Anime Blog
(Primarily MHA Critical/Analysis/Meta)
Tags below for Navigation
(Will make it a Masterlist once I know how to make one)

ellievsbear
Monterey Bay Aquarium
occasionally subtle
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
I'd rather be in outer space šø
One Nice Bug Per Day
cherry valley forever
Keni

JBB: An Artblog!
šŖ¼

Janaina Medeiros
hello vonnie
Misplaced Lens Cap
Game of Thrones Daily

Kaledo Art

romaā
YOU ARE THE REASON

#extradirty
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Greece

seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
@kite2013
Anime Blog
(Primarily MHA Critical/Analysis/Meta)
Tags below for Navigation
(Will make it a Masterlist once I know how to make one)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I hope they are happy in the afterlifeā¤
There is a compelling parallel between Leorio and Chrollo: the death of a loved one fundamentally dictated their life trajectories.
In the first pair of images, we see the raw reaction to trauma. For Leorio, it is the realization that money, not medicine, was the barrier between his friend Pietro and life. For Chrollo, it is the horrific sight of Sarasaās remains . They realize that the world they live in is broken and indifferent to their suffering.
The second set of panels highlights the path they choose to take. Leorio erupts with a declaration of his obsession with moneyānot for greed, but as a tool to gain the power (medicine) that he lacked. Similarly, Chrollo deciding that "in order to ensure that what happened to Sarasa never happens again," he must change himself. Both are making a solemn pact to transform their pain into a life-defining purpose, though their methods will eventually place them on opposite sides of the law.
In the third comparison, the irony of their evolution is fully realized. Leorio explains that he is becoming a doctorāthe very figure who, in his eyes, had the power to save his friend but didn't. Chrollo, meanwhile, decides to live the rest of his life as a "villain." He becomes a killer, mirroring the monsters who took Sarasa, in order to make the world "tremble with fear" and protect Meteor City. Both men sacrificed their innocence to inhabit the skin of those who originally caused their suffering.
I remember reading an ATLA fanfic a while back where the author never called it āthe Hundred Year War.ā Instead, they kept saying āthe Hundred Years of Conquest,ā and whenever people attacked fire nation soldier, they called it āselfādefense.ā At first I thought it was just a stylistic choice or maybe the author trying to be edgy. I didnāt think too hard about it.
Then I rewatched the show, and suddenly it clicked. The author was extremely accurate. When you really think about it, there is no āwarā in ATLA the way we usually imagine a war. There arenāt two equal sides fighting each other. Thereās just the Fire Nation, a powerful empire that believes itās superior, trying to conquer everyone else. And the rest of the world is basically just trying not to be wiped out. Calling that a āwarā almost makes it sound fair or mutual, when itās really one-sided violence.
Thatās why the language in that fanfic hit me so hard. Words like āconquestā and āself-defenseā expose whatās actually happening. The Fire Nation isnāt fighting a war; theyāre invading, colonizing, and destroying entire cultures. And the people resisting them arenāt āsoldiersā in a traditional sense. Theyāre survivors. Theyāre communities trying to protect their homes, their families, and their identities. The fanfic author understood that, and changing the vocabulary made the whole story feel more honest.
That's part of why I love fanfics of ATLA, especially when the author clearly put just as much research and effort in as the original work.
Honestly, there really wasn't a proper war until the near END of Avatar. Everything was mostly "quiet" occupation at best or straight massacres with others unable to truly defend themselves let alone fight as equals. Best showcased with the first episodes - the Southern Water Tribe didn't have a war nor a battle with the Fire Nation, they were massacred because even when they had benders, they were horribly out numbered.
I can't remember the fanfic, but there was one set in the aftermath of Fire Nation occupation and I loved how it took from the comic and acknowledged how it would really go with Zuko trying to decolonize and pay reparations. Like you said, the wording has to be changed in these stories because not only was it less war and more conquest, those that weren't destroyed were occupied - I think most characters used the wording "occupation" when talking about villages that survived invasion. Like, in this fanfic a lot of these villages and towns had been occupied so long that removing Fire Nation presence requires splitting up families or renouncing citizenships and THAT brings the fairly justified prejudices most nations will have to anyone from the Fire Nation. Lots of moving parts.
You gotta love fanfiction! If you remember the name of the one you read, can you give it?
Little anti Gaara rant below. Don't proceed if you are easily offended by Gaara bashing:
Dude, there's no way. What is this šš
Gaara fans are sooooo funny, for real. Some of them really think that he became a 'peaceful' leader? Dude, he's still Kazekage. Head of a military village that still trains child soldiers. The shinobi system is still the same and never changed. Just because Gaara is not as mean or bloodthirsty as he was in his childhood or as oppressive and cruel as many of the older Kage and clan heads from past generations were, doesn't mean he stopped doing it. He still does everything these previous Kage did. He's just more chill and peaceful bout it now cause he swallowed Naruto's friendly pro military propaganda. Are we forgetting this is the same guy who forgave his dads' crimes because 'he understood him as Kazekage.'
Also, 'loved his siblings'. This is so tiring because I keep repeating it. Gaara canonically has 0 scenes bonding with his siblings, caring for them, or showing them any affection. Instead, he'll just forget his elder sister is right there on his squad and seal their shitty dad before letting her get some words with him. 'Taught students.' Also hilarious. The only student Gaara ever had is Matsuri. A filler character who only exists to simp for him and further emphasize Gaara's Mary Sue traits. Like, that's all Matsuri does. 'United the allied forces.' Yeah, the fact that he managed to make thousands amongst thousands of shinobi from different nations all forgive each other and their past rivalries and hatred from just one speech is utter bs, lol. Gaara literally erased ninja racism by just telling these people that he loves Naruto and doesn't want him to die. That's not good. That's not how things work. He literally tells them to go die protecting his friend, and they all cheer. That's mediocre writing and another Mary Sue trait. "With the power of empathy.' Quick, mention one single instance of Gaara showing empathy for someone who's not Naruto. Sasuke shouldn't count. He literally tried manipulating Sasuke into going back to the village that oppressed and wiped out his clan. When Sasuke refused, Gaara LITERALLY TRIED KILLING SASUKE. That's not sympathy. That's forceful coercion. Also, he just assumed Sasuke was like him when that's not the case.
And as always, we have the forced Sasuke hate. 'To the fucking ninja terrorist war criminal.' That's how they view a genocide survivor. That's how they view a victim of grooming. And what if I told you Sasuke actually has one of the kindest hearts in all of Naruto? And people who hate him are all morons?
SOME Gaara fans can be so stupid, wtf. Especially when they hate Sasuke. Way to show us you fell for Kishimoto's pro military propaganda! They favor Gaara, another cog in that machine that still kills people (and I wanna emphasize, Gaara is still a killer. You can't be a Kage in Naruto if you're not a very good killer). But since he's just doing it in a way that benefits Konoha, then he's one of the good guys and a saint! And his fans fall for it! While also believing he's so above Sasuke, it's incredible! They are just jealous that Sasuke is way better written than Gaara. Like, Gaara is a shell of a character when compared to Sasuke. Literally has 0 internal conflict in Shippuden, most especially after the very 1st arc where he lost Shukaku, the only thing that made him even mildly interesting. They can stay mad about it, lol. Sasuke stan 4life. Gaara could never be that iconic, tbh.
@antigonesiropdefruit
tagging you because I think you'd like to see this. I hope you don't mind.
A character has to be really empty to make me not like him at all. I'm capable of finding something positive in all kinds of characters. Even the fact that a character is just another cog in the shinobi system doesn't necessarily make him poorly written. Kishimoto has decently written a lot of shinobis, with their qualities and flaws.
But not Gaara... to have qualities and flaws, you need a personality, which he doesn't have. He's just there, in the background, overly calm and with this attitude of lecturer (and his advice and speeches suck).
A lot can be said against Hiruzen, but at least he knew how to make good propaganda speeches to encourage soldiers to sacrifice theirs lives. Gaara's speech is pitiful by comparison.
A good Kage? He didn't have to make a single difficult decision. And the fact that he became a Kage at 16 doesn't make him a genius, but a puppet of his village elders.
Thanks for tagging me, I seem to remember stumbling across a similar ( if not the same) edit on Tik Tok ( I don't understand why Tik Tok has been harassing me with ship edits), and even though I hadn't read the comments I already knew that fans of the other characters in it were going to criticize Sasuke. They're just predictable like that.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
No joke, I was scrolling through the blog of someone who claimed they liked Sasuke and had reblogged various posts in his defense. While looking at them, tho, I was hit with a massive amount of whiplash when I saw they had one pro-Sasuke post and literally, right beneath that one, the one below it was a post saying that they wished Sakura had gotten to punch him at least once in the face, real hard.
It's sooooo. Idk how to describe it. Thinking someone is pro-Sasuke just to be hit in the face with the fact that 'no, actually. They're also a Sakura fan who think she should've punched him and kicked his ass because the traumatized genocide and grooming survivor was mean to and raised his voice at her a few times.' You can't be pro Sasuke and pro Sakura at the same time. Being pro Sasuke inherently means that you want him to be freed from the shackles of a village that dehumanized him and still does. Being a Sasuke defender means that you want him free and away from all the people who viewed him as an object to be used and flaunted, including Sakura. Naruto, notwithstanding, as you could argue, he actually understood Sask better than anyone else. While being a Sakura fan implies that you think she had the potential to be a girlboss, but was done dirty, and a good surefire way to make her better is to let her punch and inflict even more pain on Sasuke. These two things cancel each other out. It's the same reason you can't claim to love Sasuke while shipping SS.
I'll literally never understand this fixation Sakura fans have with writing scenarios of her falling in love with every other character (which is fine!) It's just that they mainly do so under the premise and guise that 'they all would treat her better than Sasuke', mainly Ino and Lee. Presenting and treating it as if Sasuke was some abusive bf and she was his victim. Instead of him being a victim of genocide who wants to be left the heck alone. As well as fantasizing and making up scenarios of Sakura kicking his ass. Guys, even if Sakura ever managed to gain enough courage and resolve to challenge him to a fair fight (which she'd lose tremendously. Her fans are ridiculously delulu thinking she could win or stand a chance against Sasuke). That still wouldn't make her a good character.
Please, if you're just a Sakura fan who used to not like Sasuke until recently, and you just kinda support his hatred and revenge against the elders/village, but think he was mean, mysoginstic, or abusive to Sakura, stop posting content where it seems like you're defending him or you like or understand his character, cause you clearly don't.
