Fritz

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

Two of the people involved in exposing DevilRadz have said themselves that he has sent targeted hate to radqueers. Like I said even now he is still active and being anti radqueer.

Being anti radqueer is inherently harmful to us regardless of how you spin it.

being anti-radqueer literally isn't harmful to anyone unless you're going into people's inboxes and suibaiting them and the like. radqueer is inherently pro-abuse so it is ACTUALLY inherently harmful

YOU YOURSELF said you don’t even have your own tumblr and your not radqueer, and you’ve proved multiple times you know little to nothing about the radqueer community so you’re the only one making shit up. Speaking of made up shit, show me a criminal case against a radqueer?

There also isn’t a lot of pro abuse accounts on here. So yeah there is only a handful of posts, and not every server has the same blacklist.

Pro contact doesn’t mean pro abuse 😭 you’re heavily insinuating that all contact is non consensual and harmful. And yes forcing your contact stance on anyone else is inherently NOT radqueer. Radqueer isn’t inherently pro or anti anything, it defeats the definition of both “radical” and “queer”, individuals decide their own stances. Majority of radqueers are anti c or pro complex c, and anti abuse. You’re mad at your own misinformation and assumptions, not anything anyone has actually done.

i do not have my own tumblr. i did a few months ago, however. i was one of the most prominent anti-radqueer blogs. i have argued with radqueers. i have seen how you guys behave. and i've come to the conclusion that 50% of you are minors that were told they wouldn't be accepted anywhere else, and 50% transphobic racists who want to fuck kids because you've been rejected by everyone your own age. i know what a radqueer is. i know what your community believes. and what your community believes is inherently abusive.

Pro-contact is pro-abuse. You cannot have sex with a child without the child being damaged in some way, be it mentally or physically. Same with most animals. Even consensual sex between a child and an adult/older child will harm the child (I know this from experience!) Children cannot consent. Animals cannot consent. Pro-consent and pro-contact is an oxymoron because children and animals Cannot consent

I'm not "assuming". The vast majority of radqueers are either pro/neutral contact and pro-contact is pro-abuse.

Pro contact isn’t inherently pro abuse, if you’re so educated on our community why didn’t you read the contact stance coins to understand them? Pro contact literally just means pro contact and is applied either individually to different IDs or used to describe someone’s contact stance as a whole.

Not very radqueer is a map, it’s a paraphilia so you aren’t required to claim the radqueer term if you are a map? It’s not even a radqueer made term my love it was around much longer than us; radqueer is simply inclusive of paraphilia havers if users have them. You also yourself admitted that most radqueers are minors themselves(probably because most adults can’t afford to be doxxed or don’t want to argue with dumb teens like you so they use other platforms), but point me to the law breaking child predators. The law also allows minors of a certain age to consent to older teens, if you disagree with that then write your state officials about changing it for your state but don’t take that out on us. I’m sorry you had a harmful experience, you still shouldn’t project that onto us. As you stated no radqueer has gone to jail(I said it because of that but of course your dumbass didn’t connect the dots) because none of have broken the law.

Pro consent is not an oxymoron because it literally cannot apply to young children and animals!!

Show me the transphobes and racist tho. Thought crime doesn’t exist, a lot of us adults go to extreme means to suppress thoughts/urges or get therapy for help managing them.

Your issue is very clear. You keep assuming pro contact and pro consent apply to animals and children, I don’t know who told you that but they lied about.

Pro contact does not apply to animals or children who cannot make informed consent because as you pointed out they cannot consent.

Trying to apply the pro contact label onto illegal or harmful dynamics will immediately get you called out.

...Where are you getting your information from? Anti-contact virtually always means anti-contact for paraphilias that would be harmful to act upon (eg pedophillia and zoophilia). Pro-contact has ALWAYS included contact for pedophilia and zoophilia. How the hell do you know so little about your own community?

You don't have to be in a community to know that said community is harmful. I'm not racist, does that mean I can't be anti-racist??

Most radqueers!!! Support minor/adult relationships!!! Or interact with people who do!!! You have never been in the tags of your own community and it's very fucking obvious

They don’t and have never meant that because they are not radqueer made terms nor do they only apply to radqueer community or paraphiliac communities. Comp c and other more detailed contact stances were coined by us.

You’re not racist and can be anti racist, but like most white liberals if you do not listen to the community you’re involving yourself in the issue of you’re going to be repeatedly called out and your “activism” insulted because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. So many white activists are called out for microsggressions and speaking over POC because they THINK they full understand what racism is. You think you full understand our community, our terms, our stances but you just admitted you’re not in our community? How could you possibly know if whenever a radqueer tries to tell you the truth regarding your information you speak over them with bullshit easily proven wrong.

Again show me the law breaking accounts. You said you’ve seen them and I’ve asked for proof more than once.

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!

Your first sentence is the complete fucking opposite of what I said, I feel like your just skimming through and reacting to what I say instead of reading and thinking.

No matter how many times I explain things to you, you keep saying the same bullshit I just explained wasn’t true. Saying something over and over won’t make it the truth especially when your bullshit was debunked before I ever interacted with you, this has been explained countless times outside of me and you debating, this has probably been explained to you before but your head is to far up ass and your ears too full of your own shit to hear anything else. You are by definition a fucking bigot.

All you have said has been incorrect, made up, and lies. The worse part is your ignorance runs so deep you refuse to listen to anything. You have never had a civil conversation and tried to actually understand anything about the radqueer community, you just yell your assumptions and lies over and over and over again I’m assuming until we just can’t stand talking to you anymore. I refuse to keep going in circles in with you just because you refuse to read and listen.

Again you said you’ve observed us, being a child abuser is a crime and multiple times I’ve asked you to show me proof of any of us breaking the law, I asked you for proof about your bullshit definitions, I’ve asked you for just proof and information to back up your bullshit and you can’t present anything. You’re only source is ‘I’ve seen you guys’ like shut up, you’re full of shit. You’re literally on your headmates account invalidating them as well, you’re a literal walking piece of shit, they need to lock your ass in the vault for a minute.

Tell me where I lied? Highlight every single part of my posts where I lied.

