Love me and the Blood is yours

Ok

But, why amc TVL should have been LIKE the book while amc IWTV was not and that was ok?

Like which is the logic behind believing amc TVL would have been faithful to the book while all what happened before wasn’t? Amc Lestat CAN'T be Lestat, he is different so his story, his personality are different too like amc Louis was different from Louis. Why amc Louis was considered a better version because different, but amc Lestat needed to be like Lestat?

I have always said this: you can't overlap canon over something that has been completely changed, it can't work, because you are talking about two different thing, that need different things.

If I'm a cat, paint me with black cat ears. 🤔 Lol the quote from Prince Lestat goes:

"Ah, but I couldn’t blame Louis for shunning Paris. He’d lost his beloved Claudia—our beloved Claudia—in Paris. How could he be expected ever to forget that? And he’d known Armand was a jungle wildcat among revenants, hadn’t he?"

"Now we slipped in the courtyard doors of the hotel and went up to the lavish parlor of our suite. Champagne glistened in a frosted bucket. Two glasses stood on the silver tray. I knew Lestat would fill one glass and sit there staring at the pale yellow color. And I, a man in a trance, lay on the settee staring at him as if nothing he could do mattered. I have to leave him or die, I thought. It would be sweet to die, I thought. Yes, die. I wanted to die before. Now I wish to die. I saw it with such sweet clarity, such dead calm."

Support me on Patreon => Reapersun on Patreon

Rockstat as a visual kei bandman, based on this photo of Kamijo from his Lareine days:

So Akasha has always been a cruel woman. Oh, and as for this whole “hatred of men” thing. She has always and only given Blood to men, creating an army of bloodthirsty vampires, and she let her sisters die, she banished Gregory because he gave Blood to a woman. Akasha wanted to use women’s anger to rule the world, and she wasn’t even smart enough to do it.