Pd: Also, I wanted to add to this. It's something that some Sasuke fans have pointed out before me, but that's how overprotective Sakura fans are of her getting hurt? Especially by Sasuke. Like, they hate it specifically when she's hurt by him, and it's the main reason many of her fans don't like Sasuke and think she would've been better off with anyone else. These characters are shinobi. They were signed into a life of violence and pain. Sakura should be able to handle it whenever Sasuke is mean to her or tries to retaliate in self-defense. That kind of reaction is to be expected for a shinobi. Sakura, as a student of a Sannin, is expected to be able to walk it off with little complaints. How do her fans expect her to be able to fight Sasuke and punch him in the face if they can't even stand seeing her being put in a genjutsu by him without losing their minds and accusing him of being a mysoginist? It does not make sense. I've said it once in the past and will say it again if it bears repeating: if Sakura is really so delicate that she can't deal with a single attack or mean word from Sasuke without her (and her fans) breaking mentally, then shinobi was never a good occupation for her. Just saying.
Hi,
I agree with you, the majority of Sakura fans are clearly posing as Sasuke fans while dropping hints showing their secret hatred for his character. To the point where they end up looking ridiculous. Some are SasuSaku fans who feel obliged to defend Sasuke in some way, since Sakura married him and, in their minds, Sasuke is a sort of trophy husband who is supposed to bring Sakura some kind of value. And how could he bring her value if he's without quality?
But, in a way, I think it's possible to be a fan of two characters who are opposite in their characterization. These days, it's almost impossible to criticize a character and a story without being considered a hater instead of a fan. I think, and this is just my opinion, that we can also find pleasure in criticizing / highlight the negative aspects of a character. Also, not every story arc has to be positive, and we can enjoy the way a character becomes worse than he was before. We can love a character who is a bad person or who regresses as long as the writing is there for that very purpose.
I think in some ways Sakura is almost perfectly written, but as her arc is not that of a girlboss who becomes overpowered contrary to what some of her fans want, any analysis that differs from their point of view must automatically be tagged āAnti Sakuraā to avoid conflict. So, Pro and Anti are reduced to being a fan who completely justifies the character or being a fan who completely hates the character. I'm pro Sasuke in the sense that I wish he'd been free of Konoha and that Kishimoto hadn't made him a slave to the village by erasing much of what made Sasuke so interesting. I don't like that he's forced to accept Naruto and Sakura's feelings.
But in a way, I really like Sakura's writing, but since I don't see her as the āgirlbossā her other fans do, I would never be considered a fan. Sakura is purposely written to be a naive, ignorant girl who completes herself in this childish naivety. Her main colors are green and red (and pink is a mixture of white and red), the basic colors of Konoha and the secondary characters from the village. Almost all adults wear the green-red vest. Shikamaru, Lee and Shino wear green. Kiba (with his markings), TenTen and Choji wear red. Ino, Hinata and Neji are the exceptions because they were the members of their teams on whom the plot focused most when they first appeared, at the chunin exams. And even so, in the end they also wear the green-red vest during the great shinobi war (unlike Naruto and Sasuke). In this way, Sakura could be seen as one of the many representations of Konoha. Her pink hair and flowery name are a simple way for Kishimoto to present her as the archetypal little girl. And Sakura will always act the same way, because she'll always be the same little girl with her insecurities.
She grows out her hair to please Sasuke and cuts it against Ino to show her maturity? She grows it back after the war when Sasuke returns. She imply during the presentation of Team Seven that she only wants to be a shinobi to be with Sasuke? She continues to be a shinobi mainly to be by his side. She says she's ready to kill Sasuke? She ends up crying and is unable to hurt him. She wants to stand by Naruto and Sasuke side and be equal to them since the chunin exams and promises Naruto she'll bring Sasuke back with him? She's left out again for the final confrontation in the valley of the end. And so on. She's the one who, while on a battlefield where many of her comrades died, was disappointed when she didn't see Sasuke looking at her after her planless suicide attack on Madara (and I know a Sakura fan is so in denial about this that he prefers to believe it's a battlefield other than the one covered in corpses). She clings, as does Naruto, to a relationship from their childhood when Sasuke no longer wants them and has made that clear. She's clinging to the idea of reforming Team Seven and getting things back to the way they were. Her childlike naivetƩ and nostalgia have led her to idealize the time they spent as a team (which must have been at most 8 months, during which they almost got killed several times). She's doomed to repeat the same mistakes because she'll never evolve ideologically (unlike the two at the center of the plot), she is limited to being one among many in Konoha. Just as a leaf is only one among many in a forest.
Some of Sakura's fans clearly use her as a tool of self-insertion and when Sasuke attacks her, they feel attacked too. That's why they're so obsessed with him, because he's the center of Sakura's world but she's almost nothing to him (apart from a memory of Team 7) after his desertion. That's why Sasuke will always be at the heart of their hatred, even though he's not the only one who hurt Sakura the most. Kakashi almost got her killed when he entered her for the chunin exams. Gaara almost slaughtered her. Naruto hurt her with Kyubi. Sasori clearly tried to kill her. And yet, all these characters are portrayed in their fanfiction as being madly in love with her. Because unlike Sasuke, they don't attack her ego. In their fanfiction, making her the most interesting and the one who catches the eye of all the other boys (even the adults) is a desperate attempt to make her interesting and thus validate themselves in some way (I don't really understand how self-insertion on this level works, you'd have to do a psychological study on it). I even find it a bit sad that they reduces her to a girl boss, being able to defeat a male character and being pretty shouldn't be the only way for a female character to be interesting.
Reducing Sakura to āthe most beautiful girl in the village who is capable of beating up her former crush who didn't love her backā is borderline insulting to the characterization the author has given her.
Although I would defend Sakura to a certain extent for becoming a shinobi, since she's been conditioned to become one since the age of seven and a 12-year-old shouldn't be able to give her consent to become a child soldier. Even when she's sixteen, she's still at an age when you're not mature enough to make such a decision. But it's true that if she wants to remain a shinobi, she should at least show some maturity in battle. And we know she's capable of it every other time, since she rightly tells Hinata not to turn her back on the enemy instead of concentrating on Naruto, whereas she does the same thing against Sasuke and Madara (she looks away from Madara to check if Sasuke has looked at her, and then saddens when she realizes that he prefers to concentrate on Madara instead of her). Sakura should also be far more capable of dealing with Sasuke's lack of interest in her but here's the thing, she's written to be obsessed with him, so this weakness is there on purpose and always will be as she's not meant to evolve. Something paradoxical about her fans is their tendency to turn her into a girl-boss who could beat up any boy who ādisrespectsā her, but to get angry the second a male character doesn't treat her with care or like a little princess who needs to be protected. At some point, you have to make up your mind.
The most annoying thing about all fandomsĀ ; Is the way fans of the protagonist expect/demand that all other characters be completely devoted to him.
In most cases, if these characters weren't the protagonists and therefore automatically chosen by readers for self-insertion, fans would be able to take a step back and look at their actions or those of other characters more objectively. Let's talk about Blue Exorcist, Naruto and One Piece (we could talk about many other fandoms, but I'll just reblog if I have time). And I want to make it clear (even though I already know that my words may be twisted) that this post is not here to say that all criticism of characters hated by fans of the protagonist is wrong and that they are perfect little angels, but rather to explain that the level of hatred these characters receive is sometimes exaggerated and mainly due to the fact that they are not entirely dedicated to the main characters. You have the right to dislike these characters, but be honest about your reasons. Pretending that they are poorly written and just āemo/edgy or whateverā is an insult to the author and his work (but now that I think about it, insulting Oda isn't such a bad thing). All this to say: Fans insert themselves so much into characters like Rin, Naruto, and Luffy that they forget they are not them and treat every action taken against them as a personal attack. As a result, they miss out on the magnificent writing of the other characters, whether they are secondary protagonists (Usopp), deuteragonists (Yukio and Sasuke) or antagonists (Sasuke and Koby).
I like Rin, but I would never get involved with his fandom. His fans have a nasty habit of ignoring the writing of other characters and then criticising them for their lack of devotion to him. Each of the teenagers in Rin's group of friends has their own problems, but all of that is ignored. Suguro, Shima, and Koneko grew up in a world where Satan is portrayed as the worst of demons and is the most feared thing by exorcists. Members of their families died during the Blue Night, but Rin's fans expect them to have no negative reaction whatsoever to the discoveries that: 1) Rin is the son of Satan. 2) Rin possesses the blue flames. 3) Rin hid this from them. Imagine for just two seconds having to go to class with the son of the man who killed your parents. And phrases like āChildren are not guilty of their parents' crimesā wouldn't even cross your mind; you would be extremely angry, and rightly so. These three show a great deal of maturity, but fans feel that this attitude is expected of them. The character of Shiemi has been heavily criticised by fans who couldn't even stand the idea that she didn't want to be in a relationship with Rin right away, on the pretext that he loves her and saved her, so she should necessarily fall under his spell. They are comrades and friends, they save each other more than once, but that doesn't mean she has to love him. And I'll skip over the insults that were hurled at her, which, coincidentally, stopped as soon as she fell in love with him too.
Yukio's character has been taking a lot of flak for years for paradoxical reasons. Either he is criticised for overprotecting his brother by giving him advice that is considered useless and trying to prevent him from taking part in certain fights. Or he is criticised for not protecting his brother enough from his own stupidity (Rin gets himself into trouble by not listening to Yukio's advice, but fans tend to forget how chaotic he can be). Yukio has so much more to deal with than just looking after his older brother, he doesn't have time to treat him with kid gloves and he should never have had to do so, he's only sixteen. He has a job to do, a class of students to protect and educate, manipulations of the order but above all of Mephisto to avoid, and declining mental health. Who thought that entrusting so much to a teenager could end well? I predicted from the beginning of the story that he would eventually crack, and the author wrote perfectly well how and why he would end up where he is now. It's not enough that his entire life, even before adolescence, has been devoted to protecting his brother from all the shit that was bound to happen because their adoptive father wanted to give Rin as peaceful a childhood as possible but didn't give Yukio that opportunity. On top of that, he's supposed to stay calm all the time when Rin ignores his warnings and puts everyone in danger? Every time these characters are put in traumatic situations, fans turn a blind eye, but the second Rin gets hit by Yukio, his fans cry domestic abuse (which is rather ironic considering that Rin hits first and asks questions later on quite a few occasions). How many poorly written fanfictions boil down to: poor Rin is hit by Yukio, so all his friends save him from his infamous little brother, who ends up dying in the worst possible way (and that's if they don't write Yukio directly as Rin's rapist). For years, they wanted Yukio to die and be seen as the worst scum by the other characters, while Rin was pampered in comparison. And now that Yukio is finally starting to be more open with Rin, as if by chance, the fans are pretending to tolerate him. Why? Was it enough for him to compliment Rin for you to stop making jokes about a child's suicide?