You are genuinely stupid as fuck. My 9 year old sibling has more reading comprehension than you. Do you want me to go on every single radqueer blog and screenshot where they say they're pro-c? That wouldn't help anyways, because you're so goddamn stupid that you don't even know the DEFINITION of pro-c.

2. My reading comprehension is fine, you’re just mad I’m not agreeing with you. But English is my 3rd or so language yet I’ve been correcting your misuse of words lmao. YOU don’t know the definition of pro c to the point radqueer blogs have already started making fun of the fact that you and most other antis don’t know it.

3. I’m tolerant of other opinions, YOU aren’t. I haven’t even commented negatively on you being anti radqueer, I’ve just been pointing out your misinformation. I don’t care that you don’t like radqueers but why would I sit a let someone just lie? I said prove it to prove that you can’t, you cannot prove any of the shit you’re saying because it’s imaginary. You said a portion of our community are child abusers, when and where’s the proof? You’re accusing imaginary people of crimes that weren’t committed simply because you don’t understand our community or what the contact stances mean. I even asked you to pull up your proof for your “definition” of pro contact (you can’t because there literally isn’t one and there not being one is the reason people have been coining more specific contact stance terms. Again pro c is not a term unique to radqueers. MAP ZOO AND NECRO are not radqueer coined terms either. That’s why I tried to bring up paras but thing at a time for the slow poke.)

4. You being anti is invalidating especially when you’re speaking so negatively about transIDs, your head mate just sounds like a pussy nobody in my system would ever go for that shit which is way I said it in the first place. Letting your head mate post anti and harmful misinformation about your community, on your account, insane. You are by definition invalidating them rather they choose to cure you out about it or not. Them tolerating you does not make your actions less invalidating, it just means he chooses not to deal with you, probably because he sees the way you act and doesn’t want to put up with it.

Pro-contact has ALWAYS meant supporting contact for things like pedophilia and zoophilia. Anti-contact has NEVER meant being anti-c for every single paraphilia. If you ask literally ANY pro-c radqueer what they mean by being pro-c they will tell you they don't think minor/adult and human/non-human relationships are inherently abusive.

You literally have said multiple times that being anti-radqueer is inherently bigoted (false). You have, in fact, insulted me for being anti-radqueer.

Just 2 minutes in the radqueer tags shows me at least 3 pro-c radqueers. That's an incredibly large amount for such a small community.

Again, NOBODY means they're anti-contact for every single paraphilia when they call themselves anti-c. Pro-contact means pro-contact for EVERY paraphilia and it always has. I never said pro-c was a term made specifically for radqueers, either. I hate pro-c non-radqueers just as much as I hate pro-c radqueers.

You know the different between POC and radqueers? POC are actually oppressed and being against them is actually harmful.

Also I never said that, I said YOURE a bigot. I’ve interacted with many anti radqueers who aren’t bigots, they’re often misinformed or just uncomfortable for their own reasons.

there was another poll asking radqueers if they support skinpainting and at least half the votes were yes however i can't find the screenshot

I genuinely don’t believe the majority of radqueers support blackface, it’s been talked about before but also not every trace individual/not even all radqueers are white/pale skinned.

Like I said not every trace person is white/pale skinned, not everyone even physically transitions or wants too because race is a lot more than color.

You’re assuming all trace people are white people transitioning to black or Asian, you’re assuming every trace person wants/needs to change their skin tone, and you’re assuming that there’s a skin tone that matches to each race and that’s simply not true. I don’t need to physically transition, my cisRace already has common features with my transrace, the only transitioning of been doing is language learning and cultural changes in my home. There are a lot of transblack folk who have no intention of changing their physical appearance.

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

Two of the people involved in exposing DevilRadz have said themselves that he has sent targeted hate to radqueers. Like I said even now he is still active and being anti radqueer.

Being anti radqueer is inherently harmful to us regardless of how you spin it.

being anti-radqueer literally isn't harmful to anyone unless you're going into people's inboxes and suibaiting them and the like. radqueer is inherently pro-abuse so it is ACTUALLY inherently harmful

YOU YOURSELF said you don’t even have your own tumblr and your not radqueer, and you’ve proved multiple times you know little to nothing about the radqueer community so you’re the only one making shit up. Speaking of made up shit, show me a criminal case against a radqueer?

There also isn’t a lot of pro abuse accounts on here. So yeah there is only a handful of posts, and not every server has the same blacklist.

Pro contact doesn’t mean pro abuse 😭 you’re heavily insinuating that all contact is non consensual and harmful. And yes forcing your contact stance on anyone else is inherently NOT radqueer. Radqueer isn’t inherently pro or anti anything, it defeats the definition of both “radical” and “queer”, individuals decide their own stances. Majority of radqueers are anti c or pro complex c, and anti abuse. You’re mad at your own misinformation and assumptions, not anything anyone has actually done.

i do not have my own tumblr. i did a few months ago, however. i was one of the most prominent anti-radqueer blogs. i have argued with radqueers. i have seen how you guys behave. and i've come to the conclusion that 50% of you are minors that were told they wouldn't be accepted anywhere else, and 50% transphobic racists who want to fuck kids because you've been rejected by everyone your own age. i know what a radqueer is. i know what your community believes. and what your community believes is inherently abusive.

Pro-contact is pro-abuse. You cannot have sex with a child without the child being damaged in some way, be it mentally or physically. Same with most animals. Even consensual sex between a child and an adult/older child will harm the child (I know this from experience!) Children cannot consent. Animals cannot consent. Pro-consent and pro-contact is an oxymoron because children and animals Cannot consent

I'm not "assuming". The vast majority of radqueers are either pro/neutral contact and pro-contact is pro-abuse.

Pro contact isn’t inherently pro abuse, if you’re so educated on our community why didn’t you read the contact stance coins to understand them? Pro contact literally just means pro contact and is applied either individually to different IDs or used to describe someone’s contact stance as a whole.

