Should I make one of those innocent lists? Based on my theories for the crimes, not the reports or the commonly accepted theories
100% inno - 3, man didn't do the murder or the home add dox, besides most of the info was public, and yea I do believe it got out of control. Not respectable behavior, but compared to other people, easily the most forgivable. Also points for calling out the uni prof.
99.9% inno - 4, could've gone without the murder (gets a pass because she tried to fix it and the murder was a panic kill), 8, honestly keep the murder and get her. But also she didn't know doing all that would kill the mother so yeah, forgivable. (If the mother died of the illness, not a child's beating, I would put her at 100% inno)
80% inno - 7, didn't exactly do anything to contribute to the murder, but I think he might have messed with the evidence and covered for his friend. While being a policeman. Get your wife some justice.
??% inno - 6, not exactly sure about the details, but it looks like she didn't do anything, not too sure about it tho. Would put her at 100% based on the report alone. But I fundamentally don't agree with the reports because they're deceiving.
??% inno - 10, can't argue with beating up molesters, especially when the law enforcement won't do shit because they're probably being bribed. Also waiting for more info.
70% guilty - 1, I think he only killed 1 child due to the bad mental, he is unstable, yeah maybe regretful. Not as bad as the report implied but still bad
??% guilty - 9, I think he did it while aware. I'm not a fan of him in general so I won't give an exact %, but there is a difference in how he treated his victims versus the others. Waiting for more info but yeah.
99.9% guilty - 2, I GUESS the child could've lived? There was a chance someone could like, rescue it or whatever. But its chances were low and she knew it. I will never believe it was an accident or an abortion. That thing was born and I will die on this hill until the project is over. If it really was only that I'll die of boredom.
100% guilty - 5, remorseless, no excuse. Nobody in this world can convince me the report is factual and that he was stressed and in a hurry because he clearly was NOT. People lean on the "bad writing" excuse instead of filling in the blanks and the blanks are that that man waited. Had the time to cool off. But didn't. He never would've had access to the man, and if the writer didn't know how hospitals worked, he wouldn't specify his department. 5 did it on purpose and I'm tired of people accepting the shit excuse that he was a poor doctor in a pinch. He was not. He doesn't work in the ER, half the hospital would've been called before him in the event that they were understaffed. The man waited, and time passed. Absolutely entitled, unhinged behavior. Shouldn't have gone into the profession at all if he's that mentally unstable. I don't care about his good behavior later on, he's not even sorry.