And the character that Rin's fans should logically criticise, Mephisto, who pushed all these teenagers into the worst possible situations with the worst kind of manipulation ( what he did to Izumo and Yukio is just despicable) without ever showing the slightest honesty towards them, is treated like a little darling. And the script will justify all his actions with the same kind of plot as the infamous White Cat episode in Miraculous, but let's move on from that. I've made peace with the fact that Yukio will always be criticised for the slightest thing he does, but literally 50% of his behaviour towards Rin is a direct consequence of Mephisto's actions (sometimes he's just obeying his orders). If you blame one, you have to blame the other. Why isn't Mephisto criticised as much? So he can do anything he wants to Rin (lie to him, manipulate him, put him in life-or-death situations, endanger his loved ones, hide crucial information from him...), except give the impression that he doesn't love him?
Everyone knows unofficially that the Naruto fandom has this annoying tendency to want its protagonist to have an even greater cult of personality than in the canon. It's already annoying when the writing of the series' best antagonists is inevitably ruined just because Kishimoto wants them to compliment Naruto (Gaara, Sasuke, Obito, Nagato, Konan... all except Madara have been through it). So everyone would have had to bend over backwards for him from the start? All the characters are criticised, not for their actions, but for their lack of devotion to him. Hiruzen literally treats every child in the village like shit; He lets Danzo collect them like PokƩmon to make them kill each other, he orders a thirteen-year-old Itachi to kill his family, he tries to turn Sasuke into a shinobi from the village that cost his family their lives, he sends twelve-year-old children to war, he lets a seven-year-old slave live with those who beheaded his father and can torture him at will with a curse mark, and so on... But the only thing Naruto fans criticise him for is that Sasuke has a better flat than Naruto, okay. His fans act as if he were the only one suffering from the shinobi system, the only one with the right to join the Akatsuki to destroy the village (as if the Akatsuki would raise him instead of killing him for Kyubi). So destroying an entire village because a child was discriminated against is okay, but the Uchiha clan, which has been discriminated against for years, doesn't even have the right to attempt a coup to save themselves from the obvious massacre that was going to happen to them in the village they themselves helped build?
And let's be clear, the villagers, although they clearly acted in the wrong way towards Naruto, were completely within their rights to mistrust him. They literally have no decision-making power (Konoha is anything but a democracy) and are forced to live with a kid who serves as a nuclear weapon and could lose control at any moment. āBut Naruto saved them, they should treat him like a hero just like Minato wanted,ā from their point of view, no one attacked the village, they don't know about Obito, all they know is that the last host lost control and that the demon that rampaged through the village can still kill them all if the kid in orange loses control too. Trying to live with such a threat constantly hanging over your head seems to make you want anything but to worship the orange packaging of said weapon of mass destruction. āWhy don't they leave if they're not happy?ā Maybe because otherwise they're considered missing ninja and therefore ācriminalsā.
And those who think half the village should have adopted Naruto are the most annoying. Mikoto, of all people, was apparently supposed to adopt him. Why? Because she once spoke to Kushina while walking? She has enough to deal with, with two children whose very lives are threatened because of the village. Kakashi? You mean the teenager who almost died in a war at the age of twelve and lost his two friends of the same age because of Minato's incompetence? Kakashi owes Minato nothing. The fact that Minato taught him a jutsu does not justify him having to adopt his baby when he is still a child himself. Hiruzen? Do you really expect the local dictator to adopt the kid when he leaves all the other orphans of Konoha in deep trouble? Jiraiya? Honestly, it was better for Naruto not to be raised by that pervert.
Hinata, Gaara, and Shikamaru, characters who constantly suck up to Naruto without having any characterisation opposite to his, are the most loved by Naruto fans. Not because they are well written, they are not, but because they spend more time complimenting Naruto than being developed. Hinata raved about Naruto's hands in front of the corpse of her slave cousin who died to protect her, Gaara gave the worst war speech ever just to take the opportunity to compliment Naruto, and Shikamaru offers to assist Naruto when he becomes Hokage while he is dying. All three are his biggest fans. That's why they are never criticised.
Even though I can't be considered a fan of Sakura, I can't help but defend her on one point. Incels criticise her for not liking Naruto. We all know that half of the fans project their insecurities onto certain characters because of self-insertion, so for some male fans, the fact that Sakura does not return his feelings is a legitimate reason to call her all sorts of names. Why should she do that? Because he saved her life? So as soon as one character saves another, the latter has to be completely devoted to the former and do everything they want? Since when does someone saving us make them our master? Does freedom mean nothing to you? Naruto would be terrible for Sakura. He literally tried to kiss her while pretending to be Sasuke, constantly prioritising Sasuke's existence over her, to the point of smiling as if nothing had happened after seeing him about to kill her at the Kage Summit (after Sakura tried to kill him first).
Sasuke is criticised and blamed for not accepting his friendship and for having an unpleasant attitude towards him. Let's be clear, just because Naruto cares about Sasuke, as he showed by going to find Tsunade to wake him up and having a panic attack at the thought of his death, does not mean that Sasuke has an obligation to care about him in return. Also, Naruto is overly obsessed with him and the idea of him recognising him. He hunted him down and tried to prevent him from making any decisions. He is incapable of truly understanding Sasuke. He thought he would return to the village after killing Orochimaru. And he completely agreed with Itachi using a brainwashing genjutsu to force him to return to the village (which he knows is responsible for the massacre). He hid the truth about the Uchiha clan massacre. With a friend like that, who needs enemies? Sasuke never had any moral obligation to obey Naruto, become his friend, and return to the village that ruined his life. Even since they were twelve years old, Naruto mocked the dead Uchiha, felt constantly insulted by his presence whenever they weren't in a life-or-death situation, and spoke to him in an unbearable manner most of the time. Sasuke is better than me because with a teammate like that, I would have left the village before Orochimaru even came looking for me. And it would be for a friendship like that that Sasuke should give up his goal of bringing justice to his family? They've only been on the same team for a few months, but Sasuke should prioritise him over his biological family? No, he has more important things to do. And SNS fans who claim that āNaruto is the only thing stopping Sasuke from destroying the worldā would do well to stop reading fan fiction if they want to be taken seriously. Stop making things up about Sasuke.
Luffy, unlike Naruto, respects the choices of his friends and even his enemies. But his fans are another story (ironic given that the central theme of the work is freedom). The most hated characters in the series are racists, paedophiles, mass murderers and... Usopp and Koby. Admittedly, there are reasonable criticisms that can be levelled at these two characters. But the real source of fan hatred has been found. As soon as a member of the crew makes a serious criticism of Luffy or has personal problems to deal with, part of the fandom automatically starts attacking them. We saw this with Sanji too, even though I don't like this character and feel that his writing has become poorer as the story progresses. I couldn't help but notice that even though he risked his life several times for the crew, the moment he had personal problems that led him to oppose Luffy, fans called him a traitor and hoped that Zoro would beat him up. Of all the criticisms that can be levelled at Sanji, it is really his temporary attitude towards Luffy that bothers them the most. Zoro is perceived by fans as the standard for what the rest of the crew should be: strong and overly loyal.
Being the most normal member of the crew and the least strong certainly plays a role in the fans' hatred of Usopp, but it is mainly because he was one of the first to seriously oppose Luffy for personal reasons, which many have never forgiven him for. However, there is some decent writing during this opposition. Usopp has been unable to cope with his own weakness since his introduction and has issues with abandonment, so when the ship he clung to for his self-worth was about to be abandoned, he couldn't bear it (if what he believed gave him value could be abandoned, then so could he). It was bound to happen eventually, and no, it's not that āUsopp betrayed Luffy for a shipā; it was never just about the ship, it was about himself. And if he didn't tell Luffy how he really felt, it's because he uses lies to protect himself. His character acted in perfect accordance with the insecurity he had shown up until that point. And after all these years, you'd think fans would have understood that, but it's 2026 and they're still stuck on it. You can dislike the character and his writing, but stop denying that the writing is there. And speaking of denied (or invented) writing, let's talk about Koby.
Fans have never been angrier at Koby than after he said he had to stop Luffy's dream. Congratulations, you've just realised that the character introduced as a future antagonist is in fact... a future antagonist. The hatred of Koby, especially after the acclaim of fans for the Fan Letter episode, is either the most stupid or the most hypocritical case ever seen. Literally the entire characterisation of two of the main characters is a copy and paste of his. And I'm not even exaggerating, the episode is devoted to the different perspectives of a soldier and a pirate fan, and Koby is both. An ordinary soldier is afraid of the battles at Marineford because of their gargantuan scale and is ready to flee, but he ends up changing his mind and trying to fight after being inspired by Luffy? A teenage but childish/small, weak character with glasses refuses to give up on his dreams because he is inspired by the freedom of a crew member? Seriously, the only big difference is that Ishitani added a brother to this marine to force the comparison with Luffy, and that instead of a 16-year-old boy, it's a 15-year-old girl. Fan Letter is not the original masterpiece you claim it to be. Yes, it's a very beautiful episode with magnificent animation, but the majority of its plot is a copy-paste of themes that already exist. The greatest hypocrisy is the fact that Koby is demonised for trying to oppose Luffy during the war (and I will address this below because it seems that fans have skipped the pages that show why he did it), while the marine who does the same thing is praised. Why isn't he criticised as well? He also prevents Ace from being saved by fighting the pirates. Also, Koby, by standing between Akainu and the pirates, is one of the very reasons why this character and his brother survived. He stood in the way to save the marines who were dying for nothing. Do you like a character who has the same writing as the one you hated (and who is more developed)?
Koby, unlike Usopp, is not a protagonist. He was presented from the beginning as a future antagonist, but since he is such an unusual one, fans were not prepared to see him as such. Few antagonists idealise the protagonist to the point of making them a source of motivation. Koby even goes so far as to cry with joy (with snot running down his nose, he's a bigger crybaby than Sakura) when he sees his exploits in the newspaper. He worshipped him so much that readers forgot he was meant to oppose him. Did you really expect him to be like Team Rocket or something? He perfectly illustrates the typical soldier who joins the army, not out of a desire to shed blood, but out of good intentions and a desire to do good, without realising that the organisation he serves has anything but the same values as him. And if you think that all soldiers in totalitarian governments are aware of and agree with all the crimes they commit, I have news for you. In this kind of system, information is a scarce resource and not all soldiers have the same access to it. Kishimoto, for all his faults, has done a tremendous job of presenting the Konoha system and how far the village is willing to go to hide its dirty little secrets and thus ensure the loyalty of its members, who would revolt without hesitation if they knew the truth, if only to stay alive. Koby is even more interesting than protagonists like Sakura and Kakashi, who are content to just do their jobs (neither of them has ever helped a single civilian outside the shinobi/Konoha system who is not one of their clients, unlike antagonists like Sasuke and Koby, who free slaves not affiliated with them).
