As a general rule, it's good to avoid 'to be' verbs in writing. But what about similies? It's extremely hard to write one without 'is like' or something similar. I don't know. Maybe I'm thinking too much about this. Any thoughts?
Similes, while they are a form of figurative language, to me feel like they are "telling" me about something instead of "showing" me that thing. They are a useful tool in describing something informally, like to a friend, or when you want your comparison to be easily understood, like to a child.
The messy warehouse was like a jungle with cords and rope hanging like vines. The tall shelves were packed so solid they were like tree trunks.
This does a fine job of describing a scene without being too flat. There is nothing truly wrong with it except the repetition of "like" can get on a writer's nerves, and occasionally a reader's. Compare it to this example,
Vines of cord and rope hung from the rusting jungle of overstocked shelves, unreachable inventory in its canopy.
By using metaphor the scene is more immersive. Instead of simply describing ideas to the reader, metaphors can make them feel and understand those ideas more intimately. Both versions are fine, but each has a different affect.
You do not need to go into your work and remove all the "like" similes. I use them whenever I want to, especially as placeholders in first drafts so I can try to transform them into metaphors later. Then sometimes only a simile will do for a scene, and in that case "is like" is free to stay.
+ Please review my pinned Ask Policy before sending in your ask. Thank you.
+ If you would like to support this blog, please visit my ko-fi and Buy Me A Coffee!
+ You can also find HEY, Writers! on: AO3 - Wattpad - Unsplash - Pinterest