Lizard Doggo

radical feminists are fighting with mainstream science over whether men are biologically prone to violence

ignoring biologically driven male violence is like saying the earth was made in six days by my imaginary friend, God.

you have to be wrong about MANY MANY THINGS to even arrive at that point

don't be a "girl's girl"

be pro science

There's a biological component in the obesity crisis. People evolved to seek out fatty, sugary foods. Me saying that doesn't mean I'm also saying that obese people aren't responsible for working with their drives and taking care of themselves, or that all people in modern civilizations will be obese because of the abundance of sugary and fatty foods. Our drives are still our responsibility, and natural ≠ good or inevitable for every individual.

I have this post about a genetic component in rapey behavior. This post talks about why a disproportionate amount of rape victims are young women. This post talks about the similarities of human war crimes and chimpanzee (our closest living relatives) "war crimes" (ethic cleansing, wartime rape). This post further talks about the evolutionary connection between warfare and rape. I cite all my sources, and the absolute majority of them are published studies.

radical feminists are fighting with mainstream science over whether men are biologically prone to violence

ignoring biologically driven male violence is like saying the earth was made in six days by my imaginary friend, God.

you have to be wrong about MANY MANY THINGS to even arrive at that point

don't be a "girl's girl"

be pro science

narratives around “fuckboys” fixate on the the supposed “sin” of men having casual sex and hookups without committing to a romantic relationship. it completely misses the problem, which is in fact NOT casual hookups without romantic ties, but instead the fact that these men are misogynistic and do not see women as equals worthy of communication and mutual conversation around each other’s boundaries/desires.

narratives around incels fixate on the fact that they are virgins and not the actual problem which is that, once again, they are misogynistic and believe women are property who owe them sex and relationships.

there is nothing wrong with virginity and casual sex— it’s so easy for you to disparage these things because they are existences which lie outside of the confines of the traditional family.

sure it’s “choice” but consent under patriarchy is coerced by default… conditioned from birth to submit, to please, to accept pain as his form of intimacy

its pumped into every aspect of mainstream media, normalizing it so thoroughly and, not to police your sex life but it’s about recognizing that if your pleasure depends on the ritualized humiliation of women, then your pleasure is political, and your politics are weak

you don't actually have to question any of the patriarchal biases you grew up with, men are *supposed* to be seen as strong domineering predators and women are *supposed* to be seen as pure and fragile and victimized.

actually transgressing these beliefs would require seeing people as people with complex individual experiences, and not as monoliths, because that is exactly how prejudice and bigotry is bred.

this isn't to say "not all men" in the quippy bullshit way that misogynists use to defend their complicity in a misogynistic culture. what i mean is that hatred based upon traits one cannot change is useless in enacting real societal and ideological change.