Hello! I got your message and I’ll respond shortly — I’m currently in the middle of eating a Peach, which is a delicate operation and thus I cannot type right now. Hope you understand!
Xuebing Du
d e v o n
KIROKAZE
Cosimo Galluzzi
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
ojovivo
Mike Driver

#extradirty
art blog(derogatory)

Peter Solarz
Stranger Things
cherry valley forever


oozey mess

shark vs the universe
macklin celebrini has autism
Not today Justin
trying on a metaphor
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
seen from United States

seen from Croatia
seen from France
seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Pakistan
seen from United Kingdom
@mala-taste
Hello! I got your message and I’ll respond shortly — I’m currently in the middle of eating a Peach, which is a delicate operation and thus I cannot type right now. Hope you understand!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Writing a pwp longfic Tolstoy style. Every arc of fucking and sucking will have a multi-chapter interlude reviewing what exactly makes something "perverted" and covertly reminding the audience that we can't definitively say what makes these characters cum because no model of attraction proposed by historians, psychologists, or anthropologists can ever grasp the true emotional mechanics of sex until they admit that divine providence plays a role.
#you jest but I just read an anthology of 19th century french erotic novellas and half of them are like this#for one i had to go through a 50-page diatribe on the nature of sex the nature of art the divine feminine vs. the evil masculine the way#that the bourgeoisie has corrupted and misunderstood sappho's tenets and a discourse on whether lesbian love is better when it's vulgar and#carnal or pure and wholesome before I got to the lesbian fucking and sucking#it was very insightful actually because I learned that the tradition of upper class racist gold star lesbians who frequent literary salons#and read each other mid poetry they wrote to explore their connection to the divine before getting into insane polycule drama is a tradition#that has existed longer than I imagined - via @mala-taste
@mala-taste so maybe drop the title fucking please??
I read it in Italian - it's called L'Età del Piacere and the editor/curator is Enrico Badellino (: if you want, when I come home I can give you a list of the individual stories inside it so you can hunt down each one independently! Most but not all of them are queer in some way
Gustave Caillebotte (1848-1894, French) ~ Parterre de marguerites, 1893 ~detail~
[Source: mdig.fr]
ᴡᴇᴅᴅɪɴɢ ᴛʀᴀɪɴ ɪɴ ᴍᴏsᴄᴏᴡ, 17ᴛʜ ᴄᴇɴᴛᴜʀʏ ʙʏ ᴀɴᴅʀᴇɪ ʀʏᴀʙᴜsᴋɪɴ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Leighton House, 12 Holland Park Road, London, United Kingdom
can we please acknowledge that tma/tme is a meaningful distinction? a justice of the US supreme court is openly saying that it's legal to discriminate against trans women because the same laws do not target trans men. the transmisogyny is what makes it permissible. your transphobia is fine as long as it has carveouts for men.
So... Respectfully, you need to look at this statement in broader context of the sports conversation in general. Trans men have not needed to be banned from sports in order to be pushed out of sports competition, because any trans person taking Testosterone and playing sports is breaking doping laws. Amy Coney Berret studied sports law for her job before coming to court and she knows that. She's not arguing that trans men and boys can play sports here. She's making a law argument that this one specific law doesn't discriminate against trans men, because we have a different law that will literally never be challenged on the basis of sex based discrimination for that that either forces trans boys out or forces trans boys to detransition, so we can use them as a convenient hypothetical for this law while also not granting them equal access to anything. The fact that you took this famously fascist woman at her word as not seeing trans men as a threat rather then wanting to sneakily pit us against each other to push us both out of public life shows you have a huge blind spot about our issues. And that blind spot hurts you.
That’s not really correct though- yes, there are some sports organizations that blanket ban testosterone as doping, HOWEVER the vast majority of sports organizations stipulated in their policies that trans men on testosterone would not be considered doping unless their T levels were above what would be considered “typical male levels”.
In fact, that is how those doping policies are enforced! Because those policies are enforced through testing. And if they banned any level of testosterone in someone, then.. literally all cis males would be barred from competing? A trans man with below or at “average” T levels would not even register at all on a surprise sports drug test.
Now again, there ARE notable exceptions to this, but it is absolutely incorrect to say that any trans person taking T is automatically considered doping in men’s sports.
In fact, as of 2025 the NCAA, which is by far the largest and most impactful organization and often sets the precedent for local and smaller sports organizations has been clear that trans women are NEVER allowed to compete on women’s teams whereas trans men are welcome to compete on men’s teams regardless of HRT status.
To be clear about something here- I do think you are correct to point out that Berret has studied sports law and likely knows that trans men could potentially be banned de facto by several means, including 1. More major sports organizations adopting “any T Rx is doping” type policies, or just straight up more strict “no trans ppl allowed- only play on your AGAB team” policies. 2. Legal bans on access to HRT meaning trans men can not get T which then means they are stuck with competing on women’s teams (or sticking out like a sore thumb on a men’s team and facing so much discrimination that it becomes not worth it to compete, something I would argue already happens with all trans ppl in sports already tbh)