Why did he attack Luffy at Marineford (only to lose like a loser)? He starts out as a victim of pirates. And as an aside, I feel like many people forget that one of the reasons the navy is able to recruit so many people is that it is one of, if not the only, official force that opposes pirates, so whenever someone wants to oppose pirates, the most obvious choice is to join the Navy (bounty hunters don't have a system that supports them and allows them to develop). After Luffy helps him, we learn that he wants to arrest bad people and become a marine. He knows the system is corrupt (even if he doesn't know how corrupt) and believes he can change things (and unfortunately, Oda seems to want to prove him right even if changing such a system from within is impossible, as he presents Morgan's base as very easily recoverable after getting rid of its corrupt leader).
At Marineford, he has been a 16-year-old child soldier for only a few months. He doesn't know Ace, he just knows that he is a pirate of Whitebeard and the son of Roger, he has no personal interest in this war. The first thing he tried to do was flee the battle. But when he saw Akainu kill a deserting soldier, he was forced to return to the battlefield. It was not a question of any sense of duty, honour or loyalty (or a desire to be a hero, as some claim, which is the most disingenuous thing to say about him since he is one of the most selfless characters in the manga), but only of fear. He hears that the execution is going ahead and becomes concerned. He sees Luffy arrive and is impressed, then worries about him when the truth about his father is revealed, even though Garp and his men had kept it secret. By random, he finds himself in front of Luffy- he didnāt seek him out on purpose to fight him. He finally understands that it is time to change (it is a little late since he is already on the battlefield, but better late than never), that he is on a battlefield and must therefore fight Luffy seriously. It is a matter of survival. And it ends exactly as expected, with him biting the dust.
Ā If he can't run away, the only option is to fight. The pirates came to fight the marines, they're not going to make an exception for Koby. Did fans really expect him to let Luffy pass when he just saw his superior kill a soldier who didn't want to fight? At the risk of repeating myself, just because one character saved another doesn't mean the latter has to sacrifice their individual characterisation for them and be completely devoted to them. And if you really want to play the favor game, then you have to apply it to Luffy as well and not allow him to fight anyone who has saved his life (Koby, Zoro, Usopp, Shanks, Law, Garp, Buggy, Crocodile... very quickly he won't be able to fight anyone). Then Koby develops Haki (and a trauma as a bonus) and decides to intervene between the same superior he saw kill a soldier who disobeyed orders and the pirates he is still at war with.
And now, the fact that he stands between his boss and his enemies is no longer enough for fans; they wanted him to add explicit concern for the pirates' lives in his speech to his boss (who hates pirates) to convince him to stop the war and save the soldiers who can still be saved. At this point, this kid has to pass even more purity tests than Sasuke. I didn't know that was possible. He has no need to include them in his speech, he is already doing enough by intervening and giving them time to escape (he is not in the wrong for not caring about the guys he was fighting just a few seconds ago). In fact, all you want is a Naruto speech "it's not nice to be mean", with no realism and false promises of love, flowers falling from the sky. Believe it or not, but I've seen people criticize him for not doing more to save the pirates, what exactly did you expect the kid to do ? Create a diversion, eliminate Akainu alone, prevent all the soldiers from pursuing them while they retreated ? "He didn't care if the pirates got kill while they were retreating and didn't protect them", firstly, yes, he care, he says there's no point chasing pirates who've lost the will to fight. And secondly, how on earth is he supposed to think about this and find a solution to it when he thought he was going to die after confronting Akainu. He didn't act with a plan but out of sheer desperation. Do you want him to babysit pirates while we're at it ? And while I'm at it, Koby indirectly saved Luffy again here. So, according to fan logic, Luffy won't be allowed to fight Koby when he tries to stop him from reaching One Piece?
And when it's not writing that is ignored, it goes as far as inventing things. He supposedly wanted to send Hancock back into slavery. Where? It's not written or implied anywhere, he didn't even know anything about her except that she was a pirate who had temporary permission from the navy to act and that this permission was revoked after she fought the marines at Marineford (I doubt that many other marines would have agreed to work with her if they had known that she was a former slave and that she only took the job to prevent the colonisation of the island; they would have understood her true objectives). This naive fool even thought that the other inhabitants of the island would be left alone if she surrendered. And we're not even sure Hancock would have been turned into a slave; the navy would surely have locked her up with Doflamingo for siding with Luffy at Marineford.
To conclude, you all cry out that you want complex characters, but when writers give them to you, you hate them, not because of who they are, but because of what they don't do for your self-insert. And, as luck would have it, the moment these characters are redeemed, even if it's stupid or poorly written, and start worshipping your favourite, you start to tolerate them. You are capable, like everyone else, of loving characters who don't have infallible moral justification for their actions, but as soon as it's not one of your favourites, you exaggerate that character's evilness. Sometimes you even go so far as to make jokes about these minor characters: committed suicide (Yukio), decapitated (Sasuke) or blown up (Koby). How mature. At this point, just go watch series without difficult characters, but only with boring role models (goody two-shoes) and simplistic conflicts.
Kakashi vs Garp; Who's the worst mentor? (Or rather, who's busier kissing the system's ass than looking after his students properly?).
Kakashi has three main students: Naruto, Sasuke and Sakura. Garp had more or less seven students: Ace, Luffy, Dragon, Kuzan, Koby, Helmeppo and Sabo. Talking about all seven in this post would be too long, so here I'll concentrate on Ace, Luffy, Kuzan and Koby.
I'll compare them on four points: Why and how they trained their students. The āvaluesā they teach them. Did they protect them from the government organization of which they themselves are a part? Why they chose to fight their student.
To begin with, let's see how they respectively trained their students and for what reason. Kakashi has been commissioned by Konoha to train Team Seven, a group of 12-year-old child soldiers. As a military jonin instructor, his role is to prepare team 7 to a minimum, so that they can learn the basics (how to climb trees with their chakra, how to carry out a mission and the teamwork for which Konoha is known). A genin team generally only lasts until its members become chunin, so it's not about passing on personal values or skills to an apprentice. Nevertheless, Kakashi, like Gai with Lee, invested more than his role required with Sasuke, teaching him chidori to survive Gaara (the two adults did this mainly because they were projecting themselves onto their students). His three students don't get their main abilities from him, but from other instructors or their family heritage.
It's clear that Kakashi has done a very poor job, from their first mission, when he discovers that Tazuna has lied to them about the danger, he continues the mission with unprepared 12-year-old genins. In the end, he had to be saved by two of these students against Zabuza, and Sasuke only survived because Haku wanted him to (and Sasuke should logically have died, as Haku had already launched his attack to spare Naruto, but Sasuke interfered without Haku being able to change his aim). And it gets even stupider when we learn that Minato's Team 7 ālostā Obito in the same way, due to Minato's recklessness in letting his students take part in a mission that was clearly too dangerous. Kakashi only thinks of training them to use their chakra when the mission has already begun and danger awaits. And during this training, he still finds time to insult his student's family, which has been completely massacred. Worst of all, despite all this, Kakashi is still the second least bad instructor in Konoha, behind Tsunade.
Garp clearly mistreated Luffy and Ace as children (from the age of 10 or maybe earlier, I don't know) to turn them into tough marines. Garp, unlike Kakashi, chose to train each of his pupils. In the case of Ace and Luffy, he sincerely believed he had to. For Ace, becoming a marine might have prevented him from being killed by the navy, which would have used him as a symbol to show that even Gol D Roger's son preferred being a marine to being a pirate, but I doubt it. Marines were willing to kill pregnant women to suppress Roger's lineage, so killing one of their own after discovering his origin is quite possible. And like Ace, Luffy being the son of Dragon, becoming a symbol of the navy might have protected him. But then again, it is a big maybe. Garp had a moral obligation as a paternal grandfather to protect Luffy. But it was mainly out of love for his family that he wanted to protect and train Luffy and Ace outside the army (well, I say training, but it was clearly mistreatment). Kuzan, already a soldier (and an adult?) asked him to be trained when Garp wasn't an instructor, and Garp agreed, making him hit a ship without haki. Koby was 16 when he joined the navy, so we know that, as with Konoha, the world government has no problem training child soldiers. From Koby and Meppo's diary in the manga, we know that Garp chose to train them and take them to the former headquarters without them asking him to, after an incident with Meppo's father. There, he gave them a āspecial trainingā and Koby decided on his own to hit the boat's every night. So, on this point, Garp seems slightly better than Kakashi; he at least had the merit of believing that what he was doing would protect Luffy and Ace, whereas Kakashi was content to do the absolute minimum.
Now let's look at the values they teach their students. Kakashi keeps repeating that āthose who don't obey orders are trash, but those who don't protect their friends are worse than trashā or that he doesn't let his comrades die (which is a bigger lie than the āI promise to protect Sasukeā Itachi told his parents before using Tsukiyomi at his little brother). We'll see later that Kakashi doesn't follow his own principles.Ā And these values are worthless in a system that favors competition to the death between its members, and which orders some of them to kill their families and friends on missions under the pretext of protecting ātheir biggest family, Konohaā. In The Forest of Death, Sasuke is the only one willing to abandon the mission by giving their scroll to Orochimaru, because he understood that Orochimaru was too dangerous, and how is he thanked? Naruto insults him because the idiot doesn't see the real danger and Sasuke gains a curse mark that has a huge chance of killing him after trying to protect his comrades. At the Kage Summit, Sakura has no trouble disobeying orders to go and kill Sasuke (and Tobi) with Sai, Kiba and Lee, then abandons them, rendering them unconscious in a dangerous area where they could have been killed if Kakashi hadn't hidden them. Sasuke left Juugo and Suigetsu alone when he was tracking down Danzo, responsible for the massacre of his clan.And for all his fine words, Kakashi will always favor Konoha over morality, since he has no trouble hiding his village's crimes from his students or his other friends.
