Burner2burnlol

As a fan of horror, its always good to resensitize yourself to how bad things are and be considerate of how others feel about things. If you realize you could probably see a corpse and be unaffected, you need to resensitize. Same with any dark or horrible thing. You need to be self aware.

original post by @.puppybaby15 but has since been deleted

HI EDIT this post has blown up so here's a much better pedo warning

edit: wonderful post someone made

they’ll mock the abuse you went through just because you don’t want them around.

argue all you want about “safe spaces”, but its just an excuse to masturbate to kids. :/

poster made by me — reblogs appreciated

Holy shit

Just because someone doesnt like and is disgusted by your fanfiction that romanctizes incest and pedophilla, doesnt make them a nazi.

PROSHITS DNI!

There is a specific kind of irony that only exists in online fandom, and it's embodied by the proshipper who preaches "don't like, don't read" while making it functionally impossible to avoid their content. For a community that claims to value freedom above all else, they sure do spend a lot of energy forcing their work into spaces explicitly marked as off-limits.

Let's talk about tagging, or rather, the deliberate refusal to do it properly. Fandom runs on tagging. It's the basic courtesy that allows a 14-year-old looking for fluffy fanart to avoid stumbling onto explicit adult content. It's the entire reason the "don't like, don't read" philosophy can even function. But too many proshippers treat tagging like a suggestion rather than a boundary-respecting necessity. They'll use vague tags. They'll hide problematic content under cutesy euphemisms. They'll create entirely new tags specifically to evade the block functions that antis and minors use to protect themselves. This isn't creative freedom. This is actively sabotaging the tools people use to consent to what they see.

And when they get blocked? When an anti curates their own space and excludes them? The response is often block evasion. New blogs. New accounts. A relentless determination to force their way back into a space that explicitly rejected them. This isn't engagement. This is harassment with extra steps.

Then there's the invasion of anti spaces. Proshippers will wander into tags like "anti proship" or "antis dni" and act shocked—shocked—that the people there don't want to see proship content. They'll reblog anti posts to mock them. They'll flood the tags with their own content specifically to trigger the people filtering those tags. They deliberately cross the line and then cry censorship when they're met with resistance.

And here's the killer: these are the same people who plaster "DNI IF YOU'RE AN ANTI" all over their own blogs. They demand that antis respect their boundaries. They demand that antis stay out of their spaces. They insist that consent matters. But the moment the roles are reversed? Suddenly boundaries are "censorship." Suddenly curated spaces are "echo chambers." Suddenly the rules only apply when they're the ones being protected.

You cannot claim to care about consent and then deliberately circumvent every tool designed to secure it. You cannot preach "your kink is not my kink and that's okay" while shoving your kink down the throats of people who have explicitly said it's not okay. The refusal to tag properly, the block evasion, the tag invasion—these aren't acts of creative defiance. They are acts of targeted harassment dressed up in the language of freedom.