirei attempts to lecture the fandom and the public, preaching that the internet is "never that serious."

In the video, she explains that "Shitposting is essentially low-quality content intentionally posted to derail a conversation or bait a reaction." If that is the case, are the exposures and criticism papers posted by the fandom on X (Twitter), DeviantArt, and Tumblr also mere shitposting? Right now, these sisters are forcefully pushing the public's legitimate and detailed demands for accountability into the low-tier internet culture categories of "shitposting" and "bait." This is nothing more than an intentional Category Error designed to devalue the discussion and evade the core issue.

She also claims that "the humor comes purely from consuming bizarre memes that are visually broken and make absolutely no sense out of context." However, the fandom is not that foolish. The fandom’s voice is not a contextless, bizarre meme; rather, it operates on a solid, historical context—namely, the clear misconduct the creator committed in the past (e.g., distributing inappropriate NSFW illustrations in spaces accessible to minors, and deceiving the community regarding the ownership of The Pink Corruption). Dismissing this as a contextless, random post is merely a reality-distorting framing tactic.

Furthermore, she argues that these posters "love to take a completely mundane opinion and crank it up to an eleven, passionately defending something completely ridiculous—like arguing that a toaster is a valid gaming console—just to see how seriously people take them." But are our arguments mere trolling? The "responsibility and morality as a creator" demanded by the fandom is not a ridiculous topic like a toaster debate; it is a basic requirement that any creator with a platform must possess. By portraying their fandom as an immature group that enjoys provoking reactions with absurd stubbornness, the sisters are subtly belittling them. It is a clever yet arrogant framing attempt to undermine the intellectual capacity of the serious critics and claim moral superiority.

Worse still, the sisters view the fandom’s critique as mere "blocks of text repeatedly copied and pasted across comment sections to flood the chat." The fandom’s critiques are not meaningless, copied-and-pasted texts; they are original writings, with each chapter containing its own distinct logic. Despite this, the sisters label the public's collective protest as a mere "copypasta" spam attack, creating a pretext to shut their ears. Lumping legitimate criticism voiced by hundreds of independent individuals into mindless spam is an utter insult to the public.

The most contradictory logic in this video lies in the golden rule of this culture: "It's never that serious." If the internet is truly such a low-stakes, lighthearted space, why did the sister react so defensively to minor differences in opinion or mentions of Original Characters (OC), mass-blocking nearly 400 users on Bluesky? While gaslighting and lecturing the public to "not take it so seriously" and "just be cool," they themselves display extreme hypocrisy, wielding controlling power with utmost bias and sensitivity over the slightest feedback. This petty attempt to hide behind low-subculture text to dismiss valid criticism as a "harmless joke" only proves they are admitting to their own authoritarian defense mechanism that has silenced hundreds of people. I hope they realize this someday, though that possibility seems increasingly slim.

16.

The 16th video in this series is a masterclass in psychological projection and a complete lack of self-awareness. It is, quite frankly, astonishing to witness. She opens the video by stating: "When someone claims they've changed, but their underlying resentment or hostility remains, they usually can't hide it for long."

She then goes on to list the signs of these so-called "haters." Let us dissect them one by one.

Mirei claims that haters, desperate to appear mature, mask their malice with backhanded praise like, "Wow, your new project is doing so well! It’s amazing you pulled this off without formal training." Yet, who is the one actually doing this? It is the Mirei duo themselves. They consistently diminish the work of other indie creators, fan artists, and even the achievements of Pink Corruption Continued(known as The Pink Corruption) (whose ownership was transferred away from them), snidely implying, "Well, the original still belongs to us." To invalidate the fandom's hard work while labeling any critical response as "hating" is a level of moral bankruptcy that speaks for itself.

She further claims that haters obsessively stalk your stories, profiles, and content just waiting for a mistake (slip-up), without ever offering support. This is a pathetic attempt to reframe public accountability as "stalking." As established before, the ones conducting constant surveillance and censorship are Mirei and Brittany. Brittany currently holds a track record of mass-blocking 300 to 400 users. Are we supposed to believe their censorship is a "mature method of self-protection" while the community's effort to preserve evidence is just "stalking"? The double standard is staggering.

Mirei warns against people who nitpick under the guise of "constructive criticism" or "doing it for your own good," claiming it only drains your motivation. But look at the very title of her own playlist: 《Some Advice For You》. She has produced over 16 gaslighting videos dedicated to lecturing others under the pretense of "offering advice." A genuine artist sharing tips would discuss overcoming art blocks or improving illustration techniques. Instead, her videos are filled with toxic rants: "No matter how much you try to bring me down, I won't blink an eye," or "Those who harass me will end up as failures in life." There is zero helpful advice here. It is merely a digital landfill where she dumps her rage and curses those who exposed her misdeeds. For someone who apologized years ago for using the internet as an emotional dumping ground, her regression into even more shameless behavior is pathetic. These videos serve as an echo chamber to justify their own actions, warp their remaining fans' perception of reality, and ruin the community's wellbeing.

The audacity reaches its peak when she claims that haters minimize past actions or gaslight victims by saying, "It was just a joke," or "You were being too sensitive." Look in the mirror. Who is currently deflecting responsibility for their actions? It is Mirei herself, who continuously dismisses her past minor-grooming allegations and the IP theft incident as "mere harassment from brainless haters." Creating an entire video series to run away from accountability, while describing that exact evasion as a trait of a "hater," goes beyond irony—it borders on pathological cognitive dissonance. What is the ultimate goal of blocking hundreds of people and isolating themselves with a handful of blind enablers? Following this path leads nowhere but total self-destruction.

Finally, she asserts that fake people treat you kindly during your struggles but turn cold and dismissive once you succeed. She defines the ultimate litmus test of true change as: "Whether they can offer a sincere apology and acknowledgement of their past actions without being forced to do so." She claims that anyone who acts like nothing happened while maintaining a hostile rivalry is just a "fake package."

Let us apply The Ultimate Litmus Test to Mirei Touyama and Brittany Robinson. They fail instantly. Mirei has never once offered a voluntary, sincere explanation or apology regarding her grooming and exploitation allegations. Instead, she simply rebranded her username and continues her activities acting as if nothing ever happened (Act like nothing ever happened). Meanwhile, Brittany blindly defends her, treating their own audience as potential criminals. Any polite inquiry or attempt to clear up misunderstandings from fans is weaponized, labeled as "hater malice," and met with an immediate block.

Do they truly believe that hiding behind a fragile, glass wall built on mass-blocking and censorship is the ultimate form of self-preservation? If so, they have proven themselves unfit to be called creators—or decent human beings. They must realize how fundamentally wrong it is to treat their audience not as equals, but as disposable objects.

17.

The 17th video appears to be an intensified version of the 3rd video that I previously covered in Vol. 1. While her arguments in this video might seem plausible at first glance to some, anyone who knows her actual track record will immediately see how utterly hypocritical this video truly is.

She claims that the goal of "haters" is merely to gain a reaction, and since ordinary insults no longer work, they resort to universally offensive and taboo themes like cults, human sacrifice, and torture to inflict fear and distress. However, what the public and the fandom are actually trying to evoke from her is not fear or distress—it is "Accountability" (moral and legal responsibility) for her grooming behavior involving minors. As I have explained before, during her past days as 'Breabear,' she was the very person who uploaded suggestive, bizarre, and explicit adult (NSFW) content featuring her sister's characters without any content warnings (CW) on a channel primarily viewed by young children. She herself brought actual "Shock Value" to the community. How utterly shameless is it for someone with such a history to twist legitimate exposure into a mere "psychological game played by haters"? She truly needs to look in the mirror and reflect on who created this situation and why things have escalated to this point.

