I think the big thing about radqueer is not assuming stuff just from a few glances at someone. Because, y'know, it's the person's deal with how to feel and be perceived, how to see and identify themself... Not yours. And that situations and beings are far more complex than you give them credit for. Which also includes:
anti-cc =/= hostile towards pro-cc
pro-cc =/= hostile towards anti-cc
anti-rq =/= pro- harassing rqs
xenosatanist, lsdqueer, etc =/= pro- noncon harm
trans / cis harmful =/= pro- noncon harm
trans / cis nazi =/= supporting the ideology
And other examples I can't think of right now.
My brother in christ xenosatanism is inherently pro noncon harm https://xenosatanism-redefined.carrd.co/
What about those who agree only with some / most points in the definition, but not all? Or trans-xenosatanists? You really gonna devalue their identity like that? Identities and concepts are made to be broken down into whatever we want.
