ain't dead yet

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

We went to an aldi to get food, and everyone insisted on paying for their own food, buying full bottles of fizzy drink, their own snacks and so on. Some of the friends brought their own baked goods too. Later, one friend covered a Chinese takeaway order for me and everyone ordered lots of food to eat with no hesitation, only to mention that their eyes had been bigger than their stomachs when the food did arrive.

I didn't realise what was happening until the next day, when each person left my flat with the same "oops, bought too much food to take home with me— I'll just leave it with you!" farewell.

a). I needed to watch that car and

b). That I needed to be careful, because the driver of the car was a massive bitch.

It kind of took me by surprise, because I really had no reason to be beefing with that car, and I also hadn't really had an impression like that since I was religious, which was in my teen years. Right? It'd been a decade since I had a little voice whisper in my ear, and I'd basically written it off as nonsense.

Anyway, I watched the car, because The Spirits or whatever were very insistent that I did. Car drove fine, went into the parking spot, inched forward, and right when it should've just stopped, the driver gunned it for some reason and it ran into the curb and cracked its bumper.

So, the driver got out, and she went to the front of the car to check that yes, she had cracked her bumper, and then she turned to look at me. The parking lot wasn't empty, but we were the only two people standing in that row, and I'd probably been staring at her for tenish seconds now.

She demanded very angrily to know why I hadn't warned her of the curb. And I could have said I didn't know you were about to gun it or is it my job to help every stranger park, or even could you have even heard me, inside your car?

And all of those would have been fine, but I was really, really busy digesting that I had somehow communed with Mormon Jesus again for the first time in fifteen years, and that the communion had mostly been there to let me watch someone park badly (?), so what I responded with was:

"Because it was foretold."

And I can't tell which would be funnier, if she went silent because there's not much to be said to that, or if she went silent because in Utah, she might actually believe me, but we parted ways without more words.

…

eating disorder

@wraith-host @friarpants So there's this collection of archeological dig sites in Brazil colloquially collectively known as Pedra Furada. Sometime in the mid 2010's I think (the earliest articles I can find about it are from like 2014-2015), excavations in the Pedra Furada dig sites started turning up clearly artificially made stone flakes resembling early stone age tools

Except that the earliest of these flakes were dated to around 48000 years ago.

This contradicts current scientific consensus that the earliest documented human presence in the american continent corresponds with the Clovis culture, around 14000 to 12000 years ago.

These stone flakes seemed to suggest that human beings had arrived into this continent tens of thousands of years earlier than initially thought, seemingly providing support to several fringe theories that hold that human occupation of the american continent largely predates the Clovis culture.

Until capuchin monkeys in the Serra da Capivara National Park (which overlaps with the Pedra Furada sites) were observed producing similar stone flakes, and not even for deliberate usage as tools.

Turns out capuchin monkeys use rocks to crack open nuts, and sometimes even just smash rocks so that they can lick up the dust residue they leave after they break (for some reason?). And when they do this, the rocks occasionally break into flakes that are virtually indistinguishable in shape from stone-age human tools.