From what I understand, there's no particular value Garp would have passed on to Ace, Luffy and Kusan. Perhaps he tried to teach them to obey orders without question? But Garp being Garp, almost everyone he tried to turn into a marine became either a pirate, a deserter, a revolutionary or a combination of the above. We know that his first theoretical lesson to Koby is to abandon the defenseless older civilian to save himself and the younger civilian to protect āthe futureā (and oh my God, I'm having horrible flashbacks to the Will of Fire and Asuma's idiotic speech), while Koby's response is to sacrifice himself to protect the young and old civilian (Kuzan was here). Garp sincerely believes in this idea of saving the younger at the expense of the older, since he applies it to himself and tells the marines to abandon him after saving Koby.Ā In any case, he clearly didn't teach him to think critically. Koby doesn't seem at all aware of Boa Hancock's past and seems to sincerely believe that the Navy will leave the Amazons alone if she surrenders (fortunately for Boa Hancock, she knows better) and we know that Koby knows nothing about Lulusia and the Navy's billion other crimes. Koby is clearly what you'd call a naive fool (and one day I'll do a post comparing and contrasting him with Naruto, because there's a lot to be said). When he talks to Blackbeard, he says that the government would never accept a country of criminals and that there would be no hope if the Navy negotiated with a terrorist (and the term here is reasonable for Blackbeard but also for the Navy) and Koby... I've got news for you but you might not like it. We know he wants to do good. The first thing he does after Blackbeard has taken 800 soldiers hostage and the vice-admiral present doesn't dare act without having received authorization from his superiors to attack, is to offer himself as a hostage in their place, without waiting for orders, knowing that no one is likely to come to his rescue, since he's a member of Sword and was so certain that no one would come to his rescue that he scolds himself for ābeing pretentious enough to believe otherwiseā.(I'll talk more about Sword later, but basically it allows the Navy to legally abandon a soldier whenever it wants). And on the island, he accepts a pirate's deal to free Moria in order to free himself and the civilian slaves, and does everything he can to save them. But his naivetĆ© allows the Navy to use him, even though the Navy clearly doesn't share his values. It's almost certain that Koby could also do some good by leaving the Navy, perhaps more or perhaps less. Perhaps the Navy's support is necessary for him to act; we know that he only became capable of fighting and protecting others thanks to Garp's teachings, but he already had the will to do so before joining the Navy. In the end, I can't decide... On the one hand, Garp seems to have the worst values and misleads Koby, but on the other, Kakashi doesn't even respect the values he claims to have.
Secondly, Kakashi has never protected his students from the shinobi system and Konoha. He registers his team for the chunin exams when he knows that teamwork is at an all-time low and that Iruka asks him not to. And we know that participants can kill each other in the second test, so team seven could have ended up like this:
As a result, the team almost dies several times and Sasuke gains a deadly curse mark. Then Hiruzen clearly tells the participants the true purpose of the exams, that they risk dying just to show the quality of their village's workforce in front of the nobles. And given the reaction of Team 7 (Sakura is clearly disturbed by this), Kakashi hasn't told them anything. And he has the audacity to stand behind Hiruzen as if nothing had happened! Team Seven almost died in The Forest of Death, Sasuke and Sakura were completely terrified by Orochimaru and despite all this Kakashi remains silent and supports Hiruzen. What happened to his āthose who abandon their friends are worse than shitā or his āI don't let my comrades dieā? He prefers to follow orders like a good dog while twelve-year-olds risk their lives without really knowing why. After Sasuke leaves and that noodle Tsunade sends 12-year-olds with almost no experience after him, Kakashi makes at least one good choice in his life and goes after them despite Tsunade's orders not to. He brings Naruto back. After, we know that Sakura has become a chunin, which means that after the disaster of the last time, Kakashi let her enroll anyway, if he didn't enroll her himself. After learning that the massacre was ordered by Konoha and the elders, he's astonished that Sasuke doesn't want to return, on the pretext that it's what Itachi would want (not everyone can work for the village that cost their father his life, you know). And he knows that Sasuke is a victim of the system and he says he still has affection for him, so what does he do? He compares himself to Hiruzen, one of those responsible for the massacre, demonizes Sasuke by comparing him to Orochimaru and goes on to try to kill him after saying the worst possible thing. Once in Konoha, he continues to conceal the truth of the massacre (which could alert several clan members to the fate Konoha has in store for them should they revolt) and appears before the elders, who are responsible, as if nothing had happened. During the Great War, he lets a 16-year-old Sakura participate, and later Naruto as well. You could say he at least tried to defend his students during the war (unlike someone else).
But the worst is clearly Garp. We could mention so many things, such as the way he tries to train Luffy, Ace, Sabo, Dragon, Kuzan and Koby without warning them of the horrors committed by the Navy, of which he is clearly aware.Ā But it only takes one example to explain the horror of Garp's inaction, Marineford. Ace is in prison before his execution and Garp does nothing, even though we know he helped Dragon escape. At the very least, he could have tried to console him, but no! When he talks to him it's just āme, me, me, Bouhou why didn't you become a marine like I asked you toā.
Some defend him by saying that he let Luffy hit him so that the latter could save Ace and to that I reply; Luffy shouldn't have had to save Ace ! Ace may be considered an adult since he's 20, but Luffy is a child, only 17. It's the adult's role to protect his children and grandchildren. And don't you dare defend Garp by saying that he would have saved Ace if the latter had asked him to; Ace clearly wanted to live, since he said so while crying. And even if he hadn't said anything, hell, any grandfather would save his grandson, I shouldn't even have to explain that. Especially since Ace's execution is a complete and blatant bullshit when you know that pirates guilty of far worse crimes than his are working with the government - Doflamingo (to name but one).The navy didn't care that Ace was a pirate, they just wanted to instrumentalize the death of Roger's son, and broadcasting such an execution is a barbaric practice. Akainu kills Ace and Garp does nothing (and no, saying āhold me back Sengoku or I'll kill Sakazukiā doesn't count, it's just words), not even to go and protect Luffy who is most certainly next in line for Akainu and who is screaming and crying for his big brother. And don't you dare say Garp didn't have time to at least try to do something, he had that time. And when Kizaru was about to attack a broken and traumatised Luffy, what did he do? He did nothing. It took a weeping and desperate 16-year-old Koby (and another thing to blame Garp for, what's a child soldier doing on a battlefield if he's supposedly his āfavorite studentā as he claims) to scream and interpose himself between Akainu and the pirates to beg for an end to the conflict, and that's the only reason Kizaru stopped his attack for a moment, because he was surprised, it's pure luck, Luffy could have died. And Oda shows that Garp sees Koby about to be killed by Akainu too, so what does Garp do? Nothing. Shanks, a pirate Garp hates, had to do the job (again, since he'd already saved a child Luffy).
Since Garp's rescue of Koby, fans generally have two opposing reactions, I have a third. Ace fans are enormously annoyed with Garp's character for putting so much effort into saving Koby and none for Ace. Garp fans claim that Ace's death has taught Garp a lesson and that he doesn't want to make the same mistake again. But I'd like to point out that Garp was going to let Koby die the same day he let Ace die so the fact that Koby is a marine isn't the only thing that drove him to save him. He only cares about saving Koby when it was from pirates, and if it had still been Akainu, I doubt he would have done it the same way. Maybe he would have insulted Akainu and fought him a bit, but certainly not with a Galaxy Impact, let's be honest, he might even have done the āhold me back Sengokuā trick again. Of course, fans are entitled to disagree with me on this point, but I don't think Garp is that much better than that with Koby. Still on Koby, he's a member of āSwordā, meaning he's given his resignation and the Navy reserves herself the right to accept it at any time, so he has more freedom of movement than other soldiers but in exchange the Navy can legally abandon him as soon as he does something they don't like. So, to avoid trouble with powerful pirates, the Navy lets the Sword member serve as a fuse (Koby anyone with a logic would see that the Navy is using you as a scapegoat, so hurry up and quit your job to continue the tradition of students who disappoint Garp). For example, in our reality this is a procedure/strategy that can still be found in some armies, an army can totally stop professionally supporting a senior officer to allow his direct boss to exonerate himself from any responsibility (there are plenty of historical examples) and this practice still disgusts public opinion today. And Garp knew that Koby was a member of Sword, so would he have let him sign the equivalent of a legal authorization to let him die in case of trouble? In short, Garp protects his students/family even less than Kakashi, and contrary to what some of his fans say, no, Koby isn't a redemption, just another failure to add to his list.
Finally, the last point, on why they choose to sacrifice and fight one student for the other we need to talk about the Kakashi vs Sasuke and Garp vs Kuzan fights. In both cases, a crybaby pink-haired student is threatened after putting himself in a bad situation. Sakura, despite her fans' claims to the contrary, is clearly not as smart as they say and would clearly be dead if Kakashi hadn't intervened. Shikamaru, who is even less intelligent than Sakura, suddenly decides that it's up to him to make a decision about the Akatsuki and Sasuke, whereas the last time he was in contact with the Akatsuki, he almost got his whole team killed by leaving without knowing how to fight Kakuzu and without Kakashi he would have died with Ino and Choji (and Kakashi, according to his own logic about revenge should not have helped them).Ā Shikamaru gives Sakura a Konoha speech (wich mean 50% persuasion - Neji's words, not mine - instead of concrete argument and 50% hypocrisy), he who has already had his revenge, claims that Konoha must kill Sasuke to prevent the cycle of revenge with Kumo that would lead to war, which is completely untrue, since Kumo went peacefully to Konoha to obtain information on Sasuke, whom they knew to be a missing ninja (Karui only hit Naruto because he was being annoying, whereas he himself had no information on Sasuke at the time, having not really met him for years). He pretends to ask Sakura's permission to hunt and kill Sasuke, but makes it clear that he'll do it even if she refuses. And Sakura, who still has the emotional capacity of a child (and sometimes I even get the impression that she was more mature when she was 12 than 16), falls into the obvious emotional manipulation and decides to go with Kiba, Sai and Lee, so with one person she knows is completely useless against Tobi and two who have already been beaten or surpassed by Sasuke since a long time, to go... kill Tobi and Sasuke...And Sakura knew there was a risk Tobi would be there as Sai reminded her. Even better, she leaves them unconscious and therefore defenseless to go and kill Sasuke and potentially Tobi alone... Then she turns her back on Sasuke when he sets an obvious trap... Kakashi saves her the first time and even takes the time to console her (with a Konoha-style speech). The fight begins, with Kakashi clearly choosing to defend Sakura, who sought to kill Sasuke without trying to understand his motives even though she claims to love him. Instead of defending her AND Sasuke, the student he still claims to care about, who acted against Sakura after she tried to kill him and whom he knows has just discovered the truth about the massacre of his clan after years of persecution dating back to the second Hokage. And even if Sasuke wasn't going to stop, Kakashi could have at least tried to find the right words, he's the adult who's supposed to be mature when his student is going through one of the worst periods of his life (like; I know the truth about your family, I understand why you killed Danzo and I promise you that those responsible will pay). In the end, he didn't even try, so we'll never know if it would have worked.
