Sovereignty Governance Determination
Individual or personal self determination is different to collective self determination. Collectively here has yet to be agreed on what self determination would be for the indigenous communities... what structures are being put in place and which of these structures are needed - Above and beyond the class action? What are the roles of the Representive both provincial and national? Please keep in mind that self determination is not independent from SA governance; it would mean that indigenous communities/ people abide by the law of the country. Sovereignty; the authority to rule. In political theory, the ultimate overseer, or authority, in the decision-making process of the state and in the maintenance of order. ... the term was originally understood to mean the equivalent of supreme power. Sovereignty has two basic aspects 'external' and 'internal'. Internally speaking it means that state has supreme power over the people within its domain and externally it implies complete freedom from foreign rule. Sovereignty over the same territory cannot reside simultaneously in two different authorities, that is, sovereignty is indivisible. Sovereignty cannot be divided without ceasing to be sovereignty proper, and precisely this quality of being indivisible distinguishes sovereign authority from other forms of political power. Dividing sovereignty between two or more authorities within a given state would therefore be to dissolve that state into parts. The indivisibility of sovereignty is thus a necessary condition of the unity of the state.