Furthermore, she claims that these haters are deeply immersed in internet subcultures as "Edgelords," viewing the sharing of horrific images as a bizarre form of social currency, using them as mere "edgy memes" or intimidating personas while forgetting the grim reality of such horrors. Just how foolish does this sister think her fandom is? I will emphasize this as many times as it takes: the fandom is not that stupid. Community users are not clueless edgelords who have lost touch with reality. Just as popular indie animations like Murder Drones artistically use gore elements for narrative immersion, fans are simply analyzing the context of the work they created and expressing their opinions. Rather, she is the one who showed the ultimate toxicity of "Edgelord culture" by being abnormally obsessed with adult content and inappropriate sexual depictions behind the scenes of a space shared with minor fans. Choosing to mass-block all incoming criticism instead of reflecting on their own actions is an act completely devoid of conscience.

She even claims that obsessing over bizarre and ritualistic gore themes indicates a loss of reality or severe antisocial tendencies (mental health issues), adding a warning: "Dark, violent themes should be taken seriously, and your safety is the top priority." While it is true that ongoing harm is happening right now, I sincerely wish these sisters would stop insulting hundreds of independent users and fans—who are raising their voices for public interest with clear physical evidence from Discord logs and X timelines—by labeling them as an "antisocial attack by mentally ill people." Do they realize that their behavior—driving legitimate critics crazy and going on a blocking frenzy—is the textbook definition of "Narcissistic Rage" and "Antisocial Gaslighting"? They truly need to stop hiding behind psychological terms to insult both academia and the public at the same time.

This next part is perhaps the most hypocritical section of all. She tells her blind followers and other creators, "If you are being harassed, screenshot everything. Document Everything, including the date, time, and account name. Never delete them. They are needed as evidence." Yes, this particular sentence is the only thing she got right in this entire video, and it is the exact, perfect definition of what the fandom and victims are doing to them right now. Countless users, including my friends, are preserving clear screenshot evidence (Documentation) of her past grooming history involving minors, her gaslighting statements, and the DARVO tactics used to twist the survival methods of actual victims. According to her own logic, these records are not "harassment" but legitimate "legal evidence" that proves their grooming allegations and complicity in gaslighting.

Her final argument in this video is: "Do Not Engage with haters. Block them on all platforms and limit your privacy. Do not argue. And Report them using platform features." Yes, just like all the other videos in the 'Some Advice For You' playlist, these guidelines are not a manual for dealing with haters. They are a "cowardly escape manual" used by these sisters to censor and suppress legitimate criticism. Under the guise of this guideline, they have locked innocent fans demanding the truth into the frame of "H8RS" and shut their mouths, stealth-blocking nearly 400 people. Just because they close their ears and dismiss the public's rightful outcry as mere "clout-chasing" or "baiting," the history of exploitation and deception they committed will absolutely never be erased. If those who are currently busy building an echo chamber through exploitation and gaslighting do not stop this behavior immediately, it's safe to say there is virtually no chance for a bright future for them.

18.

Even at a glance, the 18th video might seem like a plausible piece of relationship advice. However, when contrasted with the sisters' past actions, it exposes an astonishing level of double standards and psychological projection. Here, Mirei suggests that creators should distance themselves from so-called "clout-chasers" who supposedly seek to exploit a creator’s recognition or follower count, presenting five reasons and a set of guidelines for setting boundaries.

Mirei states: "Moving on from friends who seem more interested in the 'clout' or social status you provide than in the friendship itself can be a difficult but necessary step for your well-being." However, her choice of words—specifically "clout" and "social status"—is incredibly arrogant. These terms subtly disguise a mindset that inherently categorizes friends, colleagues, and fans into a hierarchy, viewing them not as equals, but as inferiors trying to hitch a ride on her success. They twist mutual collaboration and networking into parasitic behavior, revealing a deep-seated elitism. Do people blinded by such self-importance ever realize that this very attitude makes them unwelcome wherever they go?

Furthermore, she claims: "If your friends are focused on what you represent—your reach, your art, or your online presence—they aren't actually seeing you. They are seeing a utility." Given how these sisters actually behave, this assertion is pure nonsense. If someone genuinely appreciates their art, they immediately build a defensive wall, assuming, "They just view me as a utility to exploit." In the online creative community, respecting a colleague's "reach" or "art" and connecting through it is not parasitic—it is a natural part of networking. This harsh, distrustful gaze that reduces others to mere utilities is not something created by their friends; it is a product of their own paranoia, projecting internal suspicion onto genuine goodwill.

This next part is particularly baffling, and anyone who has ever been blocked by Brittany will understand exactly why. Mirei describes clout-chasing behavior as: "Being asked to promote their work or give them exposure constantly..." Is this serious? If a request is too demanding or uncomfortable, a mature creator simply declines. Why must she escalate it by branding the other person as "parasitic" and trying to socially ostracize them? This is nothing but a passive-aggressive coping mechanism. She goes on to talk about: "Having your personal milestones overshadowed by their attempts to use those moments for their own engagement," and "Feeling drained after interactions, rather than uplifted, because the conversation always circles back to metrics, followers, or 'the grind.'" It is absurd. Labeling ordinary, everyday conversations between creators—such as sharing worries about metrics or followers—as energy-sucking, vampiric behavior is completely uncalled for. While the sisters might dismiss us as "paranoid," it is blindingly obvious that they are the ones suffering from severe paranoia.

This brings us to what is arguably the most hypocritical argument in the entire transcript. Mirei claims: "As a creator, your original projects—like the development of characters or your digital series—require an environment of honest feedback and creative safety," adding, "If friends are 'yes-men' because they want to stay in your circle... they can inadvertently steer your work away from what makes it special." These words should never come out of their mouths. These are the very people who labeled any form of constructive feedback or critique as "hate," stealthily blocking over 400 users (estimated at around 350 individual users, accounting for duplicates) to create an echo chamber. They built a tyrannical environment where only unquestioning praise was tolerated, and yet, they have the audacity to lecture others on the importance of an "environment of honest feedback." Blaming "yes-men" for ruining the work, when they themselves forced everyone to become one, is peak hypocrisy.

The delusion continues. She states: "Constantly questioning whether someone is reaching out because they care or because they want a shoutout breeds deep-seated suspicion," and concludes, "Dumping these associations clears the air, allowing you to focus on the people who show up for you when the camera is off." While preaching morality on public platforms like YouTube and Bluesky—desperately trying to look empathetic and appeal to other creators—they act entirely differently behind the scenes. In their own private spaces and comment sections, they gaslight fans and mass-block people in silence. When you look at their track record of blocking nearly 400 people and consider the controversies surrounding them, the response from other artists who actually know the truth is bound to be overwhelmingly negative. They can only put on this facade because newer creators are completely unaware of their true history.

Then comes the most malicious part of the video: "Having ten friends who genuinely support your growth is infinitely more valuable than having a hundred 'clout-adjacent' associates. By trimming the fat, you make space in your life for people who are invested in your journey, not just the destination of your follower count." To us, this sounds like a disturbing attempt to justify their mass-blocking sprees and ongoing censorship. Dehumanizing fans and critics who fail to meet their highly subjective, moving goalposts as "fat" that needs to be trimmed is chilling. They enforce absurdly strict boundaries, going as far as banning most forms of fanfiction and fanart, yet they expect a healthy community to survive under these conditions. It defies all logic.

