Blood type:- O positive (it's a very crucial piece of information)
Languages spoken:- English, Hindi and Tamil!! (I'm a Trilingual Timmy)
currently learning German (wanted to learn Italian or even Japanese but life said NEIN)
🎨 Traditional artist
I write sometimes (oneshots + character analysis)
Book collector. I literally read ANYTHING
(Including DOAWK. Don't judge. Favorites include Leo Tolstoy and Kafka)
What Fandoms you will find in this lair:-
Jojo's Bizarre Adventures (Golden wind has me on a chokehold help)
Vocaloid (HUGGEE Maretu fan)
Genshin Impact
Countryhumans
Happy Sugar Life
Welcome to Demon School! Iruma-kun
Hellaverse (Hazbin / Helluva)
Friday Night Funkin
crippling AO3 Addiction
Random shitposts (will be tagged #random)
(also note to the hellaverse fandom:- I do not engage in discourse. This cat is tired and wants peace 😿😿😿)
PDI :-
Proshippers, antis, boomers, nerds, geeks, doomscrollers, artists, writers, weebs, breathing souls, freaks, weirdos, furries, chronically online degenerates, cats (ESPECIALLY CATS) mukbangers, humans, non-humans, Marcus Aurelius and normal and abnormal beings CAN INTERACT!!! (as long as you are respectful ofc ofc 😸)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
My interpretation of Iraq Countryhumans (Feat. Syria)
(some more nonsense and ramblings I wrote)
I'm tired of seeing Iraq as a pure victim character or completely as a radical militarized character. Here is how I view him. Whether you agree with my interpretation or not is completely fine. I just feel like there needs to be something different than these same flat stereotypes being recycled.
Since Iraq was destroyed so much due to the US invasion, during the first few years when he was utterly devastated, he was just... mute. He couldn't speak, and his pupils were white. In more recent times, he's alright. He can speak, the economy is a bit better, and they kicked ISIS out, but the white irises still remain.
One thing I noticed is that the US travel guide still keeps Iraq as Category 4. Someone saw this and went, "bet," and traveled there, and guess what? It was oddly... peaceful. The people were friendly, the food was nice, and it didn't look anything like how people usually imagine Iraq. Of course, US travel guidelines are not always wrong, nor completely wrong. Afghanistan, for example, is indeed dangerous. But Iraq is oddly quiet, even after he regained his ability to speak, since modern Iraq is pretty... okay-ish.
And no, I know I'm making him look like a sad-character trope, so I wrote some things to avoid that.
Iraq thought about his previous actions regarding invading Kuwait. Rationally, he knows it was a bad and horrible thing he did. But emotionally, he doesn't feel any regret or remorse. He doesn't and will not say sorry for it because he simply doesn't feel regret. Most of that responsibility, in his eyes, goes to his tyrannical dictator. If he were thrown into that same timeline, he's pretty sure he wouldn't take a different course.
Iraq still has pride and dignity, though. He knows how the world views him, and he simply doesn't want to deal with constantly trying to improve that image. He doesn't find the need to. He knows what people think, and he leaves it at that.
He also thinks people internally assume he's dumb because of how little he talks. He finds it pathetic when people constantly go out of their way to convince others of their redemption or good intentions.
Sometimes he stares at people because he knows it makes them uncomfortable, and he does it specifically to people he wants to leave. Low-key, he sometimes wants to laugh in their faces and tell them that the image they have of him is ridiculous, but he doesn't. He just represses the chuckle.
Also, if Iraq ever found out about Germany (the way I personally write Germany and most people do), I'm pretty sure Iraq would insult him to his face and call him pathetic.
My Germany actively spends his entire life trying to make up for what TR did. Even though he is not TR, he knows that rationally. Yet, in private, he often spirals into guilt. He tries to make himself as friendly and approachable as possible, and since he's an important member of the EU, he can be a bit of a workaholic.
Since Iraq isn't the kind of person who talks much, I find it funny that he looks at Germany and finds him so cringe that he actually has to say something.
Just one word.
"Pathetic."
With a slight look of amusement.
Another reason for this is that the West at least gave Germany a chance to show himself as separate from TR. Iraq never got that chance. Like, why are you paying for sins that aren't even yours?
I imagine everyone sees Iraq as silent and creepy, while Syria calls him a pain in the ass and says he talks way too much for someone like him.
Also, Syria and Iraq are not allies. Just neutral for the sake of it. This isn't closeness or friendship. Syria can be very reactive, and Iraq enjoys seeing it.
