I realized some people have misunderstood what noema/noemata means, so just to reiterate:
A noema is not âa âkin memory, but psychologicalâ. Noemata are not ââkin memories, but psychologicalâ.
Noema is just knowledge about your kintype thatâs in one way or another inherent. It can be psychological, spiritual, a mix, neither, or of unkown origins. The origin of your knowledge has nothing to do with whether you can call it a noema.
Noemata can take many shapes. It can be something as simple as the knowledge that your kintype has fur or hands, and it can be something as complicated as your kintypeâs life history. It can be something you know is a fabricated memory, and it can be something you believe really happened to you at one point.
âNoemaâ was coined as a handy word for me and other psych âkin to describe knowledge about our âkin selves that we wonât describe as memories, but that is not the definition of the word. âNoemaâ deliberately has a very very broad definition. Even âkin memories can be classified as noemata.
The shortest definition of noemata (outside the context of the alterhuman community) is âthe perceived as it is perceivedâ. In the context of the âkin community this can include almost anything. It includes things you experience as memories, but you rationally know arenât. It includes actual memories. It includes the most basic knowledge, like that you have hands. It includes things youâve learned along the way, like the smell of flowers.
If I were to propose a definition thatâs more relevant to our community than the original definition, it would be something along the lines of âan idea or knowledge related to your kintype and your kintypeâs lifeâ.