Not very radqueer is a map, it’s a paraphilia so you aren’t required to claim the radqueer term if you are a map? It’s not even a radqueer made term my love it was around much longer than us; radqueer is simply inclusive of paraphilia havers if users have them. You also yourself admitted that most radqueers are minors themselves(probably because most adults can’t afford to be doxxed or don’t want to argue with dumb teens like you so they use other platforms), but point me to the law breaking child predators. The law also allows minors of a certain age to consent to older teens, if you disagree with that then write your state officials about changing it for your state but don’t take that out on us. I’m sorry you had a harmful experience, you still shouldn’t project that onto us. As you stated no radqueer has gone to jail(I said it because of that but of course your dumbass didn’t connect the dots) because none of have broken the law.

Pro consent is not an oxymoron because it literally cannot apply to young children and animals!!

Show me the transphobes and racist tho. Thought crime doesn’t exist, a lot of us adults go to extreme means to suppress thoughts/urges or get therapy for help managing them.

Your issue is very clear. You keep assuming pro contact and pro consent apply to animals and children, I don’t know who told you that but they lied about.

Pro contact does not apply to animals or children who cannot make informed consent because as you pointed out they cannot consent.

Trying to apply the pro contact label onto illegal or harmful dynamics will immediately get you called out.

...Where are you getting your information from? Anti-contact virtually always means anti-contact for paraphilias that would be harmful to act upon (eg pedophillia and zoophilia). Pro-contact has ALWAYS included contact for pedophilia and zoophilia. How the hell do you know so little about your own community?

You don't have to be in a community to know that said community is harmful. I'm not racist, does that mean I can't be anti-racist??

Most radqueers!!! Support minor/adult relationships!!! Or interact with people who do!!! You have never been in the tags of your own community and it's very fucking obvious

They don’t and have never meant that because they are not radqueer made terms nor do they only apply to radqueer community or paraphiliac communities. Comp c and other more detailed contact stances were coined by us.

You’re not racist and can be anti racist, but like most white liberals if you do not listen to the community you’re involving yourself in the issue of you’re going to be repeatedly called out and your “activism” insulted because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. So many white activists are called out for microsggressions and speaking over POC because they THINK they full understand what racism is. You think you full understand our community, our terms, our stances but you just admitted you’re not in our community? How could you possibly know if whenever a radqueer tries to tell you the truth regarding your information you speak over them with bullshit easily proven wrong.

Again show me the law breaking accounts. You said you’ve seen them and I’ve asked for proof more than once.

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!

Your first sentence is the complete fucking opposite of what I said, I feel like your just skimming through and reacting to what I say instead of reading and thinking.

No matter how many times I explain things to you, you keep saying the same bullshit I just explained wasn’t true. Saying something over and over won’t make it the truth especially when your bullshit was debunked before I ever interacted with you, this has been explained countless times outside of me and you debating, this has probably been explained to you before but your head is to far up ass and your ears too full of your own shit to hear anything else. You are by definition a fucking bigot.

All you have said has been incorrect, made up, and lies. The worse part is your ignorance runs so deep you refuse to listen to anything. You have never had a civil conversation and tried to actually understand anything about the radqueer community, you just yell your assumptions and lies over and over and over again I’m assuming until we just can’t stand talking to you anymore. I refuse to keep going in circles in with you just because you refuse to read and listen.

Again you said you’ve observed us, being a child abuser is a crime and multiple times I’ve asked you to show me proof of any of us breaking the law, I asked you for proof about your bullshit definitions, I’ve asked you for just proof and information to back up your bullshit and you can’t present anything. You’re only source is ‘I’ve seen you guys’ like shut up, you’re full of shit. You’re literally on your headmates account invalidating them as well, you’re a literal walking piece of shit, they need to lock your ass in the vault for a minute.

Tell me where I lied? Highlight every single part of my posts where I lied.

You are genuinely stupid as fuck. My 9 year old sibling has more reading comprehension than you. Do you want me to go on every single radqueer blog and screenshot where they say they're pro-c? That wouldn't help anyways, because you're so goddamn stupid that you don't even know the DEFINITION of pro-c.

2. My reading comprehension is fine, you’re just mad I’m not agreeing with you. But English is my 3rd or so language yet I’ve been correcting your misuse of words lmao. YOU don’t know the definition of pro c to the point radqueer blogs have already started making fun of the fact that you and most other antis don’t know it.

3. I’m tolerant of other opinions, YOU aren’t. I haven’t even commented negatively on you being anti radqueer, I’ve just been pointing out your misinformation. I don’t care that you don’t like radqueers but why would I sit a let someone just lie? I said prove it to prove that you can’t, you cannot prove any of the shit you’re saying because it’s imaginary. You said a portion of our community are child abusers, when and where’s the proof? You’re accusing imaginary people of crimes that weren’t committed simply because you don’t understand our community or what the contact stances mean. I even asked you to pull up your proof for your “definition” of pro contact (you can’t because there literally isn’t one and there not being one is the reason people have been coining more specific contact stance terms. Again pro c is not a term unique to radqueers. MAP ZOO AND NECRO are not radqueer coined terms either. That’s why I tried to bring up paras but thing at a time for the slow poke.)

4. You being anti is invalidating especially when you’re speaking so negatively about transIDs, your head mate just sounds like a pussy nobody in my system would ever go for that shit which is way I said it in the first place. Letting your head mate post anti and harmful misinformation about your community, on your account, insane. You are by definition invalidating them rather they choose to cure you out about it or not. Them tolerating you does not make your actions less invalidating, it just means he chooses not to deal with you, probably because he sees the way you act and doesn’t want to put up with it.

Pro-contact has ALWAYS meant supporting contact for things like pedophilia and zoophilia. Anti-contact has NEVER meant being anti-c for every single paraphilia. If you ask literally ANY pro-c radqueer what they mean by being pro-c they will tell you they don't think minor/adult and human/non-human relationships are inherently abusive.

You literally have said multiple times that being anti-radqueer is inherently bigoted (false). You have, in fact, insulted me for being anti-radqueer.

Just 2 minutes in the radqueer tags shows me at least 3 pro-c radqueers. That's an incredibly large amount for such a small community.

Again, NOBODY means they're anti-contact for every single paraphilia when they call themselves anti-c. Pro-contact means pro-contact for EVERY paraphilia and it always has. I never said pro-c was a term made specifically for radqueers, either. I hate pro-c non-radqueers just as much as I hate pro-c radqueers.