The reason Syria hasn't declared Iraq an enemy is because she already has too many wars to deal with, and Iraq is mostly just a shit-talker.
Once, Iraq was just washing dishes until he saw Syria walking past his house with an annoyed look on her face.
Iraq opens his window and loudly says:
"هل ستزعج جوردان كالعادة؟"
("Going to bother Jordan as usual?")
Syria yells back from the distance:
"استمر في الكلام وسأقطع لسانك أيها الوغد!"
("Keep talking and I'll cut your tongue out, bastard!")
She keeps walking for ten seconds, pauses, turns around, and yells:
"أعلم أنك تبتسم بسخرية، أيها الوغد. يجب أن أقطع لسانك الآخر."
("I know you're smirking, bastard. I should cut off your other tongue too.")
Iraq barely reacts. She's said worse.
I initially tried writing Syria as cold and bitter, but that's already how I write Serbia. So I thought, why not a different outcome? She's still a country after all.
A bit later, Syria walks past Iraq's house earlier than usual.
Iraq opens the door and says:
"You're early."
Syria, much calmer this time, replies:
"لم أذكر كل الصفقات والأشياء التي أردتها لأن جوردان بدا وكأنه سيقفز من مبنى بهذه الوتيرة، لذلك قررت تأجيل الأمر إلى الغد."
Before Iraq can continue the conversation, Syria immediately adds:
"وأنا لست إسرائيل، لذلك ذهبت بعيداً."
("And I'm not Israel, so I left.")
Iraq actually laughs.
"يا للعجب! ظننتُ أنك لن تفعل."
("Wow. I thought you wouldn't.")
"أتمنى لو تعود إلى صمتك."
("I wish you'd go back to being mute.")
"ليس قريبًا، للأسف."
("Not anytime soon, unfortunately.")
"وسأظل أتحدث عن مدى سمنتك وكيف ستمتص دماء الأردن حتى آخر قطرة يومًا ما."
("And I'll keep talking about how greedy you are and how you'll drain Jordan dry one day.")
"اصمت أيها الإرهابي!"
("Shut up, terrorist!")
"يا مثير الشغب، يا مُشعل الحروب!"
("Rioter. War-starter.")
"أرجوك، هل ستصمت يومًا ما؟"
("Please, will you ever shut up?")
"ما رأيك ببعض القهوة؟"
("How about some coffee?")
"لا، ستسممني!"
("No, you'll poison me!")
"ولماذا أفعل ذلك؟ لا أريد أرضك المدمرة ولا أي شيء آخر."
("Why would I do that? I don't want your ruined land or anything else.")
"لا، أنا مشغول، لذا لن أتمكن من شرب قهوتك البشعة."
("No. I'm busy, so I can't drink your terrible coffee.")
"إذن، المزيد من القهوة لي."
("Then more coffee for me.")
"أتمنى أن تختنق بها."
("Hope you choke on it.")
"شكرًا جزيلًا لك، وأنت أيضًا."
("Thank you very much. You too.")
Syria adjusts her hijab with fake offense and walks off. Iraq just shakes his head like, "This woman..." and closes the door.
Then imagine it's evening.
Syria returns and asks if he still has coffee left.
Iraq replies:
"لا يكفي لإطعام اللاجئين، ولكنه يكفينا للشرب."
("Not enough to feed the refugees, but enough for us to drink.")
Syria smells the bakhoor in his house and notices the prayer mat.
Iraq casually mentions he was praying and goes to get the coffee.
Syria realizes she never prayed today because she got caught up dealing with the refugee situation. She goes to the mat, kneels, and quietly recites a few verses.
Iraq returns with the coffee, sees Syria praying on his mat, says nothing, and simply waits at the table.
After she's done, Iraq lifts his coffee.
"Bismillah."
He takes a sip.
Syria sits down.
"Alhamdulillah."
They've just known each other for so long that it's basically become wallpaper at this point.
Syria eventually says:
"I still can't believe people can be afraid of..."
(just things I thought about while writing Countryhumans)
*********
Core Philosophy
My interpretation of Countryhumans is government-first, people-second , not that people don't influence it at all
By that I mean: the government is the core structural force of a country. It directs policy, law, international relations, and ultimately shapes what the country does outwardly. So in my writing, the CH is heavily influenced by whoever is in charge.
However, this does not mean the people do not exist.
