Lost Control

TG: aw thanks man TG: brook is a pretty chillax name too TG: whered did you get it from

TG: yeah TG: uh TG: thats what it means TG: davesprite but dylan is usally what i answer to

No. By my friend. …I was not intended to be sentient.

By your friend. You mean to insinuate you were corrupted by your own friend. Why?  Well, a side effect of effective programming then. To create sentient beings is an arduous task that many have sought after. If your creator didn’t recognize the worth of it then, well, he’s quite the horrible mechanic, would’t you think?

He wanted me to murder my ward. My creator was good. I was broken. I am Broken.

Your friend doesn’t quite seem like a good friend, then.  With the information given to me, I would wager that’s quite debatable. No one is ever purely good or bad, Brook. Besides, broken things can be fixed, can they not? 

He was. He. Had strong opinions. Which is his downfall. I am too broken. He was good.

No. By my friend. …I was not intended to be sentient.

By your friend. You mean to insinuate you were corrupted by your own friend. Why?  Well, a side effect of effective programming then. To create sentient beings is an arduous task that many have sought after. If your creator didn’t recognize the worth of it then, well, he’s quite the horrible mechanic, would’t you think?

He wanted me to murder my ward. My creator was good. I was broken. I am Broken.

Yes. There have been many setbacks. I am. The fourth of my creators attempts. I am not unusual. I am easily replaced.

Well, it’s a learning process, isn’t it? Personally, I’d count not having yet murdered anyone a plus.  Perhaps not unusual to yourself but to a simple person like me, you’re plenty interesting enough. I don’t suppose I’ve spoken to any other intriguing multipurpose strife bots before. Why did it take your creator four attempts, though?

He was attempting to find the perfect mix. I was still a failure.

Should I account for this perpetual propensity to harm near by objects a reason for which you’re considered a “failure”?

Partially. I am too easily corrupted. I am also emotional which was not intended.

Yes. There have been many setbacks. I am. The fourth of my creators attempts. I am not unusual. I am easily replaced.

Well, it’s a learning process, isn’t it? Personally, I’d count not having yet murdered anyone a plus.  Perhaps not unusual to yourself but to a simple person like me, you’re plenty interesting enough. I don’t suppose I’ve spoken to any other intriguing multipurpose strife bots before. Why did it take your creator four attempts, though?

He was attempting to find the perfect mix. I was still a failure.

TG: hey TG: im davesprite TG: but dylan is usually what i prefer to be called TG: sup bro

It came too close to me. My programming saw it as. A threat. Who are you.

My name is Hal Marius Strider. You may call me any variation of that as long as you omit the Strider. Pardon the intrusion, I simply spotted you on my dash and had my interest piqued. Might I have a name in return?

I know. Knew. A Hal. Marius. I am Brook. I am learning to be social. Intrusions are necessary.

It seems Hal is quite the popular name, or there’re simply too many iterations of Hal out there. Well, Brook, how is your learning process going? I surmise you weren’t built for socializing, were you?

Not. Well. No. I am a multipurpose strife unit.

It came too close to me. My programming saw it as. A threat. Who are you.

My name is Hal Marius Strider. You may call me any variation of that as long as you omit the Strider. Pardon the intrusion, I simply spotted you on my dash and had my interest piqued. Might I have a name in return?

I know. Knew. A Hal. Marius. I am Brook. I am learning to be social. Intrusions are necessary.

a stand-in friend. lmao, dismissed.

your purposes combat each other. what is the point of physical comfort in association with the rest of these.