You know the different between POC and radqueers? POC are actually oppressed and being against them is actually harmful.

Also I never said that, I said YOURE a bigot. I’ve interacted with many anti radqueers who aren’t bigots, they’re often misinformed or just uncomfortable for their own reasons.

there was another poll asking radqueers if they support skinpainting and at least half the votes were yes however i can't find the screenshot

I genuinely don’t believe the majority of radqueers support blackface, it’s been talked about before but also not every trace individual/not even all radqueers are white/pale skinned.

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

Two of the people involved in exposing DevilRadz have said themselves that he has sent targeted hate to radqueers. Like I said even now he is still active and being anti radqueer.

Being anti radqueer is inherently harmful to us regardless of how you spin it.

being anti-radqueer literally isn't harmful to anyone unless you're going into people's inboxes and suibaiting them and the like. radqueer is inherently pro-abuse so it is ACTUALLY inherently harmful

YOU YOURSELF said you don’t even have your own tumblr and your not radqueer, and you’ve proved multiple times you know little to nothing about the radqueer community so you’re the only one making shit up. Speaking of made up shit, show me a criminal case against a radqueer?

There also isn’t a lot of pro abuse accounts on here. So yeah there is only a handful of posts, and not every server has the same blacklist.

Pro contact doesn’t mean pro abuse 😭 you’re heavily insinuating that all contact is non consensual and harmful. And yes forcing your contact stance on anyone else is inherently NOT radqueer. Radqueer isn’t inherently pro or anti anything, it defeats the definition of both “radical” and “queer”, individuals decide their own stances. Majority of radqueers are anti c or pro complex c, and anti abuse. You’re mad at your own misinformation and assumptions, not anything anyone has actually done.

i do not have my own tumblr. i did a few months ago, however. i was one of the most prominent anti-radqueer blogs. i have argued with radqueers. i have seen how you guys behave. and i've come to the conclusion that 50% of you are minors that were told they wouldn't be accepted anywhere else, and 50% transphobic racists who want to fuck kids because you've been rejected by everyone your own age. i know what a radqueer is. i know what your community believes. and what your community believes is inherently abusive.

Pro-contact is pro-abuse. You cannot have sex with a child without the child being damaged in some way, be it mentally or physically. Same with most animals. Even consensual sex between a child and an adult/older child will harm the child (I know this from experience!) Children cannot consent. Animals cannot consent. Pro-consent and pro-contact is an oxymoron because children and animals Cannot consent

I'm not "assuming". The vast majority of radqueers are either pro/neutral contact and pro-contact is pro-abuse.

Pro contact isn’t inherently pro abuse, if you’re so educated on our community why didn’t you read the contact stance coins to understand them? Pro contact literally just means pro contact and is applied either individually to different IDs or used to describe someone’s contact stance as a whole.

Not very radqueer is a map, it’s a paraphilia so you aren’t required to claim the radqueer term if you are a map? It’s not even a radqueer made term my love it was around much longer than us; radqueer is simply inclusive of paraphilia havers if users have them. You also yourself admitted that most radqueers are minors themselves(probably because most adults can’t afford to be doxxed or don’t want to argue with dumb teens like you so they use other platforms), but point me to the law breaking child predators. The law also allows minors of a certain age to consent to older teens, if you disagree with that then write your state officials about changing it for your state but don’t take that out on us. I’m sorry you had a harmful experience, you still shouldn’t project that onto us. As you stated no radqueer has gone to jail(I said it because of that but of course your dumbass didn’t connect the dots) because none of have broken the law.

Pro consent is not an oxymoron because it literally cannot apply to young children and animals!!

Show me the transphobes and racist tho. Thought crime doesn’t exist, a lot of us adults go to extreme means to suppress thoughts/urges or get therapy for help managing them.

Your issue is very clear. You keep assuming pro contact and pro consent apply to animals and children, I don’t know who told you that but they lied about.

Pro contact does not apply to animals or children who cannot make informed consent because as you pointed out they cannot consent.

Trying to apply the pro contact label onto illegal or harmful dynamics will immediately get you called out.

...Where are you getting your information from? Anti-contact virtually always means anti-contact for paraphilias that would be harmful to act upon (eg pedophillia and zoophilia). Pro-contact has ALWAYS included contact for pedophilia and zoophilia. How the hell do you know so little about your own community?

You don't have to be in a community to know that said community is harmful. I'm not racist, does that mean I can't be anti-racist??

Most radqueers!!! Support minor/adult relationships!!! Or interact with people who do!!! You have never been in the tags of your own community and it's very fucking obvious

They don’t and have never meant that because they are not radqueer made terms nor do they only apply to radqueer community or paraphiliac communities. Comp c and other more detailed contact stances were coined by us.

You’re not racist and can be anti racist, but like most white liberals if you do not listen to the community you’re involving yourself in the issue of you’re going to be repeatedly called out and your “activism” insulted because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. So many white activists are called out for microsggressions and speaking over POC because they THINK they full understand what racism is. You think you full understand our community, our terms, our stances but you just admitted you’re not in our community? How could you possibly know if whenever a radqueer tries to tell you the truth regarding your information you speak over them with bullshit easily proven wrong.

Again show me the law breaking accounts. You said you’ve seen them and I’ve asked for proof more than once.

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!

Your first sentence is the complete fucking opposite of what I said, I feel like your just skimming through and reacting to what I say instead of reading and thinking.

No matter how many times I explain things to you, you keep saying the same bullshit I just explained wasn’t true. Saying something over and over won’t make it the truth especially when your bullshit was debunked before I ever interacted with you, this has been explained countless times outside of me and you debating, this has probably been explained to you before but your head is to far up ass and your ears too full of your own shit to hear anything else. You are by definition a fucking bigot.

All you have said has been incorrect, made up, and lies. The worse part is your ignorance runs so deep you refuse to listen to anything. You have never had a civil conversation and tried to actually understand anything about the radqueer community, you just yell your assumptions and lies over and over and over again I’m assuming until we just can’t stand talking to you anymore. I refuse to keep going in circles in with you just because you refuse to read and listen.