The video concludes with a "Note on Setting Boundaries": "To distance oneself from clout-chasers without direct confrontation, one should deprioritize them by cutting off information about professional plans and shifting social interactions to mundane, non-networking environments; ultimately, by removing potential benefits, these relationships will naturally drift apart." Just how deep does their distrust of humanity run to create, validate, and promote a manual like this? This is a textbook manifestation of their desire to force everyone into a state of mutual distrust and hyper-vigilance. Like their previous videos, this is not a guide to healthy boundaries; it is a cowardly, passive-aggressive manipulation tactic designed to shut out the world without ever engaging in honest communication.

And to top it all off, it provides the ultimate tool for narcissistic reassurance: even when a friend naturally drifts away due to this cold shoulder, they can comfortably tell themselves, "See? They left because there was nothing left for them to 'gain.'" They trap themselves in a loop of self-righteousness, writing off everyone else as a parasite. What are fans supposed to learn from this? We must recognize this manual for what it truly is: a glorified, cowardly manifesto of passive-aggressive social control.

19.

In their 19th video, they continue to abuse psychological terminology, dismissing legitimate criticism from the community as nothing more than the "desperate struggles of jealous critics."

According to Mirei’s claim, "When people begin to feel threatened by your growth or influence, their behavior often shifts from casual criticism to desperate tactics. Because they lack legitimate arguments or the ability to reach your level, they resort to patterns that ultimately highlight your success rather than diminish it." Do these sisters truly lack the capacity to reflect on why the audience is reacting this way? This is a textbook ad hominem attack—a desperate attempt to avoid accountability by falsely framing the community's outrage as "jealousy" or "envy." The fandom's backlash does not stem from a lack of legitimate arguments. The community's criticism is firmly rooted in severe legal and ethical transgressions: documented allegations of minor grooming and the unauthorized exploitation of an IP against the explicit will of the official creator.

Furthermore, Mirei introduces the concept of "The 'Nitpick' Pivot," claiming: "When they can no longer critique your work effectively, they pivot to microscopic, irrelevant details. If they are attacking your grammar, the lighting in a video, or an insignificant stylistic choice... it’s a sign they’ve run out of substantive points." Are the severe, borderline-criminal issues the community has raised comparable to minor complaints about grammar, video lighting, or art styles? The sisters need a reality check. The fandom has never wasted time nitpicking trivial production details. They have manufactured a completely non-existent "hater profile" to argue against—a textbook strawman fallacy. By minimizing grave ethical failures as "microscopic, irrelevant details," they are actively trying to divert the audience's attention away from the substantive points of their abuse and intellectual property theft. This is pure, unadulterated gaslighting.

Next, Mirei touches upon "Mirroring and Copycatting," asserting: "Desperation often manifests as imitation. If you notice them suddenly adopting your aesthetic, using your specific phrasing, or trying to replicate the format of your 'popular series'..." To dismantle this, the community must look back at the actual timeline of The Pink Corruption. From the exact moment the sisters officially handed over the complete ownership of the franchise to take responsibility for their controversies, SingularityOfKhaos (formerly QuadragonX) became the sole legal and artistic owner of the IP. Yet, after unilaterally abandoning the series at Episode 6, they went behind the creator's back and restarted a non-canon continuation without permission. They hijacked the IP, replicated its format, and monetized the views—only to abruptly cancel it yet again whenever it suited their whim. What does one call this kind of behavior? The real "copycats" and thieves are nobody else but the sisters themselves. It is not the creator or the fandom copying them. It is the peak of narcissistic hypocrisy for them to squat on someone else’s property, wave it around, and then look the victimized fandom in the eye to call the community "copycats."

The part that disgusted the community the most was Mirei's third point, "Escalation to Personal Attacks," where she claims: "...When the discourse moves from your creative output to your character, appearance, or lifestyle choices, they have effectively abandoned the role of a critic and have entered the realm of a bully. This is a clear indicator that your talent intimidates them." As always, this is a profoundly arrogant statement. Demanding accountability for minor grooming and questioning a creator's integrity is not a "personal attack" or a critique of their "lifestyle choices." This is a classic deflection tactic used by perpetrators to reduce their wrongdoing to mere "privacy violations." The fandom is not driven by jealousy, nor is anyone intimidated by their "talent." They have stolen a forfeited IP, weaponized mass-blocking to silence the public, and continued to gaslight the community. Calling the public's resistance "bullying" is a gross display of narcissistic delusion.

Mirei then brings up "Coordinated 'Brigading'": "If you see a sudden influx of comments that feel robotic, repetitive, or eerily similar in tone... it is often a sign of manufactured outrage. They are working overtime to create an illusion of consensus to make you feel like your audience is turning against you when, in reality, it is just a small, loud group." What kind of absurd delusion is this? The community's outrage is not "manufactured." According to Clearsky tracking data, Brittany alone has blocked nearly 400 unique, independent users across her platforms. Even adjusting for overlap, that is a staggering 300 to 350 individual people silenced. As everyone knows, this is not an "illusion." The audience turning their backs on them is an organic, harsh reality. The only ones creating a fake "illusion of consensus" are those two, pulling the mass-block lever to erase critics and cultivate a sterile echo chamber of toxic positivity. Will they ever realize that they have trapped themselves in a prison of their own making?

And it doesn't stop there. Mirei’s 5th point regarding "Excessive Monitoring" claims: "They seem to know everything you do, the moment you do it. If they are the first to comment on every post... or keeping track of your minor platform updates, they are no longer just 'haters'—they have become fans who are simply too insecure to admit they admire your work." This is the ultimate pinnacle of a narcissistic mental victory, twisting "public safety vigilance" into "admiration." The community is tracking their updates not because anyone admires their work, but because the public is monitoring a known danger and exposing IP theft. Given that this fandom has a large population of minors, users are voluntarily maintaining a high state of vigilance to prevent another victim from emerging. Interpreting this protective barrier as "secretly liking them" is a grotesque manifestation of their warped psychological defense mechanisms.

Finally, Mirei pivots to "The 'Backhanded' Pivot," stating: "They start mixing insults with 'advice.' They might say, 'I'm just saying this because I want you to do better,' while delivering a purely destructive comment. This is a psychological maneuver to maintain access to you and appear like a helpful peer while actively trying to lower your confidence." Does this behavior not sound exactly like the very video series Mirei is hosting right now? Yes, as stated before, Mirei’s entire Some Advice for You playlist is the ultimate embodiment of this. The individual masquerading as a "helpful peer" while delivering purely destructive gaslighting is Mirei herself. The sisters stole a franchise they legally lost, and they are using pseudo-psychological maneuvers to silence the voices of the victims. This entire segment is nothing but Mirei staring into a mirror, perfectly describing her own reflection.

The conclusion of the video is equally bizarre: "Why this is actually a good sign: In the creative world, silence is the only true failure. As long as you are drawing eyes, you are doing something right. Haters rarely target those who are stagnant or failing; they target those who are gaining momentum." Let us make one thing clear: Infamy and success are entirely different concepts. The public's eyes are glued to them not because they are doing something right or because they are growing. As established in Vol. 1, the community refuses to look away because an unrepentant perpetrator of minor grooming and IP theft is continuously provoking the fandom. They are arrogantly trying to gaslight this collective civic surveillance into a narrative of their "momentum and success." This twisted rhetoric is the absolute peak of DARVO (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender)—a desperate attempt to rewrite a shameful reality into a beautiful narrative of triumph.

20.