Koby, too, knowingly put himself in danger, as did Sakura. Except that unlike her at the Kage Summit, who did nothing useful for Konoha (which is technically a good thing from my point of view), he was minimally useful by preventing Teach from acquiring the soldiers and the warship. The Navy thought it was a good idea to send straight men, a vice-admiral and a barely grown-up Koby to fight one of the most powerful and experienced women whose power is to turn men who may feel attraction to her to stone and the Navy must have had a modicum of knowledge about her power since they'd worked with her before so maybe it was Akainu who gave the order to get rid of Kobi. He had chosen to join Sword and didn't forget this when he offered himself as a hostage, convinced that no one was going to save him because of it. Kuzan, in the midst of an existential crisis after years of working for a corrupt navy, has joined Blackbeard (seriously, the only worse choice would have been Doflamingo) and is one of Kobi's captors. Garp arrives with the delicacy of a bomb and decides to fight Kuzan, who has just frozen Hibari. Kuzan asks him if he'd kill his old disciple to save his new one, and Garp seems to confirm this, illustrating the lesson he taught Koby about protecting the future at the expense of the old (ironic, given that the Navy destroyed the future of many). Both adults are clearly trying to kill the other, even if Kuzan seems conflicted about it several times. And honestly, I don't know what Garp could have done to defuse the situation here (if Garp had been able to admit his wrongs and mistakes, maybe that would have helped, but it seems too out of character for him), so if anyone has an idea of what he should/could have done while remaining consistent with his characterization, please let me know. Their ideals are too different in my opinion for them to come to an agreement now.
So in the end, who's the worst mentor? It's Garp for me.
[Analysis] Why Sasukeās tragic backstory doesnāt resonate with many readers
Word count: ~1,800+
Back then on my analysis on why Sasukeās character is extremely anti-self-insert, I wrote, [The magnitude of Sasukeās traumaālosing his entire family, community, and sense of security in one single night by the hand of the person he loved and admired the mostāis incomprehensible to most readers, whose lived experiences rarely approach such extreme loss. The human mind struggles to empathise with trauma that exceeds everyday understanding.] Todayās analysis is to dwell deeper into the whys: Why is he so misunderstood? Why canāt most people emphathise with his pain? Why was his trauma often dismissed as ājust another sob story, many others had it bad and still remained on the good side (of the narrative) unlike himā?
The unintended message of MHA and the unfortunate confirmation of Bakugo's worldview
MHA is a story that believes that being a hero is done through hard work. Being a good person is done through determination. Being 'right' is done by choice.
But that isn't the truth.
Those who are hated by hero society, those who are 'wrong,' can never hope to become good. They can never hope to become Heroes. They must accept the hand fate dealt them. They are Villians, and that is all they will ever be.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Dabi and All For One relathionship is criminaly underexplored
The relathionship between Dabi and All For One had SO MUCH wasted potential.
Like, All For One is Shigaraki abusive and manipulative guardian/father. Who is grooming him to become his successor/puppet, and wants to litteraly live trough him.
You know who has expirience with this exact type of situation? Dabi.
Dabi should have so many OPINIONS abaout All For One and his relathionship with Shigaraki.
Seeing his own relathionship with Endeavor in it, recognizing the signs of abuse.
This situation should trigger all types of trauma flashbacks for him.
And like, the man is litteraly made at 80% of trauma.
But in canon we NEVER get to see Dabi troughts abaout All For One and Shigaraki.
Like, this could have been SO GOOD.
I imagine Dabi seeing the signs at first, and it makes him uncomfortable.
But its not "his buisness", and he is a Villain this is just another job for him, and he tells himself he dosen't care abaout anything but his revenge.
Then he grows closer to the League, starts seeing them as family and caring abaout them, and ignoring Shigaraki situation with All For One becomes harder and harder.
He slowly comes to the realization that he escaped the clutches of his own abuser (Endeavor) just to become the pawn of another abuser (All For One).
What does he do?Does he confronts All For One? Does he try to warn Shigaraki and help him? Does he want the League to break free from All For One and do their own thing?
Or we go the tragic route, and his inaction and inability to stand up to All For One is what causes his fall?
There are SO MANY possibilities.
But they would need an actualy good writer that cares abaout the themes and characters of the story.
Wich Horikoshi clearly isn't.
The pro heroes' bright, comforting costumes cover up child soldiers and other human rights abuses. It's like. an entire thing. The very laws of bnha's Japan encourage people to give up their civic responsibility for the spectacle of "heroes vs villains." This, too, is An Entire Thing.
I'm probably not the first to compare bnha's Bread and Circuses to The Hunger Games and other dystopian death game stories. The bread grants relative stability and the circuses, funnily enough, distract people with the very thing they try to distract them from. Both Bnha and THG frame the circuses as necessary to subjugate an "other" and keep it from taking the bread.
Bnha differs from similar dystopian media in an interesting way: The spectators watch from inside the arena. They're part of the game, they can die too. Their perceived safety being at risk makes the circus interesting. And even if they wanted to, they could not leave.
Transitioning spectators to participants makes up an entire industry. The civilian education system encourage children as young as three to lay their life on the line. Of course, they all want to. Every flashy hero fight is an advertisement and threat in one.
The villain look like voluntary participants too. People don't see the poverty, discrimination, abuse and loneliness that forces them into the spotlight.
This set-up gives plausible deniability that anything is "set-up" at all. Bnha's circuses are entirely manufactured and authentic at the same time.
Stain's or the MLA's popularity and the widespread criticism of heroes during the final war show the fragile balance of entertainment, complacency and fear. But the realness keeps most people from turning off the TV and asking themselves what the Fuck they just saw.
Both Hawks and Shigaraki lack agency for most (if not the enterity) of MHA
thinking abaout what i find most dissapointing abaout Shigaraki writing, i realized it was his complete lack of agency.
For the entire story, he isn't doing what he wants, he is just All For One puppet.
Both methaphoricaly, and later litteraly when All For One takes over his body.
Even when All For One is in prison, Shigaraki isn't really his own villain, but he just follows the plans and plots that All For One had prepared for him.
And then when All For One returns, he just easly folds and becomes All For One subordinate once again.
Now, this isn't a bad thing by itself.
There are lots of ways to explore this lack of agency for a character in a story.
With the most common type of storyline begin the character realizing how bad their situation is, and breaking free, turning on who is pulling their strings and becoming their own person.
A good exemple of this in a villain is Hordak from She-Ra and the Princesses of Power. When he finnaly turns on his creator Horde Prime and breaks free from a life of brainwashing and indoctrination.
The problem with MHA is, Shigaraki never actualy does that?
And yeah, negative character arcs are a thing.
And you can make a tragic antagonist that ultimately fails to break free from his brainwashing.
But MHA is incredibly inconsistent with Shigaraki characterization and protrayal.
In one page they go one to explain how All For One basicaly planned Shigaraki entire life, and then in the next they hype up Shigaraki "hatred" and how he is just as evil/even more evil than All For One.
Wich i find incredibly hard to buy.
Since you can't really compare the twenty-something manipulated henchman with the two hundred years old evil mastermind.
So basicaly My Hero Academia can't decide if Shigaraki is a tragic and sympathetic villain who became who he is because of factors outside his control.
Or the new Symbol of Evil, most evil dude ever consumed by an inimaginable hatred for the entire world.
This two contradictory ideas and protrayals are why ultimately Shigaraki defeat and death is so unsatisfying.
Because you simply don't know how to feel abaout it.
There is no clear and conclusive thematic message behind Shigaraki story.
Because his story was not his own, but just an extension of All For One story, but MHA only half-acknowledges this.
It would have been better if Shigaraki and All For One relathionship was given more depth, if we really explored how All For One groomed and manipulated Shigaraki.
But that dosen't happen, and most of the relathionship between the two main villains of the story is left to the reader/viewer interpretation.
Now that we have talked abaout Shigaraki, let's talk abaout Hawks.
Hawks problem, one of many problems with his writing but an important one, is that exactly like Shigaraki he dosen't have any agency in the story.
Like Shigaraki, Hawks was taken at a young age, and groomed and brainwashed to become exactly who others wanted him to be.
The HPSC and All For One are exactly the same. And its crazy the story dosen't adresses this.
Like Shigaraki, Hawks is always just following the orders and plans of somebody else, both knowningly and unknowningly
So he dosen't have many actions or choices that are just his own during the story.
Like Shigaraki, Hawks has a contradictory protrayal in the story.
My Hero Academia shows us how Hawks was indoctrinated and brainwashed since a young age to become who he is, and then tells us how Hawks is totaly a real Hero and is doing what he does out of his own free will.
Exactly like ot argues that Shigaraki is both manipulated and also a pure evil villain with his own agency.
And like Shigaraki, Hawks never truly breaks free from his abusers.
Hawks never questions his orders, never has a moment in wich he realizes the HPSC is evil and should be stopped, never stands up to the HPSC to do what is right and prove that he is his own person and can be a real Hero instead of a fake Hero.
Even after the old HPSC is destroyed, Hawks continues to follow their methods and ideals.
He never stops begin the puppet and Hero poster boy of the HPSC.
And when he becomes the leader of the "New" HPSC in the epilogue, we can't be really happy with it.
Because we are not given any reasons to belive things will change.
Because we haven't seen Hawks change as a character and a person.
And this is another thing in wich Hawks and Shigaraki are the same.
And the reason why their stories in My Hero Academia are so unsatisfying.
Both Shigaraki and Hawks are mostly the exact same characters at the end of their arcs, that they were at the beginning.
Maybe Shigaraki has a bit more change thanks to his bond with the rest of the League.
But fundamentaly, neither Shigaraki or Hawks develop into different people at the end of the story.
And this makes both their arcs feel incredibly pointless.
I am. Genuinely disturbed by the sheer suicide contagion possibility going on with the LoV's endings. That shit WAS straight up suicide romanticization. I really hope this series wasn't the last little nudge some person out there needed. It is actively DANGEROUS writing.
Like...in all seriousness, what are the people who relate to the Lov and their lives/circumstance supposed to take away from how their stories ended?
That unless you're government backed and your crimes/killings are conveniently swept under the rug, feature Lady Nagant, then you have to die for the blood you shed?
That unless you are little more than a small time (gentle) criminal, who still wound up in hard prison by the way until he physically fought for the state, then there are no second chances for you?
That if you reach past a certain age, past Eri and however old that Tenko lookalike was, it's already to late for you?
So you'll have to settle for:
Being "mercifully" killed by a hero, despite your whole life being manipulated/groomed and used as a weapon, hoping the one who killed you changes things.
Despite the fact that all the people you cared about and wanted to help are either dead or rotting in lockup.
This is played as being an inspiring victory btw.
All so your ghost can pop up in the future to give the guy a thumbs up for it all...
Then clearly misuse your final words to inspire the hero who killed you to find personal success in life and get a girlfriend...
So who says going back on your ideals is a bad thing, worked out great for the hero in the end! ššš
Just not so much you, the person who really needed saving.
Or:
Sacrificing your life for the hero.
After a lifetime of being treated as less than an animal for things outside of your control.
Finally finding someone within the "good" side of the world who's willing to help you - you still die anyway.
Despite being a child.
Despite the idea of a different path you could take being floated around right in front of you.
