Cats are cute

I don't think that there's an elite that wants to eradicate white people. That's bullshit if you ask me. Immigration is an easy solution for our aging population. Would people rather want it that white women loose their rights and are forced to get children? Racists and white supremacists are never the friends of women. They want to subjugate us.

I understand that this theory is propably born out of frustration with all the mass immigation that has happened. There are certainly problems with immigrants, that people on the left don't want to admit. But what else can we do? In my country we desperately need doctors and nurses and if we were to get rid of all immigrants, this would be extremely bad, because a lot of them work in health care. I don't know any other solutions.

I think people should be allowed to express their thoughts about their own culture and language and the fear of loosing it, fear of islam and the problems with immigrants, without it being inherently seen as racist or "islamophobic". Maybe we should actually have a discussion about islam, considering it's a religion that wants to spread and colonize others and it using social media to radicalize the youth in european countries? The stubborness of the left to immedeatly shut down any conversation around this is not helping...

Now in my country there's a lot of things going wrong, but politicians are at fault for that and using immigrants as scapegoats for everything is just stupid.

There is also the 'have-another-child' snydrome - a socially approved way of getting to stay in (or retreat back into) the home. According to Ruth Moulton, a feminist psychiatrist on the teaching staff at Columbia University, even highly talented women will become pregnant to avoid anxiety about their blossoming careers.

Dr. Moulton discovered she could easily count twenty women between the ages of forty and sixty who had used pregnancy as an escape from the outside world. 'In at least half of these cases,' she noted, 'a third or fourth child was conceived just at a point when the older children were in grammar or high school and the mother was freer to devote more energy to outside work.

Indeed, women 'are using pregnancy as a vehicle to get out of the Army', M. Kathleen Carpenter was quoted as conceding in a 1977 report, 'Evaluation of Women in the Army.'

A destructive cycle is perpetuated when women have children as a way of avoiding the anxiety that attends personal development. They become resentful of the narrow, self-limiting role they have chosen as an out, and sometimes they become phobic and hypochondriacal. Perhaps most important of all, they do not raise independent children."

And why do men see it that way?

Sex between a man and a woman:

-most couples do doggystyle sex, were a woman is on all fours like a bitch (a female dog in heat), spreading her behind, so that the man can penetrate her, thrusting his penis into her vagina or anus

-most women perform blowjobs an men, the name itself is already a good indicator of what it is, let's not act like most people use the word "fellatio", the women has to shove something into her mouth, which is very big, try shoving a normal sized cucumber down your throat and see how you like it, blowjobs can cause the woman to gag, vomit and other things, men often have piss on their penis, because they don't wipe, which means women are often licking and sucking piss

-not just the first time of vagibal penetration, but rather the first times can be painful, uncomfortable or lead to bleeding, while there's the "g spot" which is the clitoris, most vaginal penetratuon by itself does not lead to orgams, which begs the question why women then desire vaginal penetration, that's probably caused by them being horny and the vagina getting wet and women report that there's this want for penetration that emerges, a kind of itch that needs to be satisfied

-in general a lot of sex acts that women do they must be trained for or need preparation, like anal for example

-when men ejaculate there's also urine coming out, which means women have male urine in or on their bodies

-sperm having chemicals that have for example a tiring effect on women among other things

-with porn sex acts such as anal, deepthroating, urine tract penetration, facial ejaculation and other things having become more common, it should be questioned why a lot of women are all too ready to perform these, despite the fact that they aren't getting much out of it and that they can even be harmful

-cunnilingus is often brought up, but why is something that men perform in order to boost their ego of what a good lover they are and that they will brag about to other men seen as an exception? Why would this act, that shows how desperate women are for a male body to have sex with, even though they could easily have multiple orgasms by masturbating, be seen as better than others?

-women get especially horny when they ovulate due to their hormones wanting them to get pregnant

-het men pretty much do not have to do any of these things, they stick their penis into the woman and that's it

I could go on, but I fully understand why men see sex as degrading for women. Because it is.

Radical feminists have pointed out in the past, that you can't really sexualize het men, because then they will be seen as gay. There was a post floating around a tumblr about how people tried to make a magazine similar to playboy, but with men and for women and it wasn't successfull, because the women saw the men as gay. Let's apply this to sex.

Imagine a man who is dominated by a domina. Of course this is not subversive considering the fact that men have these kind of fantasies, because once they put their clothes on and go outside, they're the ones who are powerful and not women and they could also easily rape the domina or kill her with their bare hands. But that's beside the point. The domina is using a strapon and he is an doggystyle position. She penetrates him and afterwards makes him lick and suck the strapon with all the motions that are typical for a blowjob. Because it was in his ass there's a bit of feces on the strapon, that he has to lick as well. (That's something women also do after having had anal sex.) Before all of this, the anus of the man also had to be prepared with lubricant, so that he can even take the strapon. Now imagine all the other things I listed being done to the man. Are you seriously telling me, that this isn't degrading? How is being penetrated and giving blowjobs not inherently degrading? Why are gay or bi men who do these things considered "bottom"? Why would the man in this example be considered submissive by most people?

Why are you not questioning wether this whole "it's only degrading because men see it so" even makes sense? Why are you using a typical post-modernist argument akin to "it's a social construct and therefor not real"?

Why are you not exermining and asking wether this is even true?

Why have you gotten to this conclusion, without any inquiry?

Why are you seeing sex between a man and a woman and these sex acts I described as neutral? Are they neutral? What is it saying about women that they want to be penetrated and give blowjobs? Why would men see this as degrading?

Why aren't you asking any of these questions?

Because at the end of the day, when it comes to a topic that you personally are biased to, you are like libfems. "I like it and I choose and I want it and therefor it shouldn't be evaluated and analyzed. If someone asks uncomfortable questions I will put fingers in my ears and be like "lalala" and I will cope, seethe and do mental gymnastics."

Bio essentialist feminists asked questions, were other feminists stopped asking, because it showed some uncomfortable trues about women.

Everything around het sex and women's inability to let go of wanting to have sex with men shows once again how submissive their nature is.

And it shows how women are unable to critically think, when it comes to their own desires.

As for me, I think blowjobs and getting penetrated are inherently degrading and I think having sex is inherently submissive, because you're submitting to your own hormones and your biology. Having sex is not rational. The need for sex is caused by puberty, hormones and the resulting hornyness which is why sex is not neutral to me.

Women submit to their own biology and that's the cause of a lot of their biases and the excuses that they make, not just in regards to sex, but many other things as well.

Going fourther it shows that this is the overarching cause of a lot of problems with humans in general. It's not heterosexuality that's the problem, but sexualities and human behaviour in general. Gay men watch porn, go to male prostitutes, can be pedophiles and so on. Same is true for lesbians. They also watch porn, create written or drawn porn, sexualize women, go to brothels (because of their loneliness among other things), are into BDSM and like gay men also have a desire for biological children, which is why they use surrogacy. Did you know that homosexual penguins take eggs from the bio parents when they die or that they even steal them and then hatch them? All humans are animals and homosexual people are no exception.

When you dare to point these kind of things out, you're called homophobic or lesbophobic.

I'm pointing out the truth and I don't care about any kind of -phobia or -ism nor any of the excuses and arguments made to deflect from the truth. "No real lesbian would do this!" "God forbid lesbians have sex!" Cope harder.