In her 20th video, Mirei distorts psychological and sociological theories to stage a blatant act of gaslighting, framing it as: "Those who criticize us are merely haters and clinical contrarians who reject reality." This time, I will dismantle her claims in a slightly more systematic manner, which will also lay the groundwork for the upcoming Vol. 3.

First, Mirei introduces the premise that "criticizing them is a rejection of reality." In the video, she states: "The question of why some individuals... seem to reject or attack reality is a complex mix of psychology... manifest as a defense mechanism." And further adds:"Attacking 'reality' or the people who represent it—such as creators who share honest perspectives—is often a way to cope with internal discomfort." As you can see from what we’ve read so far, Mirei elevates themselves as the 'righteous creators representing reality' while demoting the fans to 'insecure individuals who deny reality due to their own inferiority complexes.' However, the ones truly denying reality are the sisters themselves. When confronted with the undeniable facts and reality of minor grooming and copyright infringement, the ones who couldn't handle their internal discomfort—and instead projected psychological jargon back onto the public to build a defensive wall—are none other than them. What could possibly be left for these sisters, who enforce such absurdly strict guidelines while actively encouraging mass-blocking?

Next, she claims that "the solidarity among critics is nothing more than cyberbullying and a witch hunt." In her video, she argues: "When someone joins a 'hater' community, they aren't just engaging in hate; they are finding a social identity... It is much easier to be cruel to a screen or a 'brand' than to a person." She then tacks on: "Platforms often reward controversial or hateful comments with higher visibility. This creates a cycle..." Yes, this entire argument is designed to reduce the community's public outcry to a cheap, algorithm-driven 'witch-hunt collective' or mere 'rage-baiting for views.' But as you all know, the solidarity of this fandom stems not from hatred, but from a profound sense of justice rooted in empathy for the victims. The ones who genuinely dehumanized others—treating actual human beings as mere 'numbers' or 'brands'—are the sisters themselves, who ruthlessly mass-blocked over 400 innocent fans who once supported them. Without a single shred of gratitude toward their fans, they only exchange sweet talk with each other. Is mass-blocking anyone who doesn't perfectly fit their arbitrary standards truly the 'mature way to become a genuine creator' as they claim? Furthermore, Brittany is progressively losing the identity of her own channel, just as I pointed out in my previous counter-argument. She does nothing but shield her older sister, sharing these 20+ gaslighting videos and praising them as 'educational content.' Is this even normal?

To top it all off, she claims that her haters have "Main Character Syndrome" (acting like self-righteous heroes). Here, she states: "In their own minds, some people view their criticism as a vital role—like a self-appointed critic or 'truth-teller'—which justifies their behavior..." And continues: "When someone is fixated on attacking your work... it is almost always a reflection of their own internal struggles, unmet needs, or the toxic environments..." According to her logic, is our current stance merely a reflection of our own internal struggles, unmet needs, or the toxic environment we belong to? This is a conclusion where she self-soothes by labeling criticizing users as 'delusional contrarians intoxicated by self-appointed heroism.' However, this statement serves as a flawless boomerang in this exact situation. Sitting in a room, completely abandoning the actual production of animation despite running an animation channel, and instead uploading over 20 preachy videos to lecture the entire public while acting like some grand psychological prophet—THAT is the textbook definition of 'Main Character Syndrome.' This hyper-fixation is not the public's problem; it is the physical projection of the sisters' own ugly internal struggles and the toxic echo chamber they built around themselves.

Honestly, as I write this, I find it impossible to comprehend the minds of these sisters. We will likely never understand why they create this imaginary enemy called a "Hater," project it onto their entire fandom, and commit such absurd acts.

And sadly, this counter-argument will continue into Vol. 3.

*

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

To ground this struggle, I would like to speak to you all by referencing a core principle from the philosopher Immanuel Kant, known as the Categorical Imperative:

1. The Formula of Universal Law:

"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

This timeless philosophical law serves as a direct, unyielding mirror to the creative duo. Kant argues that an action is only moral if you are willing to let everyone else in the world behave the exact same way. If you claim that your actions are justified, then you must accept those same actions from others. Yet, the sisters continuously violate this absolute law. They weaponize "boundaries" to silence others, but refuse to respect the boundaries of their fandom. They demand total immunity for their own past suggestive creations, while systematically destroying the sweat and tears of other talented artists. They expect the community to sit in a silent vacuum, waiting for crumbs of content, while treating any innocent inquiry as an act of war.

2. The Formula of Humanity:

"Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end."

By stating this, Kant emphasizes that human beings should never be used as disposable tools for personal gain. Yet, the sisters completely shatter this principle. They treat their fandom and fellow creators not as individuals worthy of respect, but merely as transactional assets to fuel their own success and shield their pristine image.

By enforcing rules they themselves constantly break, they are trying to create a world where they are the ultimate exception. But reality does not bow to the whims of hypocrites. A healthy community cannot survive on double standards. To those of you who have been unfairly pushed into the dark and labeled as "haters" for simply expecting basic human decency: remember that our voice is the necessary friction against their delusion. We are not the ones tearing down this community; we are the ones standing on the moral ground they abandoned.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who choose accountability over comfort. Our refusal to accept their gaslighting is the ultimate proof that the truth cannot be mass-blocked.

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER in this volume:

21. Haters want CONTROL

22. (Will be added soon...)

*

*

*

21.

In her 21st video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's public archiving and exposure as a serious felony: "Blackmail." Through this, she is treating the general public as mere criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "felonious act driven by extortion." Here, she states:

"Blackmail is a serious crime that is fundamentally about power, control, and exploitation. When people—often referred to as 'haters'—resort to blackmail..."

And further claims:

"Financial Gain: Many perpetrators believe that the victim will pay any amount to keep their secret quiet, making it an 'easy' way to extort funds..."

Think about this. The title of this very playlist is "Some Advice For You," and its description reads: "This playlist is to spread awareness and help educate online creators." Yet, there is absolutely no actual advice that a real creator could benefit from. Instead, it is packed with nothing but strategies and warnings against "haters." And now, what? A felony? Is she out of her mind?

These sisters are actively defining the act of exposing their past scandals as a "blackmail and extortion" tactic used by low-life criminals to wring money or power out of them. However, what this community demanded was never money; it was "the truth and genuine reflection." What the victims want is an apology and the prevention of further harm, not financial compensation. To dare downgrade this into a petty, low-life crime is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy.

Furthermore, she brands her critics as "empathy-lacking contrarians seeking revenge." Here are the two exact sentences she uses:

"Revenge or Retaliation: If someone feels wronged... they may use information they possess to inflict maximum emotional or professional damage as a form of 'payback.'"

"Lack of Empathy and Ethical Boundaries: Individuals who turn to blackmail... view the victim merely as a resource to be exploited rather than a human being."

She is painting those of us who lead the public exposure—including myself and my friends—as if we are sociopaths burning with personal vindictiveness, trying to ruin someone's career without a shred of empathy.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. This, too, is a textbook act of DARVO.

Who is the one that genuinely shattered ethical boundaries and exploited the trust of minor fans? Who is the one that lacked empathy so severely that they stabbed their own fans and fellow creators in the back, choosing to control the entire fandom through the tool of mass-blocking? The true perpetrators are the sisters themselves. Their cruelty truly knows no bounds.

The most mind-boggling part has to be this next section. She stages a grand "victim cosplay" by presenting a set of safety guidelines:

"Important Safety Note: Blackmail is illegal... Do not pay... Do not engage..."