Again you said you’ve observed us, being a child abuser is a crime and multiple times I’ve asked you to show me proof of any of us breaking the law, I asked you for proof about your bullshit definitions, I’ve asked you for just proof and information to back up your bullshit and you can’t present anything. You’re only source is ‘I’ve seen you guys’ like shut up, you’re full of shit. You’re literally on your headmates account invalidating them as well, you’re a literal walking piece of shit, they need to lock your ass in the vault for a minute.

Tell me where I lied? Highlight every single part of my posts where I lied.

You are genuinely stupid as fuck. My 9 year old sibling has more reading comprehension than you. Do you want me to go on every single radqueer blog and screenshot where they say they're pro-c? That wouldn't help anyways, because you're so goddamn stupid that you don't even know the DEFINITION of pro-c.

2. My reading comprehension is fine, you’re just mad I’m not agreeing with you. But English is my 3rd or so language yet I’ve been correcting your misuse of words lmao. YOU don’t know the definition of pro c to the point radqueer blogs have already started making fun of the fact that you and most other antis don’t know it.

3. I’m tolerant of other opinions, YOU aren’t. I haven’t even commented negatively on you being anti radqueer, I’ve just been pointing out your misinformation. I don’t care that you don’t like radqueers but why would I sit a let someone just lie? I said prove it to prove that you can’t, you cannot prove any of the shit you’re saying because it’s imaginary. You said a portion of our community are child abusers, when and where’s the proof? You’re accusing imaginary people of crimes that weren’t committed simply because you don’t understand our community or what the contact stances mean. I even asked you to pull up your proof for your “definition” of pro contact (you can’t because there literally isn’t one and there not being one is the reason people have been coining more specific contact stance terms. Again pro c is not a term unique to radqueers. MAP ZOO AND NECRO are not radqueer coined terms either. That’s why I tried to bring up paras but thing at a time for the slow poke.)

4. You being anti is invalidating especially when you’re speaking so negatively about transIDs, your head mate just sounds like a pussy nobody in my system would ever go for that shit which is way I said it in the first place. Letting your head mate post anti and harmful misinformation about your community, on your account, insane. You are by definition invalidating them rather they choose to cure you out about it or not. Them tolerating you does not make your actions less invalidating, it just means he chooses not to deal with you, probably because he sees the way you act and doesn’t want to put up with it.

Pro-contact has ALWAYS meant supporting contact for things like pedophilia and zoophilia. Anti-contact has NEVER meant being anti-c for every single paraphilia. If you ask literally ANY pro-c radqueer what they mean by being pro-c they will tell you they don't think minor/adult and human/non-human relationships are inherently abusive.

You literally have said multiple times that being anti-radqueer is inherently bigoted (false). You have, in fact, insulted me for being anti-radqueer.

Just 2 minutes in the radqueer tags shows me at least 3 pro-c radqueers. That's an incredibly large amount for such a small community.

Again, NOBODY means they're anti-contact for every single paraphilia when they call themselves anti-c. Pro-contact means pro-contact for EVERY paraphilia and it always has. I never said pro-c was a term made specifically for radqueers, either. I hate pro-c non-radqueers just as much as I hate pro-c radqueers.

You know the different between POC and radqueers? POC are actually oppressed and being against them is actually harmful.

Also I never said that, I said YOURE a bigot. I’ve interacted with many anti radqueers who aren’t bigots, they’re often misinformed or just uncomfortable for their own reasons.

there was another poll asking radqueers if they support skinpainting and at least half the votes were yes however i can't find the screenshot

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

Two of the people involved in exposing DevilRadz have said themselves that he has sent targeted hate to radqueers. Like I said even now he is still active and being anti radqueer.

Being anti radqueer is inherently harmful to us regardless of how you spin it.

being anti-radqueer literally isn't harmful to anyone unless you're going into people's inboxes and suibaiting them and the like. radqueer is inherently pro-abuse so it is ACTUALLY inherently harmful

YOU YOURSELF said you don’t even have your own tumblr and your not radqueer, and you’ve proved multiple times you know little to nothing about the radqueer community so you’re the only one making shit up. Speaking of made up shit, show me a criminal case against a radqueer?

There also isn’t a lot of pro abuse accounts on here. So yeah there is only a handful of posts, and not every server has the same blacklist.

Pro contact doesn’t mean pro abuse 😭 you’re heavily insinuating that all contact is non consensual and harmful. And yes forcing your contact stance on anyone else is inherently NOT radqueer. Radqueer isn’t inherently pro or anti anything, it defeats the definition of both “radical” and “queer”, individuals decide their own stances. Majority of radqueers are anti c or pro complex c, and anti abuse. You’re mad at your own misinformation and assumptions, not anything anyone has actually done.

i do not have my own tumblr. i did a few months ago, however. i was one of the most prominent anti-radqueer blogs. i have argued with radqueers. i have seen how you guys behave. and i've come to the conclusion that 50% of you are minors that were told they wouldn't be accepted anywhere else, and 50% transphobic racists who want to fuck kids because you've been rejected by everyone your own age. i know what a radqueer is. i know what your community believes. and what your community believes is inherently abusive.

Pro-contact is pro-abuse. You cannot have sex with a child without the child being damaged in some way, be it mentally or physically. Same with most animals. Even consensual sex between a child and an adult/older child will harm the child (I know this from experience!) Children cannot consent. Animals cannot consent. Pro-consent and pro-contact is an oxymoron because children and animals Cannot consent

I'm not "assuming". The vast majority of radqueers are either pro/neutral contact and pro-contact is pro-abuse.

Pro contact isn’t inherently pro abuse, if you’re so educated on our community why didn’t you read the contact stance coins to understand them? Pro contact literally just means pro contact and is applied either individually to different IDs or used to describe someone’s contact stance as a whole.

Not very radqueer is a map, it’s a paraphilia so you aren’t required to claim the radqueer term if you are a map? It’s not even a radqueer made term my love it was around much longer than us; radqueer is simply inclusive of paraphilia havers if users have them. You also yourself admitted that most radqueers are minors themselves(probably because most adults can’t afford to be doxxed or don’t want to argue with dumb teens like you so they use other platforms), but point me to the law breaking child predators. The law also allows minors of a certain age to consent to older teens, if you disagree with that then write your state officials about changing it for your state but don’t take that out on us. I’m sorry you had a harmful experience, you still shouldn’t project that onto us. As you stated no radqueer has gone to jail(I said it because of that but of course your dumbass didn’t connect the dots) because none of have broken the law.