However, the OP is still right to point out that she is intentionally trying to sacrifice trans women in order to get people on board with these laws. In fact, I think that is a perfect example of how transmisogyny functions here- trans women are an acceptable scapegoat in conversations about sports inclusion.
You are correct that she absolutely does not actually give a shit about trans men. You are correct that it is likely not true that she doesn’t see trans men as a threat, and probably is banking on de facto exclusion. However, she is still using trans women as a sacrifice to get the public on her side in a way she likely would not be able to do with trans men.
It is also important to note that in this situation, the consequences are absolutely not even. I am a transmasc(ish) nonbinary person. I am a sports med professional. I have published research and spoken publically about trans athletes. I wrote and designed an entire inclusion policy for the NCAA institution I used to work at. I will never say that transmasc people do not face discrimination or exclusion in sport- however, there is a HUGE difference in how transfem people are treated in sport, and more to the point here, there is a HUGE difference between legal bans on participation and organizational bans on participation.
Legal bans (state and federal laws) on transfem participation in sport is such a devastating blow because laws like this are much, MUCH harder and slower to change than organizational policies. Organizational policies that exclude all trans people can be changed and are in fact likely to change over time with public opinion (depending on the structure of the organization). I’m not saying it’s easy- believe me, I know that from experience! However, if there is a LEGAL ban, this will bar trans women from women’s sports REGARDLESS of the organizations values and standpoint. Organizations will comply out of fear, and institutions like schools will HAVE to comply under threat of losing funding or being penalized. That is a devastating result for transfem people.
Again- you are not wrong to point out that Barrett is not actually on the side of any trans people, transmascs included. However, that does not negate the fact that she is using transmisogyny to her advantage because she hopes that will appease people enough to stop caring. It is important to ask why she is able to do that- why transfem people are viewed as more “acceptable” and “reasonable” to ban in the first place?
All trans people should absolutely realize that politicians like this are not our friends. However, we must use that to inspire solidarity with those in our community who are the primary targets of transmisogyny. And that does require recognizing where we are not being equally harmed or targeted.
can we please acknowledge that tma/tme is a meaningful distinction? a justice of the US supreme court is openly saying that it's legal to discriminate against trans women because the same laws do not target trans men. the transmisogyny is what makes it permissible. your transphobia is fine as long as it has carveouts for men.
to all the people in the tags insisting that trans men have it just as bad and that my saying this is dividing some community:
Amy Coney Barrett is arguing that the cases under review involve laws which only prohibit trans girls from participating in women's sports, which she believes means that they are not transphobic, since those specific laws are not similarly targeting trans boys and men.
her legal theory is that transgender people shouldn't be considered a quasi suspect class. quasi suspect classes is a legal category under the equal protections clause and laws that affect them trigger a heightened level of scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, which would require the government prove that these laws advance a legitimate public interest under more strict criteria than the typical rational basis for review. trans women are not on our own a quasi suspect class; gender and transgender status both are. because cis women's participation is not being regulated by these laws, intermediate scrutiny is not raised on the basis of gender. and because trans men's participation is not being regulated by these specific laws, intermediate scrutiny is not raised on the basis of being transgender either. these are legal terms and concepts; if you are unfamiliar, you should learn about them before engaging.
per this line of reasoning,a law discriminating against trans women does not raise intermediate scrutiny because cis women and trans men are not being targeted. whether the court ultimately accepts this reasoning remains to be seen, but this notion has precedent and could well be reaffirmed here, which would codify transmisogyny as an explicitly constitutional mode of discrimination in the United States. laws governing us would be subject to a lower standard of review, meaning it would be easier to defend them and more difficult to overrule them in the courts, which has been a primary venue in which our rights have been protected.
my describing this dynamic is not dividing a community for one reason: I give a shit about trans women and I'm not in community with anyone who doesn't. I'm not talking about trans men's discrimination here for the same reason that I'm not talking about cis women's oppression: this is not about them.
it's not about you.
fuck you.
care about trans women enough to stand by us and support us.
stop trying to make our shit about you.
Please accept my terrible meme
grounding tips for the stressed aspiring tyrant: acknowledge 5 people you can sway to your cause, 4 methods you can use to persuade them (2 violent, 2 nonviolent), 3 people in positions of moderate power you can manipulate and usurp in order to gain access to 2 powerful institutions to destroy, and 1 foundational lie