And she goes on to say:

"Report it: Contact local law enforcement. In the United States, you can also report online crimes to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing the FBI into this. By explicitly mentioning a federal reporting channel like the IC3, she finishes her video with a dramatic masquerade, pretending they are victims of a massive national cybercrime syndicate. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into critics and force them into silence.

However, we have absolutely no reason to stop. Public criticism, rooted in undeniable evidence that is already openly available on the internet, can never be a subject of an FBI investigation. This desperate attempt to intimidate the public by hiding behind the names of federal laws and institutions is the ultimate proof of how cornered this pathetic "advice" series truly is.

This is barely the starting point of Vol. 3, and I honestly dread to imagine how the rest of their narrative will unfold.

*

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from one of the most famous dystopian novel, George Orwell's 1984:

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

To those of us who have been unfairly branded as "criminals" or "blackmailers" simply for refusing to forget the truth: do not let their desperate threats shake your resolve. When creators resort to weaponizing federal agencies and masking public accountability as a federal felony, they aren't displaying strength—they are exposing the absolute depth of their own panic. They are trying to rewrite history by terrorizing their own community into silence, desperately hoping that fear will make us look away from the cold, hard facts of their misconduct. But we will not bow to this pathetic intimidation.

We are the ones standing firmly in the light of reality, holding up a mirror to a closed-off fortress of delusion. If they choose to treat an entire fandom as an enemy syndicate and retreat into a sanctuary built on blind praise and institutional fear, that is their downfall, not our burden. True artistry cannot survive inside a vacuum of censorship, and a clean reputation cannot be manufactured through a mass-blocking spree. No matter how many legal threats they throw from behind their screens, they can never erase the collective memory of this community. We are not extortionists. We are the unbreakable evidence of their actions.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.

Here's the videos of Mirei(formerly Breabear Jones) with my opinions:

Today, I would like to refute the logic regarding 'h8r' and 'victim' presented in Mirei Touyama’s recent videos. She has been frequently uploading content of this nature to YouTube lately. While some of you may have seen my recent posts, others might not be familiar with them yet.

Being from a different linguistic background, I could not grasp every nuance; however, one thing is certain: this is a clear case of psychological projection, and the current situation reveals undeniably problematic aspects.

Chapters of the videos that I'll COUNTER:

1. The truth about YOUR H8RS

2. Here's why you H8RS DENY your success

3. Your h8rs have a gore obsession, but why?

4. HERE ARE SIGNS OF A FAKE VICTIM

5. Your h8r talks you and about you like they know you. But why? Here's the answer.

6. Your h8rs may have Chronic Victimhood, here are some Facts.

7. You H8r gossip about how you spend your money, but why?

8. Your hater mask slipped. Here are the signs and why it happened.

9. Your hater hosts RAGE BAIT accounts but why?

10. Your hater DEFENDS their own abuse towards you but why??

*

*

*

1.

In her first video, she explained the 'Echo Chamber' effect: "If a hater reposts your work and uses five alt-accounts to leave negative comments, a random viewer might think, 'Oh, I guess everyone dislikes this,' and feel pressured to agree." She then suggested a 'Mass Block' as a massive time-saver—a statement I found utterly appalling.

Ironically, this is precisely what Mirei Touyama and her sister, Brittany Robinson, are practicing now. According to 'Clearsky,' a website that tracks blocked users on Bluesky, Brittany has blocked over 200 users on her main account and about 120 on her alternative account, 'Brittany's Imagination'—surpassing 300 blocks in total. Does this seem like a normal figure? If Gooseworx, the creator of The Amazing Digital Circus, had blocked that many users, it would have sparked a massive backlash online. Is this truly justifiable?

There is a high probability that many of those they ousted as 'haters' are actually innocent people. It is evident that my friends were blocked in the same manner. On Brittany’s Bluesky, one gets blocked for not meeting a certain age requirement or for violating 'OC boundaries.' Despite my efforts to follow her guidelines, she labeled me a child and blocked me simply because I hadn't specified my age. When I politely asked her to clear up the misunderstanding, she merely 'liked' my post and unblocked me—without a single word of apology.

She abandoned even the most basic human courtesy. Shouldn't a creator apologize after wrongfully blocking a genuine fan? By weaponizing these mass blocks, the sisters seem to genuinely delude themselves into believing they are in the right.

2.

While I am not suggesting one must engage with everyone they dislike, in reality, social interaction involves encountering diverse perspectives. They seem oblivious to the fact that their current position is nothing more than a fragile fortress of glass, ready to collapse at any moment.

In her second video, she brought up concepts such as 'The Mirror Effect (Projection),' 'Moving the Goalposts,' 'Cognitive Dissonance,' and the 'Crabs in a Bucket Mentality.' Among these, the 'Crabs in a Bucket' metaphor was particularly clear: the idea that haters find comfort in pulling down those who are trying to climb up and change their lives.

However, isn't the reality exactly the opposite? If they are the ones "climbing up," does that make us the other crabs pulling them down? This logic is fundamentally and laughably flawed. Furthermore, she states, "When the results are visible, the denial usually says more about the critic's frustration than the creator's effort."

To be clear, the fandom is not suffering from persecutory delusions. We are perfectly capable of seeing the truth. She remains oblivious to her own hsitory, in reality, she and her sister are the true 'crabs in the bucket'—the ones who stripped away the creative freedom of innocent creators(like QuadragonX, the creator of Pink Corruption Continued) and actively dragged them into the dirt.

3.

In her third video regarding 'gore,' she continues her narrative about 'haters.' As I understand it, she claims that these individuals are obsessed with posting graphic content and lack self-control; therefore, any negative reaction only serves to encourage them. Her advice is to ignore them entirely, document the evidence with screenshots, and report them.

Certainly, any reasonable person would agree that excessively graphic gore warrants a report. However, most creators follow basic etiquette by applying appropriate labels or content warnings. There is a line that should not be crossed, and those who ignore it are the ones at fault. Yet, this brings us to a glaring hypocrisy.

Furthermore, her claim that critics are merely "obsessed with gore" demonstrates a profound ignorance of narrative storytelling and art. Popular animated series from Glitch Productions, such as Murder Drones or Knights of Guinevere, frequently utilize graphic and gore elements. Yet, their massive fandoms do not love these shows out of a mindless obsession with blood; rather, they appreciate how these intense visuals elevate the stakes, enhance the atmosphere, and deepen story immersion. Even in classical art, countless masterpieces displayed in world-renowned museums depict grotesque and gory scenes to convey deep human emotions. Does Mirei genuinely believe that anyone who appreciates these narrative and artistic choices is just a "hater"? She fails to understand the fundamental difference between purposeful artistic expression and mindless shock value. This flawed understanding brings us directly to a glaring hypocrisy.

Even if we set aside other major controversies, it is well-known that during her 'Breabear' era, she created inappropriate illustrations and animations featuring her sister’s character—without any content warnings whatsoever. At the time, her channel was hosting 'The Pink Corruption' (a Just Shapes & Beats fan-made series), making it highly accessible to young children. Given the nature of that content, it would not have been surprising if it had been reported itself. Does she believe that gore produced by others deserves to be reported, while her own past inappropriate and suggestive works are exempt?

4.

The fourth video was, in my opinion, the most appalling and contemptible of all. Under the section 'Important Distinction,' she states: 'Victims of actual abuse often struggle to speak up, blame themselves, and may minimize what happened to them.' This is an incredibly dangerous and irresponsible narrative.