Pro consent is not an oxymoron because it literally cannot apply to young children and animals!!

Show me the transphobes and racist tho. Thought crime doesn’t exist, a lot of us adults go to extreme means to suppress thoughts/urges or get therapy for help managing them.

Your issue is very clear. You keep assuming pro contact and pro consent apply to animals and children, I don’t know who told you that but they lied about.

Pro contact does not apply to animals or children who cannot make informed consent because as you pointed out they cannot consent.

Trying to apply the pro contact label onto illegal or harmful dynamics will immediately get you called out.

...Where are you getting your information from? Anti-contact virtually always means anti-contact for paraphilias that would be harmful to act upon (eg pedophillia and zoophilia). Pro-contact has ALWAYS included contact for pedophilia and zoophilia. How the hell do you know so little about your own community?

You don't have to be in a community to know that said community is harmful. I'm not racist, does that mean I can't be anti-racist??

Most radqueers!!! Support minor/adult relationships!!! Or interact with people who do!!! You have never been in the tags of your own community and it's very fucking obvious

They don’t and have never meant that because they are not radqueer made terms nor do they only apply to radqueer community or paraphiliac communities. Comp c and other more detailed contact stances were coined by us.

You’re not racist and can be anti racist, but like most white liberals if you do not listen to the community you’re involving yourself in the issue of you’re going to be repeatedly called out and your “activism” insulted because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. So many white activists are called out for microsggressions and speaking over POC because they THINK they full understand what racism is. You think you full understand our community, our terms, our stances but you just admitted you’re not in our community? How could you possibly know if whenever a radqueer tries to tell you the truth regarding your information you speak over them with bullshit easily proven wrong.

Again show me the law breaking accounts. You said you’ve seen them and I’ve asked for proof more than once.

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!

Your first sentence is the complete fucking opposite of what I said, I feel like your just skimming through and reacting to what I say instead of reading and thinking.

No matter how many times I explain things to you, you keep saying the same bullshit I just explained wasn’t true. Saying something over and over won’t make it the truth especially when your bullshit was debunked before I ever interacted with you, this has been explained countless times outside of me and you debating, this has probably been explained to you before but your head is to far up ass and your ears too full of your own shit to hear anything else. You are by definition a fucking bigot.

All you have said has been incorrect, made up, and lies. The worse part is your ignorance runs so deep you refuse to listen to anything. You have never had a civil conversation and tried to actually understand anything about the radqueer community, you just yell your assumptions and lies over and over and over again I’m assuming until we just can’t stand talking to you anymore. I refuse to keep going in circles in with you just because you refuse to read and listen.

Again you said you’ve observed us, being a child abuser is a crime and multiple times I’ve asked you to show me proof of any of us breaking the law, I asked you for proof about your bullshit definitions, I’ve asked you for just proof and information to back up your bullshit and you can’t present anything. You’re only source is ‘I’ve seen you guys’ like shut up, you’re full of shit. You’re literally on your headmates account invalidating them as well, you’re a literal walking piece of shit, they need to lock your ass in the vault for a minute.

Tell me where I lied? Highlight every single part of my posts where I lied.

You are genuinely stupid as fuck. My 9 year old sibling has more reading comprehension than you. Do you want me to go on every single radqueer blog and screenshot where they say they're pro-c? That wouldn't help anyways, because you're so goddamn stupid that you don't even know the DEFINITION of pro-c.

2. My reading comprehension is fine, you’re just mad I’m not agreeing with you. But English is my 3rd or so language yet I’ve been correcting your misuse of words lmao. YOU don’t know the definition of pro c to the point radqueer blogs have already started making fun of the fact that you and most other antis don’t know it.

3. I’m tolerant of other opinions, YOU aren’t. I haven’t even commented negatively on you being anti radqueer, I’ve just been pointing out your misinformation. I don’t care that you don’t like radqueers but why would I sit a let someone just lie? I said prove it to prove that you can’t, you cannot prove any of the shit you’re saying because it’s imaginary. You said a portion of our community are child abusers, when and where’s the proof? You’re accusing imaginary people of crimes that weren’t committed simply because you don’t understand our community or what the contact stances mean. I even asked you to pull up your proof for your “definition” of pro contact (you can’t because there literally isn’t one and there not being one is the reason people have been coining more specific contact stance terms. Again pro c is not a term unique to radqueers. MAP ZOO AND NECRO are not radqueer coined terms either. That’s why I tried to bring up paras but thing at a time for the slow poke.)

4. You being anti is invalidating especially when you’re speaking so negatively about transIDs, your head mate just sounds like a pussy nobody in my system would ever go for that shit which is way I said it in the first place. Letting your head mate post anti and harmful misinformation about your community, on your account, insane. You are by definition invalidating them rather they choose to cure you out about it or not. Them tolerating you does not make your actions less invalidating, it just means he chooses not to deal with you, probably because he sees the way you act and doesn’t want to put up with it.

Pro-contact has ALWAYS meant supporting contact for things like pedophilia and zoophilia. Anti-contact has NEVER meant being anti-c for every single paraphilia. If you ask literally ANY pro-c radqueer what they mean by being pro-c they will tell you they don't think minor/adult and human/non-human relationships are inherently abusive.

You literally have said multiple times that being anti-radqueer is inherently bigoted (false). You have, in fact, insulted me for being anti-radqueer.

Just 2 minutes in the radqueer tags shows me at least 3 pro-c radqueers. That's an incredibly large amount for such a small community.

Again, NOBODY means they're anti-contact for every single paraphilia when they call themselves anti-c. Pro-contact means pro-contact for EVERY paraphilia and it always has. I never said pro-c was a term made specifically for radqueers, either. I hate pro-c non-radqueers just as much as I hate pro-c radqueers.

You know the different between POC and radqueers? POC are actually oppressed and being against them is actually harmful.