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Petra
saw a post rightfully complaining about the fantasy trope of the petite/agile fmc’s weapon of choice being a dagger, considering that most serious styles of dagger-based combat are literally just wrestling where the winner gets to stab the loser. however i will point out that there are many historical traditions (i’m very familiar with east asian instances of this, and i seem to recall some european ones as well) of noblewomen carrying daggers or wearing big heavy hairpins designed to stab SO THAT they can commit suicide and die with spotless honor if threatened or captured. so if a woman’s primary weapon is a dagger, it means she’s been handed the premodern equivalent of a cyanide tooth and decided to get absolutely fucking jacked to make it everyone else’s problem
Do you think people who write genre fiction can be saved?
People hate on genre fiction like 90% of literary fiction isn't also dog shit
Dear Mala-Taste,
I just finished the Djerba sequence of PiF (misery and anguish, I had my doubts about Marthe because the last time we had a doppleganger for Lymond he turned out EVIL and she's also provoking Lymond the way Joleta did, which is all not great) (also RIP to Jerott and his gay repressed homophobia) and remembered you said there was a clue in here about why it couldn't have been Lymond with Oonagh in Tripoli! Very curious about what that was, if you would like to reveal!
All in all, I'm loving this book most of the series so far; it's hilarious and traumatic but still less stressful than DK was, somehow. Also I would die for Philippa Somerville.
Sincerely, your sister in suffering,
@no-where-new-hero
Dear Sister (platonic) (needs to be said explicitly in this fandom),
I actually didn't mean to imply that the Djerba sequence has a clue about who it was that slept with Oonagh in the tent! I just remembered that you thought Oonagh might be the endgame love interest and didn't want to spoil the fact that she dies brutally halfway through the story. Which happens in Algiers, not in Djerba, I now realize - I had them mixed up lmfao.
The actual clue I was referring to is in Queen's Play - during the sex scene Dorothy says something along the lines of, "it was the first and the last time they did it" - I think you once asked me to what extent these books were preplanned and, well, while some people have pointed out some early installment weirdness with GoK, QP contains clues to the central mystery of books 5 and 6 (which helped me almost solve it!), so I don't think she'd have written that if she meant them to have sex again in the next book. I didn't want to spoil things for you by saying they never have sex again!
Having just finished my DK reread a couple of hours ago, I can also sort of comment on my other theories:
Oonagh is not a character that's intuitively comprehensible to me, so I spent a loooot of time trying to understand where her seemingly irrational and erratic actions are coming from. One aspect of her is that she's deeply idealistic - she's looking for a Grand Leader to fall in love with and be led by as he embodies her own ideals that she, being a woman, can't independently exercise - she had hoped O'Connor and Renaissance IRA might be that but turns out not. This is super relevant within the themes of DK. The other aspect of her is that she's an abuse victim with a cripplingly avoidant attachment style, so the notion of not being in control and being in someone's power are anathema to her. So she fears what she craves and resents what she doesn't fear and that's why she ends up rejecting everyone at the end of QP - O'Connor was threading a thin line with her by sort of managing to look like both if you're delusional enough, and the events of QP made him fall off.
Gabriel the master manipulator understands this - a lot of time and care is used in DK to describe how much effort he's making not to crowd her, to respect her boundaries, to leave her with her own sense of independence and autonomy and privacy, and how well she's responding to that. Lymond, when they meet, while being flirty, also makes sure that she knows that he's doing it in a friendly way - he also sets a firm and honest boundary because he understands that this is what she'll respond best to. After that, despite all of Gabriel's talk about how she mustn't interrupt Francis's Great Destiny by hitching her wagon to him, she seems ready to go with him, because his behavior makes the boundaries between them clear and comprehensible and honest and that feels safe to her.