While it is true that trauma can make it difficult for victims to speak out, educational institutions in my country—and indeed, society at large—teach victims that they must never exaggerate or minimize their experiences; they must speak the truth as it is. We are taught that victims should never blame themselves and that those around them must provide a supportive environment to listen and offer comfort.

Adhering to the logic in her video only risks allowing the abuse to escalate until it becomes irreversible. In many cases, victims finally speak out when they have reached a breaking point, desperately needing help and finally speak out. When they finally share their truth, are they merely 'playing the victim'? This rhetoric is deeply insulting and incredibly dangerous, especially to actual victims of violent crimes.

In addition, one of my friends was almost sexually assaulted by their ex. To protect themselves, they had to scream to draw a crowd—including mall employees, a security guard, and random onlookers—just to yell at her to step back. Even then, she refused to leave until the security guard finally threatened to arrest her. Fortunately, the assault was narrowingly avoided, but if my friend had not cried out for help, a truly horrific tragedy would have undoubtedly occurred. Crimes of this nature can only be prevented when victims are able to loudly alert those around them.

While her criteria for distinguishing victims may not be entirely false in a vacuum, within this specific context, it sounds like nothing more than an order for real victims to remain silent. This rhetoric drags victims further into the abyss and is, quite frankly, the exact textbook logic employed by perpetrators to silence their victims and suppress the truth.

5.

The fifth video is equally preposterous. The core argument here is that the audience 'only knows the output, not the operator'—that our knowledge is merely a 'low-resolution snapshot' colored by our imagination. Let me be clear: the audience is nowhere near as ignorant as she claims.

As someone who has produced stop-motion animation for academic projects and currently works as an illustrator, I am acutely aware of the immense labor and blood, sweat, and tears involved in creation. And, I, along with many other artists and animators in the community, possess the empathy to wait for a creator’s growth. We understand the grueling reality of solo production—from OST and puppet making to storyboarding. However, there is a reason why fans occasionally grow impatient.

Typical indie animators usually release 1–5 minute shorts every 3–6 months rather than long-form series. We know that a single long-form episode can take up to two years. Even major projects like Hazbin Hotel or Helluva Boss could only maintain their pace by expanding into professional studios. For a solo or small-scale creator like Brittany, completing even one season of 15–20 episodes is borderline impossible without a dedicated team. For instance, The Heroic Six,one of the series Brittany is making, took two years to produce a single 10-minute episode, and even then, the story had to be significantly condensed. When updates are this infrequent, the creator should ideally provide official information to sustain interest. Yet, there is a severe lack of substantial updates.

To make matters worse, Brittany’s 'OC Boundaries' as of 2026 explicitly ban fanfiction, effectively stifling the community's ability to engage through headcanons or theories. If we are deprived of both official information and the freedom to hypothesize, what exactly are we, the fans, expected to do? Sit in a silent vacuum and wait forever?

6.

The sixth video is essentially a repetition of the fourth, focusing on those who allegedly 'fake' being a victim. She describes a cycle: trying to help, having advice ignored, encountering a new 'crisis,' and then feeling guilty for not helping. Ironically, this perfectly describes the situation between her and us. We, who offered sincere advice, were dismissed as 'haters' and blocked. Is she really in a position to lecture others on this? These are words that should be coming from us, not from someone who is busy building a closed-off echo chamber. It is both frustrating and saddening to watch her fans and her sister blindly defend her.

No matter how many of their posts I read, I cannot fathom their mindset.If this cycle continues, the stability of this fandom is at risk. This is a serious concern. The reasons behind their aggressive shift in tone toward the audience, while simultaneously posting this content without ever addressing past controversies, remain deeply unsettling.

By limiting interactions to only those who offer praise and removing those who provide critical feedback, the environment becomes increasingly unbalanced. This structure creates a hierarchy where the relationship between the creator and the audience lacks the mutual respect typically found among peers or friends. Instead, it appears to be a rigid system where individuals are expected to conform to specific expectations or face exclusion. This transformation from an open community to a restricted one is a significant point of contention.

7.

The seventh video is frankly speaking, an absolute stretch. The overarching narrative presented here is incredibly extreme. In reality, if anyone actually behaved the way she describes, the community would unanimously treat them as an anomaly. This only proves how utterly absurd the premise of this video truly is. As seen throughout her "some advice for you" video series, she repeatedly relies on clichés like, "Haters often look for a reason to invalidate someone's success."

She claims that whether it is a tech upgrade, new art supplies, or just a simple dinner, critics will pounce on it. But let’s be real: unless someone is driven by a literal pathological obsession, who on earth would micromanage and nitpick such trivial matters? I sincerely hope Mirei and Brittany do not embarrass themselves by saying "they use it to build a narrative" in front of sensible people in real life. She then goes on to describe The "Sellout" Trap, whining that "If you buy something nice, they claim you've 'changed' or are 'out of touch.'" It is entirely natural for long-time followers to occasionally miss a creator's roots or "initial mindset." Yet, she exaggerates this into a malicious conspiracy. Who actually takes it to the malicious extreme she describes?

The true colors of how these sisters view their audience are laid bare in this specific sentence: "The 'Irresponsible' Narrative: If they can't find a flaw in your work, they will look for a flaw in how you manage your life, using your spending as 'proof' that you aren't deserving of your platform." As I established in my previous posts, we are not the ones suffering from persecutory delusions. And speaking of "how you manage your life"—is she referring to their own toxic habit of mass-blocking anyone who mildly displeases them? Because that is the only abnormal 'management' the fandom is actually criticizing.

Especially in Brittany’s case, it is laughable. How could people not talk about it? As the number of blocked users stealthily creeps closer to 400, even a complete outsider can look at that data and recognize that something is deeply abnormal. It is only natural that people are speaking out. Yes, it truly remains beyond ridiculous.

8.

The eighth video, you will realize how utterly absurd its content is. In this video, she explains narcissism by saying, "When things don't go their way, the frustration is no longer shimmering—it boils over."

Sure, that might apply to actual narcissists. But what if we look at the case of the people who were blocked by them? Why on earth are 300 to 400 people raising their voices against a single individual? Are we doing this without any physical evidence? Absolutely not. This issue has already been thoroughly documented and discussed across X (formerly Twitter) and DeviantArt. In fact, the only reason we are stuck here on Tumblr instead of Bluesky right now is because Brittany, the younger sister, ruthlessly blocked nearly 300 to 400 of us.

There is no world where hundreds of independent individuals suddenly suffer from the exact same mental illness just to gang up on one person.Furthermore, the sisters label every single critic who brings up these allegations as "Fake Victims" or "Haters," and both sisters are busy blocking them left and right. I believe this toxic behavior itself is the textbook definition of "Narcissistic Rage." We are not all collectively suffering from paranoia. Yet, whenever we raise legitimate concerns about their problematic actions, is it always just a "malicious conspiracy by jealous haters"?

In reality, they are the ones turning their entire world into their enemy. I also fail to understand why she uses psychiatric and psychological concepts as a shield in this series. Did doing so make her feel like her words gained more credibility? Did it make her look like some kind of benevolent person writing an educational piece? No matter what she does, she is merely forcing a negative frame onto her critics. This is nothing but an insult to both academia and the public.

These videos are not a weapon for them to use—they are simply a diagnostic report reflecting their own contradictory persona in the mirror.

9.

The ninth video clearly demonstrates how they perceive the community. They argue that critics are merely engaging in "Rage Baiting" to gain visibility, and that such actions only serve as "fuel" for the creator's growth.

