“Men suffer in silence” until they decide to kill themselves from jumping out of a plane while leaving the female pilot by herself to figure out how to land the plane, while also dealing with the fact that she just witnessed that male pilot jump out the plane.

Also I've seen a lot of bios with something in the lines of "het partnered women DNI" and it makes me laugh so hard because, again, I'm literally almost double your age and if you think I don't have good enough criteria to know who tf I'm dating, then I'll laugh even harder.

Sure, young girls are hypersexualized and will date any loser, but.... that's kind of a part of life too, people fuck up, especially teens and young adults, I know you girlies have a superiority complex and know you're just so much better than the girls who socialize with men, but trust me, you're literally not helping anybody here, I have no clue how tf you're supposed to help other women and make feminist literature if you don't talk to women from all walks of life.

This childish cancel culture is so tiring istg.

"no i won't talk to you because boys have cooties!!!"

This is exactly why so many of us are frustrated with feminists who date men. Because you have this idea that you hold some special knowledge to find a Good Man™️, implying that women who end up with abusive and dangerous men just aren’t as smart as you are.

How can you assure a woman who’s experienced domestic abuse that it wasn’t her fault, because no woman can ever predict if a man will end up being abusive…but then turn around and say “well I have good criteria for the men I date, so I’ll be fine”. Did she not have good enough criteria? Was she too stupid to see red flags? Is she just “hypersexualised and will date any loser” as you said in your post? But you’re better than her, you’ll make a good choice. You’ll find the nicest guy ever who’s super duper feminist and will never lay a hand on you. All those women who ended up unlucky just didn’t have your superior abuse screening skills.

Also, if you think that 4B is about getting women to “give up their love life for literally no reason at all”, you don’t understand the 4B movement and haven’t been listening to feminists. There’s many reasons feminists give for 4B, including but not limited to: there’s really no “love life” to be had in the first place because men are misogynistic, you can never know what man will make you breakfast in bed vs which man will kill you in a fit of rage, you can never know for sure which men are laughing at their friend’s rape jokes or simply staying quiet, and men have spent thousands of years treating women like domestic servants and have not yet unlearned this so a truly equal heterosexual relationship free of this power dynamic is nearly impossible.

It’s not just “boys have cooties”. It’s “men are dangerous to women, and get even more dangerous when they’re romantically/sexually partnered with women. Women and girls should, as a class, refrain from putting themselves in dangerous relationships with them until they—men and boys—work together as a class to stop being a danger to women and girls”.

we might have to start collecting receipts on this sorta stuff cuz apparently they might start denying it ever happened

not to mention putting this creepy as fuck trend directly in the bio. that trend being imitating a toddler who can't count/know their own age and holds up fingers. i've seriously lost count of all the posts featuring the "this many" trend, many of which are sexual in nature. nothing sexier to a lot of these people than... toddlers

It goes like this:

Women being trafficked and forced into prostitution is an atrocity and should be stopped - at this point everyone is still in agreement.

What happens to them is rape - everyone pretty much agrees with this still.

And then: If there are EXTREMELY OBVIOUS warning signs that the prostitute in question is likely a victim of trafficking*, every single john who had sex with her anyway should be prosecuted for rape.

So many people froth at the mouth at the mere suggestion. They get furious if you suggest that this should be the law. But I think nothing could be more reasonable. Trafficking and forced prostitution flourishes because "normal" johns do not care if the prostitute they are paying is there voluntarily. They do not have to care (unless, maybe, if she is underage). Nothing will happen to him.

I say: Make johns deathly afraid of a prostitute possibly being trafficked. I want it to ruin lives to rape a woman who is clearly being forced to prostitute herself.

But no, apparently that's a horrible and hateful stance to have.

I agree that all johns are rapists. This is a kind of argument I like to make with people for two reasons:

It is VERY common and according to German senior detective superintendent Helmut Sporer, who has been investigating the field for decades, applies to "hundreds of thousands" of women in Germany. The extremely obvious signs are more common than NOT.

The person you are talking to cannot argue that these men are ignorant. It's genuinely SO obvious that these women are being trafficked that you cannot argue these john aren't wilfully accepting it. German law is extremely permissive, but it is clear that the legal concept of "billigend in Kauf nehmen"* does applies here. (*this is important in German law for proving criminal intent: The perpetrator is aware a consequence is possible and accepts it indifferently even if the consequence is not their goal. If that is the case, German courts treat it as INTENTIONAL and not negligence.)

What the fuck

“She was very shaken, but with complete professionalism, she piloted the plane to the airfield and landed perfectly,” he said.