Untitled

Lawyer4Help helps women file Bladder sling lawsuit in USA who have gone through vaginal mesh complications. We provide the best lawyers who have experience in legal proceedings on these cases and reaching a fair settlement.

Pelvic organ prolapse occurs when childbirth and such conditions wear out the tissue in the pelvic area which leads to pain and discomfort. Doctor recommends mesh surgery in the time of an emergency.

Tansvaginal mesh, also known as pelvic mesh or bladder sling. It is a surgical material made of non-absorbable/absorbable synthetic polypropylene that is used to give an extra support to pelvic organ. It is implanted during a surgical procedure for mending a weakened and damaged pelvic organ.

Although, the mesh surgery causes severe complications on account of the problems linked with the procedure. According to FDA, surgical mesh complications are frequent to encounter and ultimately reclassified the use of mesh from moderate to severe risk.

Complications you may face

Frequent complications reported so far from transvaginal surgery include:

● Vaginal mesh erosion

● Infection

● Pelvic and near organ perforation

● Vaginal Shrinkage

● Urinary problems

● Neuro-muscular problem

● Trouble walking

● Fever on and off

● Nausea

● Weight loss

Some of the news reported in the past where women faced urinary issues where every time they laugh, cough, sneeze or part in activities that create extra pressure, causing a small amount of urine to leak. In some cases, it was frequently identified that women wore sanitary pads in defense.

Based on Doctor Raz's experience, 20 to 30% of complications he named as “lupus type”, results in runny nose, muscle pain, fogginess and lethargy.

Primary reason behind facing difficulty is when the mesh starts eroding in the vagina. This makes the mesh slip off of the implanted position and lead to harming pelvic organs and its surroundings.

Symptoms of mesh complications

Vaginal mesh complication symptoms occur within week or month of the surgery which include:

● Painful intercourse

● Vaginal bleeding

● Intensifying urinary incontinence

● Vaginal discharge and pain

These symptoms worsen over time. It’s required to become aware of the symptoms and take prompt actions before it’s late. Besides medical treatment, it’s needed to spread awareness and get justice from it. Bladder Sling lawsuits helped many women and brought them to justice by huge settlements.

Recommendations for women who face complications

Consult a specialist in this area with significant surgical skills and start medical treatment at the earliest.

Other than this as you’ve learned how claiming an amount from companies is beneficial. It not just fulfills your financial loss but stimulates your mental state with a sense of fairness and aids to share knowledge vastly.

Let’s get into a few facts.

Women who have sued companies over vaginal mesh have pulled off success of at least around $300 million. By 2017, many companies had settled thousands of demands for millions of people.

There was a case of Sherise Grant among many women who had faced urinary problems, she pulled off a settlement of $8 billion.

One patient has achieved a victory of $41 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson. Other times the jury awarded millions of dollars to patients. In the meantime, 108,008 lawsuits have been filed in the MDLs and reaching settlements.

In August 2021, FDA banned Boston Scientific and Coloplast devices for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to be available for commercial use.

Based on all the factuality, we recommend you to get in touch with the right attorneys on time. Lawyer4Help has experience in giving individuals the power to work out their legal rights in many matters and provides Best lawyers to you.

Settle your Transvaginal mesh lawsuit claims with us. We make things right for you!

Parents of premature infants are filing baby formula lawsuits against makers of Similac and Enfamil. In the lawsuits it is claim that manufacturers didn’t warn that these cow’s milk-based formulas could lead to serious gastrointestinal problems in premature infants that may causes to death of the baby.

Why Are People Filing Baby Formula Lawsuits?

Parents are filing lawsuit to Enfamil manufacturer Mead Johnson and Similac manufacturer Abbott Laboratories because they know that their baby formula products could cause necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants which can result into death of the premature infant. Manufacturers who work on these products failed to warn parents and medical providers about the risk.

NEC is a serious gastrointestinal condition which results into intestinal tissue death and may be fatal in as many as 50% of cases. The result of this is it causes intestinal inflammation that may cause holes in the intestine. Bacteria from the intestine can leak into the abdomen or blood, causing serious illness or deadly blood infections.

According to one research preformed in back 1990, a study in Lancet revealed that NEC was up to 10 times more common in premature babies given formula. Since then, many more studies have linked cow’s milk-based formula to a higher risk of NEC in premature infants, according to baby formula lawsuits.