"Fuel"? If that is the case, then this post, along with the testimonies of numerous victims who previously exposed their controversies, is just "fuel" to them. However, the collective movements that occurred on X, DeviantArt, and Reddit were never cheap attempts to drive traffic or farm views. It was a matter of public interest—a legitimate effort to address Mirei’s grooming allegations and the sisters' deceptive mishandling of The Pink Corruption’s ownership. Furthermore, many of those who spoke out are creators themselves. The claim that critics act out of a "lack of original ideas" or creative ability is fundamentally groundless.

Once again, this video is used to justify their systemic censorship. They assert that interacting with critics only helps them grow, which exposes their true worldview. Who could possibly defend Brittany’s dictatorial behavior of indiscriminately blocking nearly 400 innocent fans? They desire their work to be famous, yet they completely bypassed any attempt at compromise, jumping straight to the ultimate resort of mass blocking. This abuse of power cannot be justified under the guise of creator protection.

Mirei also claims that critics have a desire for power, seeking to ruin moods and "control the narrative." Ironically, if we apply this exact logic to the sisters' behavior, they are the ones acting as the aggressors. They did not just ruin the mood of the fandom; they entirely disregarded the affection of fans who wanted to expand the community. Instead, they continually bring up "h8rs" and "Fake Victims" in these "educational" videos, effectively controlling the narrative to manipulate their remaining followers.

Their decision to dismiss our collective anger and despair as mere "jealousy" is a dangerous mischaracterization. This arrogant attitude only serves to completely pulverize the fragile shards of trust that the community has desperately tried to hold onto.

10.

Now, at last, let us look at the tenth video. Frankly, what on earth is this? This episode feels less like a piece of commentary and more like the sisters looking directly into a mirror, describing their own actions verbatim. In fact, every single point raised in this video is a narrative that we, the fandom, should be directed at them.

She brings up clinical concepts to define "haters"—Cognitive Dissonance, DARVO, Moral Justification, and a Lack of Empathy and Externalization. Yet, ironically, these are the exact psychological weapons this duo has been wielding against their own community. Let us substitute their theoretical claims with the objective reality of what they have done.

First, the DARVO strategy is the exact blueprint of how these sisters have manipulated their fandom for years:

Deny: They denied the reality of minor grooming allegations and their part in fostering cyberbullying, brushing it all off as "mere harassment from brainless haters."

Attack: They attacked the character of genuine fans who dared to question them, branding them as "H8RS" and "Fake Victims."

Reverse Victim and Offender: They gaslit the community, claiming that the fandom's legitimate outcry and demands for accountability were actually an "assault" on their personal peace.

This alone proves that the content of their video is nothing more than a copy-paste of their own reflection.

Furthermore, you all know how utterly cowardly it is for them to rebrand "mass-blocking" as an act of "protecting one's peace." As I have demonstrated with clear data in chapters 1, 7, and 8, this video serves as a shamelessly ugly pretext to retroactively justify their indiscriminate mass-blocking of nearly 400 innocent fans. To silence the truth and protect their own self-interest, they are now hiding behind high-sounding psychological terminology, framing censorship as a 'mature choice to guard their mental well-being.' How pathetic. They enforce a tyrannical, unforgiving standard upon their fandom, yet display a sickening level of leniency toward themselves, each other, and the creators they mutually follow. This is double standards at its finest.

And finally, consider her concluding remark: "Their refusal to acknowledge the truth doesn't make your experience any less real."

This profound statement does not belong to Mirei. This is a truth that belongs to the victims, the fans, and specifically to QuadragonX (now known as SingularityOfKhaos). As a solo creator who genuinely loved the work and tried to single-handedly sustain the Pink Corruption Continued (PCC) series, they poured their soul into the community. Yet, because these sisters failed to clearly state the transfer of ownership and unilaterally resumed publishing without permission, QuadragonX was left entirely unprotected. They had to endure vicious attacks on their legitimacy and bear the full, crushing weight of public vilification from the community. The sisters will never compensate them for the trauma and lost time they had to endure. To preach about healing and reality after doing that is pure deception.

Just as they said, the fandom remembers. The sisters can abuse the block button to gag the community all they want, but it will never erase the history of what they have done. It will only cause the wound to rot, fester, and embed itself deeper into the roots of this fandom. Every single track of their behavior detailed here has done nothing but deceive, exploit, and deeply disappoint the very community that once gave them their platform.

*

*

*

*

We must remain acutely aware of this situation and strive for meaningful change. Currently, they dismiss anyone who does not align with their views, constructing a secluded kingdom where the genuine outcries of fans are treated as nothing more than a nuisance. They refuse to listen to heartfelt advice, viewing their own community not as supporters, but as selfish individuals or even potential threats. To be honest, I am beginning to feel that expecting them to change might be a case of 'too little, too late.' Yet, my faith lies not in them, but in us. I firmly believe that if people read and share this message, we can achieve some form of progress. Although my words may have strayed slightly from my original intent, my ultimate hope is that they will come to their senses and foster the kind of healthy, respectful relationship seen in other communities. I truly wish for a future where creators and fans can coexist in a positive environment.

Thank you very much for taking the time to read this long post. I look forward to the day when we can once again enjoy her work freely and engage in creative fan activities without restraint. I sincerely hope that a day will come when we can express ourselves openly and participate vibrantly on Bluesky, the very platform where they are most active.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from my favorite novel:

"The bird fights its way out of the egg. The egg is the world. Who would be born must first destroy a world. The bird flies to God. That God’s name is Abraxas."

To those of us who have been unfairly labeled as "haters" simply for speaking the truth: Do not be discouraged. When someone labels every critical voice as "hate" and blocks out the world, they are choosing to remain trapped inside a thick, suffocating shell of their own making. They prefer the comfort of a fake world over the pain of real growth. Our resistance is not an act of malice; it is the necessary 'destruction' required to break that shell wide open.

We are the ones tapping on the shell, trying to bring light into a closed-off space. If they refuse to listen and retreat into blind praise, that is their limitation, not our fault. True growth requires embracing both light and dark, praise and criticism. Those who reject half of the truth will never truly fly. We are not "haters." We are the struggle itself.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.

Here's the videos of Mirei(formerly Breabear Jones):

Today, I would like to refute the logic regarding 'h8r' and 'victim' presented in Mirei Touyama’s recent videos. She has been frequently uploading content of this nature to YouTube lately. While some of you may have seen my recent posts, others might not be familiar with them yet. Being from a different linguistic background, I could not grasp every nuance; however, one thing is certain: this is a clear case of psychological projection, and the current situation reveals undeniably problematic aspects.

In her first video, she explained the 'Echo Chamber' effect: "If a hater reposts your work and uses five alt-accounts to leave negative comments, a random viewer might think, 'Oh, I guess everyone dislikes this,' and feel pressured to agree." She then suggested a 'Mass Block' as a massive time-saver—a statement I found utterly appalling. Ironically, this is precisely what Mirei and her sister, Brittany, are practicing now. According to 'Clearsky,' a website that tracks blocked users on Bluesky, Brittany has blocked over 200 users on her main account and about 120 on her sub-account, 'Brittany's Imagination'—exceeding 300 in total. Does this seem like a normal figure? If Gooseworx, the creator of The Amazing Digital Circus, had blocked that many users, it would have sparked a massive backlash online. Is this truly justifiable? There is a high probability that many of those they ousted as 'haters' are actually innocent people. It is evident that my friends were blocked in the same manner. On Brittany’s Bluesky, one gets blocked for not meeting a certain age requirement or for violating 'OC boundaries.' Despite my efforts to follow her guidelines, she labeled me a child and blocked me simply because I hadn't specified my age. When I politely asked her to clear up the misunderstanding, she merely 'liked' my post and unblocked me—without a single word of apology. She abandoned even the most basic courtesy; shouldn't one apologize after blocking a genuine fan? By engaging in these mass blocks, they seem to believe they are in the right. While I am not suggesting one must engage with everyone they dislike, in reality, social interaction involves encountering diverse perspectives. They seem oblivious to the fact that their current position is nothing more than a fragile fortress, ready to collapse at any moment.