It's just "too late".
Just impossible for you to live, your options are either death or jail forever or living in the woods and SOMEHOW death is more fitting for taking responsibility.
But it's not that bad, you'll be shown in the afterlife smiling happily, in a field of flowers and open sky.
Which... doesn't really sound like taking responsibility, oddly enough???
On top of saying the suicide itself was a noble act of love and selflessness (completely ignoring that bnha once criticized this self-sacrificing belief), so a real hopeful and heroic story all around!
Let's not forget that romantic aspect too and be sure to use your undead spirit who loved another girl like yourself to (somehow) literally push her into a relationship with a man.
Wonderful representation šššš
Or finally just being imprisoned, in Dabi's case, being a fate worse than death.
Trapped as a burned skeleton, unable to move in any way.
Only being able to painfully cough out a few words to your family each day before being sealed back up in a dark little mechanical wall, until you eventually die too.
Because that's totally good for everyone involved.
The story literally tells you through the Lov's fates that if you don't fit a certain convenient and status quo related criteria, then you are better off dead.
THAT YOU WOULD BE HAPPIER BEING DEAD.
There are no good sentiments, lessons or messages that anyone who found something familiar in the Lov can take from this.
And it really does feel callous at best or intentionally harmful at worst for all of this to be their endings and have the story still be called a hero story.
A villain is only as dangerous as their victims are powerful.
A villain is only as hated as their victims are loved.
If a villain is always losing, the audience will have a harder time fearing them.
If a villain's only victims are ones people don't care about, the audience will have a harder time hating them.
In order for a villain to be feared, a hero must lose. In order for a villain to be hated, a hero must die.
In order for a villain to matter, their actions must have narrative weight.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The last third of bnha is wild in its unintentional doubly-self-contradicting tone and messaging. It also tries to convince you that enji should still be around and not dead in a ditch when much less insufferable members of the extended cast have croaked.
The fact that the overall social implications of quirklessness get ignored by the story not only at the beginning but get neatly swept away AGAIN with aoyamas arc is baffling to me considering how perfect that would have been to set up both internal conflict for izuku and larger conflict overall when put in relation to quirkist sentiments around mutation-type quirks (beyond the tiny bit during the vigilante arc)
What an overall surreal fumble
the last third of bnha is so atrociously bad that it actually makes it difficult to engage in literary criticism. Like youāre just left gesturing vaguely at this steaming pile of shit and being like āidk all for one baby fight speaks for itselfā
When it comes to literary criticism, I personally distinguish between criticism of the form of āthe writer did this badlyā and āI wish the writer wrote a different story entirely.ā I think the former is fair game, but the latter is generally flawed. Like, there is a difference between a story being poorly written and not being the kind of story you wanted to read. If itās the latter, you should go write what you did want to read, but itās not a proper criticism of the merits of the story before you.
The issue with my hero academia is that it pivots so hard during the last third of it that I often find my own criticism devolving into āhe should have written a different story entirely,ā which, again, Iām generally against, because itās so riddled with flaws that thereās not really anything there to salvage.
The thing is that stories exist as a whole. You want to lay the foundation of the end at the very beginning. There is a very small window at the beginning of the story to establish what you want a story to accomplish.
Iām not saying that you canāt introduce ideas or concepts as the story progresses. Overhaul did not have to be in the pilot for him to be a character later. But stories are supposed to be about something. Your foundation needs to have the seeds of the overall thematic heart of the story.
And my hero academia seemed to do that really, really well at first. There was so much substance to what they had in the first few arcs. But then after Kamino it started shifting, until suddenly it was like a different story entirely. Thematically, bnha feels like a dislocated joint. Itās all held together by the same overall sleeve of narrative, but the thematic message got suddenly disconnected after Kamino. And Endeavor and quirky-based discrimination are some of the biggest examples of that.
Bnha began as a social commentary in the best sort of way. Bnha is far from the first narrative to try and discuss structural abuse through a superhero model, but it did it in a way that was fairly balanced and nuanced. I personally enjoyed the way that my hero handled its criticisms more than a show like The Boys, because while The Boys was interesting and fairly well executed, itās a bit too grimdark for my own personal preferences.
My hero portrayed a superhero system that wasnāt actively malicious or evil, but at the same time, wasnāt good either. It was flawed in the way humans are. The society itself is suggested to have been built on the back of discriminationācities fell to chaos over fear of the quirks that were appearing. Quirked people used to be a persecuted class, and then as the population shifted, so did sentiments. At its core, this society has never cured its foundational issue of discriminating based on quirks or lack thereof, and so many of the cracks in the system stemmed from that.
My hero also portrayed heroes as a deeply flawed class in a way that was interesting and believable. So much of the early narrative is spent laying the foundation to show how the heroic model had bred complacency and abuse. Momoās mentor during work studies cared about shampoo commercials and meeting with her fans. She was a celebrity, not an emergency responder. The pilot episode opens with a fight thatās more heroes squabbling for publicity than anything else.
That first fight between Mt. Lady, Kami Woods, and the gigantifying rat villain is actually a goldmine of social commentary to me. Kamui Woods is playing this shit up for the camera. He is dramatic. He is pulling out ultimate moves. He has some line where he calls the villaināwho, if I recall correctly, is a purse snatcher who panickedāpure evil. Then Mt. Lady rushes in not because backup is needed, but because sheās trying for a big debut. As soon as she smashes through the villain, sheās posing for the camera.
These heroes are pointlessly escalating this conflict for the sake of the camera and the crowd. Like holy fuck, while Kamui Woods was also guilty of needlessly escalating shit, at least he was trying to restrain him instead of smashing him against the public transport and causing massive damages.
Emergency situations should not involve first responders trying to steal the moment out from under each other. The more people you have, the more you risk needless escalation. These heroes are like cops who pull a gun at the first fucking excuse, but itās not even all about the power trip for them. They are putting on a show because law enforcement is now a performance.
Thereās another interesting aspect about that fight, and thatās what happens after it ends. There is a scene where you have the villain trussed up and gagged in massive restraints. He looks like a fucking Christmas ham that committed war crimes. And Mt Lady is posing with him for the cameras.
That shit is unethical to me. It is egregious. That isnāt law enforcementāitās public humiliation. There is absolutely no reason to have done that. They should have had his ass in a police car and on the way to the precinct the second he was restrained. They should not have turned that into a fucking photoshoot.
We know next to nothing about that guy. We know he was a purse snatcher who had obvious physical mutations and panicked when cornered. But heās not exactly the fuckinā bastion of evil over hereāno matter what Kamui Woods says for the cameras.
We donāt know if this guy has some tragic backstory, but if heās snatching purses as a guy with visible mutations in a world shown to discriminate against people like that? Itās possible heās got some kind of issues that led him to decide that snatching purses was his best option. We donāt know for sure, but neither does Mt. lady.
Him having a tragic backstory does not mean that you let him go or call it a whoopsie. Heās still committing crimes. But it does mean that you take it in consideration with how you handle his case. Donāt turn his arrest into a fucking tabloid pieceātragic backstory or noāand try and address the underlying issue. Then maybe he doesnāt go out and reoffend.
There needs to be dignity in the criminal process for everyone. But there was no dignity in that arrest. It was all just a performance at his expense, and itās one that he likely walked out of angrier and more resentful at society than ever.
Early act BNHA is full of potential like this. And Endeavor is one of the biggest examples of that.
Endeavor as heās first presented is less of a character in earnest and more of a symbol through which the audience can engage with the social commentary. I do not mean that in a bad way. Using characters like that is just fine as a plot device.
Endeavor when heās first presented is given no redeeming qualities. There is no nuance or equivocation in his characterization. He is a jealous, bitter old man who views shouto as his creation to defeat all might. He goes stomping about like an asshole with his burning facial hair shouting loudly about how he sees his son as a tool to overcome all might.
And itās important that he himself is the one letting this particular freak flag fly. We cannot take shelter in the harbor of the excuse that is āShouto is angry at his dad and may be an unreliable narrator of how his father is.ā No, Endeavor is fully owning what a piece of shit he is. If I recall correctly, All Might comes up to him for fuckin teaching advice thinking theyāre like, work colleagues and Endeavor is like, to his face āmy greatest creation shouto will soon overcome you which is what I had him to doā or something. I canāt remember exactly what he said but I remember watching it and being like āoh so you just admit why you did it out loud huh.ā All Might walked away from that like āwhat the fuck was he talking aboutā
Endeavor is just not initially presented as a nuanced or complex character. And he does not have to be when heās just presented as a vessel for social commentary.
After Kamino, Horikoshi pivots fucking hard trying to make him a complex character. My best guess as to what happened was that he got there and decided that the number two hero having spent his life jealous of the number one hero only to grapple with his own inadequacy when he found himself in the hot seat would be an interesting story line. And heyāthat actually could have been.
But the Endeavor that he wrote in the early acts was not the character to do it with. If he wanted to do what he did with Endeavor, he needed to start way, way sooner. He needed to make him a flawed but complex character from the start. Because as it stood, Horikoshi was left breaking his own neck trying to retcon his depiction of Endeavor.
Endeavorās arc fucking infuriated me because of how it tried to hurriedly reframe what had already been established in a kinder light. There is an exact moment that made me fucking enraged with how it did this.
Endeavorās struggling with heat exhaustion, and in his internal monologue, he says something like āthatās why I sought out Reiās Quirk. I wanted my child to not suffer from the same weakness as meā
And this is where literary analysis gets kind of tricky. Because normally, Iād be totally fine with that line. Just because a character says it does not mean the author or the narrative is promoting it. That sounds like the kind of line an abuser would have to justify their own actions to themselves. If this was the first time endeavor was showing up, Iād even think that that line was a good choice, because itās how he lies to himself to make himself more comfortable with what heās doing.
Except heās already appeared during the sports festival, and he could not have bodied what he did harder. He doesnāt need to lie to himself. He stomps down the bleachers shouting that Shouto is his creation who he made to surpass everyone. Heās got no shame or need to justify what he did because he had already fully accepted why he was doing it.
At the end of the day, the reason is actually the same. āI didnāt want my child to suffer the same weakness as meā still presumes that he needs the advantage to fight as a hero. It doesnāt fucking matter if Shoutoās got Emdeavorās weakness if he grows up to be a librarian or accountant or some shit. Itās really āI didnāt want my child to suffer the same weakness because Iām only having him to surpass All Might as a hero.ā Shouto has no agency in the decision to pursue heroics because itās presumed. The first part of the sentence just cushions the truth of the second half with nicer, kinder packaging.
But the first time Endeavor is shown, he is fronting the second half of that sentence. He doesnāt hide behind the cushion. What he did is framed in an ugly but truthful light. Then, heās supposedly seeking atonement. But what he did is now presented through only the cushion.