The country is influenced by the government, not identical to it.
The weight between government and people shifts depending on the country, the regime, and the time period.
2. Ratio System
I view CH through a sliding ratio between government influence and people influence.
Some examples:
North Korea: Government override is extremely high. It has always been structured as a dictatorship, and its ideological core aligns with centralized control. In this case, the regime heavily overrides the people aspect.
Russia or Britain (depending on era): The ratio might be closer to 60–50. Government influence is strong, but not absolute. There is still internal tension and contradiction.
Nordic countries or neutral states like Switzerland: Government is less dominating in shaping identity outwardly. The ratio shifts more evenly.
Some Balkan countries (Greece, Albania, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia): The government may not fully override, but harsh political opinions can bleed into society and reinforce public sentiment.
This ratio is not fixed. It changes over time.
Great Britain during its imperial era cannot be compared to modern Britain.
WW2 USSR cannot be compared to present-day Russia.
The system is flexible and can bend at any time depending on who is in charge and how dominant the structure is.
3. Foundational Identity and Internal Conflict
Countries also have ideological blueprints.
For example:
North Korea was built as a dictatorship. In my interpretation, it genuinely believes what it is doing is right, because its structure and identity were built around that system.
In my storyline, America (with it's current president, yk), however, was not “supposed” to be authoritarian. Its foundational narrative centers around liberty and certain moral ideals. So when policies contradict that narrative or begin harming its own citizens, it creates internal strain.
That is why America ends up cracking in my writing.
Not because it blindly agrees with everything, but because there is still a remaining moral foundation. When actions directly contradict that foundation, it takes a toll.
The difference is alignment between current government and foundational identity.
If the government aligns with the ideological blueprint → less internal conflict.
If the government contradicts it → identity strain and fracture.
4. Rebellion and Reform
If people get tired of the government and overthrow it, the country does not collapse with the government.
The country changes when the government falls.
Rebellion triggers transformation, not destruction.
If I had written a country as mostly pro-government, and that government was overthrown, the event would feel like part of the CH dying. But after things calm down, the CH would reflect and reform its personality.
The CountryHuman is not blind.
They may believe they are right.
But they can be forced into self-reflection.
5. When people affect CountryHumans
Although I prioritize government influence, there are situations where the people’s condition bleeds heavily into the CH instead.
For example, if something deeply affects the population — such as extreme drops in happiness index, high suicide rates, long-term economic suffering, or widespread social unrest — that collective atmosphere can shape the CH’s emotional state.
If the government is not highly authoritarian, then cultural identity, social values, and the beauty of the people can mix into the CH more easily.
In these cases, the influence shifts.
Government may direct policy, but public mood, suffering, or pride can alter the CH’s personality and behavior.
The ratio is dynamic.
6. "Countries don't have to agree with their government"
I understand the argument that countries do not have to agree with their governments. However, in my interpretation, since the government is the institutional core directing policy, I cannot fully separate them.
For example, when people describe Russia as a homophobic country, they are usually referencing laws that have been enforced. That legal structure becomes part of how the country is perceived outwardly.
In my writing, I did make Russia homophobic in alignment with that legal structure. However, it is not a defining personality trait that overshadows everything.
It is integrated into the character, not screamed as a singular label.
Russia does not walk around as “HOMOPHOBIA” personified.
But if LGBTQ topics are brought up in a situation where those laws are relevant, Russia may show discomfort or internal tension.
It is not written as “enforce law = moral correctness.” It is written as structural alignment with current governance, unless challenged by context.
Government traits are integrated, not exaggerated into caricature unless the regime itself is overwhelmingly dominant.
7. Few cases
Some regimes, like the Third Reich, are treated almost entirely as regime embodiment.
If a government is extremely dominating and ideologically rigid, it overrides nearly every people aspect of it. That does not mean every individual person was evil. It means the regime’s ideological core defined the state.
In such cases, nuance does not mean redemption. It means recognizing that the CH represents the regime structure of that time.
Applying a similar structural logic to other countries is not meant to flatten them. It is meant to maintain consistency in how power dominance is represented.
8. Why Do I even focus government first?
It is impossible to fully represent “the people” because there is no singular “the people.” Every individual in a country is different. Different ideologies, classes, values, and experiences.
Since full representation of millions of individuals as one entity is impossible, I choose to prioritize the structural power that directs the country’s outward behavior.
This does not erase people. It acknowledges that government holds institutional control, even if it can be pressured or overthrown.