In her second video, she brought up concepts such as 'The Mirror Effect (Projection),' 'Moving the Goalposts,' 'Cognitive Dissonance,' and the 'Crabs in a Bucket Mentality.' Among these, the 'Crabs in a Bucket' metaphor was particularly clear: the idea that haters find comfort in pulling down those who are trying to climb up and change their lives. However, isn't the reality exactly the opposite? If they are the ones "climbing up," does that make us the other crabs pulling them down? This logic is fundamentally flawed. Furthermore, she states, "When the results are visible, the denial usually says more about the critic's frustration than the creator's effort." To be clear, we are not suffering from persecutory delusions. We are perfectly capable of seeing the truth. She remains oblivious to her own actions, yet she is the one stripping away our freedom and dragging us down.

In her third video regarding 'gore,' she continues her narrative about 'haters.' As I understand it, she claims that these individuals are obsessed with posting graphic content and lack self-control; therefore, any negative reaction only serves to encourage them. Her advice is to ignore them entirely, document the evidence with screenshots, and report them. Certainly, any reasonable person would agree that excessively graphic gore warrants a report. However, most creators follow basic etiquette by applying appropriate labels or content warnings. There is a line that should not be crossed, and those who ignore it are the ones at fault. Yet, this brings us to a glaring hypocrisy. Even if we set aside other major controversies, it is well-known that during her 'Breabear' era, she created inappropriate illustrations and animations featuring her sister’s character—without any content warnings whatsoever. At the time, her channel was hosting 'The Pink Corruption' (a Just Shapes & Beats fan-made series), making it highly accessible to young children. Given the nature of that content, it would not have been surprising if it had been reported itself. Does she believe that gore produced by others deserves to be reported, while her own past inappropriate and suggestive works are exempt?

The fourth video was, in my opinion, the most appalling and contemptible of all. Under the section 'Important Distinction,' she states: 'Victims of actual abuse often struggle to speak up, blame themselves, and may minimize what happened to them.' This is an incredibly dangerous and irresponsible narrative. While it is true that trauma can make it difficult for victims to speak out, educational institutions in my country—and indeed, society at large—teach victims that they must never exaggerate or minimize their experiences; they must speak the truth as it is. We are taught that victims should never blame themselves and that those around them must provide a supportive environment to listen and offer comfort. Adhering to the logic in her video only risks allowing the abuse to escalate until it becomes irreversible. In many cases, victims finally speak out only when they have reached a breaking point, desperately needing help. When they finally share their truth, are they merely 'playing the victim'? While her criteria for distinguishing victims may not be entirely false in a vacuum, in this context, it sounds like nothing more than an order for real victims to remain silent. This rhetoric drags victims further into the abyss and is, quite frankly, a logic typically employed by perpetrators to suppress the truth.

The fifth video is equally preposterous. The core argument here is that the audience 'only knows the output, not the operator'—that our knowledge is merely a 'low-resolution snapshot' colored by our imagination. Let me be clear: we are not that ignorant. As someone who has produced stop-motion animation for academic projects and currently works as an illustrator, I am acutely aware of the immense labor involved in creation. I, along with many other artists and animators in the community, possess the empathy to wait for a creator’s growth. We understand the grueling reality of solo production—from OST and puppet making to storyboarding. However, there is a reason why fans occasionally grow impatient. Typical indie animators usually release 1–5 minute shorts every 3–6 months rather than long-form series. We know that a single long-form episode can take up to two years. Even major projects like Hazbin Hotel or Helluva Boss could only maintain their pace by expanding into professional studios. For a solo or small-scale creator like Brittany, completing even one season of 15–20 episodes is borderline impossible without a dedicated team. For instance, The Heroic Six took two years to produce a single 10-minute episode, and even then, the story had to be significantly condensed. When updates are this infrequent, the creator should ideally provide official information to sustain interest. Yet, there is a severe lack of substantial updates. To make matters worse, Brittany’s 'OC Boundaries' as of 2026 explicitly ban fanfiction, effectively stifling the community's ability to engage through headcanons or theories. If we are deprived of both official information and the freedom to hypothesize, what exactly are we expected to do?

The final video is essentially a repetition of the fourth, focusing on those who allegedly 'fake' being a victim. She describes a cycle: trying to help, having advice ignored, encountering a new 'crisis,' and then feeling guilty for not helping. Ironically, this perfectly describes the situation between her and us. We, who offered sincere advice, were dismissed as 'haters' and blocked. Is she really in a position to lecture others on this? These are words that should be coming from us, not from someone who is busy building a closed-off echo chamber. It is both frustrating and saddening to watch her fans and her sister blindly defend her. No matter how many of their posts I read, I cannot fathom their mindset.If this cycle continues, the stability of this fandom is at risk. This is a serious concern. The reasons behind the aggressive shift in tone toward the audience and the decision to post content without addressing previous controversies remain unclear. By limiting interactions to only those who offer praise and removing those who provide critical feedback, the environment becomes increasingly unbalanced. This structure creates a hierarchy where the relationship between the creator and the audience lacks the mutual respect typically found among peers or friends. Instead, it appears to be a rigid system where individuals are expected to conform to specific expectations or face exclusion. This transformation from an open community to a restricted one is a significant point of contention.

We must remain acutely aware of this situation and strive for meaningful change. Currently, they dismiss anyone who does not align with their views, constructing a secluded kingdom where the genuine outcries of fans are treated as nothing more than a nuisance. They refuse to listen to heartfelt advice, viewing their own community not as supporters, but as selfish individuals or even potential threats. To be honest, I am beginning to feel that expecting them to change might be a case of 'too little, too late.' Nevertheless, I firmly believe that if people read and share this message, we can achieve some form of progress. Although my words may have strayed slightly from my original intent, my ultimate hope is that they will come to their senses and foster the kind of healthy, respectful relationship seen in other communities. I truly wish for a future where creators and fans can coexist in a positive environment.

Thank you very much for taking the time to read this long post. I look forward to the day when we can once again enjoy her work freely and engage in creative fan activities without restraint. I sincerely hope that a day will come when we can express ourselves openly and participate vibrantly on Bluesky, the very platform where they are most active.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from my favorite novel:

"The bird fights its way out of the egg. The egg is the world. Who would be born must first destroy a world. The bird flies to God. That God’s name is Abraxas."

To those of us who have been unfairly labeled as "haters" simply for speaking the truth: Do not be discouraged.When someone labels every critical voice as "hate" and blocks out the world, they are choosing to stay trapped inside a thick, suffocating shell. They prefer the comfort of a fake world over the pain of real growth. Our resistance is not an act of malice. It is the necessary "destruction" that Hermann Hesse spoke of. We are the ones tapping on the shell, trying to bring light into a closed-off space. If they refuse to listen and retreat into blind praise, that is their limitation, not our fault. True growth requires embracing both light and dark, praise and criticism. Those who reject half of the truth will never truly fly. We are not "haters." We are the struggle itself. Let us overcome this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.