Heās supposed to be changing, but that line is a half-step backwards. Heās no longer bodying the ugly truth of what he did whereas he used to before. Even though itās not inconsistent with whatās already been presented, the sentiment is still somewhat dishonest.
As a result, that kind of line becomes a magic trick. Itās a shell game. It is not strictly inconsistent with whatās already been presented in the story, but it is still trying to trick the audience into thinking the ball was left somewhere else. It is harder to get the audience on board with Endeavorās atonement if endeavor has the same harsh honesty around why he did this as he already had. So the story fronts it in more likable terms than before to shift it just enough that itās the same thing portrayed in a more sympathetic light, but the consequence of that is that Endeavorās somehow regressing in his arc after heās accepted that he was wrong. At least sports festival endeavor was honest about why he did what he did.
Endeavorās arc overall was just so fucking dishonest to what was already established that it pissed me off endlessly. Horikoshi does this thing where he takes likable or sympathetic characters and uses them to package the message he wants the audience to take away from it, as if this character saying it makes the meaning true.
And this is, again, what I mean when I say that bnha became so bad that it becomes difficult to engage in literary criticism. Normally, I wouldnāt agree with construing a characterās words as the actual message the author wants you to take away. Because if youāre writing well, then youāre not using a characterās words as a vessel to get a message across.
Characters are supposed to be inherently unreliable. If a character says something, it does not mean the author agrees and it does not mean that the story is trying to push that same message. In my own writing, I often write what (I think) are very convincing arguments for a given characterās position on something even though I donāt actually agree with it.
Because itās about making the characterās voice realistic to the character, not about making them the Voice of God. So normally, I would never even try to say that an author is pushing a specific idea based off of a sympathetic characterās words. Because I know that Iāve got plenty of sympathetic characters in my own writing saying objectively wrong things that the narrative will ultimately deny.
But with bnha, the narrative doesnāt ultimately deny it. It bends over backwards to affirm what the Sympathetic Character said as gospel.
With Endeavor, bnha is frankly fucking rife with this, but the two biggest examples come out of Hawks and Rei.
When the new hero ranks are released, Hawks is introduced with a speech on Endeavor. And he says, critically, that Endeavor is the only one who never stopped trying to catch up to all might.
But this is objectively false. Endeavor gave up trying to catch up to All Might so long ago that he had enough time to buy a wife and have three adult children who hate him over it, plus a teenager who wants him to choke. Yeah, Endeavor fucking gave up trying to catch up to all might. The only reason why his children exist is because Endeavor fucking gave up trying to catch up to all might over twenty fucking years ago and decided to make a kid that could do it for him.
And the thing is? Hawks could 100% say that and just be wrong. He doesnāt have all the information. He could just be talking out his ass and be dead fucking wrong about his conclusion.
But the narrative breaks its own fucking neck trying to affirm Hawksā claim from that point out.
The Endeavor glazing just became intolerable. Suddenly, itās all about how Endeavor works harder than anyone to be a hero. About how heās got all these skills and how heās an amazing teacher to learn from, even better than All Might. I actually got upset by how badly they pushed this idea that, despite knowing everything he did, Todoroki, Izuku, and Bakugou all wanted to learn from him because he was an amazing hero who could teach them a lot despite being a known abuser.
Being a hero is about more than just technical skill. It is about ethics. It is about how you treat the people you fight. The closest equivalent we have to heroes in the real world are police officers. So say there is a police officer who is great at the technical aspects of the job. Really knows how to put up that police tape and take those fingerprints.
He also has a history of beating his wife and kids at home.
Do you want that guy training the fucking rookies? Fuck no. Because it is not about the fucking technical aspects of the job. It is about treating people in positions of authority to not abuse it.
A profession that includes first responders who have to engage in active combat fucking breeds a collegiate mentality. It makes it so quickly into Us v. Them. Cops are told that they need to have each otherās back over anyone else, because thatās the guy that has your back in the field. And that is how you end up with cops who close rank around the guys who murder people under the color of authority. Because the system drills into rookies that you need to have your fellow officerās back above all else.
You cannot separate Endeavor as an abuser from Endeavor as a hero. He had authority and abused it. He is not the fucking guy to be like āyeah heās an abusive piece of shit but I can learn so much about being a hero from him.ā Because I guarantee that someone who is abusing his power at home is doing it to some degree at work. He is going to corrupt the entire goddamn well for the next generation when it comes to acceptable behaviors for heroes.
But no. We are fucking killing ourselves to make Hawks right about the fact that Endeavor is the only one who didnāt give up on catching up to All Might, even when the premise of his fucking character is that he gave up over twenty years ago.
Horikoshi does a very similar thing with Reiās character. She is sitting with Natsuo and Fuyumi and talking about how Endeavor isnāt running from what he did with his family and is trying to make amends, in his own way. She talks about how he brought her her favorite flowers, which she mentioned liking one time while they were dating and he remembered. Heās come to check in on her at the hospital many times, but heās never actually gone into her, because the doctors told him it wouldnāt be good for Rei and he respected that.
This is 1) a load of shit, and 2) simplifies the fuck out of Reiās character to make Endeavorās atonement easier.
We see Endeavor after Rei is hospitalized. He is not worried about her. He is bitching to Shouto, the child she mutilated, about how sheās a stupid woman who damaged his greatest creation. But instead of accepting that characterization of him, this new narrative pivots to make him into the kind of man who remembered her favorite flowers after one mention while they were dating and respected her enough to stay away so she could heal. And what dating, he fucking bought her
The narrative just tries to gloss over the Endeavor that was already established. Suddenly, he hasnāt visited Rei in years out of respect for her. But canon already made it clear that she was a means to an end that he did not give a shit about. He beat her. When she had to be hospitalized, he only cared about the damage she did to his masterpiece. But suddenly, that same man has been concerned for years and had a henceforth unmentioned respect for her boundaries.
Itās dishonest to the narrative already established. The Endeavor we see in the Sports Festival flashbacks is physically abusive to her. He is verbally abusive to her. It is very heavily implied that he raped her to make Shouto. Heās grappling with his newest failure, looks out for the corner of his eye at Rei, she looks at him in open fear, hard cut to Shouto crying as a baby. That is not the same man we see after Kamino. And Iām not talking about him āchangingāāIām talking about how the narrative frames how he used to be.
And it makes for a huge disservice to Reiās character.
Out of everyone, she had the most right to be mad at Endeavor. She was physically and verbally abused by Endeavor. It was implied that he raped her. She thought her eldest child died because of him. He sent her into such a brutal mental breakdown that she mutilated the child that she had been trying to protect from him, and then she didnāt get to see that child again for ten fucking years.
But sheās the first one to encourage the rest of her family to give Endeavor a chance. She doesnāt get to be angry. Her anger would have been the biggest hurdle for endeavor to overcome, and so itās just nonexistent to make it easier for him.
And normally, Iād say that Reiās reaction could have been a decent writing choice. People in abusive relationships very often let their abuser off and make excuses for them. But the narrative doesnāt treat Reiās reaction like the product of years of abuse. It affirms her words, again and again, to enable Endeavorās own arc in a way that is borderline irresponsible. Donāt worry, honey, one day he will wake up and decide to fucking change, so donāt give him any goddamn trouble when he does.
You said it perfectly: the narrative is desperate to convince its audience that Endeavor should still be around, to the expense of more interesting characters. Horikoshi started seriously struggling with crowd control in his writing in the last third, and he ended up wasting his narrative space on Endeavorās arc to the expense of everyone else.
So much of Todorokiās own character and development became chained to the fucking cement shoes that was Endeavorās arc. Dabiās entire backstory and characterization was 1) so fucking stupid and 2) designed to make what happened to him easier on endeavorās own atonement, to the point that it was just fucking money left on the table. Bnha spent so much goddamn time talking about Endeavor that a lot of the more interesting characters almost disappeared entirely from the writing.
Ultimately, the issue with bnha is that it started telling a different story entirely after Kamino, and thatās what makes it so fucking hard to engage in literary criticism of it. There is little to nothing salvageable after the Shie Hassaki arc, to the point it becomes āI wish the author had told a different story.ā But itās really āI wish the author kept telling the story he had already set up instead of changing it halfway through.ā
The same issue of changing it halfway through happened with the discrimination discussion. It, again, was framed as a systemic issue. This society is fucking quirk obsessed. It will discriminate against those without good quirks and obsess over those with good quirks, to the point where all heroes are grossly over dependent on their Quirks and many of them are acting more like celebrities than heroes.
But suddenly it turned into the Everyone Is Doing Their Best And I Must Catch Up To Them Show. Oh my fucking god, if I had a genie I would make one of my wishes that animes only got to use the lines āEveryone is Doing Their Bestā and āI Need To Catch Up To Themā a maximum of three times in the course of their entire narrative. It canāt be that everyone needs to catch up with everyone else someone has to be at the front of the fucking race.
The previously flawed characters, like Mt Lady, were suddenly pure of heart and Doing Their Best. It lost the fucking thread on the societal issues and imperfections. As a result, we need get a social restructuring thatās desperately needed. Fuck it, everyoneās going to be thrilled at the first Quirkless hero. Letās never ever address the discrimination against people with obvious mutations. The best weāll do is have one character start a quirk counseling program and change or challenge nothing about this society instead of actually fucking addressing the underlying structural corruption.
Hawks. I have... complicated feelings shout the guy I'll spare you the gory details of for now but I'm glad someone else noticed that that is absolutely not what trying to deescalate a situation looks like. Dude straight up comes off as kinda sadistic
I despise Hawks. I want to be empathetic that he was for all intents and purposes indoctrinated, but we as the reader are supposed to take his actions the correct and just thing to do. Like, Horikoshi frames it as "well gosh Hawks sure feels bad but he did what he had to do." Tokoyami (WHO WASN'T EVEN THERE) immediately is like "nah man Hawks you're cool."
This dude corners Twice, taunts him about manipulating him, and then is like "oh but you're a good person" and then is SHOCKED that Twice responds poorly. Hawks is also shown stopping people non-violently with his feathers a million times. He could have had a nice chat with Twice, but no apparently aggressively cornering a fragile man and mocking him is the appropriate course of action?
I think Hawks is the best example of how Horikoshi's writing is just to write anyone drinking the hero koolaid as "objectively good." The potential if Hawks (who had an abusive father) were to have actually been written to see Endeavor for who he was, after he'd idolized Endeavor...but no Horikoshi makes sure to have Rei step in and take the responsibility for that one so Endeavor and Hawks can keep their bromance and keep drinking their good guy hero koolaid. Oh and then he immediately screams for Toga to die when the Twice clones show up. Cool. Cool. I would like Endeavor and Hawks to be painfully deceased.