9. Personal view
I am not a patriot. I have never strongly felt pride toward my own country. I feel culturally attached, but politically detached. That may influence how I write.
Because of that detachment, I find it easier to merge government and country in my interpretation without feeling like I am betraying something sacred.
However, this is just my interpretation of Countryhumans.
It is not the only way to write them.
My CountryHumans are structure-dominant embodiments with a human undercurrent.
Government first. People second. Not people zero.
The ratio shifts with time, ideology, regime dominance, and collective public condition.
When government collapses, the country transforms.
When public suffering intensifies, it can bleed into the CH as well.
I love this, I appreciate it accounts for how a country will be treated by the most part according to the actions of their government
That's especially easy to notice when you look at historical countries in the fandom, they're consistently and comfortably portrayed with a huge government influence, at the end of the day, what a country does will ultimately be what the ones in charge do, and that's what creates a legacy to look back on for characterization.
If a country doesn't embody their government in some way they won't be doing much of anything 😭 and YEAH!!! THERE IS NO “PEOPLE”
I understand the desire to separate traditions of politics from a place of respect, especially when they involve horrors, but political structures are always connected to a cultural context too
I agree with the ratio and the core foundation ideas so bad, the reform thing makes a lot of sense that's a very good way to put it
I'm glad to see someone with similar views as mine regarding this topic.
"I understand the desire to separate traditions of politics from a place of respect" ....Yea......I absolutely love researching and seeing other countries cultures (mostly through folk songs, Kaval Sviri and sakkijarven polkka is peak I love them a LOT and learning the stories behind it) We get it, the people are not the government, but the country's name and reputation is in their hands, so they do matter too!
but even though other frameworks are interesting (like one I saw where the countryhuman is the representative of the country and are neither the people or the government and have their own independent thoughts and live in government appointed buildings) but the thing is I need an anchor to start off with so I wrote what sticks with me the best.
An idea!!! I'm currently working on Egypt countryhumans and one of the things I've seen people write about is about United Arab nations, the time era where Egypt tried to unite the arab word.
I was thinking, instead of writing him off as someone who knows about his intentions and tries to actively manipulate and charm his way through....what if he genuinely believed in his dream?
He genuinely thought he had goodwill and wanted to bring the change for all good reasons, but it ended up collapsing since he was being too blinded by his own ambitions that he ended up using and treating, for example Syria, as an object to move forward rather than someone he has to work and move forward with.
Like he wakes up everyday thinking "one day everyone will thank me in the future" instead of thinking how to exploit others.
And that I personally think will make this entire thing more intriguing.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Jordan and Kuwait deserve much more attention in the fandom, to be honest. Their roles are so interesting. They are both mediators, but in different ways!
Let me explain:
Kuwait is known for its charity, donations, and humanitarian aid, which makes me view him as a compassionate person. (Conservative like the rest of the countries surrounding him, yes, but that's just messily human.) Meanwhile, Jordan is more of a tired and done person. I mean, I would be tired too if my neighbours were Israel and Syria.
Kuwait seems like the more hopeful type. Not exactly naive, but someone who likes to hope for the best. If he says, "Guys, please calm down. We can talk about this!", Jordan would say, "Can you not make this worse for yourselves for five minutes???"
Kuwait's relations with Iraq are neutral-ish at best, which puts them way ahead of still-active burning anger. Though the situation is very personal and complicated, this could also reflect Kuwait's willingness to move on.
Jordan literally hosts 1.3 million Syrian refugees. (In my AU, Syria is a... unique person to deal with. Not exactly pleasant.) The grueling negotiations with the UN about releasing the Yemeni prisoners stuck in Amman also show that he is persistent.
Now, how does Jordan himself feel about all of this?
I imagine a conversation between Kuwait and Jordan in a group chat. Kuwait is talking about some problem, and Jordan replies with:
"Hm. At least you don't have to deal with that woman I'm stuck with XD"
"You mean Syria?"
"She is... well, a unique case."
Next message:
"Her situation is horrible, but sometimes it's unbearable to deal with her."
"Why do you think I'm even in this? No one else will."
"It's indeed impressive how many refugees you are taking in. It's admirable."
And Jordan doesn't quite know what to say to that.
Like, what is he supposed to say?
"Oh, my infrastructure is being stressed, I'm facing an economic crisis and a lack of water, and I'm being pushed to my limits with this many refugees because no one else will take them in, but I'm so fucking glad you find it admirable."