Oonagh thinking that Francis came to the tent then could then have two effects:
Falling prey to her feelings and submitting to the ideal all over again once again annihilates her own sense of control and independence. Having sex with "Lymond" brings her back to the humiliating state that she's trying to avoid and escape, so she'll feel unsafe and out of control and rather doom herself than stay trapped in said state. Oonagh craves relinquishing control (and finding a companion who's an equal partner) but does NOT want it consciously and tries to avoid it if she can. Especially if she feels that what he's expressing is not genuine - awareness of it is part of why she didn't stay with him in QP and her knowing that he's not in love but still came to her perhaps makes her perceive him as unsafe in DK as well.
"Francis" coming to have sex with her makes her think that he's succuming to his own impulses instead of following the path of leadership and righteousness that she's hoping he'll follow, so she decides to take herself out of the equation before that happens, especially considering (1) (she can't trust herself to really leave him once she's free).
TBH I was vacillating between the two and I'm still unsure of which one it is, exactly, but I'm leaning towards more 1 than 2, since she already thinks he's throwing away his grand destiny before he comes to the tent and seems relatively fine with it. In this interpretation Gabriel, who spent enough time with her to understand her, wants her to feel threatened by her own feelings and follow her worst and most avoidant impulses, so that's why he does it, in addition to just finding her hot and deriving pleasure out of pulling one over on someone so staunchly independent.
Also, in a way, Gabriel's giving Oonagh the choice between Francis the man and Francis the intimidating yet appealing ideal, and she chooses Francis the ideal, and anything that sort of flaws this ideal (like him shallowly coming to her to get his rocks off) makes her distance herself from him in an effort to maintain it. If he refuses to embody the ideal she'll MAKE him embody it by removing all other choices from him. Between saving herself and having an honest friendship with Francis and feeling like she's the one who brought the grand ideals of the prefect leader to fruition, she'll choose the latter. And it also maintains her own self-image as important yet independent kingmaker.
But I may be overthinking it and he just did it on a whim because he was attracted to her, the way he told Meg Erskine about Tom's death with no ulterior motives.
Another more practical consideration is that Gabriel needs Dragut to think they're lovers (or so he thinks), so Dragut doesn't connect the dots and figure out the potentially blonde child is Lymond's and not his. Since Dragut's guards are constantly watching them.
Anyway, PiF is IMHO the best book in the series, and the very stressful parts are yet to come! This is the fun chill part!
I feel in love with Philippa the first time I saw her in GoK so I get you completely <3 She's my blorbo <3
Yours faithfully,
-- @mala-taste (my formatting got fucked when I used the numbered list so I can't make the font fancy... Sorry!)
EDIT: Another thing that comes to mind is that a man who's had sex with her could probably tell that she's pregnant. While she can trust Francis to not throw his mission away for her, she knows he would for the child, ergo she needs to "die".
NEVER ASK YOIR PARENTS TO PICK YOU UP A BEER WHAT THE FUCK KS THISSSS
Listen tails this is my smart beer I’m smarter when I’m drunk
tonight, we let the LKLDS🏛️IL talk

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Edvard Munch
Madonna
Lithograph
1895/1902
Will you be seeing red after taking this quiz?
I can only read “dogs” and only see anything in one other. I see nothing in any other.
8/10 but fuck, OW.
8/10 also!