Hate to bring this rubbish up again, but I just have to say that, for me, the messed-up part about Bucky and Rhodeyās narratives in CA:CW is absolutely notĀ Rhodey being paralysed nor Bucky being basically suicidal. I mean, look, regardless of what tumblrās very bad no-good discourse might say, arguments from authority are actually terrible, so Iām not saying here that, since I am disabled, I have an automatic and thorough insight into what is and isnāt ableist (if I do have a decent insight into ableism itās, yes, from experience, but also from other peopleās experiences, critical analysis, discussing things with disabled people who may not necessarily agree with me, etc). What I am saying is that, as someone with both serious physical and mental disabilities, I do actually want to see a superhero popcorn film in which one of the heroes has suffered a permanently disabling injury, and in which one of the heroes is dealing with the psychological impact of trauma and abuse. Not in a didactic way, just as a thing that exists and is a part of the characters and impacts the narrative, likeĀ ābeing displaced in timeā orĀ āpalladium poisoningā.
My big, big problem is a) thatās absolutely not what I got or will get and b) the appalling framing. Rhodey doesnāt get paralysed because they wanted to have a paralysed character, he gets paralysed because otherwise he would logically have gone with Tony to Siberia and the Russos and M&M needed a way to push him out of the narrative, and what better way to bench a character than giving them a disability? He gets paralysed to give another character angst (note that we donāt even see Rhodey realising heās paralysed, or learn this information along with him, thereās not even a clichedĀ āI canāt feel my legsā bit when heās lying on the ground, heās in a Convenient Coma and the information has to be relayed to us by Tony), and even Rhodeyās last scene in the movie is from Tonyās PoV and about Tony.
Likewise, with Bucky, I donāt have a problem with him blaming himself, wanting to punish himself, wanting to do the PG-13 equivalent of killing himself, etc. Trauma almost always comes with some very ugly and dark places (that have nothing to do with any Trauma Makes You Evil nonsense cliches) and I do want fiction to show that. What I have a big problem with is everybody around him going along with itĀ with the excuse of the poorly thought-out trigger words nonsense so we can have the PG-13 superhero popcorn flick equivalent of an euthanasia scene, complete with white clothing and soft lighting, ~heās better off like this~, ~sacrificing himself for others~ and whatnot.
Nor do I think for one second that if we ever see these characters again (lol, Iāll believe it when I see it) weāll have anything other than off-screen backstory magical cures. (Again, Iām not saying I want to see something didactic or issueifc-y. An equivalent of the way Charles Xavierās disability is handled in X:A would be fine and genre-appropriate, and thatās hardly a high bar. Still Iām sure theyāll manage to slide right under it.)
tl;dr, having Rhodey be paralysed is all well and good in and of itself, Bucky having mental disabilities is all well and good in and of itself, having disabled characters in big pop culture media franchises is all well and good in and of itself, my huge, colossal/gonna die historic on the Fury Road problem is the shitty way this was all framed and handled, itās the execution and the noxious tropes around it harold, and even though I usually couldnāt care less about fandom opinions since all our nonsense is pretty much irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, I have to admit it bothers me a bit when I come across complaints about Rhodey being paralysed per se as opposed to everything around it, or basically āoh, M&M walked it back and said Bucky wants to punish himself as opposed to objectively deserving to be punished, that makes That Scene OK, that was the big problem with it and their commentsā, it reminds me of how I had so many problems with Natās narrative in AoU and then saw other people also having problems--yes!--only the argument they were making wasĀ āfemale characters are not allowed to think of themselves as broken or monstrousā, which... buddy... no... thatās not what I was objecting to...