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

Two of the people involved in exposing DevilRadz have said themselves that he has sent targeted hate to radqueers. Like I said even now he is still active and being anti radqueer.

Being anti radqueer is inherently harmful to us regardless of how you spin it.

being anti-radqueer literally isn't harmful to anyone unless you're going into people's inboxes and suibaiting them and the like. radqueer is inherently pro-abuse so it is ACTUALLY inherently harmful

YOU YOURSELF said you don’t even have your own tumblr and your not radqueer, and you’ve proved multiple times you know little to nothing about the radqueer community so you’re the only one making shit up. Speaking of made up shit, show me a criminal case against a radqueer?

There also isn’t a lot of pro abuse accounts on here. So yeah there is only a handful of posts, and not every server has the same blacklist.

Pro contact doesn’t mean pro abuse 😭 you’re heavily insinuating that all contact is non consensual and harmful. And yes forcing your contact stance on anyone else is inherently NOT radqueer. Radqueer isn’t inherently pro or anti anything, it defeats the definition of both “radical” and “queer”, individuals decide their own stances. Majority of radqueers are anti c or pro complex c, and anti abuse. You’re mad at your own misinformation and assumptions, not anything anyone has actually done.

i do not have my own tumblr. i did a few months ago, however. i was one of the most prominent anti-radqueer blogs. i have argued with radqueers. i have seen how you guys behave. and i've come to the conclusion that 50% of you are minors that were told they wouldn't be accepted anywhere else, and 50% transphobic racists who want to fuck kids because you've been rejected by everyone your own age. i know what a radqueer is. i know what your community believes. and what your community believes is inherently abusive.

Pro-contact is pro-abuse. You cannot have sex with a child without the child being damaged in some way, be it mentally or physically. Same with most animals. Even consensual sex between a child and an adult/older child will harm the child (I know this from experience!) Children cannot consent. Animals cannot consent. Pro-consent and pro-contact is an oxymoron because children and animals Cannot consent

I'm not "assuming". The vast majority of radqueers are either pro/neutral contact and pro-contact is pro-abuse.

Pro contact isn’t inherently pro abuse, if you’re so educated on our community why didn’t you read the contact stance coins to understand them? Pro contact literally just means pro contact and is applied either individually to different IDs or used to describe someone’s contact stance as a whole.

Not very radqueer is a map, it’s a paraphilia so you aren’t required to claim the radqueer term if you are a map? It’s not even a radqueer made term my love it was around much longer than us; radqueer is simply inclusive of paraphilia havers if users have them. You also yourself admitted that most radqueers are minors themselves(probably because most adults can’t afford to be doxxed or don’t want to argue with dumb teens like you so they use other platforms), but point me to the law breaking child predators. The law also allows minors of a certain age to consent to older teens, if you disagree with that then write your state officials about changing it for your state but don’t take that out on us. I’m sorry you had a harmful experience, you still shouldn’t project that onto us. As you stated no radqueer has gone to jail(I said it because of that but of course your dumbass didn’t connect the dots) because none of have broken the law.

Pro consent is not an oxymoron because it literally cannot apply to young children and animals!!

Show me the transphobes and racist tho. Thought crime doesn’t exist, a lot of us adults go to extreme means to suppress thoughts/urges or get therapy for help managing them.

Your issue is very clear. You keep assuming pro contact and pro consent apply to animals and children, I don’t know who told you that but they lied about.

Pro contact does not apply to animals or children who cannot make informed consent because as you pointed out they cannot consent.

Trying to apply the pro contact label onto illegal or harmful dynamics will immediately get you called out.

...Where are you getting your information from? Anti-contact virtually always means anti-contact for paraphilias that would be harmful to act upon (eg pedophillia and zoophilia). Pro-contact has ALWAYS included contact for pedophilia and zoophilia. How the hell do you know so little about your own community?

You don't have to be in a community to know that said community is harmful. I'm not racist, does that mean I can't be anti-racist??

Most radqueers!!! Support minor/adult relationships!!! Or interact with people who do!!! You have never been in the tags of your own community and it's very fucking obvious

They don’t and have never meant that because they are not radqueer made terms nor do they only apply to radqueer community or paraphiliac communities. Comp c and other more detailed contact stances were coined by us.

You’re not racist and can be anti racist, but like most white liberals if you do not listen to the community you’re involving yourself in the issue of you’re going to be repeatedly called out and your “activism” insulted because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. So many white activists are called out for microsggressions and speaking over POC because they THINK they full understand what racism is. You think you full understand our community, our terms, our stances but you just admitted you’re not in our community? How could you possibly know if whenever a radqueer tries to tell you the truth regarding your information you speak over them with bullshit easily proven wrong.

Again show me the law breaking accounts. You said you’ve seen them and I’ve asked for proof more than once.

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!

Your first sentence is the complete fucking opposite of what I said, I feel like your just skimming through and reacting to what I say instead of reading and thinking.

No matter how many times I explain things to you, you keep saying the same bullshit I just explained wasn’t true. Saying something over and over won’t make it the truth especially when your bullshit was debunked before I ever interacted with you, this has been explained countless times outside of me and you debating, this has probably been explained to you before but your head is to far up ass and your ears too full of your own shit to hear anything else. You are by definition a fucking bigot.

All you have said has been incorrect, made up, and lies. The worse part is your ignorance runs so deep you refuse to listen to anything. You have never had a civil conversation and tried to actually understand anything about the radqueer community, you just yell your assumptions and lies over and over and over again I’m assuming until we just can’t stand talking to you anymore. I refuse to keep going in circles in with you just because you refuse to read and listen.

Again you said you’ve observed us, being a child abuser is a crime and multiple times I’ve asked you to show me proof of any of us breaking the law, I asked you for proof about your bullshit definitions, I’ve asked you for just proof and information to back up your bullshit and you can’t present anything. You’re only source is ‘I’ve seen you guys’ like shut up, you’re full of shit. You’re literally on your headmates account invalidating them as well, you’re a literal walking piece of shit, they need to lock your ass in the vault for a minute.

Tell me where I lied? Highlight every single part of my posts where I lied.