We all know having a baby should be a joyous time for a family. Parents wish for the best of future. But the first few weeks or months can be stressful, also in more so if the baby was born prematurely and treated in a NICU. As parents and guardians they ensure a new baby gets all of the nutrition it needs to be healthy is crucial. While studies have shown that breast milk is better for premature babies but in few conditions baby formula is the only option, or needed to supplement breastfeeding. But there are clear dangers with cow-based formula or different products, especially when given to premature babies.

According to the lawsuit, when a preterm infant is given cow-based baby formula and gets sick as a result, healthcare providers and manufacturers who are aware from the results may face legal claims for medical negligence and product liability. If they didn’t adequately warn consumers or doctors of the risks, those involved may be held liable. Such is the case in the lawsuit against Abbott and Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, who makes the baby formula, Similac.

Here is one news in which the wrongful death lawsuit was filed by parents of a preterm baby in California who was given Similac in the NICU, developed necrotizing enterocolitis, and died from the disease just 16 days after birth. They claim the risk of Similac baby formula causing NEC wasn’t properly disclosed on its packaging, in its warnings, or on other materials which causes to death.

Studies have shown that certain types of baby formula increase risks of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Also when a baby is fed bovine-based baby formula, the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis is even greater, adding another layer of complications for infants. As parents it is important to know your legal rights when your baby gets sick from a product, or the worst happens.

The claim against Similac was not the first baby food lawsuit to make headlines but in February 2021, there were reports of more than 80 lawsuits against manufacturers of baby food after poisons were found, including arsenic. The neurotoxic effects of the discovered poisons can be fatal and cause significant damage to brain development.

Why are Premature Babies at Greater Risk of NEC?

Premature babies are at risk of immediate and lifelong struggles because their organs are not mature when born as results in it face respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and immunological morbidities and deficiencies. Babies are considered to be premature when they’re born before 37 weeks gestation which is results in serious condition that can be life-threatening.

Many premature babies are unable to successfully breastfeed because they are not strong or big enough to do so which results in they often need additional nutrition to promote healthy growth and development, and to survive. To complete the lack of this, it needs substitute with baby formula, much of which is cow-based.

But studies over the last few decades have clearly shown the increased risk of NEC and that cow-based formulas present even greater risks. That’s why the proper warnings are needed to ensure parents and doctors make informed decisions.

Almost a decade ago, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended breastmilk should be exclusively fed to infants for the first six months of their lives. While many premature babies struggle with breastfeeding, in this case donated breast milk is one solution.

Now the question us who can file NEC lawsuit? So the parents who had a premature infant diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis after using products like Similac or Enfamil then they can file a baby formula lawsuit for potential compensation.

The wrongful death lawsuit against Similac for its baby formula has brought to light and highlighted the role food companies have in a new baby’s life. If NEC risks associated with formula for preterm infants aren’t clear, or a doctor doesn’t communicate the risks to parents, there may be grounds to hold them accountable and seek justice.

It is possible that your baby may have been fed by Similac or Enfamil in the hospital. If you are unsure, your lawyer may be able to help you find out. Make sure you provide the name of the hospital and the hospital’s location.

It is also possible that after your baby was discharged from the hospital, you may have fed your baby a Similac or Enfamil formula product that’s why lawyers encourage parents to keep any receipts, proof of purchase, packaging or boxes from the formula for evidence.

Zanatc is a medicine which reduces the amount of acid produced in the stomach which is available both by prescription & in medical stores as OTC products. It reduces heartburn, acid reflux & other gastrointestinal, stomach related issues.

The Zantac lawsuit is a lawsuit filed against the manufacturers of Zantac and ranitidine by people who developed cancer from NDMA, a probable carcinogen. Zantac claims that Zantac may be contaminated with the carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA).

Zantac Manufacturers Named in Lawsuits

Zantac personal injury lawsuits may be brought against drug manufacturers, distributors, pharmacies, physicians and any other parties who market, market or distribute Zantac to individuals and are aware of the possible risks of Zantac cancer.Thousands have joined Zantac's personal injury, wrongful death and class-action lawsuits seeking damages from Zantac's drug maker.

Few manufacturers that are facing zantac class-action lawsuits are:

● Sanofi

● GSK

● Pfizer

● Boehringer

● GlaxoSmithKline

GSK was the first to manufacture & created Zantac in 1977.

Then in 2004 Pfizer manufactured over the counter Zantac.

After that it was bought by sanofi in 2017. All and all there are about 20 manufacturers who created OTC Zantac. Zantac was branded with sanofi in the US market and was sold in India with the name Rantac OD.