Because he doesn't see it as an act of glory or charity. It's something he has to do.
He can't be the one refusing. He can't be the one losing composure when everything around him is on fire 24/7.
Because it's either this, or the second option.
And the second option is not letting them in and doing nothing.
He wouldn't be able to live with that.
No.
It's not even an option.
This is my character view on Jordan (and Kuwait) so far!!
Also Jordan def seems like a type to fall asleep while seated on a chair.
An idea!!! I'm currently working on Egypt countryhumans and one of the things I've seen people write about is about United Arab nations, the time era where Egypt tried to unite the arab word.
I was thinking, instead of writing him off as someone who knows about his intentions and tries to actively manipulate and charm his way through....what if he genuinely believed in his dream?
He genuinely thought he had goodwill and wanted to bring the change for all good reasons, but it ended up collapsing since he was being too blinded by his own ambitions that he ended up using and treating, for example Syria, as an object to move forward rather than someone he has to work and move forward with.
Like he wakes up everyday thinking "one day everyone will thank me in the future" instead of thinking how to exploit others.
And that I personally think will make this entire thing more intriguing.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
(just things I thought about while writing Countryhumans)
*********
Core Philosophy
My interpretation of Countryhumans is government-first, people-second , not that people don't influence it at all
By that I mean: the government is the core structural force of a country. It directs policy, law, international relations, and ultimately shapes what the country does outwardly. So in my writing, the CH is heavily influenced by whoever is in charge.
However, this does not mean the people do not exist.
The country is influenced by the government, not identical to it.
The weight between government and people shifts depending on the country, the regime, and the time period.
2. Ratio System
I view CH through a sliding ratio between government influence and people influence.
Some examples:
North Korea: Government override is extremely high. It has always been structured as a dictatorship, and its ideological core aligns with centralized control. In this case, the regime heavily overrides the people aspect.
Russia or Britain (depending on era): The ratio might be closer to 60–50. Government influence is strong, but not absolute. There is still internal tension and contradiction.
Nordic countries or neutral states like Switzerland: Government is less dominating in shaping identity outwardly. The ratio shifts more evenly.
Some Balkan countries (Greece, Albania, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia): The government may not fully override, but harsh political opinions can bleed into society and reinforce public sentiment.
This ratio is not fixed. It changes over time.
Great Britain during its imperial era cannot be compared to modern Britain.
WW2 USSR cannot be compared to present-day Russia.
The system is flexible and can bend at any time depending on who is in charge and how dominant the structure is.
3. Foundational Identity and Internal Conflict
Countries also have ideological blueprints.
For example:
North Korea was built as a dictatorship. In my interpretation, it genuinely believes what it is doing is right, because its structure and identity were built around that system.
In my storyline, America (with it's current president, yk), however, was not “supposed” to be authoritarian. Its foundational narrative centers around liberty and certain moral ideals. So when policies contradict that narrative or begin harming its own citizens, it creates internal strain.
That is why America ends up cracking in my writing.
Not because it blindly agrees with everything, but because there is still a remaining moral foundation. When actions directly contradict that foundation, it takes a toll.
The difference is alignment between current government and foundational identity.
If the government aligns with the ideological blueprint → less internal conflict.
If the government contradicts it → identity strain and fracture.
4. Rebellion and Reform
If people get tired of the government and overthrow it, the country does not collapse with the government.
The country changes when the government falls.
Rebellion triggers transformation, not destruction.
If I had written a country as mostly pro-government, and that government was overthrown, the event would feel like part of the CH dying. But after things calm down, the CH would reflect and reform its personality.
The CountryHuman is not blind.
They may believe they are right.
But they can be forced into self-reflection.
5. When people affect CountryHumans
Although I prioritize government influence, there are situations where the people’s condition bleeds heavily into the CH instead.
For example, if something deeply affects the population — such as extreme drops in happiness index, high suicide rates, long-term economic suffering, or widespread social unrest — that collective atmosphere can shape the CH’s emotional state.
If the government is not highly authoritarian, then cultural identity, social values, and the beauty of the people can mix into the CH more easily.
In these cases, the influence shifts.
Government may direct policy, but public mood, suffering, or pride can alter the CH’s personality and behavior.
The ratio is dynamic.
6. "Countries don't have to agree with their government"
I understand the argument that countries do not have to agree with their governments. However, in my interpretation, since the government is the institutional core directing policy, I cannot fully separate them.
