A template for analyzing features of a personality.
View of Self: "Great Director" as he is known, devotee of the theatrical arts, a rare visionary within an industry otherwise known for its corruption and greed. As much as Mr. Reca positions himself as the last bastion of directorial talent, he's still a Cremator, with the unhinged tendencies that would imply, and before that, he was a human who was perhaps too eager to throw it all away. No one needs to know about the unsavory details, though, nor the boring backstory... Do they even matter, when his body of work speaks for itself?
View of Others: His cast members, of course! Memokeepers are usually solitary, and they perceive the world very differently from corporeal beings; reading memories is akin to looking through time, being able to glean long-term patterns in an instant. This creates quite the barrier between him and humanity, and he willingly reinforces this divide. To the Remembrance, memory equals existence, so a person and their memories--their story--are one and the same. He sees it as his role to uncover and share these stories, but this is also the way in which he treats others as film material.
View of World: "A dream trapped in a cage," as he said himself. Reca believes everyone has potential to be something great, but that potential is bogged down by the dull repetition of mundane life. He considers everyday routine to be a script in need of a rewrite, because if someone spends their life occupied with monotony, their passion will give way to numbness, and when they pass on, they'll be forgotten. The world is cruel and vapid, but films are the antithesis, where life can be portrayed as exciting and wonderful as it should be.
Motivations & Goals: His career is the obvious answer, but his films serve a very specific purpose. He's an interesting exploration of the concept of "Remembrance" in the sense that, through his art, he wants both himself and others to be remembered. In contrast to typical Memokeepers that internally cherish moments no one else has ever seen, he would find a moment no one else has ever seen and immediately start drafting a movie pitch. The act of "remembering" isn't enough for him; is it even worth remembering if the audience doesn't find it memorable?
What They Value Most: A story for the ages
Reaction to Stress: Memokeepers aren't biochemically affected by their emotions, so they're notoriously hard to read, but their feelings will still be apparent in their behavior. That said, I'm pretty sure Reca was "stressed" throughout most of 2.6, considering he had three entire hours to live. Using that as a template, when he's under pressure, he's more willing to compromise his standards and blatantly meddle in scenes. He considers it sloppy--this puts him more at risk at revealing his true nature, after all, but it's better than dying!
Reaction to Fear: Again, it's not going to be terribly apparent in his expression or body language, but he'll resort to bargaining if he considers his life to be at risk (begging, even, if it gets to that point). He's also a fan of the fawn response, and will crank up the flattery as part of his pleas. As a Memokeeper, he's a font of information, and can be a powerful ally besides; anything that could pose a threat to him would know this. A miserable (but temporary) collaboration, as in 2.6, is also better than dying!
Reaction to Success: In the moment, it would be the overdramatic cheering and jumping for joy you might expect. In terms of awards, however, he's had so many successful films that I feel like he's grown used to the praise. For him, it's more about the actors he can lead into the spotlight and the lives he can touch than it is about accolades. Success is instead a way he can extend his reach to even more potential talents.
Reaction to Failure: Sulking, griping..."snobbish embarrassment" is the best way I can put it. If a production is bad enough, he'll want to distance himself from it, even going so far as to remove his name from the credits. Beyond his art, though, if the failure is an interpersonal one, he'll be deeply apologetic, looking to make amends upfront. He'd never want to be on the bad side of a talented actor.
Ideal Self: Quite simply, an inspiration. Being an accomplished filmmaker is one thing; highlighting unsung heroes with those films is another, but something he'd really like is for others to follow his lead and finally inject some life into this creatively bankrupt industry. The world isn't changed through one director alone, but perhaps through his influence, a true art movement can take hold of the audience.
Areas of Growth: He's prideful and perfectionistic. While he may compromise his standards if the situation calls for it, he really prefers not to, considering it a failing, voluntarily disclosing that he feels his work isn't up to par. In terms of his creative process, it wouldn't surprise me if he edits the footage to absurd degrees before deciding on a final cut... He can't let "right" sit with "wrong," but he probably should learn to let it sit.
Barriers to Growth: Operating solo and in secret, the only feedback he receives before taking charge is from his own judgment (aka the assistant director). Peer review might help with decision-making, but he's not getting it anytime soon--he's dismissive toward cast members that get in the way, and he and his colleagues at the Garden don't see eye-to-eye. This lack of supervision is probably why he keeps getting into messes.