Cancers associated with Zantac Lawsuits

Attorneys handling the ranitidine and Zantac claims listed stomach, liver and bladder cancers as the top injuries related to NDMA contamination. People who took Zantac and filed lawsuits reported numerous cancer cases related to Zantac and NDMA.

Cancer associated with ZAntac are:

● Stomach cancer

● Bladder cancer

● Intestinal cancer

● Lung cancer

● Liver cancer

● Kidney cancer

● Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

● Ovarian cancer

● Testicular cancer

● Pancreatic cancer

● Prostate cancer

● Throat cancer

Eligibility to file a Zantac Lawsuit

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer or suffered an unfair death as a result of ingesting a toxic Zantac product, you may be eligible to file a Zantac claim with a responsible pharmaceutical manufacturer along with others.

A nationwide lawsuit has been filed on behalf of individuals taking Zantac and experiencing negative long-term and short-term side effects due to the carcinogenic effects of taking Zantac (ranitidine).

There are certain criteria that need to be present for filling Zantac lawsuit

● zantac need to be purchased from pharmacy(present of receipt for the same)

● consumed bottle acta s proof that you must had consumed the zantac

● you should have suffered from personal injury or any damage after consuming Zantac as listed above.

Why Are Zantac Lawsuits Being Filed?

Lawsuit against Zantac and ranitidine maker Zantac and ranitidine alleges the company makes and sells a drug they know contains a carcinogenic chemical (NDMA), a carcinogenic chemical (NDMA) that risks are not disclosed to consumers or governments.

There are various studies & researches which link zantac prescription to cancer in both animals & humans. It has proved that formation of cancer in animals & probably carcinogenic to humans.

Status of Zantac Lawsuits 2022:

In Zantac's first lawsuit 2016, plaintiffs accuse drugmakers Sanofi and Boerhringer of making, marketing and selling Zantac potentially tainted with NDMA .

In 2019 zantac was recalled by sanofi in US & canada and in april 2020 FDA request to manufacturers to withdraw zantac from market. Zantac was withdrawn from the US market and was suspended in Europe & australia

In 2020, South Florida-based MDL(Multiple District Litigation) focused on the cause by showing that ranitidine, a heartburn drug, can be chemically converted to NDMA, a known human carcinogen, under certain storage conditions or when the drug is digested in the human body.

As for now in 2022, there are two main updates related to zantac

● on Feb 2, 2022- Zantac is related to the loss of smell and taste. Although the verification is still pending for the same.

● the class action suit against Zantac manufacturers in California is the first to officially schedule a trial date on October 10, 2022.

● There are over 2000 cases filed against zantac till Feb1 2022 for now.

Consult With A Zantac Lawsuit Attorney

Lawyer4Help USA is pursuing a Zantac class-action lawsuit related to the risk of cancer in patients who have taken the popular heartburn medication Zantac (the active ingredient ranitidine) for heartburn, peptic ulcers, stomach ulcers pain and increased stomach acid, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common disease of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) in premature infants and newborns and one of the most catastrophic comorbidities associated with prematurity. In spite of extensive research, the disease remains unsolved. NEC is classified depending on its severity into disease states according to the modified Bell's Classification.

If we talk about the treatment of NEC then depending on its severity it can be a conservative therapeutic approach to surgery with resection of the affected parts of the intestine. Mortality is considerably high in extremely small preterm infants reaching up to 42% of the affected children. Measures such as breastfeeding or alternatively nutrition with pasteurized human donor milk from a milk bank, administration of probiotics, avoidance of histamine type II receptor antagonists, and restrictive antibiotic treatment should be considered early on for prevention of NEC.

These infants require long term nursing care that is complicated and costly. The yearly additional hospital charges for NEC in the United States are estimated in excess of $6.5 million. Epidemiologic risk factors and clinical predictors have been explored; however, only prematurity has been identified as a consistent risk factor associated with NEC.

What causes it ?

The research is going on as doctors are also not sure. In premature babies lungs and intestines are weak and less mature then full term babies which are the result of lack of blood and oxygen. They also have problems breaking down their food and fighting infection.

Who’s at risk

Fortunately it is good that NEC is rare. It affects just one in 2,000 to 4,000 births. Now if we talk about the risk then it can happen in any newborn baby, but it’s most common in premature babies who weigh less than 3.25 lbs. Others who may be at risk include:

● High-risk or premature babies in which, they are feed by mouth or tube

● Those who had a difficult delivery or have lowered oxygen levels

● Babies who have too many red blood cells in circulation

● Babies with existing gastrointestinal infections

What are the symptoms ?