For example, when people describe Russia as a homophobic country, they are usually referencing laws that have been enforced. That legal structure becomes part of how the country is perceived outwardly.
In my writing, I did make Russia homophobic in alignment with that legal structure. However, it is not a defining personality trait that overshadows everything.
It is integrated into the character, not screamed as a singular label.
Russia does not walk around as “HOMOPHOBIA” personified.
But if LGBTQ topics are brought up in a situation where those laws are relevant, Russia may show discomfort or internal tension.
It is not written as “enforce law = moral correctness.” It is written as structural alignment with current governance, unless challenged by context.
Government traits are integrated, not exaggerated into caricature unless the regime itself is overwhelmingly dominant.
7. Few cases
Some regimes, like the Third Reich, are treated almost entirely as regime embodiment.
If a government is extremely dominating and ideologically rigid, it overrides nearly every people aspect of it. That does not mean every individual person was evil. It means the regime’s ideological core defined the state.
In such cases, nuance does not mean redemption. It means recognizing that the CH represents the regime structure of that time.
Applying a similar structural logic to other countries is not meant to flatten them. It is meant to maintain consistency in how power dominance is represented.
8. Why Do I even focus government first?
It is impossible to fully represent “the people” because there is no singular “the people.” Every individual in a country is different. Different ideologies, classes, values, and experiences.
Since full representation of millions of individuals as one entity is impossible, I choose to prioritize the structural power that directs the country’s outward behavior.
This does not erase people. It acknowledges that government holds institutional control, even if it can be pressured or overthrown.
9. Personal view
I am not a patriot. I have never strongly felt pride toward my own country. I feel culturally attached, but politically detached. That may influence how I write.
Because of that detachment, I find it easier to merge government and country in my interpretation without feeling like I am betraying something sacred.
However, this is just my interpretation of Countryhumans.
It is not the only way to write them.
My CountryHumans are structure-dominant embodiments with a human undercurrent.
Government first. People second. Not people zero.
The ratio shifts with time, ideology, regime dominance, and collective public condition.
When government collapses, the country transforms.
When public suffering intensifies, it can bleed into the CH as well.
Are there any Jojo fans from India or is it just me?
Like bhai tum log kaha ho 😭 har jagah Naruto aur Demon Slayer hi dikhte hain but JoJo ke baare mein koi baat hi nahi karta.
MERI FAMILY KAHA HAI. MUJHSE koi toh baat karo
I rarely listen to bands. I mostly listen to Vocaloid producers and indie artists, I never really been into bands. Tho I have only heard the popular ones like QUEEN and Linkin Park
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
But he can't leave his team dealing with that now, can he?
"For DIO'S SAKE!! - AGAIN???!?!"
Pesci's voice could be heard across the room, his tone calming down once he noticed Ghiaccio flinching.
"Tsk, no surprise there I guess."
Pesci said that more to himself than anyone else as he went to his room.
"20 million lira right? If it's any lower I have to adjust the budget." Formaggio replied in his usual calm voice, accompanied by Illuso's comforting tone. "Well...I mean hey something is better than nothing, right? We aren't homeless at least!"
"And we have the best things! Each other, food for the most part and THIS!" Prosciutto exclaimed holding his favorite bottle of whiskey -of which he generously poured Risotto a cup of.
Melone softly laughed.
"Well it's almost time for dinner, mind taking over dinner for today? I will help you out."
"Thanks but I have it under control." Formaggio said heading to the kitchen to cook alone as usual.
Risotto smiled contently, looking at this Domestic scene, even if the world went to hell, he knew he would still have his family.
Speaking of, it's been a while since he called his parents, hasn't it? They raised him when they were just his aunt and uncle and accepted him despite all of............................this. They deserve a call at very least.
Risotto walked into his office, a bit silent and locked the door behind him.
Of course, before he could do that Ghiaccio called out to him. Risotto noticed that this was the first thing Ghiaccio said all day.
"Ris, are you alright?"
"Yea, just gonna call my parents. Anything you need Ghia?"
"Oh nothing, just curious. But do thank your mother for the dish last week."
Risotto smiled, as he closed the door behind him, sliding the lock into place....
Fin.
(Ghiaccio began to look for Sorbet and Gelato to ask about dinner.)
Previous chapter (the prologue):- https://www.tumblr.com/meowskithemeowingcat/805898611450953728/diavolo-hummed-to-himself-as-he-looked-over-the