You are genuinely stupid as fuck. My 9 year old sibling has more reading comprehension than you. Do you want me to go on every single radqueer blog and screenshot where they say they're pro-c? That wouldn't help anyways, because you're so goddamn stupid that you don't even know the DEFINITION of pro-c.

haiii i used to be einhornsocken !! (the anti that has THANKFULLY deactivated) i'm not really into discourse anymore (hence why i don't have my own blog anymore and am posting this on a headmate's blog lol) but this post made me mad so i had to say something

for context devilradz was an "undercover" anti "pretending" (for lack of better words) to be a radqueer. their intentions didn't seem to be bad, though. they weren't intentionally trying to hurt anybody as far as we know (and i'd bet no radqueer is even actually as affected by this as they claim to be)

the person in the screenshot had a fairly popular anti blog at one point (burningradqueers) and then right before new years deactivated and made a rq blog. they were never actually an anti though. i will call them O because they seem to throw tantrums if you even dare mention their name

Two of the people involved in exposing DevilRadz have said themselves that he has sent targeted hate to radqueers. Like I said even now he is still active and being anti radqueer.

Being anti radqueer is inherently harmful to us regardless of how you spin it.

being anti-radqueer literally isn't harmful to anyone unless you're going into people's inboxes and suibaiting them and the like. radqueer is inherently pro-abuse so it is ACTUALLY inherently harmful

YOU YOURSELF said you don’t even have your own tumblr and your not radqueer, and you’ve proved multiple times you know little to nothing about the radqueer community so you’re the only one making shit up. Speaking of made up shit, show me a criminal case against a radqueer?

There also isn’t a lot of pro abuse accounts on here. So yeah there is only a handful of posts, and not every server has the same blacklist.

Pro contact doesn’t mean pro abuse 😭 you’re heavily insinuating that all contact is non consensual and harmful. And yes forcing your contact stance on anyone else is inherently NOT radqueer. Radqueer isn’t inherently pro or anti anything, it defeats the definition of both “radical” and “queer”, individuals decide their own stances. Majority of radqueers are anti c or pro complex c, and anti abuse. You’re mad at your own misinformation and assumptions, not anything anyone has actually done.

i do not have my own tumblr. i did a few months ago, however. i was one of the most prominent anti-radqueer blogs. i have argued with radqueers. i have seen how you guys behave. and i've come to the conclusion that 50% of you are minors that were told they wouldn't be accepted anywhere else, and 50% transphobic racists who want to fuck kids because you've been rejected by everyone your own age. i know what a radqueer is. i know what your community believes. and what your community believes is inherently abusive.

Pro-contact is pro-abuse. You cannot have sex with a child without the child being damaged in some way, be it mentally or physically. Same with most animals. Even consensual sex between a child and an adult/older child will harm the child (I know this from experience!) Children cannot consent. Animals cannot consent. Pro-consent and pro-contact is an oxymoron because children and animals Cannot consent

I'm not "assuming". The vast majority of radqueers are either pro/neutral contact and pro-contact is pro-abuse.

Pro contact isn’t inherently pro abuse, if you’re so educated on our community why didn’t you read the contact stance coins to understand them? Pro contact literally just means pro contact and is applied either individually to different IDs or used to describe someone’s contact stance as a whole.

Not very radqueer is a map, it’s a paraphilia so you aren’t required to claim the radqueer term if you are a map? It’s not even a radqueer made term my love it was around much longer than us; radqueer is simply inclusive of paraphilia havers if users have them. You also yourself admitted that most radqueers are minors themselves(probably because most adults can’t afford to be doxxed or don’t want to argue with dumb teens like you so they use other platforms), but point me to the law breaking child predators. The law also allows minors of a certain age to consent to older teens, if you disagree with that then write your state officials about changing it for your state but don’t take that out on us. I’m sorry you had a harmful experience, you still shouldn’t project that onto us. As you stated no radqueer has gone to jail(I said it because of that but of course your dumbass didn’t connect the dots) because none of have broken the law.

Pro consent is not an oxymoron because it literally cannot apply to young children and animals!!

Show me the transphobes and racist tho. Thought crime doesn’t exist, a lot of us adults go to extreme means to suppress thoughts/urges or get therapy for help managing them.

Your issue is very clear. You keep assuming pro contact and pro consent apply to animals and children, I don’t know who told you that but they lied about.

Pro contact does not apply to animals or children who cannot make informed consent because as you pointed out they cannot consent.

Trying to apply the pro contact label onto illegal or harmful dynamics will immediately get you called out.

...Where are you getting your information from? Anti-contact virtually always means anti-contact for paraphilias that would be harmful to act upon (eg pedophillia and zoophilia). Pro-contact has ALWAYS included contact for pedophilia and zoophilia. How the hell do you know so little about your own community?

You don't have to be in a community to know that said community is harmful. I'm not racist, does that mean I can't be anti-racist??

Most radqueers!!! Support minor/adult relationships!!! Or interact with people who do!!! You have never been in the tags of your own community and it's very fucking obvious

They don’t and have never meant that because they are not radqueer made terms nor do they only apply to radqueer community or paraphiliac communities. Comp c and other more detailed contact stances were coined by us.

You’re not racist and can be anti racist, but like most white liberals if you do not listen to the community you’re involving yourself in the issue of you’re going to be repeatedly called out and your “activism” insulted because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. So many white activists are called out for microsggressions and speaking over POC because they THINK they full understand what racism is. You think you full understand our community, our terms, our stances but you just admitted you’re not in our community? How could you possibly know if whenever a radqueer tries to tell you the truth regarding your information you speak over them with bullshit easily proven wrong.

Again show me the law breaking accounts. You said you’ve seen them and I’ve asked for proof more than once.

Pro-contact IS a fucking paraphile contact stance!!! Pro-contact means your support contact for paraphilias!!! I thought this would be obvious but you don't know the history of your Own Fucking Community

I never fucking said any radqueer broke the law!!!! Not ONCE!!! You don't have to break the law for something to be morally wrong!!!

I listen to radqueers!!! I have argued with multiple radqueers!!! And I am STILL anti-radqueer!!! I have talked to radqueers, I have observed their interactions with each other!!! And you are all racist ableist transphobic child abusers hiding under the label of "queer"!!!