Not all the symptoms are same as they can differ from child to child. But there are some common symptoms in NEC baby and it will normally develop the following in the first two weeks of life:

● Swollen or bloated belly

● Feedings that stay in the stomach and don’t move through the intestines

● Green fluid in the stomach

● Bloody poop

● Trouble breathing or low heart rate

What’s the treatment ?

Doctors are researching on better treatment but normally the treatment will depend on a number of things like health and medical history, how premature your baby is and how far the infection has spread.

Some of the treatment factors -

● Stop feedings

● Doctors insert a tube through their nose and into their stomach to remove fluid so that it will keep their stomach empty.

● Start the process of IV fluids as it will to keep them nourished and hydrated

● Treat with antibiotics to fight infection

● Regular monitor the condition

● Provide extra oxygen or a breathing machine if their belly is too swollen for them to breathe on their own

● Once the infection is gone which is in 5-7 days, your baby can start feeding again by mouth

If we talk about the cure of disease then right now, there’s no way to prevent NEC. But research says that babies who were only fed breast milk, were less likely to develop this disease. That’s why doctors recommend feeding at-risk infants breast milk, starting with small amounts. Many doctors are suggesting using donor breast milk when there is none available from the mother in order to reduce the incidence of NEC.

A vast number of women have taken legal action against the transvaginal mesh in recent years. The lawsuits have alleged various physical complications and autoimmune problems caused by the transvaginal mesh.

Here, the claims on transvaginal mesh filled in the U.S. are analyzed to identify their characteristics for clinical decision making.

What Is Transvaginal Mesh?

Transvaginal mesh is a net-like synthetic surgical tool used to treat pelvic organ prolapse among female patients. Organ pelvic prolapse is a condition that makes women leak from their bladder while doing activities like running, jumping or even sneezing and coughing.

It provides extra support to repair damaged or weakened internal tissues. It is implanted in the vagina vis surgical procedure. Transvaginal mesh can be also be known as sling, tape or hammock. It is usually impossible to remove the implant after it has been implanted.

Problems Described in the Transvaginal Litigation

Women who received the implant filed lawsuits claiming that they suffered from painful injuries. The complications include pain, bleeding, organ perforation, infection and autoimmune problems. According to the lawsuit, these ladies experienced issues walking, sitting, and engaging in other high-impact activities.

The problems described by the women who received the implant were so bad that they had to suffer multiple revision surgeries to remove the implant. Studies show that bacterial infections can grow on the implants.

The implant damages internal organs causing erosion in the vaginal wall. In addition, the implant cuts through tissues and damages nerves that cause pain during impact activities. In some claims, the mesh blocks the bladder, which causes urinary problems.

Studies show that in most cases, the complications were relatively minor. However, in some cases, the complications were severe. Studies also show that the implant can fail even after surgery, causing recurring prolapse. Some women even experience worsened unitary incontinence.

Allegations against Manufacturers

Five companies manufactured transvaginal mesh in the United States. American Medical System, Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard, Ethicon and Proxy Biomedical are transvaginal mesh manufacturers.

The lawsuit claims that the manufacturer had a legal duty to ensure the safety and effectiveness of its products. But the patients were misled with false information. According to a study in 2017, the products were cleared against the charge based on weak evidence.

● Lack of proper test of the implant

● Lack of research on the risk of the implant

● Failing to create a compelling and safe method to remove the implant

● Inadequate in waring the potential complications and injuries to the patients

● Misleading the patients, medical community and the public about the effectiveness of the product

The manufacturing companies have agreed to settle outstanding lawsuits and have set aside hundreds of millions of dollars for this. As of November 2019, Ethicon faced 1,202 lawsuits, followed by Boston Scientific with 965, American Medical with 80 and Bard with 16.

Current Controversy Surrounding Transvaginal Mesh

As of November 2019, more than 108,000 lawsuits have been filed against the mesh manufacturer.

More than 2,263 lawsuits are still pending. One of the largest settlements to date was $830 million for 20,000 claims.

In 2019, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration stopped all sales of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse treatment. In the short-term clinical trial, studies found high efficiency and low complication rate in the transvaginal mesh implant for unitary incontinence. However, there is huge evidence of low efficiency and high complication rate for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.

