Finally the discussion "Gen AI is for disabled people to do art" got to me. And I want to use it as an excuse to write about disabled artists.
In my opinion, art is preserved for disabled people. It's our place to be. We don't need a toxic tool to be both disabled and artists, we have always been here. Gen AI doesn't help disabled people to get included in the world that was closed from them otherwise. That's the point of disability accommodations: to help us be a part of the society.
And art itself is that accommodation! That's why art therapy is a thing, and that's why we have art made by intellectually disabled people, and that's why artists continued to paint while they were in the mental hospitals. The process of creation is the accomo that helps disabled people to be valued by society, to feel included, to earn their living.
So I'll start on my favorite disabled artist:
Henry de Toulouse-Lautrec
Toulouse-Lautrec was a French post-impressionist, and his art provides a unique perspective of life he had: he depicted people ugly in terms of conventional beauty, but the feeling, the dynamic of his works is rad.
Are you bothered with your second chin? Your big cheeks, your crooked legs? Don't you worry, Monsieur Toulouse-Lautrec would draw you a hundred times worse than you are and you would still look great.
Because humans are great. We can't do anything with it, we are social creatures, and for us other humans will always be the best company. There's nobody else who suits us better than other humans, who can get us, see us, love us and be loved by us.
Charisma and action is what makes Toulouse-Lautrec's characters amazing. You know how it's hard to caption a person's beauty in a static picture? You see them as the most gorgeous creature ever been on earth, but their photos don't show how charming they are. Because photography is too literal. That's why we need painting.
Henry de Toulouse-Lautrec was amazing draughtsman and printmaker. The modern art of posters and advertising owes him a lot. And I'd say that animation took a lot from him too.
Henry was a child of a very inbred family, which resulted in his disability. What we know for sure is that he got both legs broken at the age of 13-14, and it didn't heal properly. He broke femurs, or the thigh bones, the longest, the strongest and the thickest bones in the human body. His bones were really fragile.
His alleged diagnosis is either pycnodysostosis (Toulouse-Lautrec Syndrome), osteopetrosis, achondroplasia, or osteogenesis imperfecta. Because of his condition, Henry could not participate in the society as a proper aristocrat, the son his father Count Alphonse wanted him to be. Henry was an outcast of his own class, so he vibed with the lower class folks, like sex workers, washwomen, performers from Moulin Rouge. If he lived today, he would love drag queens and kings, I'm sure.
He died early, at the age of 36, but his art was the thing that made him a part of the community, an honorable man and a much more noticeable person than his aristocracy and money could have ever made him. And his disability was one of the reasons why Toulouse-Lautrec became the immortal artist known worldwide.