The UK NHS study shows that one in 15 women who had the implant later removed them surgically. In a survey of 2,220 women who received the transvaginal mesh implant, 59% said that the treatment did not resolve the original issue. 58% of women said that they experienced pain during physical activity.

Settlement and Verdicts

So far, mesh manufacturers have paid billions for the lawsuit settlements. As of February 2019, 32 women had filed cases in the state court, out of which 24 women received a jury award of $345 million. The mesh manufacturer has paid $8 billion in settlement of the lawsuit.

As of March 2021, Boston Scientific agreed to settle deceptive marketing claims by paying $188.7 million.

Final words!

The transvaginal mesh litigation involves a sling for the procedure. However, the rise in the lawsuit does not reflect low complication rates in the report. The complication seems to be expected in women who had received the implant to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

New treatments are trialled on patients when other treatments have proven ineffective. However, patients should always be informed about the treatment and its efficiency to give informed consent for the procedure.

Our Experts Can Help You With Zantac Lawsuit

The maker of Zantac (ranitidine) is facing a product liability lawsuit because the drug contains itrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a drug classified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a Chemical substance known as probable carcinogens by the World Health Organisation and the Environmental Protection Agency.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning that Zantac and its generic form ranitidine may cause cancer in some users. In the Zantac cases, ranitidine is a lousy drug because it contains ingredients that can form NDMA.

If you have been taking Zantac or its generic ranitidine and have developed any of the potentially related cancers, you should speak to a Zantac attorney immediately.

Call our team to hire a Zantac Cancer Lawyer today at +1 (307) 828 1476 for a free consultation.

Side-effects of Zantac

The Zantac lawsuit is filed against the manufacturers of Zantac and ranitidine by people who developed cancer from NDMA, a probable carcinogen.

Millions of people have been using Zantac for years without knowing the risks they are facing, and some users now have cancer caused by the drug. This has led to thousands of lawsuits against Zantac from people who regularly used the drug and were subsequently diagnosed with cancer.

People who have taken Zantac and filed lawsuits have reported many cases of cancer associated with the drug and NDMA. Lawyers are handling ranitidine and Zantac compensation claim list stomach, liver, and bladder cancer among the top injuries associated with NDMA contamination.

Cancer-associated with usage of Zantac

● Bladder cancer

● Prostate cancer.

● Kidney cancer

● Liver cancer.

● Stomach cancer.

● Breast cancer.

If you have one of these cancers, you must speak with an experienced Zantac attorney who can help you.

Speak with Lawyer4Help USA & determine if your cancer is a good fit to get you the compensation.

Conditions to qualify for Zantac Lawsuit:

According to Zantac’s lawyers, people must meet three conditions to qualify for a lawsuit potentially-

● proven use of Zantac

● a diagnosis of cancer

● a link between the diagnosis and Zantac

At a minimum, people wishing to take part in the Zantac lawsuit must have taken Zantac regularly in the past and contracted a form of cancer associated with NDMA.

Meeting these criteria makes a platform to file a lawsuit against Zantac. Keep in mind that a link between Zantac use and your cancer must be reasonably demonstrated to increase your chances of a settlement.

Suppose you have been taking prescribed Zantac (ranitidine) for an extended period and have not been diagnosed with cancer. In that case, you can still file a Zantac class-action lawsuit to get reimbursed for the money you spent on stomach burn medication.

Those joining the Zantac cause don’t need to prove they were directly affected by the drug, just that they bought it without being warned of any possible cancer risks. Anyone who has used Zantac and subsequently develops a severe illness can sue.

Types of Zantac Lawsuits

There are mainly two legal actions one can take for the harm that Zantac had caused to you or your loved one’s.

● Class Action

Thousands have joined Zantac for personal injury, wrongful death and class-action lawsuits seeking damages from drug makers that failed to detect and disclose the carcinogenic effects of drugs.

Thousands in the U.S. have joined a lawsuit against drugmaker Zantac for failing to warn and protect consumers from the drug’s cancer-causing effects.

● Individual lawsuit

Suppose you believe you or a family member or loved one is suffering from NDMA related cancer due to Zantac (whether or not prescribed by a doctor or over the counter). In that case, you should contact a personal injury attorney in the USA who handles Zantac MDL cases.

Compensation and result for Zantac lawsuit

After taking ranitidine-based Zantac, people diagnosed with cancer can sue for compensation, which includes lost wages, medical bills, and pain and suffering.

In addition to the FDA, drug agencies worldwide have also begun recalling a popular heartburn drug.